1 Cathy Carroll & Judy Mumme WestEd Developing Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Barbara Kuehl, Salt Lake City School District Scott Hendrickson, Brigham Young University C ONNECTING THE D OTS : M ATHEMATICAL T ASKS TO B UILD AN U NDERSTANDING.
Advertisements

Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning
1 Solving the Problem: What Mathematics Do Teachers Need to Know? Hyman Bass Forum on Mathematical Competencies in Higher Education Bogotá, Colombia November.
1 Learning to Do the Mathematical Work of Teaching Deborah Loewenberg Ball Hyman Bass, Tim Boerst, Yaa Cole, Judith Jacobs, Yeon Kim, Jennifer Lewis, Laurie.
Welcome to Day 3 Please be seated in groups of 4.  Like grade bands  Mixed schools  New faces Introduce yourself to your table members.
AERA April 2005 Judy Mumme & Cathy Carroll WestEd Rebekah Elliott Oregon State University Using Videocases to Examine Mathematics Professional Development.
Re-viewing the CMI Framework (Re-view: Take another look, see anew)
Learning and Teaching Linear Functions Video Cases for Mathematics Professional Development, 6-10.
Teacher Quality Workshops for 2010/2011
Fostering Algebraic Thinking October 26  December 2  6-hour Assignment after Session 2  January 20 Presented by: Janna Smith
Analyzing Shifts in Teacher Discourse and Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching Nanette Seago WestEd.
5 Pillars of Mathematics Training #1: Mathematical Discourse Dawn Perks Grayling B. Williams.
Common Core State Standards in Mathematics: ECE-5
TIER ONE INSTRUCTION Comparing Fractions. Tier I Instruction Tier I is the highly effective, culturally responsive, evidence-based core or universal instruction,
Algebra 1 - Functions: Interpret & Building Functions Unit 5
TEAM-Math and AMSTI Professional Mathematics Learning Communities Building Classroom Discourse.
Warm Up Problem As you arrive, please work on the Geometric Transformation Workout (copies are on your table along with tracing paper if you wish to use.
Learning and Teaching Linear Functions Video Cases for Mathematics Professional Development, 6-10.
Rigor Breakdown Conceptual Understanding
The Standards for Mathematical Practice
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department of.
Region 11: Math & Science Teacher Center Solving Equations.
NYC Schools Task Alignment Project The Common Core State Standards Aligning and Rating Math Tasks April 28, 2011.
Exploring Cognitive Demands of Mathematical Tasks Milwaukee Public School Bernard Rahming Mathematics Teaching Specialist
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Selecting and Sequencing Students’ Solution Paths to Maximize Student Learning Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching.
NCTM Overview The Principles and Standards for Teaching Mathematics.
Task 4 Mathematics Boot Camp Fall, 2015.
Engaging Students in High Level Cognitive Tasks Marjorie Graeff April 21, 2010 Division of Teaching & Learning.
Vacaville USD December 5, AGENDA Problem Solving and Patterns Math Practice Standards and High Leverage Instructional Practices Number Talks –Computation.
Math rigor facilitating student understanding through process goals
© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Making Sense of Numbers and Operations Fraction Standards via a Set.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Study Group 7 - High School Math (Algebra 1 & 2, Geometry) Welcome Back! Let’s.
Protocols for Mathematics Performance Tasks PD Protocol: Preparing for the Performance Task Classroom Protocol: Scaffolding Performance Tasks PD Protocol:
9.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION 1 17 SEPT 2014 TAKING CHANCES (IN CONTENT AND PEDAGOGY)
1 Overview Comments on notebooks & mini- problem Teaching equitably Analyzing textbook lessons End-of-class check (Brief discussion) Introduction to multiplication.
