Geneva, Switzerland, 18 February 2014 OGC Where the Internet of Things touches Location/Space Bart De Lathouwer, OGC, bdelathouwer [at] opengeospatial.orgbdelathouwer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
® ® Collaborative Development of Open Standards for Expanding GeoWeb to the Internet of Things Expanding GeoWeb to an Internet of Things A workshop during.
Advertisements

Sensor Web Standards and the Internet of Things May 24 th, 2011 Scott Fairgrieve Geospatial Research and Development COM.Geo 2011 Workshop Expanding GeoWeb.
George Percivall, OGC and Ingo Simonis, OGC-E
© Geospatial Research & Consulting Ingo Simonis Ingo Simonis Freelancer.
Sensor Web Enablement and GEOSS Presented by: Terence van Zyl.
CEOS WGISS, China, February, Sensor Web Enablement (SWE) Wyn Cudlip BNSC/QinetiQ Presentation to WGISS China, 2008.
Geneva, Switzerland, 18 February 2014 OGC Where the Internet of Things touches Location/Space Bart De Lathouwer, OGC, ITU.
Mike Botts – Summer Open Geospatial Consortium Sensor Web Enablement (SWE) GEOINT Huntsville August 14, 2013 Dr. Mike Botts
FOSS4G 2009 Building Human Sensor Webs with 52° North SWE Implementations Building Human Sensor Webs with 52° North SWE Implementations Eike Hinderk Jürrens,
52north.org. SWE Components Core  SOS  SAS/SES  SPS  WNS  Clients  SWEcurity Incubation  Sensor Instance Registry  Sensor Observable Registry.
This presentation is property of CREATE-NET and is protected by Copyright © Best practices – Semantic interoperability Collaborative Open Market to Place.
Service Oriented Sensor Web Xingchen Chu and Rajkumar Buyya University of Melbourne, Australia Presented by: Gerardo I. Simari CMSC828P – Fall 2006 Professor.
. Smart Cities and the Ageing Population Sustainable smart cities: from vision to reality 13 October ITU, Geneva Knud Erik Skouby, CMI/ Aalborg University-Cph.
Copyright © 2006, Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc., All Rights Reserved. The OGC and Emergency Services: GML for Location Transport & Formats & Mapping.
OGC Liaison Report WGISS-20 Allan Doyle, EOGEO
© OGC, All Rights Reserved Open Geospatial Consortium
From Data Integration to Integrated Solutions Tom Shyka, GMRI Paul Currier, NH DES Water Quality Workshop MACOORA - NERACOOS -SECOORA IOOS, USGS, EPA,
52°North Simon Jirka – VGIrisk Workshop - April 2011.
Mike Botts – January SensorML and Processing September 2009 Mike Botts Botts Innovative Research, Inc.
® Sponsored by In Location Alliance Coordination: architecture and use cases 95th OGC Technical Committee Andreas Wachter, ILA/Qualcomm George Percivall.
Mike Botts – August Supporting QA/QC for Ocean Observations using Sensor Web Enablement (SWE) and SensorML August 2008 Mike Botts (UAH), Tony Cook.
Environmental Monitoring: Database and Beyond Chengyang Zhang Computer Science Department University of North Texas.
Sensors, SWE and European spatial data initiatives – INSPIRE and GMES Brno, Radim Štampach, Ph.D.
Linked-data and the Internet of Things Payam Barnaghi Centre for Communication Systems Research University of Surrey March 2012.
® SOS 2.0 Profile For Hydrology 91 st OGC Technical Committee Geneva, Switzerland Simon Jirka (52°North) 11 June 2014 Copyright © 2014 Open Geospatial.
Extensible Markup Language (XML) Extensible Markup Language (XML) is a simple, very flexible text format derived from SGML (ISO 8879).ISO 8879 XML is a.
CEOS WGISS, Hanoi May OSCAR Prototyping the sensor web Wyn Cudlip BNSC/QinetiQ Presentation to WGISS Hanoi May 2007 (Slides.
Service Oriented Sensor Web: NOSA Approach Rajkumar Buyya and Xingchen Chu Grid Computing and Distributed Systems (GRIDS) Laboratory Dept. of Computer.
® The importance of international standards for data exchange Denise McKenzie Executive Director, Communications & Outreach Open Geospatial Consortium.
1 Building Controls XML/Web Services Guideline Meeting June 3, 2003 CABA Intelligent & Integrated Buildings Council Sponsored by:
EGU 2015 Dr. Ingo Simonis Open Geospatial Consortium Europe Citizen Observatories: A Standards Based Architecture.
E2E Spatial Infrastructures The South Esk Hydrological Sensor Web Andrew Terhorst Project Lead: Real-Time Water Information Systems 6 December 2010 Water.
