Justice & Fairness Approach LP: Ethical Theories Presentation By: Nelita, Brandon Keshia,Jennifer Section: Tuesday 5:30 April 1, 2008.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Advertisements

Rawlsian Contract Approach Attempts to reconcile utilitarianism and intuitionism. Attempts to reconcile utilitarianism and intuitionism. Theory of distributive.

Justice as Fairness by John Rawls.

"... reason accepts no authority above itself and is necessarily subversive." - Allan Bloom, The Closing of the American Mind (1987), p. 258.

Kristin Mike Olvina Santigo Cassie Carlson Travis Langolf LP5- Ethical Theories Presentation Performance Assessment Task 6 10/27/2009.

PHIL 104 (STOLZE) Notes on Heather Widdows, Global Ethics: An Introduction, chapter 4.

360 Business Ethics Chapter 4. Moral facts derived from reason Reason has three properties that have bearing on moral facts understood as the outcomes.

Justice as Fairness by John Rawls.

Ethics and Morality Theory Part 2 11 September 2006.

COMP 381. Agenda  TA: Caitlyn Losee  Books and movies nominations  Team presentation signup Beginning of class End of class  Rawls and Moors.

John Rawls' theory of justice ~ slide 1 John Rawls’ theory of justice zIn A Theory of Justice –1. The basis for the theory äA revised version of.

Justice as Fairness: A Closer Look by Tom Lupkie James Noonan Brian Rodriguez October 6, 2008 A-115, Professor Charles Willie.

John Rawls, Who? GETTING TO THE ASSIGNED ARTICLE: A THEORY OF JUSTICE (1971) HOW WERE PEOPLE THINKG ABOUT ETHICS AND JUSTICE? – Utilitarian.

Ethical Principle of Justice principle of justice –involves giving to all persons their "rights" or "desserts" –the distribution of various resources in.

Contemporary Liberalism: John Rawls: Justice as Fairness l All citizens should share in a society’s wealth and be given equal economic opportunities l.

THE RIGHTS APPROACH Jill Stiemsma M, 8:30 Ethical Theories Presentation April 21, 2008.

THEORIES ABOUT RIGHT ACTION (ETHICAL THEORIES)

Rawls John Rawls ( ): A Theory of Justice (Harvard UP, 1971) -and other books, notably Political Liberalism (1990) -and Justice as Fairness Restated.

Andrea Wellenstein, Jill Kollmann, Heather Lammers, and Britni Klein Monday at 1:30-4:30 Ethical Theories Presentations April 6 th, 2010.

THE LIMITS OF CONSTITUTIONAL JUSTICE Dr Murray Wesson.

January 20, Liberalism 2. Social Contract Theory 3. Utilitarianism and Intuitionism 4. Justice as Fairness – general conception 5. Principles.

Equality and Inequality: Perspectives from Political Theory

Chapter One: Moral Reasons

JUSTICE OR FAIRNESS APPROACH

 Rawls was influenced by Kant and Aristotle  An American Philosopher  Wrote the Following: A Theory of Justice, Political Liberalism, The Law of Peoples,

“To be able under all circumstances to practise five things constitutes perfect virtue; these five things are gravity, generosity of soul, sincerity, earnestness.

Business Ethics Week 3. Article on: You See, the Ends Don’t Justify the Means: Visual Imagery and Moral Judgment Visual imagery and Moral judgement –

Ethical Theories Presentation LP 5 Melissa Sweet, Tara Guelig, Katherine Norton April 9 th,2009.

Rawls on justice Michael Lacewing co.uk.

Contractualism and justice (1) Introduction to Rawls’s theory.

Kantian Ethics: Rights Approach Ethical Theories Presentation Prepared by: Nicole George Julie Bublitz Bee Vang Section: Thursday, 8:30 March 26, 2008.

CHAPTER EIGHT: SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY P H I L O S O P H Y A Text with Readings TENTH EDITION M A N U E L V E L A S Q U E Z.

John Rawls A Theory of Justice PULSE – April 16, 2013.

Rawls III: Social justice: an ahistorical account? PHIL 2345.

LIBERTY, EQUALITY AND JUSTICE GONDA YUMITRO. LIBERTY Liberty is the ultimate moral ideal. Individuals have rights to life, liberty, and property that.

