Cosmic-Ray Induced Neutrons: Recent Results from the Atmospheric Ionizing Radiation Measurements Aboard an ER-2 Airplane P. Goldhagen 1, J.M. Clem 2, J.W.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BELGISCH INSTITUUT VOOR RUIMTE-AERONOMIE INSTITUT D’AERONOMIE SPATIALE DE BELGIQUE BELGIAN INSTITUTE FOR SPACE AERONOMY BELGISCH INSTITUUT VOOR RUIMTE-AERONOMIE.
Advertisements

Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
GLAST The GLAST Balloon Flight experiment was performed with the collaboration of NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center,
1 The QinetiQ Atmospheric Radiation Model and Solar Particle Events Clive Dyer, Fan Lei, Alex Hands, Peter Truscott Space Division QinetiQ, Farnborough,
Paul Evenson, Waraporn Nuntiyakul,
Victor Hess Before making balloon ascents himself, he determined the height at which ground radiation would stop producing ionization (about 500 meters)
Neutron Monitor Detection Efficiency John Clem University of Delaware 2004 Annual CRONUS Collaboration Meeting.
IAEA Sources of Radiation Natural Radiation - Cosmic Radiation Day 3 – Lecture 8 1.
Solar Energetic Particles -acceleration and observations- (Two approaches at the highest energy) Takashi SAKO Solar-Terrestrial Environment Laboratory,
UTILIZING SPENVIS FOR EARTH ORBIT ENVIRONMENTS ASSESSMENTS: RADIATION EXPOSURES, SEE, and SPACECRAFT CHARGING Brandon Reddell and Bill Atwell THE BOEING.
PLANETOCOSMICS L. Desorgher, M. Gurtner, E.O. Flückiger, and P. Nieminen Physikalisches Institut, University of Bern ESA/ESTEC.
MP BACH MultiPixel Balloon-borne Air CHerenkov Detection of Iron Cosmic Rays Using Direct Cherenkov Radiation Imaged with a High Resolution Camera University.
Radiation conditions during the GAMMA-400 observations:
SHINE Meeting, July 31 – August 4, 2006 Neutron Monitor Observations of the January 20, 2005 Ground Level Enhancement John W. Bieber 1, John Clem 1, Paul.
New results for Radiation Effects on the Human Health Obtained during the COST-724 Action F. Spurný a, Ts. Dachev b, a Nuclear Physics Institute, Czech.
Development of energy-dependent scaling for cosmic-ray neutron intensities and for in- situ cosmogenic nuclide production rates Marek Zreda - Arizona Devendra.
Preliminary validation of computational procedures for a New Atmospheric Ionizing Radiation (AIR) model John M. Clem (1), Giovanni De Angelis (2,3), Paul.
Ground Level Enhancement of May 17, 2012 Observed at South Pole SH21A-2183 Takao Kuwabara 1,3 ; John Bieber 1 ; John Clem 1,3 ; Paul Evenson 1,3 ; Tom.
3/2003 Rev 1 I.4.2 – slide 1 of 20 Part I Review of Fundamentals Module 4Sources of Radiation Session 2Cosmic Radiation Module I.4.2 IAEA Post Graduate.
3/2003 Rev 1 I.4.2 – slide 1 of 20 Part I Review of Fundamentals Module 4Sources of Radiation Session 2Cosmic Radiation Module I.4.2 IAEA Post Graduate.
Evaluation of the flux of CR nuclei inside the magnetosphere P. Bobik, G. Boella, M.J. Boschini, M. Gervasi, D. Grandi, K. Kudela, S. Pensotti, P.G. Rancoita.
Keep the standard candle of electron observations burning Provide an intercalibration with PAMELA and AMS Search for the origin of the turn up in the low.
The PLANETOCOSMICS Geant4 application L. Desorgher Physikalisches Institut, University of Bern.
Radiation on Planetary Surfaces M. S. Clowdsley 1, G. DeAngelis 2, J. W. Wilson 1, F. F. Badavi 3, and R. C. Singleterry 1 1 NASA Langley Research Center,
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Kevin DaughertyProject Manager.
Page 1 HEND science after 9 years in space. page 2 HEND/2001 Mars Odyssey HEND ( High Energy Neutron Detector ) was developed in Space Research Institute.
Monte Carlo methods in ADS experiments Study for state exam 2008 Mitja Majerle “Phasotron” and “Energy Plus Transmutation” setups (schematic drawings)
Systematic studies of neutrons produced in the Pb/U assembly irradiated by relativistic protons and deuterons. Vladimír Wagner Nuclear physics institute.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Residual Does Rate Analyses for the SNS Accelerator Facility I. Popova, J. Galambos HB2008 August 25-29,
Aa GLAST Particle Astrophysics Collaboration Instrument Managed and Integrated at SLAC/Stanford University The Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope (GLAST)
Cosmic rays at sea level. There is in nearby interstellar space a flux of particles—mostly protons and atomic nuclei— travelling at almost the speed of.
Use of Cosmic-Ray Neutron Data in Nuclear Threat Detection and Other Applications Neutron Monitor Community Workshop—Honolulu, Hawaii October 24-25, 2015.
