WGR Ramp Rate in Nodal: “As High as Possible” Mike Grimes for QMWG Meeting 10 August 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bill Blevins Management of the West-North Stability Limit Under the Nodal Market.
Advertisements

IMPACT TO FREQUENCY CONTROL DURING STARTUP AND SHUT DOWN OF UNITS
Proposal on Ancillary Service Deliverability Requirements QMWG January 6, 2012.
Ancillary Services and SCED Jeff Gilbertson Market Analyst Congestion Management Working Group 9/4/2013.
ERCOT Draft NPRR Phase 2 ORDC RATF July 8, ERCOT draft NPRR Phase 2 ORDC Draft NPRR will include the following clarifications or additions: Updates.
NERC LTRA Update / CDR Capacity Counting Issues
1 Market Trials Open Market Participant Call Weekly Kick Off Aug 16, 2010.
SBBH Flag Implementation QMWG October 11, SBBH Flag - Background SBBH Flag - Background: –The SBBH acronym stands for “SCED Base Point Below HDL”
March 30, 2015 SCED Event Follow up: Proposed Improvements QMWG, May 08, 2015.
1 Generator Telemetry and Market Prices WebEx Training July 28 th, 2015.
PDCWG Report to ROS August 12, 2010 Sydney Niemeyer.
Sai Moorty ERCOT Integration Options into ERCOT systems.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal Version EDS 3 R6.3 8 Focused Input Test (FIT) II Web Ex Texas Nodal Load Frequency Control.
1 Cutover Daily Call 4:30 PM November 23, :30.
Demand Side Working Group Load Resource Performance Subgroup April 9, 2010 Mary Anne Brelinsky EDF Trading North America.
1 Settlement Changes R5 (SEP 2015) and R5.5 (OCT 2015) Blake Holt ERCOT COPS 9/14/2015.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Load Frequency Control (LFC) EDS 3 Release 6 - Handbook EDS 3 Release 6 MP Planning.
1Texas Nodal Market Trials Update. 2Texas Nodal Full System Market and Reliability Test 24-Hour Test Observations Duration of Test for Week of 8/ Hour.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Load Frequency Control (LFC) EDS 3 R6.1 EDS 3 Release 6 LFC Workshop October 10, 2007.
NPRR XXX: PRR 307 Inclusion in Nodal…Part II. Questions Raised 06/26/06 Section 3 –COP (resource parameters) –CLR participation limits –Telemetry Requirements.
NPRR425 - Creation of a WGR Group for GREDP and Base Point Deviation Evaluation and Mixing Turbine Types Within a WGR Art Deller, P.E. RARF Workshop 8/29/13.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal Version Workshop: 2-Hour Full-System Load Frequency Control (LFC) Testing (fka, EDS 3 R6.3.
QMWG – Feb. 26, 2014 Discussion topic: NPRR585 Clarification of Administrative Pricing Requirements for Self-Committed Combined Cycle Combustion Turbines.
Quick Start Resource – Payment for Start-Up at less than LSL Current NPRR language: ( 8) If a QSGR comes On-Line as a result of a Base Point less than.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 EDS 3 R6.2 Testing Overview Texas Nodal Load Frequency Control (LFC) EDS 3 Release 6 LFC WebEx.
1 Market Trials Update NATF June 1, 2010.
Optimizing Deployment of CCGT Duct Firing Capacity in the Nodal Market Josh Clevenger Brazos Electric Cooperative.
1 1 Beacon Power Corporation Energy Storage – Regulation Issues Prepared for: Emerging Technologies Working Group January 5, 2011.
Nodal ATF 1 Nodal Advisory Task Force Update for TAC November 4 th, 2010.
Nodal ATF 1 Nodal Advisory Task Force Update for TAC September 2 nd, 2010.
1 Reliability Deployment Task Force (RDTF Meeting) December 20 th 2011 December 20, 2011.
RCWG Update to WMS July 11, Alternatives to Address Negative Prices At its June meeting, WMS directed RCWG to bring back something to vote on. RCWG.
Analysis of ERCOT Regulation Service Deployments during 2011 David Maggio Market Enhancement Task Force Meeting 3/29/
Congestion Management and Ramp Rate for Delivering Ancillary Services Resmi Surendran.
7 August, 2006 TPTF MMS Issues Review Brandon Whittle Lead, Real-Time Market Operations.
October Project Release (NPRRs 710, 706, 698 and 595) ERCOT Operations & Market Operations WebEx Training October XX, 2015.
Operational Issues & Risks ERCOT Operations Planning August 22, 2008.
July 10, 2008 ROS Early Delivery Systems Status – R6.3 2 Hour Test John Dumas and Jeff Gilbertson.
1Texas Nodal Texas Nodal NMMS/RARF Data Discussion By John Moseley, ERCOT, Network Modeling Group.
Resource Parameters Needed for LFC NATF WebEx Meeting 05/11/2010 Dave Maggio Operations Engineer, Supply Integration and Grid Applications.
Floyd Trefny, P.E. Director of Wholesale Market Design Nodal Market Tools to Manage Wind Generation January 29, 2009 Presentation to the Renewables Technology.
1 Market Trials Real-Time Market / LFC Weekly Update July 30, 2010.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 EDS 3 Release 5 Monday / Friday Market Updates Feb 01, 2008.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Load Frequency Control (LFC) Business Requirements Energy.
QSE Managers Working Group Report to WMS, April 8, 2011 S. Looney, Luminant.
Resource Registration Update Dana Showalter Patrick Coon March 4, 2008.
DSWG Update to WMS 2/9/2011. EILS Procurement Results from 1/31 Business Hours 1 HE 0900 through 1300, Monday thru Friday except ERCOT Holidays; 425 hours.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 High-Level Overview of draft NPRR implementing PUCT Rule Posting Requirements January 8,
1 Nodal Stabilization Market Call December 27, 2010.
1/07/2014 QMWG – RUC and AS update QMWG – ERCOT Update ERCOT Market Analysis.
1 Cutover Daily Call 10:30 AM November 23, :30.
PDCWG Report to ROS January 13, 2011 Sydney Niemeyer.
RARF QnA Session November 1, General Information EDS 4-1 RARF due on Friday, November 9, This includes pink, blue, white cells. (Also should.
Real Time Balancing (RTB) & Resource Plan Statuses Change to the QSE practice of showing offline units as online and available ERCOT Presentation to ROS.
Demand Side Working Group March 5, 2010 Mary Anne Brelinsky EDF Trading North America.
Text reason for Deviation from Defined High Sustained Limit/Low Sustained Limit John Adams January 5, 2010 Nodal Advisory Task Force.
07/27/2006 Overview of Replacement Reserve Procurement ERCOT Staff PRS RPRS Task Force.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Market Management System Update on TPTF Comments on MMS Clarification Notes May 21,
Multi-Interval Real-Time Market (MIRTM) Updates SAWG Sean Chang Market Analysis February 22, 2016 ERCOT Public Version
1 EEA Workshop 3 April 2, /3/2015For the purpose of discussion only.
GREDP Monitoring QSE Manager’s Working Group December 15, 2010.
IMM alternate framework for Look-Ahead SCED November 21, 2011.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Energy & Market Management System EMS/MMS Projects Requirement Documents November.
August 11, 2008 TPTF Early Delivery Systems Status Daryl Cote.
NSRS in Nodal Proposal for Deployment & Recall Procedures ERCOT ROS 10/12-13/2006 By: S.Niemeyer R.Jones R.Wheeler B.Green J.Dumas P.Breitzman.
“Look Ahead SCED” Sai Moorty ERCOT November 28, 2011.
Current FRRS Language & Explanation of Posted Data
Congestion Management and Ramp Rate for Delivering Ancillary Services
David Kee Chair CPS Energy Sydney Niemeyer Vice Chair NRG Energy
Texas Nodal Load Frequency Control (LFC) EDS 3 R6
Presentation transcript:

WGR Ramp Rate in Nodal: “As High as Possible” Mike Grimes for QMWG Meeting 10 August 2009

WGR Ramp Rate in Nodal: “As High as Possible” SCED computes new base point assuming ramp is limited to registered ramp rate WGR Base point = telemetered output, not an issue absent curtailment, i.e. new base point from SCED RARF instruction is: WGRs should register “highest possible ramp rate” Implication is that WGRs are expected to move to new base points as quickly as possible Frequency excursions due to varying ramp rates are managed by QSEs providing A-S, via LFC

SCED’s New Base Point Assumes Ramp Rate HDL = Min (POWERTELEM + (SURAMP * 5), HASL), Where SURAMP effectively = Ramp Rate [in MW/minute]

SCED Assumes a Ramp Rate Tracks Output Every 4 Seconds Required to set HSL = telemetered output each cycle (nominally 5 minutes) – NP (3) “For each Wind-powered Generation Resource (WGR), the QSE shall set the HSL to the output capability of the facility based upon all available units and the current measured wind speed (HSL must be equal to or greater than the latest telemetered net real power of the WGR).” SCED uses registered/updated ramp rate as an input when choosing a new base point 2 cases of interest: – Curtailment/base point < HSL (or RPP) – Release from curtailment/ base point = RPP

Background - SCED Uses RARF Ramp Rate as Input Required: Generation Resource Parameters (NP ) – (1)(f) Normal Ramp Rate curve; – (1)(g) Emergency Ramp Rate curve; QSEs must update Resource Status (NP 6.4.5) – (1) ERCOT shall use the telemetered Resource Status for all applications requiring status of Resources during the Operating Hour, including SCED, Load Frequency Control (LFC), and Network Security Analysis processes. QSEs shall provide ERCOT with accurate telemetry of the current capability of each Resource including the Resource Status, Ramp Rates, HSL, and LSL and a text reason for any Resource where a Ramp Rate is deviating from a standard Ramp Rate curve for the Resource, or the HSL is less than, or LSL is greater than, the normal high and low limits set in Section 3.7.1, Resource Parameter Criteria.

