Albert-Einstein-Institut www.aei-potsdam.mpg.de Black Hole Initial Data for Evolution Distorted Black Holes: “Brill Wave plus Black Hole” (NCSA model)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Aim: Creating the model of thermal decomposition of energetic material (tetryl). Data:4 results (data sets) of DSC experiment carried out in linear heating.
Advertisements

Numerical Relativity & Gravitational waves I.Introduction II.Status III.Latest results IV.Summary M. Shibata (U. Tokyo)
Maximal Slicing of Schwarzschild or The One-Body-Problem of Numerical Relativity Bernd Reimann Mexico City, 8/12/2003 ICN, UNAM AEI.
07 Nov 2003Gravitational Wave Phenomenology Workshop1 Numerical Relativity Deirdre ShoemakerCornell University  The role of numerical relativity in gravitational-wave.
Current status of numerical relativity Gravitational waves from coalescing compact binaries Masaru Shibata (Yukawa Institute, Kyoto University)
Recent results with Goddard AMR codes Dae-Il (Dale) Choi NASA/Goddard, USRA Collaborators J. Centrella, J. Baker, J. van Meter, D. Fiske, B. Imbiriba (NASA/Goddard)
BSSN: why/when does it work? Miguel Alcubierre Mexico City, May 2002.
Pennsylvania State University Joint work at Southampton University Ulrich Sperhake Ray d’Inverno Robert Sjödin James Vickers Cauchy characteristic matching.
EMMI - Hot Matter Aug 2010 | Vienna, Austria Colliding black holes Vitor Cardoso (CENTRA/IST & Olemiss)  PRL101:161101,2008; PRL103:131102,2009;
ASYMPTOTIC STRUCTURE IN HIGHER DIMENSIONS AND ITS CLASSIFICATION KENTARO TANABE (UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA) based on KT, Kinoshita and Shiromizu PRD
Improved constrained scheme for the Einstein equations: an approach to the uniqueness issue in collaboration with Pablo Cerdá-Durán Harald Dimmelmeier.
Black hole binary mergers: recent developments in numerical relativity First-term presentation By Nikos Fanidakis Supervisors: Carlton Baugh, Shaun Cole,
Gravitational Physics Personnel:C. R. Evans B. Brill T. Garrett M. Peppers ResearchSources of Gravitational Radiation Interests:Numerical Relativity &
Gravitational Radiation Energy From Radial In-fall Into Schwarzschild and Kerr Geometries Project for Physics 879, Professor A. Buonanno, University of.
1 Binary Black Holes, Gravitational Waves, & Numerical Relativity Joan Centrella NASA/GSFC Bernard’s Cosmic Stories June 2006 Valencia, Spain.
Some Interesting Topics on QNM QNM in time-dependent Black hole backgrounds QNM of Black Strings QNM of colliding Black Holes.
The 2d gravity coupled to a dilaton field with the action This action ( CGHS ) arises in a low-energy asymptotic of string theory models and in certain.
13.3 Black Holes: Gravity’s Ultimate Victory Our Goals for Learning What is a black hole? What would it be like to visit a black hole? Do black holes really.
LIGO-G Z Merger phase simulations of binary- systems: status Waveforms – today BH-BH BH-NS NS-NS Main difficulties/unknowns Outlook (for some.
Schwarzschild Perturbations in the Lorenz Gauge Leor Barack (Soton) Carlos Lousto (UTB)
1 Yasushi Mino Theoretical AstroPhysics Including Relativity (TAPIR), CalTech Index 1: Introduction: LISA project 2: MiSaTaQuWa.
Forming Nonsingular Black Holes from Dust Collapse by R. Maier (Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas-Rio de Janeiro) I. Damião Soares (Centro Brasileiro.
Black hole production in preheating Teruaki Suyama (Kyoto University) Takahiro Tanaka (Kyoto University) Bruce Bassett (ICG, University of Portsmouth)
A New Code for Axisymmetric Numerical Relativity Eric Hircshmann, BYU Steve Liebling, LIU Frans Pretorius, UBC Matthew Choptuik CIAR/UBC Black Holes III.
Albert-Einstein-Institut What I hope we achieve at this Workshop Inspired by Kruegersdorp Ed Seidel Albert-Einstein-Institut.
Einstein’s elusive waves
Galaxy Collisions Top left is an image of the Cartwheel galaxy. The ring of young stars was likely created as a smaller galaxy passed through the disk.
“Models of Gravity in Higher Dimensions”, Bremen, Aug , 2008.
Precession during merger R. O’Shaughnessy (UWM) J. Healy, L. London, D. Shoemaker (Georgia Tech) Midwest Relativity Meeting, Chicago arXiv:
Louisiana State University Numerical Simulations of Colliding Black Holes General Motivation: why is this so important now? –Understanding.
1+log slicing in gravitational collapse. Ingredients of successful binary black hole simulations Pretorius Generalized harmonic coordinates Excision ____________________________.
