Experimenter Contributions to Booster Improvements Eric Prebys FNAL Accelerator Division.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
First Operation of MI8 Collimation Bruce C. Brown All Experimenters Meeting 22 January 2007.
Advertisements

Booster Cogging Robert Zwaska Fermilab (University of Texas at Austin) Accelerator Physics & Technology Seminar Dec. 8, 2005.
Chris Smith Booster RF Cavity Upgrade Contents: The Booster Existing RF Cavities Why Upgrade? New Cavities Prototype Plans University Involvement Prototype.
1 Proton Upgrades at Fermilab Robert Zwaska Fermilab March 12, 2007 Midwest Accelerator Physics Collaboration Meeting Indiana University Cyclotron Facility.
Linac Status Eric Prebys DOE Review, Proton Source Breakout Session July 21,2003.
All Experimenters’ Meeting January 09, Accelerator Operation Summary Calendar Week # 51 NuMI Weekly Integrated Intensity 8.81E18 protons BNB Weekly.
Near Term* Plans for the Fermilab Proton Source Eric Prebys FNAL Accelerator Division *Near term = “prior to proton driver”
NOvA meeting PIP Update W. Pellico. PIP Goals and Scope (Provided in 2011 – Directorate S. H. / DOE Talk ) Goals: Specific to the issues surrounding the.
F UEC - 6 Oct 06 Recent FNAL Collider Operations Ron Moore Fermilab – Tevatron Dept.
Proton Plan PMG 3/22/07 E Prebys 1 Proton Plan Status February Eric Prebys.
NuMI NuMI Overview NBI 2002 S. Childress (FNAL) 14 March ‘02 NuMI / MINOS Overview.
Proton Plans at Fermilab Robert Zwaska - Fermilab Science and Engineering at Henderson- DUSEL Capstone Workshop Stony Brook University May 5, 2006 Outline.
SNuMI: Phase I & Phase II Nancy Grossman Phase I: $33.4M FY06$ (no contingency, no G&A) 41% contingency Phase II: $53.7M FY06$ (no contingency, no G&A)
Commissioning of the Fermilab Accelerators for NuMI Operation Robert Zwaska University of Texas at Austin NBI 2003 November 7, 2003.
F MI High Power Operation and Future Plans Ioanis Kourbanis (presented by Bruce Brown) HB2008 August 25, 2008.
Run II DOE Review - Booster Eric Prebys Booster Group Leader FNAL Beams Division.
Mu2e WBS 2 Accelerator Progress Report Mu2e WGM 6/15/2011 Steve Werkema L2 Manager for the Accelerator Systems.
Proton Plan Director’s Review 8/15/06 Prebys 2006 Shutdown Eric Prebys, FNAL Accelerator Division.
AAC February 4-6, 2003 Protons on Target Ioanis Kourbanis MI/Beams.
Proton Planning Eric Prebys FNAL Accelerator Division.
Dog( leg )s of War Eric Prebys Run II Meeting March 13, 2003.
Proton Study Meeting 4/19/05 Eric Prebys 1 Proton Plan Stage I Eric Prebys.
The MINER A Operations Report All Experimenters Meeting Howard Budd, University of Rochester Sep 26, 2011.
Proton Source: Linac and Booster Elliott McCrory AAC Review February 4, 2003.
F Proton Plan Eric Prebys, FNAL Accelerator Division.
Diagnostics in the Fermilab Proton Source (Linac + Booster) Eric Prebys FNAL Beams Division.
Booster Cogging Bob Zwaska University of Texas at Austin Bill Pellico FNAL.
The “Run II Era” The proton source is very close the the specifications in the Run II Handbook. Although it’s the highest priority, support of collider.
Booster Cogging: Synchronization with the Main Injector for NuMI & Slip-Stacking Robert Zwaska University of Texas at Austin Budker Seminar July 27, 2004.
Booster Issues for NuMI Eric Prebys FNAL Beams Division.
Proton Improvement Plan Keith Gollwitzer January 5th, 2015 All Experimenters’ Meeting 11/5/2015Gollwitzer AEM.
Proton Plan PMG 7/7/05 E Prebys 1 Proton Plan Status June Report Eric Prebys.
F Proton Plan Eric Prebys, FNAL Accelerator Division.
Proton Source 1/12/07 E Prebys 1 Proton Delivery Because MiniBooNE is off.
