Management of CMDH Policies Group Name: WG5-MAS Source: Wolfgang Granzow, Qualcomm, Meeting Date: 2014-04-07 Agenda Item: Management.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CMDH Refinement Contribution: oneM2M-ARC-0397
Advertisements

Summary on the M2M CMDH Policies Management Object (MCMDHMO)
Is a Node or not Node? ARC Node_resolution Group Name: ARC Source: Barbara Pareglio, NEC, Meeting Date: ARC#9.1 Agenda.
Problem of Current Notification Group Name: ARC WG Source: Heedong Choi, LG Electronics, Meeting Date: ARC 9.0 Agenda Item: TBD.
Problem of non-Blocking Synchronous mode Group Name: ARC WG Source: Yuan Tao, Mitch Tseng, Huawei Technologies Meeting Date: ARC 15.0 Agenda Item: TBD.
Group:WG3 (PRO) Source:Peter Niblett, IBM, Date: Agenda:PRO#14 TS-0004 Data Representation Proposal Discussion.
Device Management using mgmtCmd resource
On Persistent AE Identifiers Group Name: SEC#12.2 Source: Phil Hawkes, Qualcomm Inc (TIA), Francois Ennesser,
Group:WG3 (PRO) Source:Peter Niblett, IBM, Date: Agenda:PRO#14 TS-0004 Data Representation Proposal Discussion.
Resource Announcement Procedures Group Name: WG2 Source: Rajesh Bhalla, Hao Wu - ZTE Meeting Date: Agenda Item: TBD.
CMDH Policies Contribution: ARC R03-CMDH_Policies.ppt Source: Josef Blanz, Qualcomm UK, Hongbeom Ahn, LG Electronics,
In-Band Access Control Framework Group Name: WG4 SEC Source: Qualcomm Meeting Date: Agenda Item:
Announcement Resources ARC Announcement_Issues Group Name: WG2 Source: Barbara Pareglio, NEC Meeting Date: Agenda Item: Input Contribution.
End-to-End security definition Group Name: SEC WG4 Source: Phil Hawkes, Qualcomm, Meeting Date:
PRO R01-URI_mapping_discussion Discussion on URI mapping in protocol context Group Name: PRO and ARC Source: Shingo Fujimoto, FUJITSU,
3GPP Rel-13 Interworking discussions
In-Band Access Control Framework Group Name: WG4 SEC Source: Qualcomm Meeting Date: Agenda Item:
TS0001 Identifiers way forward Group Name: WG2 Source: Elloumi, Foti, Scarrone, Lu (tbc), Jeong (tbc) Meeting Date: Agenda Item: ARC11/PRO11.
Usage Scenarios for CSE Group Name: WG2(ARC-WG) Source: Shingo Meeting Date: Agenda Item: Message.
Supporting long polling Group Name: ARC WG Source: SeungMyeong, LG Electronics, Meeting Date: x-xx Agenda Item: TBD.
WG5 - MAS Progress Report at TP #9 Group Name: WG5 MAS (Management, Abstraction & Semantics) Source: Yongjing Zhang, Chair, Meeting.
Ontology Architectural Support Options Group Name: MAS WG Source: Catalina Mladin, Lijun Dong, InterDigital Meeting Date: Agenda Item: TBD.
Customized Resource Types MAS Group Name: MAS + ARC + PRO WGs Source: Wolfgang Granzow, Qualcomm Inc., Meeting Date:
Discussion on the problem of non- Blocking Synchronous mode Group Name: ARC WG Source: Yuan Tao, Mitch Tseng, Huawei Technologies Meeting Date: ARC 15.2.
WG5 - MAS Progress Report at TP #10 Group Name: WG5 MAS (Management, Abstraction & Semantics) Source: WG5 Chairs Meeting Date: to
Status Report on Access TP8 Group Name: WG2 Decision  Meeting Date: Discussion  Source: OBERTHUR Technologies Information  Contact:
Matching Resources with CSFs Group Name: WG2 (ARC) Source: Hongbeom Ahn, LG Electronics, Meeting Date:
Ontology Resource Discussion
Ontology Architectural Support Options Group Name: MAS WG Source: Catalina Mladin, Lijun Dong, InterDigital Meeting Date: Agenda Item: TBD.
Discussion on XSD implementation conventions (document number PRO R01) Group Name: PRO Source: Wolfgang Granzow, Meeting.
Interworking with an External Dynamic Authorization System Group Name: SEC WG Source: Qualcomm Inc., Wolfgang Granzow & Phil Hawkes Meeting Date: SEC#20.2,
Different planes for the resource structure Group Name: WG5 – MAS and WG2 – ARC Source: Nicolas Damour, Sierra Wireless
