CloudSat/VIIRS CBH Validation Activities at CIRA Curtis Seaman, Yoo-Jeong Noh, Steve Miller, Dan Lindsey 10 September 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Robin Hogan Julien Delanoe University of Reading Remote sensing of ice clouds from space.
Advertisements

Application of Cloudnet data in the validation of SCIAMACHY cloud height products Ping Wang Piet Stammes KNMI, De Bilt, The Netherlands CESAR Science day,
Upgrades to the MODIS near-IR Water Vapor Algorithm and Cirrus Reflectance Algorithm For Collection 6 Bo-Cai Gao & Rong-Rong Li Remote Sensing Division,
Precipitation Products PPS Anke Thoss, SMHI User Workshop, February 2015, Madrid.
Improved Automated Cloud Classification and Cloud Property Continuity Studies for the Visible/Infrared Imager/Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) Michael J. Pavolonis.
TRMM Tropical Rainfall Measurement (Mission). Why TRMM? n Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) is a joint US-Japan study initiated in 1997 to study.
1 An initial CALIPSO cloud climatology ISCCP Anniversary, July 2008, New York Dave Winker NASA LaRC.
VIIRS Cloud Phase Validation. The VIIRS cloud phase algorithm was validated using a 24-hour period on November 10, Validation was performed using.
1 A First Look at Mid-Level Clouds Using CloudSat, CALIPSO, and MODIS Data Stanley Q. Kidder, J. Adam Kankiewicz, Thomas H. Vonder Haar Cooperative Institute.
CoRP Symposium, 10-11August 2010, Fort Collins, CO 1 A daytime multispectral technique for detecting supercooled liquid water- topped mixed-phase clouds.
Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies University of Wisconsin - Madison Steve Ackerman Director, Cooperative Institute for Meteorological.
Spatial & Temporal Distribution of Clouds as Observed by MODIS onboard the Terra and Aqua Satellites  MODIS atmosphere products –Examples from Aqua Cloud.
Profiling Clouds with Satellite Imager Data and Potential Applications William L. Smith Jr. 1, Douglas A. Spangenberg 2, Cecilia Fleeger 2, Patrick Minnis.
A New Cloud Cover Layers Application Andrew Heidinger and Dan Lindsey NOAA/NESDIS Andi Walther, Steve Wanzong UW/CIMSS Steve Miller, YJ Noh, Curtis Seaman.
Cyclone composites in the real world and ACCESS Pallavi Govekar, Christian Jakob, Michael Reeder and Jennifer Catto.
Assimilation of GOES Hourly and Meteosat winds in the NCEP Global Forecast System (GFS) Assimilation of GOES Hourly and Meteosat winds in the NCEP Global.
Evaluation of the VIIRS Cloud Base Height (CBH) EDR Using CloudSat
Applications and Limitations of Satellite Data Professor Ming-Dah Chou January 3, 2005 Department of Atmospheric Sciences National Taiwan University.
Orbit Characteristics and View Angle Effects on the Global Cloud Field
RGB Airmass and Dust products NASA SPoRT CIRA. RGB Air Mass RED (6.2 – 7.3) –vertical moisture distribution GREEN ( ) – tropopause height based.
Case Study Example 29 August 2008 From the Cloud Radar Perspective 1)Low-level mixed- phase stratocumulus (ice falling from liquid cloud layer) 2)Brief.
A43D-0138 Towards a New AVHRR High Cloud Climatology from PATMOS-x Andrew K Heidinger, Michael J Pavolonis, Aleksandar Jelenak* and William Straka III.
1 Center for S a t ellite A pplications and R esearch (STAR) Applicability of GOES-R AWG Cloud Algorithms for JPSS/VIIRS AMS Annual Meeting Future Operational.
Cloud Top Properties Bryan A. Baum NASA Langley Research Center Paul Menzel NOAA Richard Frey, Hong Zhang CIMSS University of Wisconsin-Madison MODIS Science.
Towards Operational Satellite-based Detection and Short Term Nowcasting of Volcanic Ash* *There are research applications as well. Michael Pavolonis*,
STAR JPSS 2015 Annual Science Team Meeting
Schematic diagram of the convective system life cycle size evolution Lifetime=  (A e Initiation ) Mass flux or condensation process in the initiation.
1 Validated Stage 1 Science Maturity Review for VIIRS Cloud Base, Nighttime Optical Properties and Cloud Cover Layers Products Andrew Heidinger September.
1 Optimal Channel Selection. 2 Redundancy “Information Content” vs. “On the diagnosis of the strength of the measurements in an observing system through.
NASA Ocean Color Research Team Meeting, Silver Spring, Maryland 5-7 May 2014 II. Objectives Establish a high-quality long-term observational time series.
1 Hyperspectral Infrared Water Vapor Radiance Assimilation James Jung Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies Lars Peter Riishojgaard.
Andrew Heidinger and Michael Pavolonis
Testing LW fingerprinting with simulated spectra using MERRA Seiji Kato 1, Fred G. Rose 2, Xu Liu 1, Martin Mlynczak 1, and Bruce A. Wielicki 1 1 NASA.
