MIS DATA CONFERENCE 2012 JULY 23, 2012 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Federal Programs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Delaware Statewide Title I Conference 1 School Improvement – The Ever-Changing Landscape – Part I June 29, 2010 Bill McGrady U. S. Department of Education.
Advertisements

INTENT OF FUNDS. INTENT OF TITLE I A Title I Director salary and benefits Title I Administrative Assistant/Secretary salary and benefits Teachers Educational.
New Title I/NCLB Directors Workshop NCLB Winter Conference January 16, 2007 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development Margaret MacKinnon, Title.
Title I & Title III Annual Parent Meeting
UPDATE National Forum on Education statistics JULY 27 and 28, 2010 Annual Mandatory Collection of Elementary and Secondary Education Data through EDFacts.
Blackfoot School District Federal Programs. Descriptions are provided for the following Federal Programs:  Title I  Title I-C Migrant  Title III 
Title I A Requirements under NCLB Public Law Office of Federal Programs September 2014 Oklahoma State Department of Education.
IMPLICATIONS FOR KENTUCKY’S SCHOOLS AND DISTRICTS SUPERINTENDENTS’ WEBCAST MARCH 6, 2012 NCLB Waiver Flexibility 1.
 Free- and reduced-price lunch data › Used for identifying Title I schools, as designated by school districts  Reported to the Bureau of Student Assistance.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Ross Santy Director, Performance Information Management Service U.S. Department of Education Incorporating new programs into EDFacts 25 th Annual MIS Conference.
REAP Districts Have Flexibility NCLB Strategist Training Spring 2006.
Rural Education Achievement Program(REAP) and Rural and Low-Income Schools Grant(RLIS)
The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) as reauthorized by The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) Benefits to Private School Students and Teachers.
Implementing RTI Using Title I, Title III, and CEIS Funds Key Issues for Decision-makers.
What are Federal Programs and How Can I be Involved? Professional Development Meeting Stanley Hupfeld Academy August 2014.
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS October 5, 2011.
BO MERRITT DIRECTOR OFFICE OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS Federal Grants Planning Titles I, II, & III.
Title I, Part D and the Annual Count: Understanding the Grant and the Count Process.
MIS Data Conference Office of Reporting EDFacts Federal Reporting SY
MONITORING INDISTAR® STATE-DETERMINED IMPROVEMENT PLANNING TOOL.
Serving English Language Learners with ESEA Title III, Part A Funds.
Provided by Education Service Center Region XI 1 Title I, Part A Overview Provided by Education Service Center Region XI
The Basics of Title I Florida Public School Choice Consortium's Annual Conference (FPSCC) Anke Toth November 18, 2009.
Update: Web Data Collection System (WDCS) Title I Administrative Meeting—September 30, 2010 Kristi Peters, Research and Evaluation Coordinator 1.
A Parent’s Guide to Understanding the State Accountability Workbook.
ISES UPDATES August 28, Topics for Session Review of the Fall 2007 CD/YE Collection Changes in WSLS ISES Data CD/YE Element Changes October 1 Supplement.
OFFICE OF FIELD SERVICES SPRING PLANNING WORKSHOP 2012.
Federal Programs Fall Conference Title I and the ACIP Logan Searcy and Beth Joseph.
Elementary & Secondary Education Act Marcia Beckman ESEA Program Director
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together.
Title I Schoolwide Ray Draghi and Rasha Hetata October 2014.
Data in Perspective: A view of national, state, and local data collection, compilations and systems Presented by : Beth Hartness Program Specialist, National.
1 Mississippi Department of Education 2008 Summer Data Conference School and Student Coding for Federal Programs Office of Innovative Support Presented.
Connecting Financial Data to EDFacts 25th Annual Management Information Systems Conference San Diego, CA February 15, 2012 Ross Santy and Matthew Case.
NCLB Federal Funding Planning Meeting Private Non Profit Schools LEA Date.
Federal Program Funding to Improve Student Outcomes Consolidated Application Spring Report District Learner Advisory Commitee (DAC) Meeting June.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title III, Part A: Language Instruction for Limited English Proficient (LEP) and Immigrant Students  The purpose of Title III, Part A is to help ensure.
Program Evaluation NCLB. Training Objectives No Child Left Behind Program Series: Program Evaluation To provide consistency across the State regarding.
1 No Child Left Behind for Indian Groups 2004 Eva M. Kubinski Comprehensive Center – Region VI January 29, 2004 Home/School Coordinators’ Conference UW-Stout.
Consolidation of Funds in Schoolwide Programs FY15 Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Federal Programs.
1 NCLB Title Program Monitoring NCLB Title Program Monitoring Regional Training SPRING 2006.
July 18, Glover Marietta, Georgia 1.  Federally funded program which provides resources to schools, based on the poverty percent at that school.
Federal Support for World-Class Schools Gwinnett County Public Schools 4/18/13.
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
Title I Updates Donna Brown, Director North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Federal Program Monitoring and Support September 29,
1 Title IA Coordinator Training Preparing for Title IA Monitoring
Consolidated State Performance Report & Survey to Generate Title I Neglected and Delinquent Funds for Subpart 1 State Agencies Neglected,
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 6 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
Federal Programs and the ESEA Flexibility Waiver Titles I, II, VI and X.
1 New Coordinator Orientation Lauren Amos, Katie Deal, and Liann Seiter.
Common Education Data Standards (CEDS) and ED Facts …What’s Next Jack Buckley, Commissioner – NCES Ross Santy, Director – ED Fact s U.S. Department of.
1 Restructuring Webinar Dr. Zollie Stevenson, Jr., Ph.D. Director Student Achievement and School Accountability Programs Office of Elementary and Secondary.
Title III, Part A, Foundations Stacy Freeman, Title III Specialist Shyla Vesitis, Title I/III Specialist Title III University October 8, 2015.
Virginia Department of Education November 5, 2015.
The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA): A Briefing for Alaska Lee Posey State-Federal Relations Division National Conference of State Legislatures.
Committee of Practitioners January 22, 2016 Janette Kirk.
1 Welcome! Choose a photo from the table that appeals to you or represents you in some way. Write the answers to the following questions on a 3×5 notecard.
Federal Program Funding to Improve Student Outcomes
Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015: Highlights and
IDEA EDFacts File Specifications 101
ESEA Title Programs Use of Funds: Consolidated School Wide Budget
The Role a Charter School Plays in its Charter Authorizer’s Submission of the Consolidated Federal Programs Application Joey Willett, Unit of Federal Programs.
ANNUAL TITLE I MEETING NOBLE ACADEMY COLUMBUS.
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together
Presentation transcript:

MIS DATA CONFERENCE 2012 JULY 23, 2012 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Federal Programs

Consolidated State Performance Report (CSPR) Data elements collected from local districts Data collection and reporting process Future changes to the data collection process

The CSPR is an instrument administered annually be US Department of Education Office of Elementary and Secondary Education to collect data on a number of programs authorized by ESEA. The CSPR places the use of robust, timely performance data at the core of educational decision making and policymaking.

EDFacts Systems EDFacts Reporting System. EDFacts data analysis and reporting tools permit users to access, analyze and report on education data. Two kinds of reporting options are available – preformatted reports and ad hoc, or individually tailored, reports. States can access preformatted reports for the data they provide to ED, while Department staff can access both preformatted and ad hoc reports. EDEN Submission System (ESS). The ESS is an electronic system that facilitates the efficient and timely transmission of data from SEAs to the Department. SEAs provide the vast majority of their education data to ED using the ESS. EDEN Survey Tool (EST). The EST is a web-based interface that allows LEAs and other local level entities to submit data to ED. The EST is used to collect data for the Civil Rights Data Collection and the Electronic Application System for Indian Education. EDFacts Metadata and Process System (EMAPS). EMAPS provides an easy method for states to report and maintain metadata, which are information collected to explain and analyze data in ESS. Examples of metadata include state definitions, state policies, assessment information (such as performance levels and testing accommodations), graduation rate calculations, and accountability information.

Title I, Part A – Basic Program Title I, Part A – School Improvement Program Title I, Part C – Migrant Education Program Title I, Part D – Neglected and Delinquent Program Title II, Part A - Highly Qualified Teachers and Principals Title III, Part A – English Learners Title VI, Part B – Rural Education Achievement Title X, Part C – Homeless Education Program

Title I, Part A – Schoolwide and Targeted Assistance Programs – Student Participation – Services Offered (Instructional and Social Services) Title I, Part A - School Improvement (1003a) – AYP – Public School Choice and Supplemental Educational Services (SES) Eligibility Student Participation Cost of Services

English Learners, Immigrants, and Migrants

English Learners and Immigrants – Enrollment Counts – Languages Spoken – Proficiency Rates – Local Program Services Types of Language Instructional Programs Student Participation Professional Development Staff

Migrant Education Program – Identification and Enrollment Counts – Student Participation – Student Mobility Rates – Program Services (Instructional and Social Services) – Proficiency Rates – Staff

Neglected and Delinquent Program – Student and facility counts – Length of program participation – Student demographics – Academic and vocational outcomes – Academic achievement in reading and mathematics

Homeless Education – Identification and Enrollment Counts – Student Participation – Proficiency Rates – Services Offered – Barriers Removed

Title VI: Rural Education Achievement Programs – REAP-FLEX Authority – Spending Objectives Transferability Authority

District Accreditation Policy: 2.5 FACTORS AFFECTING CHANGE IN ACCREDITATION STATUS An assigned accreditation status may remain unchanged during that school year except in those cases where verified noncompliance with financial standards (See Appendix H), the testing standard (See Appendix F), standards for Safe and Healthy Schools (See standards 35, 36, & 37), continued noncompliance with federal regulations, or reporting false information MAY DOWNGRADE A STATUS IMMEDIATELY. When the district has verified correction of deficiencies in meeting all process standards previously cited as deficiencies on the district’s Accreditation Record Summary, the accreditation status will be upgraded.

MSIS Indicators – Title I – Title Student Indicators – Migrants – LEP/Immigrant – Homeless – Neglected/Delinquent

Frequency of the submission of data Personnel responsible for submitting data Reporting students that the district no longer has ownership of that are served in special programs Reporting students participating in 21 st Century Community Learning Programs Monitoring the completion of the data