Routing Problem of the Current Architecture Group Name: ARC Source: Hongbeom Ahn, LG Electronics, Meeting Date: Agenda.
Different planes for the resource structure Group Name: WG5 – MAS and WG2 – ARC Source: Nicolas Damour, Sierra Wireless
WG-2 - ARC TP #18 Status Report Group Name: oneM2M TP #18 Source: WG2 Chair (Nicolas Damour – Meeting Date: Agenda.
M2M Service Subscription Profile Discussion Group Name: oneM2M TP #19.2 Source: LG Electronics Meeting Date: Agenda Item:
SE abstraction scenarios Group Name: SEC Source: Claus Dietze, Giesecke & Devrient Meeting Date: Agenda Item: WI SE abstraction.
PRO/ARC and TST/PRO joint sessions at TP20 Group Name: oneM2M TP20 Source: Peter Niblett, IBM Meeting Date:
OIC INTERWORKING Resource mapping
WG5 – MAS#19 Status Report Group Name: WG5 MAS (Management, Abstraction & Semantics) Source: Yongjing Zhang (Huawei, WG5 Chair) Meeting Date:
Security API discussion Group Name: SEC Source: Shingo Fujimoto, FUJITSU Meeting Date: Agenda Item: Security API.
Protocol Issues related to Plugtest Group Name: TST Source: Wolfgang Granzow, Qualcomm Inc., Meeting Date: Agenda.
M2M Service Layer – DM Server Security Group Name: OMA-BBF-oneM2M Adhoc Source: Timothy Carey, Meeting Date:
End-to-End Primitive Security: Challenges and Suggestions Group Name: SEC WG Source: Qualcomm Inc., Phil Hawkes, Wolfgang Granzow, Josef Blanz Meeting.
3GPP SCEF Interworking Discussions
M2M Service Session Management (SSM) CSF Group Name: WG2-ARC Source: IDCC, LGE, ZTE Meeting Date: TP8 Agenda Item:
Issues of Current Access Control Rule and New Proposal Introduction Group Name: ARC 21 Source: Wei Zhou, Datang, Meeting Date:
Adding Non-blocking Requests Contribution: oneM2M-ARC-0441R01R01 Source: Josef Blanz, Qualcomm UK, Meeting Date: ARC 7.0,
Authorization Architecture Discussion Group Name: SEC WG Source: Seongyoon Kim, LG Electronics, Meeting Date: 28 MAY, 2014 Agenda.
Protocol Issues related to Plugtest Group Name: TST Source: Wolfgang Granzow, Qualcomm Inc., Meeting Date: Agenda.
CMDH and Policies Contribution: oneM2M-ARC-0603
Issues about management Group Name: MAS9.2 Source: Jiaxin Yin, Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Meeting Date: Agenda Item:
WG5 – MAS#22 Status Report Group Name: WG5 MAS (Management, Abstraction & Semantics) Source: Tim Carey(Alcatel-Lucent, WG5 Vice Chair) Meeting Date:
DM Execute Group Name: WG2/WG5 Source: Jiaxin Yin, Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Meeting Date: Agenda Item: TBD.
Reasons for CSF Clean-up (Issues & Next Steps) Group Name: WG2 Source: Syed Husain – NTT DOCOMO Meeting Date: (ARC_9.3) Agenda Item: 6 DOC#:
Management CSF(s) Architectural choices Group Name: WG2 (ARC), WG5(MAS) Source: Catalina Mladin, InterDigital Comm., Meeting.
TS-0004 guideline for new resource type definition Group Name: PRO WG Source: SeungMyeong JEONG, LG Electronics Meeting Date: Agenda Item: TS.
Specifying the Address of Management Client of Managed Entity Group Name: ARC Source: Hongbeom Ahn, SK Telecom, Meeting Date: TP#21 Agenda.
Interworking with an External Dynamic Authorization System Group Name: SEC WG Source: Qualcomm Inc., Wolfgang Granzow & Phil Hawkes Meeting Date: SEC#20.1,
[authenticationProfile] <mgmtObj> specialization
Service Enabled AE (SAE)
End-to-End Security for Primitives
Group multicast fanOut Procedure
Proposed design principles for modelling interworked devices
MAF&MEF Interface Specification discussion of the next steps
oneM2M Versioning Next Steps
CMDH Refinement Contribution: oneM2M-ARC-0397R01
Discussion on XSD open issues
Service Layer Dynamic Authorization [SLDA]
Summary of the MAF and MEF Interface Specification TS-0032
Presentation transcript:

Management of CMDH Policies Group Name: WG5-MAS Source: Wolfgang Granzow, Qualcomm, Meeting Date: Agenda Item: Management of policies

Background At TP#9, the resource type was introduced into TS-0001 It has been agreed that CMDH policies are subject to Service Management Discussions on how to map policies to mgmtObj resources started at TP#9, and were continued in some offline discussions, but are not yet concluded © 2014 oneM2M Partners MAS

Characteristics of CMDH Policies Represent a set of rules which define how remotely hosted resources can be accessed via the CMDH CSF CMDH policies are required and executed in field entities, i.e. ASN-CSE and MN-CSE CMDH policies represent rules which need to be – provisioned to field entities before these can start communication with other entities – managable remotely by the M2M service provider © 2014 oneM2M Partners MAS

Excerpt from TS-0001v0.4.3, clause The resource type represents a set of rules defining which CMDH parameters will be used by default when a request issued by a local originator (eg. locally registered AE or another CSF inside the local CSE) contains the “ec” parameter but not all other CMDH parameters. One or several resources of type may be linked as child resources of the local resource, thus defining a set of CMDH policies applicable whenever this local hosting CSE receives requests. In addition, one or several resources of type may be linked as child resources of other resources of type or, thus overriding the default set of policies for the relevant locally registered Application Entities or remote CSEs. © 2014 oneM2M Partners MAS

Options to associate CMDH policies with resources 1.Define a new parent resource of type which includes a link to a resource 2.Redefine the existing resource as a resource of type and all its child resources as of type 3.Redefine the existing resource and all its child resources as of type. Include references to child resources in form of links © 2014 oneM2M Partners MAS

Option 1 Pro: no redefinition of the existing resource type required Con: entire cmdhPolicy resource tree must be mapped to a management object of the external DM technology, no addressing of sub- resources possible Resource type fixed value “cmdhPolicySet” URI to a resource in IN-CSE URN identifying external DM technology data model path of the external management object instance on the managed entity some optional text description of cdmhPolicySet © 2014 oneM2M Partners MAS

Option 2 Resource type all children (and their children) are of resource type Pro: all resources currently defined as children of (and their children) remain individually addressable Cons: requires to keep child resources in ; possibly large memory requirements for storage in IN-CSE; existing resource and all children need to be redefined (large impact on TS-0001) © 2014 oneM2M Partners MAS

Option 3 Resource type Attributes representing links to other instances of resources Pros: all resources currently defined as children of (and their children) remain individually addressable and can most easily be mapped to MOs of external DM technology, no need for child resources, minimal memory requirements for storage in IN-CSE Cons: existing resource and children need to be redefined (large impact on TS-0001) © 2014 oneM2M Partners MAS

Proposed Way Forward We suggest to go with option 3 A corresponding CR to TS-0001 is submitted in ARC Remaining issues that still need to be resolved: – Shall resource be deleted completely in TS-0001? – Shall these be replaced by [cmdhPolicy] MOs in the field entities, or removed entirely? © 2014 oneM2M Partners MAS