Chapter One: Moral Reasons Review Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth.

January 20, Liberalism 2. Social Contract Theory 3. Utilitarianism and Intuitionism 4. Justice as Fairness – general conception 5. Principles.

Distributive Justice John Rawls. Which is better? MusicCheese 65.

Justice as Fairness John Rawls PHL 110: ETHICS North Central College.

Justice and Economic Distribution

Three Modern Approaches. Introduction Rawls, Nozick, and MacIntyre Rawls, Nozick, and MacIntyre Have significant new approaches Have significant new approaches.

Equity and Sustainability. Roseland and Equity North/South comparison … fairness The developed nations need to consider ‘our own poor’ … Definitional:

Justice as Fairness by John Rawls. Rawls looks at justice. Kant’s ethics and Utilitarianism are about right and wrong actions. For example: Is it ethical.

1 Ethical Issues in Computer Science CSCI 328, Fall 2013 Session 5 Analogical Reasoning.

Justice/Fairness Approach Learning Plan #5 Sara Deibert, Sara Roxbury, Allie Forsythe, Robert Phillips March 31,2008.

John Rawls Theory of Justice. John Rawls John Rawls (February 21, 1921 – November 24, 2002) was an American philosopher and a figure in moral and political.

Rationality in Decision Making In Law Nisigandha Bhuyan, IIMC.

DEONTOLOGICAL ETHICS (CH. 2.0) © Wanda Teays. All rights reserved.

Deontological Approaches Consequences of decisions are not always the most important elements as suggested by the consequentialist approach. The way you.

Social Ethics continued Immanuel Kant John Rawls.

© 2012 Wanda Teays. All rights reserved. Rawls, like Kant, is a Deontological Ethicist. He emphasizes moral duty and obligations, rather than end goals.

John Rawls By Othello Jimenez. John Rawls

PHIL 104 (STOLZE) Notes on Heather Widdows, Global Ethics: An Introduction, chapter 4.

History of Philosophy.

John Rawls’ theory of justice

Business Ethics Dr. Aravind Banakar –

Business Ethics Dr. Aravind Banakar –

Business Ethics

Business Ethics

Business Ethics

Business Ethic s

Rawls’ Theory of Justice

John rawls -an American moral and political philosopher

Ethical Theories Ethical Theories Unit 5.

Three Dimensions of Justice

John Rawls Theory of Justice.

A Text with Readings TENTH EDITION M A N U E L V E L A S Q U E Z

Professional Ethics (GEN301/PHI200) UNIT 3: JUSTICE AND ECONOMIC DISTRIBUTION Handout #3 CLO#3 Evaluate the relation between justice, ethics and economic.

Social and economic inequalities are arranged so that they are both:

Presentation transcript:

Justice & Fairness Approach LP: Ethical Theories Presentation By: Nelita, Brandon Keshia,Jennifer Section: Tuesday 5:30 April 1, 2008

Justice & Fairness “All equals should be treated equally.” -Aristotle

The Principle States: "Treat people the same unless there are morally relevant differences between them.“

He was the most notable product of the educational program devised by Plato. A famous Greek Philosopher Aristotle

John Rawls Harvard Philosopher Two Rules:  Each person is to have an equal right to the most extensive basic liberty compatible with similar liberty for others.  Social and Economic inequalities are to be arranged so that they are both: a) reasonably expected to be to everyone’s advantage and b) attached to positions and offices open to all.

Difference between Aristotle & Rawls  Aristotle :Equality amongst each other  Rawls: Social balance

Problem (s) with Justice Approach  We may not always agree on who is equal  Who gets to decide who is equal  Who constitutes fairness

Questions to think about:  Would you consider an 18 year old an equal adult?  Do you consider an immigrant equal compared to a natural born citizen?

Application of Relief Funds For September 11 th Tragedy

Attack on Twin Towers

Positive Effects of the Relief Funds  Families get support * Emotional * Financial * Physical * Educational

Negative effects of the Relief Funds  Impossible to determine how much each victim suffered  Is there going to be money there for future relief efforts?  Where does money come from?  Are people worthy of the compensations?

Rebuilding Hope

Review Questions:  Who is the Greek Philosopher that taught the justice theory?  What is the Justice/Fairness Approach?  What is the difference between Rawls and Aristotle’s Theories?

Questions?