Background – RARF Instructions Ramp rate curves are step functions in the up and down directions at ten MW break points. All ramp rate values, including downward rates, should be entered in the RARF as positive values. The values submitted in the RARF are used to build the ramp rate step curves, and should not be used as tools to restrain the operating range of the unit or configuration. The curves essentially range from zero to infinity, but realistically, the curves are limited to LRL and HRL.

Background – RARF Q&A 11 November 2007 Ramp rates per MW value? – Ramp rate CURVE is intent – points on curve provide reasonable data for dispatching different MW’s at different curves. Ramp Rate? – ERCOT not requesting all 5 requesting range/curve to cover your full operating range. ‘Generation’ tab, why are there different MW values for Ramp Rate? – This is for the ramp rate curve. If you are at Low Sustainable Limit (LSL), your ramp rate may be 5 MW p/min, but a higher limit may be able to ramp faster. Once you get to the High Sustainable Limit (HSL) you may have to ramp slower. What is a normal ramp rate for wind, since it depends on the availability of wind to be able to generate? – ERCOT desires the highest possible ramp rate from the resource under any circumstances (validity check only, not used for dispatch).

Background – RARF Q&A 12/12/07; Repeated in WGR RARF Workshop 24 March 2008 Does ERCOT want the ramp rate for conditions of a zero wind speed (zero generation) to the highest wind speed on the manufacturer’s curve (nameplate capacity)? – ERCOT desires the highest possible ramp rate from the resource under any circumstances in order to be able to validate data (not used for dispatch). For the "Normal Ramp Rate Curve" on the "Combined Cycle" tab, does ERCOT expect to see the ramp rate from LSL to HSL or the ramp rate in the start-up period? – ERCOT desires the ramp rate curve at Low Reasonability Limit (LRL) to the High Reasonability Limit (HRL). For Ramp Rate Curves, the ramp rate varies in different operational scenarios, such as winter, summer etc. What does "Normal" mean? – ERCOT desires the ramp rate curve from the Low Sustainable Limit (LSL) to the High Sustainable Limit (HSL) and can be entered in 5-pairs (at different MW levels). If there are significant changes in operational conditions (derating, unplanned outages, seasonal configuration changes) the ramp rate curves can be updated with the QSE providing a reason code- but this should be only a few times per year.

Background – RARF Q&A 17 April 2008 Regarding ramp rates for a wind farm: There are internal turbine limits set – regardless of ramp requests. Should I use these for my limits? – If you have a known limit, please use it. How is ERCOT using the High Reasonability Ramp Rate Limits in comparison to the Emergency Ramp Rate curves? EDS appears to be using the lowest value of the Emergency Ramp Rate curves as limits. – Similar to the HRL and LRL, the HRRRL and LRRRL should be “out-of- bounds” values for the Ramp Rate curves submitted in the RARF and by the QSE. ERCOT is researching this question. The HRL, LRL, HRRRL, and LRRRL are not used operationally – they are used only to validate submittals. – Responsive Reserve limit is the minimum of 20% of the HSL or 10 times the minimum emergency ramp rate. ERCOT is reviewing the use/accuracy of the minimum emergency ramp rate in this situation

Background – Updated Desired Base Point “expected MW output of a Generation Resource ramping to a SCED Base Point” SCED sees output every 4 seconds, and uses that data to issue “desired” BPs, but only to QSEs offering A-S. Ca. January 2007 “SCED Base Point Dispatch” white paper recommends telemetry of “updated base points” every 4 seconds via LFCSCED Base Point Dispatch – Intended to address frequency deviation resulting from units ramping at different rates – Discusses ramping over 4 minutes, so units get to new base points before end of 5 minute interval – Benefit: minimize regulation A-S Approved as part of NPRR 049 for QSEs providing A-S – “Based on the ACE MW correction, the LFC issues a set of control signals every four seconds to each QSE providing Regulation and, if required, each QSE providing Responsive Reserve.” (NP (4))

Background – Terms Defined SURAMP= RAMPRATE – (RUSTELEM / 5) VariableDescription SURAMPSCED up ramp rate RAMPRATE Normal Ramp Rate when RRS is not deployed or when the subject Resource is not providing RRS. Emergency Ramp Rate for Resources deploying RRS RUSTELEMReg-Up designation provided by telemetry HDL= Min (POWERTELEM + (SURAMP * 5), HASL) VariableDescription HDLHigh Dispatch Limit POWERTELEMGross or net real power provided via telemetry SURAMPSCED up ramp rate HASLHigh Ancillary Service Limit – definition provided in Section 2, Definitions and Acronyms.