Argument Theory. SOCRATES: … And so come, Gorgias, imagine you are questioned by these men and by myself as well, and answer what it is you claim to be.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Basic Terms in Logic Michael Jhon M. Tamayao.
Advertisements

A Note on Straight-Thinking A supplementary note for the 2nd Annual JTS/CGST Public Ethics Lecture March 5, 2002(b), adj. 2009:03:05 G.E.M. of TKI.
Chapter 4: Enforcing the Law 4 How Can Disputes Be Resolved Privately?
Argument Analysis Understanding the structure of an argument.
Chapter 1 Critical Thinking.
Argument Structure. Arg.A.“All men are animals and all animals are mortal and Socrates is a man so Socrates is mortal.” with base: F.B:< ‘All men are.
Logic & Critical Reasoning Identifying arguments.
Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Fall 2007 Dr. Robert Barnard.
Debate. Inductive Reasoning When you start with a probable truth, and seek evidence to support it. Most scientific theories are inductive. Evidence is.
Persuasion. What Is It? Persuade – To convince someone to change their stance or opinion of something.
Assessing and Developing Argument ©
Definitions – John Dewey
CS5371 Theory of Computation
BASIC CONCEPTS OF ARGUMENTS
EE1J2 – Discrete Maths Lecture 5 Analysis of arguments (continued) More example proofs Formalisation of arguments in natural language Proof by contradiction.
1 Arguments in Philosophy Introduction to Philosophy.
Over the years since federation, the High Court has been called on to interpret many sections of the Constitution and to determine how they apply in practical.
Part 1 Simple Essays Essay When it comes to writing an Essay, brainstorming is very important. Choose what the main idea of your essay is going to be,
Debate. Inductive Reasoning When you start with a probable truth, and seek evidence to support it. Most scientific theories are inductive. Evidence is.
Can Big Questions Be Begged?. Fallacies are mistakes in inference, BUT Begging the question is not a mistake in inference. Is it a fallacy at all? Robinson.
Invitation to Critical Thinking Chapter 3 Lecture Notes Chapter 3.
Logic is the study of the principles of correct reasoning associated with the formation and analysis of arguments.
Steps for Writing a STAAR Persuasive Essay
Chapter 1: Lecture Notes What Is an Argument? (and What is Not?)
Logical Arguments. Strength 1.A useless argument is one in which the truth of the premisses has no effect at all on the truth of the conclusion. 2.A weak.
FALSE PREMISE.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 3 Formalizing an argument By David Kelsey.
CT (critical thinking) in Economics When economists reason, they make arguments, they deduce from hypotheses, they create models, and they offer explanations.
4 th CENTURY BC. Aristotle & Socrates Can you guess who is who and why?
Persuasive Appeals Logos AP LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION.
The Art of Persuasion Attempts to persuade us – to believe something, to do something – are everywhere. How can we learn to think critically about such.
2.8 Methods of Proof PHIL 012 1/26/2001.
Lesson#1 – What is an argument and how do I know its parts?
Research Skills Mr. BETA Aim: How do you conduct proper research for a paper or project? Do Now: In your notebooks, Define: * Argument *
DEDUCTIVE VS. INDUCTIVE REASONING. Problem Solving Logic – The science of correct reasoning. Reasoning – The drawing of inferences or conclusions from.
Breaking Down An Arguments Into Propositions
Critical Thinking. Critical thinkers use reasons to back up their claims. What is a claim? ◦ A claim is a statement that is either true or false. It must.
BBI 3420 Critical Reading and Thinking Critical Reading Strategies: Identifying Arguments.
Argument Diagramming Part I
Do Now  What does logos appeal to in an advertisement?  Give three examples.
History of Philosophy Lecture 5 Formalizing an argument
Sentence (syntactically Independent grammatical unit) QuestionCommandStatement “This is a class in logic.” “I enjoy logic.” “Today is Friday.”
Understanding the Persuasive Techniques in Developing Arguments How a speech can soothe and inspire a grieving population.
Argument. Persuasion vs Argument Persuasive WritingArgumentative Writing Goal: To get reader to agree with you on a particular topic Goal: to get reader.
The Art of Persuasion Attempts to persuade us – to believe something, to do something – are everywhere. How can we learn to think critically about such.
Logic: The Language of Philosophy. What is Logic? Logic is the study of argumentation o In Philosophy, there are no right or wrong opinions, but there.
ARGUMENTS Chapter 15. INTRODUCTION All research projects require some argumentation An argument simply ‘combines’ existing facts to derive new facts,
Argument.
Persuasive Texts Understanding Argument. Definitions Argument: A set of statements where it is claimed that one statement (conclusion) is true and supported.
Author’s Position.  An author’s position on a topic refers to what the author thinks about the topic, his or her perspective on the subject.
Epistemology TIPS 1. What is Truth & Knowledge? 2. How can one determine truth from falsehood? 3. What are the pre- suppositions to knowledge?
Repairing Arguments. Need to repair arguments  We can and must rewrite many arguments by adding an unstated premise or even an unstated conclusion.
Categorical Propositions Chapter 5. Deductive Argument A deductive argument is one whose premises are claimed to provide conclusive grounds for the truth.
Do now Can you make sure that you have finished your Venn diagrams from last lesson. Can you name 5 famous mathematicians (including one that is still.
ACADEMIC ENGLISH III Sept. 24, What is the author trying to argue? How does he/she support his/her point? What kind of evidence is used? Do you.
Arguments and Conclusions
FALSE PREMISE.
Deductive Arguments.
Argumentation and Persuasion
The Ontological Argument
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
Arguments.
Building Argument and Integrating Evidence
Know Your Reading Strategies
The Ontological Argument
The Power of Critical Thinking
Analyzing and Evaluating Arguments
Elements of an Argument
Presentation transcript:

Argument Theory

SOCRATES: … And so come, Gorgias, imagine you are questioned by these men and by myself as well, and answer what it is you claim to be the greatest blessing to man, and claim also to produce. GORGIAS: Something, Socrates, that is in very truth the greatest boon, for it brings freedom to each man, and to each man also dominion over others in his own country. SOCRATES: And what exactly do you mean by that? GORGIAS: I mean the power to convince by your words the judges in court, the senators in Council, the people in the Assembly, or in any other gathering of a citizen body. And yet possessed of such power you will make the doctor and the trainer your slave, and your businessman will prove to be making money, not for himself, but for another, in fact for you who can speak and persuade multitudes. (Plato, Gorgias, 452d-e)

F. An argument is a set of claims called the premisses, and another claim called the conclusion, such that a person puts forward the premises to try to persuade others to accept the conclusion on the grounds that the latter is guaranteed by the former.

D1.The Proponent. The person(s) attempting the persuasion. D2.The Respondent. The person(s) being subjected to an attempt at persuasion. D3.The Inducement. The technique of persuasion which the proponent uses. The Target. The thing that the proponent is trying to persuade the respondent to accept.

D1.Argument Formation is a sequence of statements in which a.the final member is called the Conclusion, and b.the other members are called the Premisses. D2.An Argument Base for an inducement is an argument formation in which the conclusion is he target of the inducement. An argument base defines premisses and conclusion for the inducement. D3.An Argument specifies an argument base. Arg.A.“All men are mortal and Socrates is a man so Socrates is mortal.” F.A:< ‘All men are mortal’, ‘Socrates is a man’, ‘Socrates is mortal’ > An Effective argument is one such that just recognising the argument base causes the respondent to feel the Argument Intuition, so that the respondent is more disposed to accept the target if the other statements are accepted.

Premiss A word or phrase to signal that a local passage contains statements Indicator that can play the role of premisses. EG: Because, since, for, as we see from the following. NB: In cases where there is ambiguity or uncertainty in determining whether a word or phrase is acting as a premiss indicator, replace with ‘because’ and determine whether the meaning has changed. If it has not then it was a premiss indicator. ‘Since I’ve repaired the car I can drive to Melbourne.’ ‘Since I repaired the car I’ve driven to Melbourne.’ Conclusion A word or phrase to signal that a local passage contains a statement Indicator that can play the role of a conclusion. EG: therefore, hence, so, implying, thus, consequently. NB: In cases where there is ambiguity or uncertainty in determining whether a word or phrase is acting as a conclusion indicator, replace with ‘therefore’ and determine whether the meaning has changed. If it has not then it was a conclusion indicator. ‘I’ve repaired the car, so I can drive to Melbourne.’ ‘I repaired the car so that I could drive to Melbourne.’ Argument A word or phrase to signal that a local passage contains an Indicator argument.Premiss and conclusion indicators are argument indicators.

D1.An argument is said to be in Standard Form just in case it looks like this: Premise 1... Premise n  Conclusion E.g. All men are mortal Socrates is a man Socrates is mortal

Arg.A.“All men are animals and all animals are mortal and Socrates is a man so Socrates is mortal.” F.B:< ‘All men are animals’, ‘All animals are mortal’, ‘Socrates is a man’, ‘Socrates is mortal’ >

D1.An Effective Argument Formation for the respondent is an argument formation whose recognition causes the respondent to feel the Argument Intuition, so that the respondent is more disposed to accept the conclusion if the premisses are accepted. Arg.B.“All men are animals and all animals are mortal and Socrates is a man so Socrates is mortal.” F.B:< ‘All men are animals’, ‘All animals are mortal’, ‘Socrates is a man’, ‘Socrates is mortal’ > F.1:< ‘All men are animals’, ‘All animals are mortal’, ‘All men are mortal’ > F.2:< ‘All men are mortal’ ‘Socrates is a man’, ‘Socrates is mortal’ >

D1.An Argument Completion associated with an argument is a sequence of argument formations where: a.Each premiss of the base appears as a premiss in at least one formation in the sequence, b.The final formation in the sequence has the target as its conclusion. D2.An Argument specifies: a.An argument base, b.An argument completion. D3.An Effective Argument Completion for the respondent is an argument completion whose recognition causes the respondent to feel the Argument Intuition, so that the respondent is more disposed to accept the conclusion of the argument if the premisses are accepted. An Effective Argument for the respondent specifies a base and an effective completion for the respondent.

FidelityA principle of interpretation that demands that a passage be interpreted in a way that remains faithful to what the author actually states. CharityA principle of interpretation that demands that a passage be interpreted in a way that does most credit to the rationality of the author.