Nishu Karna Mentor:Dr. William Dean Pesnell Code: 671 SESI Program-2009 Goddard Space Flight Center St. Cloud State University Date: August 5, 2009 RELATIVISTIC.
Assessment of radiation shielding materials for protection of space crews using CR-39 plastic nuclear track detector J. M. DeWitt 1, E. R. Benton 1, Y.
Cosmic Rays2 The Origin of Cosmic Rays and Geomagnetic Effects.
Air Crew Hazards and Safety: FAA Uses of Neutron Monitor Data in Aviation Radiation Safety Presented by Kyle A. Copeland, Ph.D Neutron Monitor Community.
GLAST The GLAST Balloon Flight experiment was performed with the collaboration of NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center,
Study of high energy cosmic rays by different components of back scattered radiation generated in the lunar regolith N. N. Kalmykov 1, A. A. Konstantinov.
Russian Aviation and Space Agency Institute for Space Research NASA 2001 Mars Odyssey page 1 Workshop HEND Radiation environment on Odyssey and.
Daniel Matthiä(1)‏, Bernd Heber(2), Matthias Meier(1),
Athens University – Faculty of Physics Section of Nuclear and Particle Physics Athens Neutron Monitor Station Study of the ground level enhancement of.
16-20 Oct 2005SSPVSE Conference1 Galactic Cosmic Ray Composition, Spectra, and Time Variations Mark E. Wiedenbeck Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California.
February 7, Long Term Decline of South Pole Neutron Monitor Counting Rate – A Possible Magnetospheric Interpretation Paul Evenson, John Bieber,
The objective of the CRONUS-Earth Project is to simultaneously address the various uncertainties affecting the production and accumulation of in-situ cosmogenic.
Insolation and the Earth’s Surface. Insolation- The portion of the Sun’s radiation that reaches the Earth INcoming SOLar RadiATION Angle of insolation.
A complete simulation of cosmic rays access to a Space Station Davide Grandi INFN Milano, ITALY.
Design of novel GEM-based neutron spectrometer E. Aza 1,2* 1 CERN, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland, 2 AUTH, Department of Physics, Thessaloniki, Greece,
Preliminary validation of computational procedures for a New Atmospheric Ionizing Radiation (AIR) model John M. Clem, Giovanni De Angelis, Paul Goldhagen.
4th International Summer School « Nuclear Physics Methods and Accelerators in Biology and Medicine » Monte-Carlo simulations : FLUKA vs. MCNPX Maxime ODEN.
Voyager Observations of Galactic Cosmic Ray Transport in the Heliosheath and their Reacceleration at the Termination Shock F.B. McDonald 1, W.R. Webber.
Topic 6: Insolation and the Earth ’ s Surface. Insolation- The portion of the Sun ’ s radiation that reaches the Earth INcoming SOLar RadiATION Angle.
Bringing 93,000,000 Miles to 40,000 Feet: Space Weather & Aviation An introduction to Space Weather What is it? Where does it come from? What does it do?
CHANDLER Detector Neutronics Modeling Alireza Haghighat William Walters Nuclear Science and Engineering Lab (NSEL) Nuclear Engineering Program, Mechanical.
Neutron production in atmosphere Nuclear physics for Galactic Cosmic Rays in the AMS-02 era – Grenoble (38) / France Session: Neutron detectors,
Overview on cosmic radiation at aircraft altitudes Marcin Latocha, Peter Beck, Sofia Rollet, Michael Wind, Andrea Zechner AIT – Austrian Institute of Technology.
The Real-Time Neutron Monitor Database Christian T. Steigies (2), Karl-Ludwig Klein & Nicolas Fuller (1), on behalf of the NMDB team (1) Christian-Albrechts.
Atmospheric radiation modeling of galactic cosmic rays using LRO/CRaTER and the EMMREM model with comparisons to balloon and airline based measurements[1]
Atmospheric radiation modeling of galactic cosmic rays using LRO/CRaTER and the EMMREM model with comparisons to balloon and airline based measurements.
of occupational exposure
Pradiphat (ฝุ่น) Muangha2 David J Ruffolo2
Presenter: Paul Evenson
Early Alert of Solar Radiation Hazard
Development of a GLE Alarm System Based Upon Neutron Monitors
Gamma-ray Albedo of the Moon Igor V. Moskalenko (Stanford) & Troy A
Do Now: How does the Earth get heated?
SCIENCE MISSION DIRECTORATE
University of Delaware
Application of neutron monitor data for space weather
Simulation of 14C production rates for the troposphere and stratosphere in weak geomagnetic intensity at 26,000 yr BP 1 Graduate School of Science and.