GOES-R Cloud Phase Algorithm Integration Status. GOES-R Cloud Phase Integration The initial GOES-R cloud phase algorithm, modified to run on VIIRS data,
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Using CALIPSO to Explore the Sensitivity to Cirrus Height in the Infrared.
CBH statistics for the Provisional Review Curtis Seaman, Yoo-Jeong Noh, Steve Miller and Dan Lindsey CIRA/Colorado State University 12/27/2013.
Yuying Zhang, Jim Boyle, and Steve Klein Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Jay Mace University.
Cloud Mask: Results, Frequency, Bit Mapping, and Validation UW Cloud Mask Working Group.
Investigations of Artifacts in the ISCCP Datasets William B. Rossow July 2006.
Modeling GOES-R µm brightness temperature differences above cold thunderstorm tops Introduction As the time for the launch of GOES-R approaches,
DoD Center for Geosciences/Atmospheric Research at Colorado State University Annual Review March 8-9, Mixed-phase clouds and icing research. Part.
Use of Solar Reflectance Hyperspectral Data for Cloud Base Retrieval Andrew Heidinger, NOAA/NESDIS/ORA Washington D.C, USA Outline " Physical basis for.
Overview of Satellite-Derived Cirrus Properties During SPARTICUS and MACPEX P. Minnis, L. Nguyen NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA R. Palikonda,
TOMS Ozone Retrieval Sensitivity to Assumption of Lambertian Cloud Surface Part 1. Scattering Phase Function Xiong Liu, 1 Mike Newchurch, 1,2 Robert Loughman.
ASAP In-Flight Icing Research at NCAR J. Haggerty, F. McDonough, J. Black, S. Landolt, C. Wolff, and S. Mueller In collaboration with: P. Minnis and W.
Request for VIIRS Cloud Properties Beta Maturity DR # 7154 CCR # 1075 DRAT discussion: 4/17/2013 AERB presentation: June 12, 2013 Cloud Properties Products.
Initial Analysis of the Pixel-Level Uncertainties in Global MODIS Cloud Optical Thickness and Effective Particle Size Retrievals Steven Platnick 1, Robert.
Validation of Cloud Top Temperature with CLOUDNET cloud radar data during the BBC2 Period Erwin Wolters (D. Donovan Presenting)
Visible optical depth,  Optically thicker clouds correlate with colder tops Ship tracks Note, retrievals done on cloudy pixels which are spatially uniform.
Cloud property retrieval from hyperspectral IR measurements Jun Li, Peng Zhang, Chian-Yi Liu, Xuebao Wu and CIMSS colleagues Cooperative Institute for.
Ozone PEATE 2/20/20161 OMPS LP Release 2 - Status Matt DeLand (for the PEATE team) SSAI 5 December 2013.
Comparison between aircraft and A-Train observations of midlevel, mixed-phase clouds from CLEX-10/C3VP Curtis Seaman, Yoo-Jeong Noh, Thomas Vonder Haar.
MODIS Atmosphere Level-3 Product & Web Site Review Paul A. Hubanks Science Systems and Applications, Inc.
MODIS, AIRS, and Midlevel Cloud Phase Shaima Nasiri CIMSS/SSEC, UW-Madison Brian Kahn Jet Propulsion Laboratory MURI Hyperspectral Workshop 7-9 June, 2005.
Supplemental Material for Request for VIIRS Cloud Properties Beta Maturity DR # 7154 CCR # 1075 DRAT discussion: 4/17/2013 AERB presentation: June 12,
SAGE III Aerosol Studies: Size Distribution Retrievals and Validation Mark Hervig GATS Inc.
International Ocean Color Science Meeting, Darmstadt, Germany, May 6-8, 2013 III. MODIS-Aqua normalized water leaving radiance nLw III.1. R2010 vs. R2012.
Shaima Nasiri University of Wisconsin-Madison Bryan Baum NASA - Langley Research Center Detection of Overlapping Clouds with MODIS: TX-2002 MODIS Atmospheres.
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory PM2 MSG cloud model 17 th February 2008 Comparisons with Calipso and Cloudsat C. Poulsen R.Siddans.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Combining GOES Observations with Other Data to Improve Severe Weather Forecasts.
Properties of Tropical Ice Clouds: Analyses Based on Terra/Aqua Measurements P. Yang, G. Hong, K. Meyer, G. North, A. Dessler Texas A&M University B.-C.
1 Application of MET for the Verification of the NWP Cloud and Precipitation Products using A-Train Satellite Observations Paul A. Kucera, Courtney Weeks,
Roger A. Stocker 1 Jason E. Nachamkin 2 An overview of operational FNMOC mesoscale cloud forecast support 1 FNMOC: Fleet Numerical Meteorology & Oceanography.
Satellite Survey of Tropical Deep Convection Particularly Stratospheric Penetrators William B. Rossow 12 June 2006.
W. Smith, D. Spangenberg, S. Sun-Mack, P.Minnis
Tony Reale ATOVS Sounding Products (ITSVC-12)
Hui Liu, Jeff Anderson, and Bill Kuo
Igor Appel Alexander Kokhanovsky
NOAA Objective Sea Surface Salinity Analysis P. Xie, Y. Xue, and A
JPSS Cloud Products Quick Guides.
Presentation transcript:

CloudSat/VIIRS CBH Validation Activities at CIRA Curtis Seaman, Yoo-Jeong Noh, Steve Miller, Dan Lindsey 10 September 2012

Accomplishments Coordinated with CloudSat Data Processing Center to provide CloudSat data – Operational CloudSat data remains (as yet) unavailable to the public – Acquired 2 months of data during CloudSat/NPP matchup time periods (February and May 2012) Acquired parallax-corrected VIIRS Intermediate Products for each matchup time period Acquired and successfully installed software developed at CIMSS to identify matching CloudSat profiles/VIIRS pixels Developed software to analyze/compare CloudSat CBH/CTH with VIIRS – Developed framework to compare CBH/CTH matchup statistics – Compared CBH/CTH as a function of VIIRS COT, cloud phase, cloud height – Identified areas where further investigation is needed to understand retrieval behavior and suggest improvement Began creation of CloudSat/VIIRS matchup data set (HDF) to be run operationally when CloudSat data is officially released to public

Accomplishments/DRs Identified possible CTH retrieval issue with clouds near the tropopause – CBH retrieval requires accurate CTH retrieval

CBH Retrieval Algorithm Performance Summary VIIRS Cloud Base Height (CBH) compared with CloudSat, shows only marginal skill – Scatterplot shows large spread in retrieval – R 2 correlation value of globally CBH algorithm depends on numerous retrievals that must be correct before CBH can be retrieved – Cloud top temperature, optical thickness, effective particle size, cloud top height – Errors in these retrievals impact CBH retrieval Difficulty implementing changes in upstream retrievals hampers improvements to CBH retrieval Possibility to develop CBH/CTH retrieval in PATMOS-x where changes to algorithm would be easier to test/implement

Results – VIIRS vs. CloudSat for May 2012 CloudSat must be within 1500 km and 15 minutes of Suomi-NPP for a “matchup period” typically occurs for a ~4.5 hour period every three days CloudSat only collects data during daytime

Results – VIIRS CBH compared with CloudSat 1 month of data shown – All clouds included Scatterplot (left) and 2D histogram (density of points) of VIIRS CBH vs Cloudsat for all clouds Histogram uses a logarithmic scale There is a large spread in CBH retrievals between CloudSat and VIIRS Primary goal in the short term is to identify causes of this spread

Results – VIIRS CBH/CTH compared with CloudSat 1 month of data shown – All clouds included Notes: top black line represents all clouds; colored lines represent histograms for optical thickness bins (see color table); Error is defined as (CloudSat) – (VIIRS) so negative value means VIIRS CBH or CTH was higher than CloudSat CBHCTH

Results – VIIRS CBH/CTH compared with CloudSat 1 month of data shown – Cirrus clouds only Large variation in VIIRS CBH (left) for CloudSat profiles that indicate clouds near the surface Is the VIIRS CTH (right) pinned to the tropopause? Similar patterns seen for “Cirrus”, “Overlap” and “Opaque Ice”

Results – VIIRS CBH/CTH compared with CloudSat 1 month of data shown – Water clouds only Why do so many “water” clouds have CloudSat CBH/CTH values above 10 km MSL? Is this a VIIRS problem or a CloudSat problem? Most of these clouds have a high VIIRS cloud optical thickness It is expected that the retrievals would perform better in optically thick clouds

Issues/Challenges/Setbacks Availability of CloudSat data has been a limitation – CloudSat data products not operationally available – CloudSat data available only during daytime when satellite is turned on – No problem getting VIIRS data thanks to PEATE VIIRS CBH retrievals are dependent on a wide variety of cloud property retrievals that need to be accurate to get the correct CBH – For example: cloud top temperature, cloud optical thickness, effective particle size, cloud phase and cloud top height – Issues in these retrievals need to be resolved before CBH retrievals can be improved

FY13 Plans Continue analysis of CBH and CTH retrievals from both CloudSat and VIIRS and indentify where retrievals perform best – Compare land vs. ocean retrievals – Use recently developed CloudSat precipitation product to separate precip from clouds – Use combined CloudSat/CALIPSO products when they become available to improve CBH/CTH retrievals of optically thin clouds Continue development of CloudSat/VIIRS matchup database and run it operationally on PEATE Develop a VIIRS CBH/CTH retrieval based on PATMOS-x that can be run locally, and would be easier to adjust as our knowledge of the retrieval increases