FDA Case Studies Pediatric Oncology Subcommittee March 4, 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee
Advertisements

Brown JR et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 523.
Safety and Extrapolation Steven Hirschfeld, MD PhD Office of Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapy Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research FDA.
Phase 1/2 Study of Weekly MLN9708, an Investigational Oral Proteasome Inhibitor, in Combination with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients with Previously.
Novel AKT Inhibitor Afuresertib in Combination with Bortezomib and Dexamethasone Demonstrates Favorable Safety Profile and Significant Clinical Activity.
Modified Megestrol The Clinical Trials by : Carolina R. Akib
Richardson PG et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 535.
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 446.
Roberts AW et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 325.
Lesokhin AM et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 291.
Introduction  Soft Tissue Sarcoma (STS) are a group of highly chemotherapy resistant tumors  Doxorubicin is the only APPROVED 1 st line chemotherapy.
Results of a Phase 2 Randomised, Open- Label, Study of Lower Doses of Quizartinib (AC220; ASP2689) in Subjects with FLT3-ITD Positive Relapsed or Refractory.
Meeting Agenda Presentations on endpoints –Regulatory issues –Scientific issues Pros and cons of end points –Classical end points –Non-classical end points.
Neonatal/Juvenile Animal Safety Studies Kenneth L. Hastings, Dr.P.H., D.A.B.T. Office of New Drugs, CDER.
Oncology Pediatric Initiatives Richard Pazdur, MD Director, Division of Oncology Drug Products.
Basis for Neulasta® (Pegfilgrastim) Approval
ODAC SCHERING-PLOUGH RESEARCH INSTITUTE 1 Temozolomide Oncology Drug Advisory Committee March 13, 2003 Craig L. Tendler, M.D. Vice President, Oncology.
1 FDA Review of NDA Valganciclovir for the Treatment of CMV Retinitis in AIDS Joseph Toerner, MD Medical Officer DAVDP.
Regulatory Experience Employing Extrapolation In Pediatric Drug Development William Rodriguez, M.D. Science Director of Pediatrics Office of Counter-Terrorism.
Treatment with Bendamustine- Bortezomib-Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Shows Significant Activity and Is Well Tolerated Ludwig H.
1 Kepivance™ (Palifermin) Basis for Approval and Pediatric Studies Kepivance™ (Amgen) Approved 12/15/04 Joseph E. Gootenberg, M.D. Office of Oncology Drug.
Weekly MLN9708, an Investigational Oral Proteasome Inhibitor, in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Results from a Phase I Study After Full Enrollment.
A Phase 2 Study of Elotuzumab in Combination with Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Updated.
1 SNDA Gemzar plus Carboplatin Treatment of Late Relapsing Ovarian Cancer.
Ibrutinib in Combination with Bendamustine and Rituximab Is Active and Tolerable in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory CLL/SLL: Final Results of a Phase.
A Phase II Study with Carfilzomib, Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone (CCd) for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Bringhen S et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract.
Ibrutinib, Single Agent or in Combination with Dexamethasone, in Patients with Relapsed or Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM): Preliminary Phase.
History of Pediatric Labeling
Rivaroxaban Has Predictable Pharmacokinetics (PK) and Pharmacodynamics (PD) When Given Once or Twice Daily for the Treatment of Acute, Proximal Deep Vein.
Lenalidomide Is Safe and Active in Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM) 1 Updated Results from a Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Phase 1b/2 Study.
Improved Survival in Patients with First Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Treated with Vosaroxin plus Cytarabine versus Placebo plus.
Endpoints for Past Approvals Ramzi Dagher DODP/CDER/FDA.
Locatelli F et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 4378.
Rationale for Developing New Drugs 25% of children with cancer will not survive 5 years25% of children with cancer will not survive 5 years The acute toxicity.
A Phase 3 Prospective, Randomized, International Study (MMY-3021) Comparing Subcutaneous and Intravenous Administration of Bortezomib in Patients with.
C-1 Pegfilgrastim (Neulasta  ) Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee Pediatric Subcommittee October 20, 2005 Amgen Inc.
A Phase 2 Study of Single-Agent Brentuximab Vedotin for Front- Line Therapy of Hodgkin Lymphoma in Patients Age 60 Years and Above: Interim Results Yasenchak.
12 th Annual CTOS Meeting 2006 AP23573 Induced Long-term Stability in 2 Patients with Desmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumor (#561) Scott Schuetze, Warren.
Initiatives Drive Pediatric Drug Development January 30, 2002.
Continued Overall Survival Benefit After 5 Years’ Follow-Up with Bortezomib-Melphalan-Prednisone (VMP) versus Melphalan-Prednisone (MP) in Patients with.
A Phase II Study of Lenalidomide for Previously Untreated Deletion (del) 5q Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Patients Age 60 or Older Who Are Not Candidates.
Agency Review of sNDA SE-006 DOXIL for Ovarian Cancer Division of Oncology Drug Products Office of Drug Evaluation 1 Center for Drug Evaluation.
1 Presented by Martin Cohen, M.D. at the Pediatric Oncology Subcommittee of the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee.
Moskowitz CH et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 673.
Chemoimmunotherapy with Fludarabine (F), Cyclophosphamide (C), and Rituximab (R) (FCR) versus Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR) in Previously Untreated and.
Alemtuzumab BLA committee CD52 Expression Leukocytes B- lymphocytes T- lymphocytes Monocytes Macrophages Thymocytes Granulocytes (
Food and Drug Administration Division of Pulmonary and Allergy Drug Products Summary Comments - Orally Inhaled and Intranasal Budesonide and Fluticasone.
Pediatric Oncology Subcommittee of the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee July 15, 2003 Steven Hirschfeld, MD PhD CAPT USPHS Division of Oncology Drug.
Phase II Multicenter Study of Single-Agent Lenalidomide in Subjects with Mantle Cell Lymphoma Who Relapsed or Progressed After or Were Refractory to Bortezomib:
1 NDA Clofarabine Cl-F-Ara-A Presented by Martin Cohen, M.D. at the December 01, 2004 meeting of the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee meeting.
1 NDA Nelarabine. 2 Proposed Indication Nelarabine is indicated for the treatment of patients with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and.
May 29 - June 2, 2015 TIGER-X: Rociletinib Activity in EGFR T790M Mutant NSCLC CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting* *CCO.
Results of a Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Eribulin Mesylate as First-Line Therapy for Locally Recurrent or Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast.
Pharmacokinetics (PK) and Pharmacodynamics (PD) of Rivaroxaban: A Comparison of Once- and Twice-daily Dosing in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Replacement.
MM-005: A Phase 1, Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Study to Determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose for the Combination of Pomalidomide, Bortezomib,
Phase II Study: Pembrolizumab + Pomalidomide/Dexamethasone for Patients With R/R MM New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference Coverage* of ASH.
Kantarjian HM et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract Long-Term Follow-Up of Ongoing Patients in 2 Studies of Omacetaxine Mepesuccinate for Chronic Myeloid.
Clinical Trials.
Nivolumab in Patients (Pts) with Relapsed or Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (R/R cHL): Clinical Outcomes from Extended Follow-up of a Phase 1 Study.
Randomized, Open-Label Phase 1/2 Study of Pomalidomide Alone or in Combination with Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple.
Oki Y et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 252.
ASCO Recap Palak Desai, MD.
Acalabrutinib (ACP-196) in Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Fujiwara H et al. Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 181.
Intervista a Lucio Crinò
Dimopoulos MA et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract LBA-6.
Faderl S et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 6503.
1 Verstovsek S et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract Cervantes F et al.
Pomalidomide plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Myeloma Refractory to Both Bortezomib and Lenalidomide: Comparison of Two Dosing Strategies in Dual-Refractory.
Yang Liu, Anne Chain, Rebecca Wrishko,
Presentation transcript:

FDA Case Studies Pediatric Oncology Subcommittee March 4, 2003

Case 1 Dosing and Proof of Concept Submitted Pediatric and Adult Disease are the Same

Case 1 Types of studies: Two Phase I dose- finding studies in children with hematologic malignancies –from supplemental (S) NDA and from original (O) NDA Size of data set: –for efficacy/safety: 39 [31(S) + 8(O) ] –for PK: 33 [27(S) + 6 (O) ]

Type of Information Submitted Safety PK PK-PD Proof of concept Case 1

Results Safety: similar to adults; MTD not reached PK: parameters similar to adult values PK-PD relationship: no correlation Proof of concept –remissions induced in the same malignancy in pediatrics as in adults, although in a limited number of pediatric patients –remissions occurred in approximately the same proportion as in adults Case 1

Comparison between Children & Adults Same side effects as adults but lower grade Lack of PK-PD relationship –exposure (area under the concentration-time curve) and Day 28 white blood cell count Lack of clear dose-proportionality –starting dose chosen to provide similar exposure to adult doses –lack of relationship between dose and exposure overlap between AUCs for different doses Case 1

Issues & Conclusions Efficacy and extrapolation –first time extrapolation has been used for approval Challenge in finding a pediatric dosage Case 1

Case 2 Dosing Submitted Pediatric and Adult Disease are the Same

Case 2 Type of study: Single Phase II pharmacokinetic study in malignant and non-malignant life-threatening conditions Size of data set: –24 patients –ages 5 months to 16 years