F All Experimenters' Mtg - 2 Jun 03 Weeks in Review: 05/19/03 –06/02/03 Keith Gollwitzer – FNAL Stores and Operations Summary Standard Plots.
Getting the Booster to 2010 Eric Prebys December 20, 2002 Outine Longevity Issues Non-radiation related Radiation related Personnel Performance Issues.
Recent Work Towards Increasing the AP2 & Debuncher Aperture – Keith Gollwitzer – May 9, Recent Work Towards Increasing the AP2 & Debuncher Aperture.
What’s Up in the Booster Eric Prebys February 27, 2002 and March 6, 2003.
Proton Planning – Major Projects, Schedule, Decisions, and Projections Eric Prebys FNAL Accelerator Division.
Doug Michael Sep. 16, GeV protons 1.9 second cycle time 4x10 13 protons/pulse 0.4 MW! Single turn extraction (10  s) 4x10 20 protons/year 700.
Proton Plan PMG 2/23/06 E Prebys 1 Proton Plan Status January Report Eric Prebys.
Proton Plan Expectations Eric Prebys AD/Proton Source.
How Can Experimenters Help Improve Accelerator Operations? Jean Slaughter UEC Meeting November 22, 2003.
Run II PMG 1/19/06 Pushpa Bhat 1 Run II Upgrades Status January 2006 Pushpa Bhat.
F Proton Plan Eric Prebys, FNAL Accelerator Division.
Proton Plan PMG 2/22/07 E Prebys 1 Proton Plan Status January Eric Prebys.
Status of the Accelerator Complex Keith Gollwitzer Antiproton Source Accelerator Division Fermilab 2009 Fermilab Users’ Meeting.
Users' Mtg - 4 Jun 08 FNAL Accelerator Complex Status Ron Moore Fermilab – AD / Tevatron Dept.
SNuMI: WBS 1.1 Booster Upgrades Eric Prebys $642K FY06$ (no contingency, no G&A) xx% contingency Main Injector & Recycler BNB NuMI Tunnel Booster Ring.
Proton Planning Eric Prebys FNAL Accelerator Division.
Proton Plan PMG 10/13/05 E Prebys 1 Proton Plan Status September Report Eric Prebys.
Barrier RF Stacking Weiren Chou and Dave Wildman Fermilab, U.S.A. October 20, 2004 Presentation at the Proton Driver Session ICFA-HB2004, Bensheim, Germany,
Setting BLM Limits in the Booster The Booster is now delivering all the protons needed by the collider program, and about 40% of the protons needed by.
The Proton Source (mostly Booster) in the “Collider Era” Eric Prebys February 3, 2003.
Proton Plan Director’s Review 8/15/06 Prebys Proton Plan Answers to Questions Director’s Review August 2006 Eric Prebys.
Proton Plan Eric Prebys, FNAL Accelerator Division.
Proton Plan PMG 4/18/05 E Prebys/J. Sims 1 Proton Plan Status March Report Eric Prebys Jeff Sims.
F Proton Plan Eric Prebys, FNAL Accelerator Division.
Toward a Proton Plan Eric Prebys Fermilab Accelerator Division.
Proton Source Meeting, August 8, 2003 – E. Prebys 1 Major Projects in Linac/Booster  New Linac Lambertson  (4) New EDWA magnets in MI-8 line  (3) New.
Proton Improvement Plan Bob Zwaska September 9, 2013 All-Experimenters Meeting.
PAC Meeting, December 12, Prebys 1 The Problem.
Run II Status Keith Gollwitzer Temple Review July 1, 2003.
Proton Plan Eric Prebys, FNAL Accelerator Division.
Limitations to Total Booster Flux Total protons per batch: 4E12 with decent beam loss, 5E12 max. Average rep rate of the machine: –Injection bump magnets.
Booster Status, September 4, 2003 – E. Prebys 1 Frantic Shutdown Preparations Continue…
Proton Economics Eric Prebys FNAL Accelerator Division.
Accelerator Division View Sergei Nagaitsev DOE Independent Project Review of PIP-II 16 June 2015.
Booster Corrector Review, Oct. 10 th, 2006 E. Prebys Introduction/Specifications Eric Prebys Proton Plan Manager.
Toward an Improved Model of the Fermilab Booster Synchrotron A. Drozhdin, J.-F. Ostiguy and W. Chou Beam Physics Department Introduction The Booster is.
Presentation transcript:

Experimenter Contributions to Booster Improvements Eric Prebys FNAL Accelerator Division

AEM, June 14 th, Prebys 2 General  The Booster has exceeded the Run II handbook specification for protons to the pBar target  Slip-stacking the only thing left for Run II  Challenges come from neutrino program  The present MiniBooNE and near future NuMI experiments depend critically on the performance of the Booster.  When these experiments were initially approved, there was no evidence whatsoever that the Booster could meet the need.  Luckily, the experiments came to understand this, and have provided and continue to provide valuable help:  People (studies, calculations, general help)  Fabrication (hardware, machine shop time)  Money (well, yeah)  “Advocacy” (very important)

AEM, June 14 th, Prebys 3 Challenges in the Booster  Repetition Rate  Injection system  Extraction septum  RF system  Peak Intensity (batch size):  RF  Tuning  Transition  damping  Beam loss  Tuning  Lattice Improvements  Beam control  Collimation  Above-ground radiation  Calculation  Shielding  Work area re-classification  Multi-batch issues  Beam cogging  Reliability and Basic Understanding  Monitoring  Analysis

AEM, June 14 th, Prebys 4 Proton Demand

AEM, June 14 th, Prebys 5 Early Contributions from MiniBooNE  Shielding and Loss Calculations:  Eric Zimmerman (Colorado U)  Randy Johnson (U. Cincinnati)  Goeff Mills (LANL)  Dipole Corrector Studies:  Jocelyn Monroe (Columbia)  Morgan Wascoe (LSU)  Linda Coney (Columbia)  General Booster Studies  Adam Malik (LSU)  Linday Coney (Columbia)  Jocelyn Monroe (Columbia)  Total loss monitors  Yan Liu (U. Michigan)

AEM, June 14 th, Prebys 6 RF Prototype Cavities – it takes a village  Originally planned to build one large-aperture RF cavity based on a proton driver R&D proposal  With the help of university machine shops, we were able to build two at a much lower price that one would have cost:  Princeton (MiniBooNE)  CalTech (NuMI)  Columbia (MiniBooNE)  Tufts (NuMI)  Indiana (MiniBooNE)  U. Texas, Austin (NuMI)  University Coordination:  Doug Michael (CalTech)  Chris Smith (CalTech)  Bill Sands (Princeton)  Construction an unmitigated success  All parts delivered on time  NO mistakes.  One cavity will go in this fall and another in 2005 (as 19 th and 20 th cavities)

AEM, June 14 th, Prebys 7 Fall 2003 Shutdown Work  Collimator System  Initial collimator design abandoned as unworkable in late 2002  Aggressive new design in 2003 Larry Bartoszek, chief mechanical engineer (MiniBooNE)  Installation originally cancelled for 2003 shutdown Columbia rescued it with a $300K loan.  Dogleg modifications  Indiana provided a $100K loan to complete some of the miscellaneous installation and magnet work.

AEM, June 14 th, Prebys 8 Current Projects  Booster Cogging  Needed for both NuMI and pBar multi-batch operation  B. Zwaska (NuMI, U. Texas, Austin/FNAL Accel. PhD)  Booster Ramp Monitoring  Monitor and alarm ramped devices  Ami Choi (MiniBooNE, Columbia)  Booster Rad Robot  Use a robot to monitor both real time loss and activation in the Booster  $35K NSF grant through Columbia  Dave Schmidt (Columbia) working on software

AEM, June 14 th, Prebys 9 Successes MiniBooNE (15x protons) protons Raw Activation Normalized activation collimators

AEM, June 14 th, Prebys 10 Activation (since collimators)

AEM, June 14 th, Prebys 11 Recent Records  Protons per pulse: 6.06E12 (Run II=5E12)  Protons per hr to MiniBooNE: 7.5E16 (80% MiniBooNE goal)

AEM, June 14 th, Prebys 12 Some Comments  If experiments depend critically on accelerator performance, it’s vital that experimentors get involved.  The contributions from MiniBooNE and NuMI have been very important to the Booster, but…  Most of the work has come from the lab, both from the proton source department and other departments, who have not been thanked here.  While on the topic of “outside help”, I should mention Argonne (Jim Norem, Kathy Harkay, Jeff Dooling):  Transition work  $$ for dogleg modification.