Photon Efficiency Measures & Processing Dominic W. Berry University of Waterloo Alexander I. LvovskyUniversity of Calgary.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Comparison of Two CNOT Gate Implementations in Optical Quantum Computing Adam Kleczewski March 2, 2007.
Advertisements

Entanglement-enhanced communication over a correlated-noise channel
What really happens upon quantum measurement?[n eeds revision] References are more fully listed in my Phys Rev A paperPhys Rev A paper Art Hobson Prof.
Shanhui Fan, Shanshan Xu, Eden Rephaeli
Quantum limits in optical interferometry R. Demkowicz-Dobrzański 1, K. Banaszek 1, J. Kołodyński 1, M. Jarzyna 1, M. Guta 2, K. Macieszczak 1,2, R. Schnabel.
Universal Uncertainty Relations Gilad Gour University of Calgary Department of Mathematics and Statistics Gilad Gour University of Calgary Department of.
Phase Measurement & Quantum Algorithms Dominic Berry IQC University of Waterloo Howard Wiseman Geoff Pryde Brendon Higgins Guoyong Xiang Griffith University.
The GSI oscillation mystery Alexander Merle Max-Planck-Institute for Nuclear Physics Heidelberg, Germany Based on: AM: Why a splitting in the final state.
REM : Active Queue Management Sanjeewa Athuraliya, Victor H. Li Steven H. Low, Qinghe Yin Presented by Hwangnam Kim.
Observing the quantum nonlocality in the state of a massive particle Koji Maruyama RIKEN (Institute of Physical and Chemical Research) with Sahel Ashhab.
Displaced-photon counting for coherent optical communication Shuro Izumi.
Non-Gaussianity as a power-up for quantum communication and estimation Gerardo Adesso.
NMR Quantum Information Processing and Entanglement R.Laflamme, et al. presented by D. Motter.
Niels Bohr Institute Copenhagen University Eugene PolzikLECTURE 5.
Characterization of statistical properties of x-ray FEL radiation by means of few-photon processes Nina Rohringer and Robin Santra.
School of Physics & Astronomy FACULTY OF MATHEMATICAL & PHYSICAL SCIENCE Parallel Transport & Entanglement Mark Williamson 1, Vlatko Vedral 1 and William.
QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT AND IMPLICATIONS IN INFORMATION PROCESSING: Quantum TELEPORTATION K. Mangala Sunder Department of Chemistry IIT Madras.
Mode Group Diversity Multiplexing in Step Index and Graded Index Multimode Fibers Grzegorz Stępniak.
R. Demkowicz-Dobrzański 1, J. Kołodyński 1, M. Guta 2 1 Faculty of Physics, Warsaw University, Poland 2 School of Mathematical Sciences, University of.
Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing (DWDM) Technology
Where, Nageswaran Rajendran and Dieter Suter, Institutes for Physics, University of Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany Geometric Phases for Mixed States.
Weak Values in Quantum Measurement Theory - Concepts and Applications - Yutaka Shikano 07M01099 Department of Physics, Tokyo Institute of Technology “Master.
Manipulating Continuous Variable Photonic Entanglement Martin Plenio Imperial College London Institute for Mathematical Sciences & Department of Physics.
School of something FACULTY OF OTHER School of Physics and Astronomy FACULTY OF MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES Nonlocality of a single particle Jacob.
Security of practical quantum cryptography with heralded single photon sources Mikołaj Lasota 1, Rafał Demkowicz-Dobrzański 2, Konrad Banaszek 2 1 Nicolaus.
A deterministic source of entangled photons David Vitali, Giacomo Ciaramicoli, and Paolo Tombesi Dip. di Matematica e Fisica and Unità INFM, Università.
Lecture note 8: Quantum Algorithms
Engineering of arbitrary U(N) transformation by quantum Householder reflections P. A. Ivanov, E. S. Kyoseva, and N. V. Vitanov.
The Road to Quantum Computing: Boson Sampling Nate Kinsey ECE 695 Quantum Photonics Spring 2014.
Towards a Universal Count of Resources Used in a General Measurement Saikat Ghosh Department of Physics IIT- Kanpur.
Czesław Radzewicz Warsaw University Poland Konrad Banaszek Nicolaus Copernicus University Toruń, Poland Alex Lvovsky University of Calgary Alberta, Canada.