Type of Information Submitted Safety –Clinical Adverse Events and laboratory abnormalities PK/PD –Multiple sampling in each patient with initial dosing based on body weight and subsequent adjustment based on PK/PD information Case 2

Results Safety: generally similar to adults PK/PD: Suggested pediatric dosing based on population PK – Two-step dosing based on body weight – 12 kg Case 2

Comparison between Children & Adults Pediatric data indicate need for higher dosage in smaller children (by weight) Case 2

Issues & Conclusions Limited safety information and dosing recommendations added to Special Populations - Pediatric section Case 2

Case 3 Dosing and Proof of Concept Submitted Preliminary Activity in a Disease found only in Pediatric Patients with the Approved Indications for Diseases found only in Adults

Case 3 Types of studies: –Phase I dose-finding study in children with solid tumors and hematologic malignancies –Phase II open label single arm study for response rate in children with refractory or relapsed solid tumors Size of data set: –Phase I: 48 (30 solid tumor + 18 leukemia), ages 1-15 years –Phase II: 108, ages <1 to 15 years

Type of Information Submitted Safety PK PK-PD Proof of concept Case 3

Results Safety: similar to adults; MTD not reached for leukemia, MTD for solid tumors higher than approved adult dose PK: parameters similar to adult values PK-PD relationship: no relationship between exposure and nadir white blood cell count due to maximal suppression at lowest dose Proof of concept –Consistent tumor responses seen in one class of solid tumors Case 3

Comparison between Children & Adults Higher doses tolerated in children Responses seen in some pediatric malignancies that are not found in adults Case 3

Issues & Conclusions The disease where activity was demonstrated in children is a pediatric disease that is rarely found in adults The approved indications are diseases found almost exclusively in adults Extrapolation of efficacy cannot be used Product labeling did not include the submitted pediatric data Product currently not approved for use in children Case 3

Case 4 Dosing and Response Submitted Lack of Activity

Case 4 Types of studies: Phase I dose-finding trial in solid tumors and hematologic malignancies Size of data set: –Solid tumors: 25 evaluable patients –Hematologic malignancies: 4 evaluable patients –Additional 17 patients treated; inevaluable –Ages 2-17

Case 4 Types of studies: Phase II stratified open- label study in solid tumors –Primary endpoint: Response rate Size of data set: –Designed to enroll at least 14 patients per subset –CNS tumors 21 patients –Soft tissue sarcoma 21 patients –Neuroblastoma 4 patients –Age < 21 (2 older ineligible pts excluded)

Type of Information Submitted Safety –Collected only AEs attributed to drug by PI –Post-marketing pediatric safety reports PK/PD –Abbreviated study reports (no primary data) Efficacy –Abbreviated clinical trial study reports Case 4

Results Safety: similar to adults PK: MTD, recommended Phase II dose identified PK/PD: Recommended Phase II dose too toxic; dose lowered Efficacy –RR 0 in CNS, neuroblastoma strata –Neuroblastoma arm closed early –1 CR and 1 PR in soft tissue sarcoma Case 4

Comparison between Children & Adults Toxicity profile similar in adults and children Recommended dose (after testing in Phase II) similar to that approved in adults Case 4

Issues & Conclusions Brief description of study included in the label Negative efficacy data included in the label No PK or dosing data included Case 4

Case 5 Dosing and Efficacy Submitted Spectrum of Diseases Including Approved Adult Indication

Case 5 Types of studies: –two Phase I studies included pharmacokinetics and dose determination data on patients with relapsed or refractory CNS & solid tumors –one single-arm Phase II study to evaluate efficacy in relapsed or refractory CNS & solid tumors Size of data set: –Phase I studies: 82 patients, ages 3 to 17; 19 patients had pharmacokinetic data –Phase II study: 122 patients, ages 3 to 17

Type of Information Submitted Safety PK/PD –multiple sampling in each patient with initial dosing based on body surface area Efficacy Case 5

Results Safety: similar to adults PK/PD –the pharmacokinetics of the drug are similar independent of previous treatment –no relationship between age and clearance Efficacy: Of 122 patients, 1 CR and 5 PR Case 5

Comparison between Children & Adults Similar clearance and volume of distribution values Response to therapy is different (worse in children) Responses occurred in a different histological subtype from the adult tumor Case 5

Issues & Conclusions This drug was approved for an adult disease that also exists in children, BUT did not show efficacy in that disease Responses were seen in a disease that occurs primarily in children and for which there is available effective therapy What information, if any, should be included in the labeling? Case 5

Case Summaries