A. Mishev, I.Usoskin, S. Tuohino & A. Ibragimov
Presentation transcript:

Cosmic-Ray Induced Neutrons: Recent Results from the Atmospheric Ionizing Radiation Measurements Aboard an ER-2 Airplane P. Goldhagen 1, J.M. Clem 2, J.W. Wilson 3, R.C. Singleterry 3, I.W. Jones 3, M. Reginatto 4 1 Environmental Measurements Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, New York, NY; 2 Bartol Research Institute, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 3 NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA; 4 PTB, Braunschweig, Germany Conclusions  Calculations agree with measurements  Doses within  8% at ~0.8 GV  Spectrum shape nearly constant for aviation  Big change on ground  High-energy neutrons are significant  25% , 42% H*, 71% E from E n >10 MeV  Polar neutrons > 8  equatorial  H*(10) > Effective dose for cosmic ray neutrons  MNS with metal shells works for high-E neutrons  Useful at high-energy accelerators Flight paths of the AIR ER-2 flights and altitude profiles of three of them. Neutron data from the boxed portions of the flights have been analyzed. Boeing’s proposed Sonic Cruiser would fly 10,000 feet higher than present-day commercial jets. NASA ER-2 taking off for the AIR cosmic-ray measurements. Radiation sensors were carried in the nose, the fuselage behind the cockpit, and the front of both wing pods. Introduction Crews working on present ‑ day jet aircraft are a large occupationally exposed group with a relatively high average effective dose from galactic cosmic radiation (GCR). Crews of future high-speed commercial aircraft flying at higher altitudes will be even more exposed. To help reduce the significant uncertainties in calculations of such exposures, the Atmospheric Ionizing Radiation (AIR) Project, an international collaboration of 15 laboratories, made simultaneous radiation measurements with 14 instruments on a NASA ER ‑ 2 high-altitude aircraft.[1, 2] In addition to evaluation of air crew exposures, the results have applications in radiation effects on microelectronics, in determining source terms for cosmogenic nuclides used for atmospheric tracers and geological dating, and in evaluation of the background radiation exposure of the world population. The intensity of the different particles making up atmospheric cosmic radiation, their energy distribution, and their potential biological effect on aircraft occupants vary with altitude, geomagnetic latitude, and time in the sun’s magnetic activity cycle. Neutrons contribute roughly half of the biological exposure and most of the uncertainty in it. The effective dose from neutrons depends strongly on their energy distribution (spectrum). Cosmic-Ray Measurement Flights Five AIR measurement flights were made in June 1997, a time of maximum GCR (solar minimum). The flights covered latitudes from 18° to 60°N (vertical geomagnetic cutoff rigidities GV), with each flight lasting 6½ to 8 hours. The AIR measurements concentrated on altitudes from 16 to 21 km (52, ,000 ft, atmospheric depths g cm-2), but some data were also taken at lower altitudes and on the ground. Neutron Spectrometer The primary AIR instrument was a highly sensitive extended-energy multisphere neutron spectrometer (MNS, or Bonner spheres). Lead and steel shells within the moderators of two of its 14 detectors were used to enhance response at high energies. Detector responses were calculated for neutrons, protons, and pions at energies up to 100 GeV using the new high-energy Monte Carlo radiation transport code MCNPX. The effect of nearby materials, including other detectors, was included in the response calculations, but the effect of the airplane structure was not. The response of the larger MNS detectors to high-energy protons was significant. Correction for counts produced by protons was made using GCR-induced AIR hadron spectra calculated [3, 4] using FLUKA. Cosmic-ray neutron spectra were unfolded from the corrected measured count rates using the MAXED code.[5] What's New for This Workshop New FLUKA calculations of GCR-induced AIR hadron spectra at each measurement location [3, 4] provide:  Proton spectra to correct for proton counts in MNS   Calculated neutron spectra:  To compare with measured spectra  As starting point for unfolding measurements  Computational procedures for a new AIR Model Results Measured spectra of GCR-induced neutrons at 4 flight locations and on the ground, corrected for proton counts, are shown below. Spectra are shown as graphs of energy, E, times fluence rate per unit energy, d  /dE, on a linear scale vs. energy on a logarithmic scale. Calculated spectra for 2 locations are also shown. There is a pronounced “evaporation” peak at around 1 MeV and a high-energy peak around 100 MeV. 25% of the neutrons are above 10 MeV, and they contribute 71% of the effective dose. Total fluence rates and doses derived from the measured spectra are shown in the table. Cosmic-ray neutron spectra measured at low (0.8 GV) and high (12 GV) geomagnetic cutoff at 20 km altitude. The shape of the spectrum changes only slightly, while the neutron total fluence rate is 8 times higher at the north location. The calculated fluence rate at 0.8 GV cutoff is 10% less than the measured rate. Cosmic-ray neutron spectra measured at 3 altitudes. The shapes of the spectra are almost identical. Total fluence rate was almost constant from 16 to 20 km at ~0.8 GV cutoff, but 2.9  lower at 12 km and 4.5 GV cutoff. At 16 km, calculated fluence is 3% less than the measured rate. The shape of the neutron spectrum changed significantly on the ground, which reflects neutrons differently than air does. Total fluence rate was 280 times lower at sea level than at 12 km altitude. Effect of protons on measured neutron spectrum Joint DOE Low Dose Radiation Research Program Workshop II and NASA 12 th Annual Space Radiation Health Investigators’ Workshop June 27-30, 2001, Arlington, VA