Classical Computers Very Likely Can Not Efficiently Simulate Multimode Linear Optical Interferometers with Arbitrary Inputs quantum.phys.lsu.edu Louisiana.
Atom-atom correlations A Thomas-Fermi density profile of size R TF,i (i=x,y,z) for the source MBEC, has a momentum distribution of width ~1/ R TF,i. The.
Multi-Partite Squeezing and SU (1,1) Symmetry Zahra Shaterzadeh Yazdi Institute for Quantum Information Science, University of Calgary with Peter S. Turner.
R. Demkowicz-Dobrzański 1, J. Kołodyński 1, K. Banaszek 1, M. Jarzyna 1, M. Guta 2 1 Faculty of Physics, Warsaw University, Poland 2 School of Mathematical.
V.L. Kashevarov. Crystal Collaboration Meeting, Mainz, September 2008 Photoproduction of    on protons ► Introduction ► Data analysis.
Characterisation of non-classical light sources for quantum information technologies Wojciech Wasilewski Michał Karpiński Piotr Wasylczyk Czesław Radzewicz.
Bell Measurements and Teleportation. Overview Entanglement Bell states and Bell measurements Limitations on Bell measurements using linear devices Teleportation.
Analytical Approach to Optimal Discrimination with Unambiguous Measurements University of Tabriz M. Rezaei Karamaty Academic member of Tabriz University.
Quantum noise observation and control A. HeidmannM. PinardJ.-M. Courty P.-F. CohadonT. Briant O. Arcizet T. CaniardJ. Le Bars Laboratoire Kastler Brossel,
Refractive index enhancement with vanishing absorption in an atomic vapor Deniz Yavuz, Nick Proite, Brett Unks, Tyler Green Department of Physics, University.
LPHYS’07 – Leon – August 22 nd 2007 Alessandro Zavatta, Valentina Parigi, Myungshik Kim, and Marco Bellini Istituto Nazionale di Ottica Applicata (INOA)
Efficiency of thermal radiation energy-conversion nanodevices Miguel Rubi I. Latella A. Perez L. Lapas.
Distillation and determination of unknown two-qubit entanglement: Construction of optimal witness operator Heung-Sun Sim Physics, KAIST ESF conference:
Some Ideas on Coatingless all-reflective ITF Adalberto Giazotto (*) INFN- Pisa (*) Work done in collaboration with G. Cella.
Sources, Memories, Detectors Ryan Camacho, Curtis Broadbent, Michael Pack, Praveen Vudya Setu, Greg Armstrong, Benjamin Dixon and John Howell University.
October 1, 2007 Quantum Optical Sensing: Single Mode, Multi-Mode, and Continuous Time Jeffrey H. Shapiro.
Prebunching electron beam and its smearing due to ISR-induced energy diffusion Nikolai Yampolsky Los Alamos National Laboratory Fermilab; February 24,
Multi-photon Absorption Rates for N00N States William Plick, Christoph F. Wildfeuer, Jonathan P. Dowling: Hearne Institute for Theoretical Physics, LSU.
Suggestion for Optical Implementation of Hadamard Gate Amir Feizpour Physics Department Sharif University of Technology.
QUANTUM OPTICS LAB IAP, UNIVERSITÄT BERN Qudit Implementations with Energy-Time Entangled Photons 1 Bänz Bessire Quantum Optics Lab – The Stefanov Group.
Sense and sensitivity:,,robust’’ quantum phase estimation R. Demkowicz-Dobrzański 1, K. Banaszek 1, U. Dorner 2, I. A. Walmsley 2, W. Wasilewski 1, B.
Metrology and integrated optics Geoff Pryde Griffith University.
ISTITUTO NAZIONALE DI RICERCA METROLOGICA Exploiting hidden correlations: the illusionist game Alice Meda Marco Genovese.
Conservation of Vacuum in an Interferometer
Presented By: Muhammad Imran PhD student (PIEAS)
Four wave mixing in submicron waveguides
Quantum optics Eyal Freiberg.
Coherent and squeezed states of the radiation field
Profs. Charles A. DiMarzio and Stephen W. McKnight
Unconstrained distillation capacities of
A. Windhager, M. Suda, C. Pacher, M. Peev, A. Poppe Contact:
Ψ WHITFIELD GROUP Ψ WHITFIELD GROUP
Peter Samuelsson, Sara Kheradsoud, Björn Sothmann
Quantum Information with Continuous Variables
Quantum State and Process Measurement and Characterization

Fig. 2 Optomechanical scheme to measure photon angular momentum and optical torque in a waveguide. Optomechanical scheme to measure photon angular momentum.
Optical π phase shift created with a single-photon pulse
Presentation transcript:

Photon Efficiency Measures & Processing Dominic W. Berry University of Waterloo Alexander I. LvovskyUniversity of Calgary

State is incoherent superposition of 0 and 1 photon: State is incoherent superposition of 0 and 1 photon: J. Kim et al., Nature 397, 500 (1999). J. Kim et al., Nature 397, 500 (1999). Single Photon Sources

Photon Processing... measurement U(N) Network of beam splitters and phase shifters

... D00 1/2 1/3 1/(N  1)  2 2 A Method for Improvement D. W. Berry, S. Scheel, B. C. Sanders, and P. L. Knight, Phys. Rev. A 69, (R) (2004). Works for p < 1/2. Works for p < 1/2. A multiphoton component is introduced. A multiphoton component is introduced.

Conjectures 1. It is impossible to increase the probability of a single photon without introducing multiphoton components. 2. It is impossible to increase the single photon probability for p ≥ 1/2.

Generalised Efficiency Choose the initial state  0 and loss channel to get . Choose the initial state  0 and loss channel to get . Find minimum transmissivity of channel. Find minimum transmissivity of channel. EpEp loss D. W. Berry and A. I. Lvovsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, (2010).

Generalised Efficiency Example: incoherent single photon. Example: incoherent single photon. Minimum transmissivity is for pure input photon. Minimum transmissivity is for pure input photon. Efficiency is p. Efficiency is p. EpEp loss D. W. Berry and A. I. Lvovsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, (2010).

Generalised Efficiency Example: coherent state. Example: coherent state. Can be obtained from another coherent state for any p>0. Can be obtained from another coherent state for any p>0. Efficiency is 0. Efficiency is 0. EpEp loss D. W. Berry and A. I. Lvovsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, (2010).

Proving Conjectures... measurement U(N) D. W. Berry and A. I. Lvovsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, (2010).

Proving Conjectures Inputs can be obtained via loss channels from some initial states. Inputs can be obtained via loss channels from some initial states. measurement EpEp U(N) EpEp EpEp... EpEp EpEp D. W. Berry and A. I. Lvovsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, (2010).

Proving Conjectures Inputs can be obtained via loss channels from some initial states. Inputs can be obtained via loss channels from some initial states. The equal loss channels may be commuted through the interferometer. The equal loss channels may be commuted through the interferometer. measurement EpEp U(N) EpEp EpEp... EpEp EpEp D. W. Berry and A. I. Lvovsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, (2010).

Proving Conjectures Inputs can be obtained via loss channels from some initial states. Inputs can be obtained via loss channels from some initial states. The equal loss channels may be commuted through the interferometer. The equal loss channels may be commuted through the interferometer. The loss on the output may be delayed until after the measurement. The loss on the output may be delayed until after the measurement. The output state can have efficiency no greater than p. The output state can have efficiency no greater than p. measurement EpEp U(N) EpEp EpEp... EpEp EpEp D. W. Berry and A. I. Lvovsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, (2010).

Catalytic Processing... U(N) Network of beam splitters and phase shifters measurement D. W. Berry and A. I. Lvovsky, arXiv: (2010). ? p p

Option 0 We have equal loss on the modes. We have equal loss on the modes. The efficiency is the transmissivity p. The efficiency is the transmissivity p. We take the infimum of p. We take the infimum of p. Multimode Efficiency D. W. Berry and A. I. Lvovsky, arXiv: (2010).

Option 1 We have independent loss on the modes. We have independent loss on the modes. The efficiency is the maximum sum of K of the transmissivities p j. The efficiency is the maximum sum of K of the transmissivities p j. We take the infimum of this over schemes. We take the infimum of this over schemes. Multimode Efficiency D. W. Berry and A. I. Lvovsky, arXiv: (2010).

Option 1 Example: a single photon in one mode and vacuum in the other. Example: a single photon in one mode and vacuum in the other. We can have complete loss in one mode, starting from two single photons. We can have complete loss in one mode, starting from two single photons. The multimode efficiency for K=2 is 1. The multimode efficiency for K=2 is 1. Multimode Efficiency D. W. Berry and A. I. Lvovsky, arXiv: (2010).

Option 1 Example: The same state, but a different basis. Example: The same state, but a different basis. We cannot have any loss in either mode. We cannot have any loss in either mode. The multimode efficiency for K=2 is 2. The multimode efficiency for K=2 is 2. Multimode Efficiency D. W. Berry and A. I. Lvovsky, arXiv: (2010).