Self-Force and the m-mode regularization scheme Sam Dolan (with Leor Barack) University of Southampton BriXGrav, Dublin 2010.
1 Calculating Gravitational Wave Signatures from Black Hole Binary Coalescence Joan Centrella Laboratory for High Energy Astrophysics NASA/GSFC The Astrophysics.
Black holes sourced by a massless scalar KSM2105, FRANKFURT July, 21th 2015 M. Cadoni, University of Cagliari We construct asymptotically flat black hole.
Sources of Gravitational Radiation EU Astrophysics Network Overview Ed Seidel Albert-Einstein-Institute Principal Network Coordinator.
1 Building Bridges: CGWA Inauguration 15 December 2003 Lazarus Approach to Binary Black Hole Modeling John Baker Laboratory for High Energy Astrophysics.
Initial Data for Magnetized Stars in General Relativity Eric Hirschmann, BYU MG12, Paris, July 2009.
Numerical Relativity is still Relativity ERE Salamanca 2008 Palma Group Alic, Dana · Bona, Carles · Bona-Casas, Carles.
Boson Star collisions in GR ERE 2006 Palma de Mallorca, 6 September 2006 Carlos Palenzuela, I.Olabarrieta, L.Lehner & S.Liebling.
Initial data for binary black holes: the conformal thin- sandwich puncture method Mark D. Hannam UTB Relativity Group Seminar September 26, 2003.
Cactus Workshop - NCSA Sep 27 - Oct Cactus For Relativistic Collaborations Ed Seidel Albert Einstein Institute
Cosmological Heavy Ion Collisions: Colliding Neutron Stars and Black Holes Chang-Hwan Lee Current Status of Numerical Approaches.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California CC & M. Vallisneri, PRD.
Manuela Campanelli, LSC Worshop 3/20/2002 The Lazarus Project: Modeling gravitational radiation from coalescing binary black holes MANUELA CAMPANELLI Department.
Computational General Relativistic Astrophysics at Wash U: What are we doing lately? Nov., 2006 Numerical Relativity Group Washington University.
Gravitational collapse of massless scalar field Bin Wang Shanghai Jiao Tong University.
Black Hole Universe -BH in an expanding box- Yoo, Chulmoon ( YITP) Hiroyuki Abe (Osaka City Univ.) Ken-ichi Nakao (Osaka City Univ.) Yohsuke Takamori (Osaka.
Cosmological Heavy Ion Collisions: Colliding Neutron Stars and Black Holes Chang-Hwan Lee
KERR BLACK HOLES Generalized BH description includes spin –Later researchers use it to predict new effects!! Two crucial surfaces –inner surface = horizon.
Gravitational Self-force on a Particle in the Schwarzschild background Hiroyuki Nakano (Osaka City) Norichika Sago (Osaka) Wataru Hikida (Kyoto, YITP)
Carles Bona Tomas Ledvinka Carlos Palenzuela Miroslav Zacek Mexico, December 2003 Checking AwA tests with Z4 ( comenzando la revolucion rapida) ( comenzando.
1 Yasushi Mino ( 蓑 泰 志 ) WUGRAV, Washington University at St. Louis Index 1: Introduction 2: Self-force in a Linear Perturbation.
Gauge conditions for black hole spacetimes Miguel Alcubierre ICN-UNAM, Mexico.
BLACK HOLES. BH in GR and in QG BH formation Trapped surfaces WORMHOLES TIME MACHINES Cross-sections and signatures of BH/WH production at the LHC I-st.
Numerical Relativity in Cosmology - my personal perspective - Yoo, Chulmoon ( Nagoya U. ) with Hirotada Okawa ( Lisbon, IST ) New Perspectives on Cosmology.
Innermost stable circular orbits around squashed Kaluza-Klein black holes Ken Matsuno & Hideki Ishihara ( Osaka City University ) 1.
Teruaki Suyama Black hole perturbation in modified gravity Research Center for the Early Universe, University of Tokyo 公募研究 ( 計画研究 A05) 「強い重力場での修正重力理論の検証に向けた理論的研究」
MWRM, Nov 16-19, 2006, Washington University, Saint Louis Area Invariance of Apparent Horizons under Arbitrary Lorentz Boosts Sarp Akcay Center for Relativity.
LIGO-G09xxxxx-v1 Form F v1 Numerical Simulations of Superkick Binary Black Holes Lydia Nevin Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute LIGO SURF 2014 Mentor:
Geometrically motivated, hyperbolic gauge conditions for Numerical Relativity Carlos Palenzuela Luque 15 December
BLACK HOLES SIMULATION and visualization
3 rd Karl Schwarzschild Meeting, Germany 24 July 2017
Numerical Relativity at AEI: What, Why???
Manuel Tiglio Hearne Institute for Theoretical Physics
Inspiral of comparable mass binaries Facilitators: Bala Iyer, Thomas Baumgarte, Jolien Creighton and NS-NS/NS-BH binary merger Facilitators: Fred Rasio,
Global Defects near Black Holes
Fred Rasio Northwestern University
Graviton Emission in The Bulk from a Higher Dimensional Black Hole
Spin and Quadrupole corrections to IMRIs
Presentation transcript:

Albert-Einstein-Institut Black Hole Initial Data for Evolution Distorted Black Holes: “Brill Wave plus Black Hole” (NCSA model) –ds 2 =  4 (e 2q (dr 2 +r 2 d  2 )+ r 2 sin 2  d  2 ) q(r  ) --> true 3D distorted BH –Good model for late stage of BH merger Binary IVP: Multiple Wormhole Model –Misner 2BH: equal mass, time symmetric, colliding BHs, variations –Cook et al fully general merger data Binary IVP: Multiple “Punctures” –Brandt-Brügmann general merger data –Now evolving... More coming: Meudon/AEI/Jena S1S1 S2S2 P1P1 P2P2 S1S1 S2S2 P2P2 P1P1 S Brill Wave

Albert-Einstein-Institut Why are Black Holes so Difficult? Collapsing Star Horizon Singularity t=150 t=100 t=50 t=0 Fundamental Problem with Black Holes Stretching of hypersurfaces leads to pathologies in metric functions Why not cut singularity away if surrounded by horizon??? Crash! g rr

Albert-Einstein-Institut A Little Lesson in Black Hole Physics Black Hole Perturbation Theory –What happens when a BH is perturbed? –How can this be used in numerical work? –Going beyond linear theory through numerical relativity...

Albert-Einstein-Institut What happens when a black hole is perturbed? Take existing black hole (Schwarzschild solution) –Analytic solution known since 1916! –Perturb by tossing pebble into it Is it stable? –Perturb metric tensor g  ds 2 = -(1-2M/r) dt 2 + dr 2 /(1-2M/r) + r 2 (d  2 + sin 2  d  2 ) by adding  h  (Y lm ), expand to first order in  –Discover (after 30 years study!) … –Scattering off potential barrier Find resonance frequencies of this potential barrier –  ~ exp(i  (t-x)) –  resonances are complex: get damped sinusoids –Frequency depends on mass and spin of BH, that’s all! In all theoretical studies, these modes are excited –Collapse of matter to a BH, Distorted, Colliding BH’s... V(r)  + V(r)  = 0 Black hole pebble Horizon

Albert-Einstein-Institut Black Hole Normal Modes Ringing modes: damped sinusoid ~e i  t Measure this, can determine mass and spin of BH that created it Questions, Questions: what happens when we go beyond linear theory?

Albert-Einstein-Institut Colliding BH Roadmap: A patchwork to success Time Post Newt inspiral Final Plunge Ringdown t ~ M t ~ 100 M t ~ 30 M Merger Phase Time Scale Technique Post N Perturbative Excision: making progress Standard Numrel: Exciting new results, but will break down gap Need Post-N BH Initial data

Albert-Einstein-Institut Start with ADM Evolution Equations (used almost exclusively for last 30 years…) The 3+1 evolution equations used in numerical relativity are normally written as: These equations are highly non-unique: add arbitrary multiples of constraints, obtain new evolution equations that are just as valid. New equations: same physical solutions, but very different mathematical properties, different solutions away from constraint hypersurface (“off-shell”). Highly computationally intensive: want larger computers than exist, must perform many, many developmental tests: very slow! “Arnowitt-Deser-Misner” (or simply “ADM”) evolution equations.

Albert-Einstein-Institut First attempt to go beyond axisymmetric, non-orbital data Brandt-Brügmann Puncture data Unequal mass, spin, orbital J Maximal slicing, no shift Nested grids to get boundary away from holes Merger of AH First True 3D Grazing Black Hole Collision Bernd Brügmann 97 Single outer AH appears as holes merge MTSs inside S1S1 S2S2 P2P2 P1P1 M1M1 M2M2 ADM evolution to about t=7M but then crash!