Ensuring that Professional Development Leads to Improved Mathematics Teaching & Learning Kristen Malzahn Horizon Research, Inc. TDG Leadership Seminar.
Math & Science Collaborative Analyzing Mathematical Tasks and the Mathematical Task Framework.
Community Context Series of Community Math Nights Leadership Development for Math Support Team Mathematics Content Courses for K-20 Teachers Ongoing support.
PROCESS STANDARDS FOR MATHEMATICS. PROBLEM SOLVING The Purpose of the Problem Solving Approach The problem solving approach fosters the development of.
UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE Assessing the Mathematics Knowledge of Teachers William S. Bush University of Louisville North Carolina Association of Mathematics.
Developing and Using Meaningful Math Tasks The Key to Math Common Core Take a moment to record on a sticky: What is a meaningful Math Task?
Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’
Effective Practices and Shifts in Teaching and Learning Mathematics Dr. Amy Roth McDuffie Washington State University Tri-Cities.
Amy Jones Lewis November 2010 Green River Regional Educational Cooperative MathPLUS Content Day 1: Student-Centered Problem Solving.
National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics CCSS Standards of Mathematical Practice: Reasoning and Explaining The Common Core State Standards Illustrating.
Developing and Using Meaningful Math Tasks The Key to Math Common Core Take a moment to record on a sticky: What is a meaningful Math Task?
USING VIDEO TO THINK ABOUT WHAT THE MATH PRACTICES LOOK LIKE IN K-5 CLASSROOMS.
1 Learning to Lead Mathematics Professional Development.
Teaching & Learning Trajectories: Building Coherence, Connections, and Retention Across Grades Session 3 May 10, 2012 Oakland Schools Gerri Devine
Instructional Design and Delivery Dr. Balaa Krishnan
Instructional Leadership: Planning for Improvement.
Curiosity-Based Knowing in Developing an Inquiry Stance in Teaching Mathematics Olive Chapman University of Calgary Canada.
Slide 1 Welcome California Mathematics and Science Partnership (CaMSP) Year 2, Follow Up 3 January 22, 2011.
#1 Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them How would you describe the problem in your own words? How would you describe what you are trying.
1 Math CAMPPP 2011 Plenary 4 Responding to Student Work Over Time Students Responding to Students Assessing Algebraic Reasoning.
© Crown copyright 2006 Renewing the Frameworks Enriching and enhancing teaching and learning.
This module was developed by Margaret Smith and Victoria Bill at the University of Pittsburgh. Video courtesy of Pittsburgh Public Schools and the Institute.
This module was developed by Lynn Raith, Mathematics Curriculum Specialist K-12. Video courtesy of NYC District 2 and the Institute for Learning. These.
Developing pre-service elementary mathematics teachers’ knowledge bases through Standards-based curriculum materials Andrew M. Tyminski Clemson University.
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
Identifying Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching at the Secondary Level (6-12) from the Perspective of Practice Joint NSF-CLT Conference on Curriculum,
Session 3 Implementing Tasks: Maintaining Fidelity Reflecting on Practice: Worthwhile Tasks Reflecting on PracticePark City Mathematics Institute1.
Productive Mathematical Discussions: Working at the Confluence of Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical.
CHAPTER 3 Teaching Through Problem Solving
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 5
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 1
Olive Chapman University of Calgary Canada
Reflecting on Practice: Worthwhile Tasks
Pedagogical Content Knowledge
Pedagogical Content Knowledge – Elementary Mathematics
Presentation transcript:

1 Cathy Carroll & Judy Mumme WestEd Developing Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching

2 Purposes for Doing Mathematics in PD Some commonly identified purposes… To have a common experience for a group of people To prepare for using with students An opportunity to increase teacher content knowledge of math Begin to address particular math issue(s) Opportunity to reconstruct one’s notion of what it means to do mathematics, nature of mathematical activity Identify certain kinds of pedagogy that support learning in particular situations How do these resonate with your experience?

3 Session Overview Consider a purpose of developing teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching (with a focus on specialized content knowledge) through  Work on a mathematics task  Watch a video  Consider next steps from the video to work on MKT with teachers

4 Doing Mathematics in PD Pairs (1 minute each) What supports you in doing math in PD? What gets in the way? Small group (5 minutes) Share what things are supportive and what are not. (Note: these may be different for each person) Pairs/Small Group With this in mind, it is important to respect individual differences and provide everyone equal access in group work

5 Assume the pattern continues to grow in the same manner. Find a rule or formula to determine the number of tiles in a figure of any size. Logos What are the different ways that the geometric model can be decomposed and how can those ways be connected to symbolic expressions? How do those different expressions represent the growth of this model?

6 Considering the Task What are some expressions you came up with to represent the growth (un-simplified versions)? Whole Group

7 Considering the Task Take each of the expressions and see if you can figure out how that group was thinking about how the model was growing  What is the relationship between these expressions and the logos model? Small Group

8 Considering the Task How did you map the expressions to the logos model? Whole Group

9 Considering Purpose What potential mathematical ideas could teachers work on through the use of this task?  Why would those be good goals for teachers? Would you do that with students?  How might one’s purposes be similar/different there? Whole Group

10 Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching (MKT) Frame: knowledge “entailed by the work of teaching”  Knowledge used or needed in practice What do we mean by “knowledge”?  Mathematical knowledge, skills, habits of mind What do we mean by the “work of teaching”?  The activities in which teachers engage, and the responsibilities they have, to teach mathematics, both inside and outside of the classroom

11 Pedagogical Content Knowledge Common Content Knowledge (CCK) Specialized Content Knowledge (SCK) Knowledge of Content and Students (KCS) Knowledge of Content and Teaching (KCT) Subject Matter Knowledge Knowledge at the mathematical horizon Knowledge of curriculum Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal for Teacher Education, 59(5),

12 Common Content Knowledge (CCK) Mentally find the answer to 92-56: = 36 Knowing how to estimate that it is greater than 30 and less than 40

13 What meanings of subtraction might each represent? Do these methods always work? If so, why do they work? 56 = – 50 = = = – 52 = – 4 = = – 50 = – 6 = = = ( ) – (60 – 56) = Specialized Content Knowledge (SCK)

Pedagogical Content Knowledge Knowledge of content and students (KCS)  Knowing which approaches students are likely to use  Knowing which ways of decomposing the numbers are likely to lead to confusion (e.g. rounding the two numbers in different directions - 92 to 90 and 56 to 60 Knowledge of content and teaching (KCT)  Choosing numbers which invite particular approaches or stumbles  Choosing contexts or models to illustrate different approaches  In a whole-class, choosing which approaches or methods you want to pursue and in what order

15 Tasks of Teaching Mathematics That Require SCK Unpacking and decomposing mathematical ideas Explaining and guiding explanation Using mathematical language and notation Generating examples Making mathematical practices explicit Choosing and using representations Comparing the affordances of different representations or methods Analyzing and interpreting alternative solutions Analyzing errors Interpreting and evaluating alternative solutions and thinking Analyzing mathematical treatments in textbooks

16 SCK in Logos What SCK might it be possible to develop using the Logos task?

17 SCK in Logos How did our framing of the task focus your attention on SCK? In what ways did our discussion of the task enable consideration of SCK? Our framing of the task: What are the different ways that the geometric model can be decomposed and how can those ways be connected to symbolic expressions? How do those different expressions represent the growth of this model?

18 Pause Point What issues does this session have you thinking about now?  How are those related to your practice?

19 We’ll start back promptly at 10:30 BREAK

20 We are looking at this We are here

21 Context Group of 27 high school and middle school teachers from 6 districts Session 7 of of an ongoing series--8 Saturday sessions over the school year Small groups have worked on the logos task and posted charts with their solutions 3 groups have shared their work, and Shamshir is asked to talk about his poster Mike is the PD leader We drop in here

22 Mike and the teachers are offering us a gift of allowing us to carefully examine a real instance of practice. We are examining their practice, not critiquing them. Caveat

Mike

24 Viewing the Video We will watch the clip one time, then use it as a jumping off spot for connecting to practice, with a focus on helping teachers develop SCK

25 Frame for Viewing What approaches are teachers sharing? Suggestion: Use transcript to think about issues after viewing the video

What approaches are teachers sharing?