© 2006, Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. The OGC Sensor Web Enablement framework Simon CoxMike Botts CSIRO Exploration & MiningNational Space Science &
ITU-T SG16 and JCA-IoT activities
Sensor Standards Harmonization Working Group Report Summary of Sensor Standards Harmonization Working Group (SSHWG) Meeting held on Sensor Standards Harmonization.
Open Geospatial Consortium Overview and why we are adopting the standards.
Geography Markup Language (GML). GML What is GML? – Scope  The Geography Markup Language is  a modeling language for geographic information  an encoding.
Architecture Task AR Status Presented to the July Meeting of the GEO and Architecture and Data Committee Dr. Thomas C. Adang AR Point.
Introduction to Web Services Presented by Sarath Chandra Dorbala.
Data Assimilation Decision Making Using Sensor Web Enablement M. Goodman, G. Berthiau, H. Conover, X. Li, Y. Lu, M. Maskey, K. Regner, B. Zavodsky, R.
© 2005, Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. CrisisGrid: Critical Infrastructure and Informatics for Emergency Response 4 May 2005 Mark Reichardt President.
WG2 Roadmap Discussion Denise Warzel May 25, 2010 WG2 Convenor SC32 WG2N1424SC32 WG2N1424.
OGC Update WGISS-19 - March 2005 Allan Doyle, GSDI/EOGEO
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use INSPIRE Orthoimagery TWG Status Report Antonio Romeo ESRIN 15/02/2012.
® OGC standards work for City & Regional Planners Bart De Lathouwer Open Geospatial Consortium 24 September 2014, Gdynia Poland Copyright © 2014 Open Geospatial.
SDI 4.0 Crowd-sourcing, Gov-sourcing Geographic Data via Open Geosynchronization Raj R. Singh Director, Interoperability Programs Open Geospatial Consortium.
® Capacity Development & Knowledge Frameworks Denise McKenzie Open Geospatial Consortium 22 April 2016 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
® OGC perspective on CyberGIS for Collaborative Problem Solving AAG Annual Meeting panel, April 2015 George Percivall Chief Engineer and CTO
® Sponsored by SOS 2.0 Profile For Hydrology 90th OGC Technical Committee Washington, DC Michael Utech 26 March 2014 Copyright © 2014 Open Geospatial Consortium.
EVOLVING SENSOR WEB PROTOCOLS FOR SENSOR DATA MANAGEMENT H. Conover, K. Regner, M. Maskey, J. Lu, X. Li (UA-Huntsville) and H. Michael Goodman (NASA MSFC)
. A Standardized Encoding to Exchange Citizen Science Data January 2016 Dr. Ingo Simonis Open Geospatial Consortium Europe
. A Standardized Encoding to Exchange Citizen Science Data EO Science 2.0 – Oct 2015 Dr. Ingo Simonis Open Geospatial Consortium Europe
1 O PEN S ENSOR H UB FOR S ENSOR W EBS AND I O T FOSS4G-NA May 2016 Mike Botts Botts Innovative Research, Inc Alex Robin Sensia Software.
® Standards for Disaster Mitigation and Response Scott Simmons Executive Director, Standards Program Open Geospatial Consortium Copyright © 2016 Open Geospatial.
EarthCube Integrative Activities: Cross-Domain Observational Metadata Environmental Sensing Network (X-DOMES) September 2015 – August 2017 Focusing on.
Botts – August 2004 Sensor Web Enablement Sensor Web Enablement WG (SWE-WG)
Sensor Web Enablement (SWE) and Sensor Modeling Language (SensorML)
Justin Buck OceanSITES data Incentives for participation: Data citation & data services Justin Buck
Prof John Davies, BT Future Cities: The role of IoT and Semantic Technology Transforming Data into Value: Data Interoperability & Open Data Platforms.
Prof John Davies, BT Future Cities: The role of IoT and Semantic Technology Transforming Data into Value: Data Interoperability & Open Data Platforms.
Sensor Web Standards and the Internet of Things
INSPIRE – What if...? Workshop at OGC meeting in Delft
Updates from the OGC Speaking today about Mobile, Sensors & Big Data.
OGC Where the Internet of Things touches Location/Space
Introduction to the WMO/OGC Hydrology Domain Working Group
Status OpenSearch Standardisation Activities - HMA-S Project
Sensor Web technologies in support of monitoring climate change
SWE 2.0 – Current Status of Standards
SDI from a technological perspective: Standards
Presentation transcript:

Geneva, Switzerland, 18 February 2014 OGC Where the Internet of Things touches Location/Space Bart De Lathouwer, OGC, bdelathouwer [at] opengeospatial.orgbdelathouwer [at] opengeospatial.org Presentation based on work from SWE DWG, Dr. Mike Botts, Dr. Ingo Simonis, Dr. Arne Bröring and SW for IoT by Dr. Steve Liang ITU Workshop on the “Internet of Things - Trend and Challenges in Standardization” (Geneva, Switzerland, 18 February 2014)

© 2012 Open Geospatial Consortium Topics OGC Introduction IoT touches Location/Space SWE SWE for IoT Conclusions and Recommendations

The Open Geospatial Consortium Not-for-profit, international voluntary consensus standards organization; leading development of geospatial standards Founded in members and growing 33 “core” standards 15 extensions/profiles Hundreds of product implementations Alliances and collaborative activities with ISO and many other SDO’s Copyright © 2014 Open Geospatial Consortium 3

4

Sensor Web Desires  Quickly discover sensors and sensor data (secure or public) that can meet my needs – location, observables, quality, ability to task  Obtain sensor information in a standard encoding that is understandable by me and my software  Readily access sensor observations in a common manner, and in a form specific to my needs

Sensor Web Desires II  Task sensors, when possible, to meet my specific needs  Subscribe to and receive alerts when a sensor measures a particular phenomenon

Sensor Web Vision I  Sensors will be web accessible  Sensors and sensor data will be discoverable  Sensors will be self-describing to humans and software (using a standard encoding)  Most sensor observations will be easily accessible in real time over the web

Sensor Web Vision II  Standardized web services will exist for accessing sensor information and sensor observations  Sensor systems will be capable of real- time mining of observations to find phenomena of immediate interest  Sensor systems will be capable of issuing alerts based on observations, as well as be able to respond to alerts issued by other sensors

Sensor Web Vision III  Software will be capable of on-demand geolocation and processing of observations from a newly-discovered sensor without a priori knowledge of that sensor system  Sensors, simulations, and models will be capable of being configured and tasked through standard, common web interfaces  Sensors and sensor networks will be able to act on their own (i.e. be autonomous)

Building Blocks: OGC SWE Registries & Dictionaries Sensor Description Language Phenomenon Description Language Services ObservationTaskingAlertingAnalysis SensorMLO&M SOSSPSSASWNS CS-W

SWE CAT SOS Sensors Register Search SOS Bind DB Publish O&M SensorML Register

SWE CAT SOS Sensors WNS SPS Register SOS SPS SensorML Task Search 1 Task 2 Notify 3 notification 4 GetResults 5 O&M 6

SWE CAT SOS SAS Sensors WNS SPS Register Search SOS SAS GetResults SensorML Task Notify notification Register Publish Alert Notify Bind

© 2012 Open Geospatial Consortium

Sensors Everywhere (Things or Devices) 50 billions Internet-connected things by 2020 OGC SWE-IoT Focus

16 Existing IoT Applications are Silos IoT service A IoT service B IoT service C IoT service D Applicatio n A Applicatio n B Applicatio n C Applicatio n D Silo ASilo BSilo CSilo D

17 OGC Let ’ s say you want to develop the following application IoT service A IoT service B IoT service C IoT service D Applicatio n When my body temperature is high and hours of sleep is low, the light cannot be turned on and room temperature will be set to 15 degree Celsius.

18 Opportunities for Standards ThingSpeak Xively (Pachube) SensorCloud Others...Numerex Others... Device Cloud Evrythng

19 OGC OGC SW-IoT Goal IoT service A IoT service B IoT service C Many more innovative applications by mashing-up the IoT data infrastructure

20 Why OGC? Every thing has a location Location information needs to be carefully described. e.g., outdoor, indoor, geometry, topology, semantics, sensor space, etc. OGC Sensor Web Enablement is widely adopted and implemented e.g., OGC/ISO Observation and Measurements, OGC SensorML, OGC Sensor Observation Service, etc. The OGC SensorThings API is built based on the OGC SWE 20

21 ® Example: GML Point Profile Describe the location of a THING using geographic coordinates

22 ® Example: OGC CityGML – Semantic 3D city and building models provide the geometry and a thematic differentiation of the indoor areas (at least separation in building parts, levels and rooms) Describe the location of a THING in a building

23 ® Example: OGC Indoor GML Goal of IndoorGML – Common schema framework for Interoperability between indoor navigation applications Describe the location of a THING indoor

® OGC SensorThings API Status Current draft on GitHub a reference service implementation ready a simple client ready a.NET Micro Framework ready (Netduino) a Javascript library almost ready an Interactive SDK ready x Submit your comments here:

® Timeline Copyright © 2012 Open Geospatial Consortium Finalization and signed-off standard Draft API January 2013 OGC IoT Workshop Brussels Sensors4 IoT ad hoc meeting March 2012 in Austin, TX Sensors4 IoT first meeting June 2012 in Exeter UK Use cases for Public Review October 2012 Draft API v.0.2 March 2013 We are here!! Draft Spec February 2014

Conclusions OGC and IoT Mature SWE stack SWE Implementation Maturity ER CityGML, IndoorGML, ARML SW for IoT OGC SensorThings API Link to the newly formed Health DWG Geneva, Switzerland, 18 February

Next steps Democratize IoT Semantic interoperability & mediation Security & Privacy Opportunistic networks … Geneva, Switzerland, 18 February

Recommendations Influence the standards Participate in standards making process TC meeting in DC (March) and Geneva (June) Work with other SDO and initiatives Too many standards? Interoperability across the OSI stack ITU, IEEE, OASIS, W3C, M2M, ISO, ETSI, IERC, IoTA, OpenIoT, … Geneva, Switzerland, 18 February

Thank you Questions? bdelathouwer [_at_] opengeospatial.org Chair for SWE DWG: Dr. Mike Botts Chair for SW for IoT SWG: Dr. Steve Liang Geneva, Switzerland, 18 February