Albert-Einstein-Institut Very important new thing: The BSSN Formulation All recent simulations use the Baumgarte-Shapiro (BS) Shibata- Nakamura (SN) reformulation of the EEs. This BSSN formulation is based on a conformal decomposition of the standard ADM equations: A crucial ingredient of the BSSN formulation is the introduction of the conformal connection functions as independent variables: The BSSN formulation has been found to be extremely stable when compared to standard ADM in a large variety of cases, both with and without matter, so it is our preferred choice. Will apply to NS, too!!

Albert-Einstein-Institut Return to Brügmann Grazing Collision… Alcubierre, Allen, Benger, Brügmann,Lanfermann, Nerger, ES, Takahashi Could never do this before 1999 BSSN –Spent 2 years understanding BSSN (Alcubierre…) –Focused on pure waves (demanding, but w/o singularity complications) Then applied to BH problem –Big Boost! 5x as far! Finally doing real (toy?) physics with 3D numerical relativity… Next: NS-NS

Albert-Einstein-Institut Gauge-Invariant waveform extraction: Extract physics, predict rotation and mass of final BH QNM’s seen at late times –Good fit for two lowest a/M = 0.73 Kerr QN modes –Fit improves with resolution –Fit poor if use different a/M values! Energy radiated in all modes of order 1% M ADM Energy Estimate: –M ir ≈ 3.0 –M AH ≈ 3.3 Compare –M ADM = 3.22 Have done parameter studies –Low, med, high spin cases Convergence of waveform Fit to Kerr QNM’s t/M  22 even  22 even  22 even good better best QNM fit (lowrez) QNM fit (medrez) QNM fit (highrez)

Albert-Einstein-Institut Going Further: Black Hole Excision (Alcubierre, Brügmann, Pollney, Takahashi, ES) Computational domain horizon Excised region singularity Two Ingredients –Excise a region inside the AH. –(Superluminal) Shift vector! Hard! –Spherical topology, ill adapted to cartesian coords –Large shifts can cause instabilities: causal differencing –Moving across grid?? Everything from here forward unpublished so far… Unruh, ‘84, ES, Suen, ‘92, Alcubierre, Brügmann, ‘00, many others Crash!

Albert-Einstein-Institut Shift Conditions (Alcubierre, et al…) New shift condition obtained by making the conformal connection functions to be time-independent: “Gamma-freezing” shift condition closely related to “minimal distortion” shift condition, but related to fundamental variables in BSSN! Obtain hyperbolic conditions by making second time derivatives of the shift proportional to the elliptic operator contained in the above condition. VERY important: will apply to NS, too!

Albert-Einstein-Institut Schwarzschild: Horizon Mass M ADM =2,  x = 0.2, grid points 3D run, excision+shift 2D run, no excision, no shift, high resolution Crash! 3D run, no excision, no shift Crash! Very robust No fine tuning! Remember: started with –  = 1 –  i = 0 It just works naturally… This is very new in the community…

Albert-Einstein-Institut How about rotating, distorted BH?: Waveforms (  4 ) Mimics final stages of BBH Coalescence M ADM =7.54, a/M=0.62,  x = 0.5, points 2D runs crashes! Remarkable agreement between 2D and 3D! Crash! S No fine tuning! It just works… very naturally as gauges drive system static… Shift has min. distortion character: like Boyer- Lindquist for Kerr so keeps coords OK Even waves are fine… Lots of other examples…

Albert-Einstein-Institut Grazing Collision with shift and excision!! Starting to put it together Could never do this before… Only excise final BH Just a test, only –Horizons great –Waveforms, too –Runs “forever” now Will be able to do 512 3, Plenty of parameter tuning to do How far can this go? Move into ISCO and beyond… New, low res test simulation w/shift!! M AH Grazing results in press…

Albert-Einstein-Institut Preliminary Result: Plunge from the ISCO using new shift, excision grid: 195x195x100 h = excision of final BH

Albert-Einstein-Institut The Evolution of the Evolution of 3D Black Holes DistortGrazing t(M) Evolution times for robust, accurate evolutions, with solid horizon physics, waveforms Lazarus Full non- Linear??? Pre-ISCO??

Albert-Einstein-Institut Conclusions Main message: unusual progress, will benefit entire Network I have waited many years to see such results –1D broke through barrier in 1987 –2D in –3D got stuck until last year… Why is all this happening now? –We have a great team! (Critical mass, talent, focus, collaboration) –Developed much better theoretical understanding/practical experience. –We developed great collaborative technology (otherwise not possible.) –We have much better computers (need even more access) 3+1 codes have smashed through the t = 30M barrier –Shift to cure grid-stretching –Evolutions orders of magnitude better than last year All this applies to NS-NS and other problems! You get this for free!

Albert-Einstein-Institut Hot off the Presses: Most Recent Waveform Result