Option 2 We only try to obtain the reduced density operators. We only try to obtain the reduced density operators. The efficiency is the maximum sum of K of the transmissivities p j. The efficiency is the maximum sum of K of the transmissivities p j. We take the infimum of this over schemes. We take the infimum of this over schemes. Multimode Efficiency D. W. Berry and A. I. Lvovsky, arXiv: (2010).

Multimode Efficiency D. W. Berry and A. I. Lvovsky, arXiv: (2010). Option 2 Example: a single photon in one mode and vacuum in the other. Example: a single photon in one mode and vacuum in the other. We can have complete loss in one mode, starting from two single photons. We can have complete loss in one mode, starting from two single photons. The multimode efficiency for K=1 is 1. The multimode efficiency for K=1 is 1.

Multimode Efficiency D. W. Berry and A. I. Lvovsky, arXiv: (2010). Option 2 Example: the same state in a different basis. Example: the same state in a different basis. We can have loss of 1/2 in each mode, starting from two single photons. We can have loss of 1/2 in each mode, starting from two single photons. The multimode efficiency for K=1 is 1/2. The multimode efficiency for K=1 is 1/2.

Option 3 We have independent loss on the modes. We have independent loss on the modes. This is followed by an interferometer, which mixes the vacuum between the modes. This is followed by an interferometer, which mixes the vacuum between the modes. The efficiency is the maximum sum of K of the transmissivities p j. The efficiency is the maximum sum of K of the transmissivities p j. We take the infimum of this over schemes. We take the infimum of this over schemes. interferometer Multimode Efficiency D. W. Berry and A. I. Lvovsky, arXiv: (2010).

Loss via Beam Splitters Model the loss via beam splitters. Model the loss via beam splitters. Use a vacuum input, and NO detection on one output. Use a vacuum input, and NO detection on one output. vacuum NO detection In terms of annihilation operators: In terms of annihilation operators: NO detection D. W. Berry and A. I. Lvovsky, arXiv: (2010).

We can write the annihilation operators at the output as We can write the annihilation operators at the output as Form a matrix of commutators Form a matrix of commutators The efficiency is the sum of the K maximum eigenvalues. The efficiency is the sum of the K maximum eigenvalues. interferometer Vacuum Components... D. W. Berry and A. I. Lvovsky, arXiv: (2010).

discarded vacua Vacuum Components interferometer D. W. Berry and A. I. Lvovsky, arXiv: (2010).

Method of Proof measurement U(N)... D. W. Berry and A. I. Lvovsky, arXiv: (2010).

Method of Proof measurement U(N)... Each vacuum mode contributes to each output mode. Each vacuum mode contributes to each output mode. D. W. Berry and A. I. Lvovsky, arXiv: (2010).

Method of Proof measurement U(N)... Each vacuum mode contributes to each output mode. Each vacuum mode contributes to each output mode. We can relabel the vacuum modes so they contribute to the output modes in a triangular way. We can relabel the vacuum modes so they contribute to the output modes in a triangular way. D. W. Berry and A. I. Lvovsky, arXiv: (2010).

Method of Proof Each vacuum mode contributes to each output mode. Each vacuum mode contributes to each output mode. We can relabel the vacuum modes so they contribute to the output modes in a triangular way. We can relabel the vacuum modes so they contribute to the output modes in a triangular way. A further interferometer, X, diagonalises the vacuum modes. A further interferometer, X, diagonalises the vacuum modes. measurement U(N)... X D. W. Berry and A. I. Lvovsky, arXiv: (2010).

Conclusions We have defined new measures of efficiency of states, for both the single-mode and multimode cases. We have defined new measures of efficiency of states, for both the single-mode and multimode cases. These quantify the amount of vacuum in a state, which cannot be removed using linear optical processing. These quantify the amount of vacuum in a state, which cannot be removed using linear optical processing. This proves conjectures from earlier work, as well as ruling out catalytic improvement of photon sources. This proves conjectures from earlier work, as well as ruling out catalytic improvement of photon sources. D. W. Berry and A. I. Lvovsky, arXiv: (2010). D. W. Berry and A. I. Lvovsky, arXiv: (2010). D. W. Berry and A. I. Lvovsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, (2010). D. W. Berry and A. I. Lvovsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, (2010). References

Positions Open Macquarie University (Australia) Macquarie University (Australia) 1 Year postdoctoral position 1 Year postdoctoral position 2 x PhD scholarships 2 x PhD scholarships Calculations on Tesla supercomputer! Calculations on Tesla supercomputer!