27 Small Group Discussion What approaches were teachers sharing?

28 Whole Group Discussion How did the approaches that were shared relate to the approaches we came up with?

29 Connecting to Practice Assume a goal of developing teachers’ understandings of how various ways of decomposing or transforming the model relate to different symbolic expressions--possibly including how they show aspects of quadratic growth (i.e., square, linear, and constant components)  How would you frame the next steps in sharing?  What solutions would you select to pursue to help develop teachers’ SCK? Why? How do they relate to your goal?  How would you sequence and connect these to achieve your goal with teachers?  How would you highlight aspects of SCK? What ideas did you consider in your process? What issues arose for you in this task? Small Group

30 Whole Group Connecting to Practice What ideas did you consider in planning? What issues arose for you?

31 Reflecting on the Experience What are you thinking about now with regard to developing SCK with teachers in PD? Small Group/Whole Group

32 A High Leverage Purpose We’re placing our bets that a focus on developing mathematical knowledge for teaching (specifically specialized content knowledge) will better enable teachers to be effective in the classroom

33 Assume the pattern continues to grow in the same manner. Find a rule or formula to determine the number of tiles in a figure of any size. Logos What are the different ways that the geometric model can be decomposed and how can those ways be connected to symbolic expressions? How do those different expressions represent the growth of this model?

34 The Mathematical Task Framework (MTF)* Tasks as set up by teachers Tasks as they appear in curricular materials Tasks as enacted by teacher and students Student learning * Smith & Stein (1998) Stein, Smith, Henningsen & Silver (2000)

35 The Mathematical Task Framework Adapted to PD* Tasks as set up by PD leader Tasks as they appear originally Tasks as enacted by PD leader & teachers Teacher learning * Kazemi 2009

36 Unpacks, makes explicit, and develops a flexible understanding of mathematical ideas that are central to the school curriculum Opens opportunities to build connections among mathematical ideas Provokes a stumble due to a superficial “understanding” of an idea Lends itself to alternative/multiple representations and solution methods Provides opportunities to engage in mathematical practices central to teaching (explaining, representing, using mathematical language, analyzing equivalences, proving, proof analysis, posing questions, writing on the board) * Suzuka, K., Sleep, L., Ball, D. L., Bass, H., Lewis, J., & Thames, M. (in press). Designing and using tasks to teach mathematical knowledge for teaching. Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators (AMTE) Monograph. Important Features of SCK Task Design*

37 Challenges of Teaching SCK Staying focused on the mathematics, and not on how to teach the math Keeping the problems focused on SCK and not just sliding to Knowledge of Content & Students or Curriculum Unpacking the mathematics sufficiently and convincingly helping teachers see what there is to learn and do Making visible the connections to the kinds of mathematical thinking, judgment, reasoning one has to do in teaching 37

38 Enactment What are key questions and moves that leaders can use to keep a task focused on developing SCK?  Asking teachers to Explain their solutions to others Make correspondences between solutions and/or representations Explain someone else’s thinking Figure out what might be confusing/difficult for someone else about the problem  Having teachers Explain what is/was confusing to them Ask questions to become clearer about their colleagues’ solutions  Providing opportunities to “talk mathematics” and write on the board  Narrating how something a teacher does/says relates to or is a skill used in teaching

39 To Learn More About… Learning to Lead Mathematics Professional Development Leadership Development Seminars  Contact Information   Web:  WestEd.org/LLMPD  WestEd.org/PLMPD