0 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute What makes implementation difficult? TodaysMeet.com/delivery.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

June 20, Your Presenters  Ken Mattingly – Rockcastle County  Jessica Addison – Todd County/KDE.
Literacy in the middle years of schooling focusing on Aboriginal Students.
Parents as Partners in Education
ELL Reading Committee 1 School House Road Reading, PA x321 Improving Reading Performance for ABC School District Presented to: ABC.
Next Generation Science Standards Adoption and Implementation Workbook.
Camp D 2014 EDI’s Delivery Plan and Stocktakes April 11, 2014.
Skills for Routines Breakout Sessions Breakout session 1: Preparing for a routine: Self-assessment and calibration.
Leading with Wonder National Title I Conference February 2015 U.S. Department of Education Office of State Support (OSS)
Inter-Board Governor Support Programme
Common Core State Standards and Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) Common Core State Standards and Partnership for.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Professional Learning in the Learning Profession Effective Practice  Increased Student Learning Frederick Brown Director of Strategy.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
Introduction to digiCOACH Empowering Instructional Leaders Common Core Edition.
OSSE School Improvement Data Workshop Workshop #4 June 30, 2015 Office of the State Superintendent of Education.
Administrator’s Academy July 2015 Instruction & Accountability Division.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Maximizing Reading Gains to Meet AYP Targets: Decision Support Analytics for School Board Providence School District, RI April 2014.
Module 3: Unit 1, Session 2 MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 1, Session 2.
Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
District Workforce Module Preview This PowerPoint provides a sample of the District Workforce Module PowerPoint. The actual Overview PowerPoint is 62 slides.
Chapter 6 Leading the Data Teams Process: Standards, Assessment, and Instruction.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
OSSE School Improvement Data Workshop Workshop #1 January 30, 2015 Office of the State Superintendent of Education.
Communication System Coherent Instructional Program Academic Behavior Support System Strategic FocusBuilding Capacity.
The Academy of Pacesetting Districts Introducing...
Rwanda MCC Threshold Program CIVIL SOCIETY STRENGTHENING PROJECT Cross-Cutting Advocacy Issues Data Collection Monitoring and Evaluation.
1 College and career readiness Board of Elementary & Secondary Education Special meeting: March 21, 2011.
+ Is your School's Instructional Program Ready for Common Core? Reach Institute for School Leadership.
Module 3: Unit 1, Session 3 MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 1, Session 3.
OVERVIEW 1. WHAT IS FIP YOUR SCHOOL? 2 What is a FIP School? Our goal is to make every school in Ohio a FIP School – a school committed to embracing.
Critical Elements Effective teaching Alignment of curriculum and instruction to standards Instructional program coherence Fidelity of implementation Evaluation.
Destination--- Common Core Staff Meeting/SSC February 2013.
Monitoring & Evaluation: The concepts and meaning Day 9 Session 1.
2 ©2014 U.S. Education Delivery Institute Session Objectives At the end of this session, you will: ▪ Understand the core components and tools of driving.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
Teresa K. Todd EDAD 684 School Finance/Ethics March 23, 2011.
Guidance for Completing Interim Report I Evaluation Webinar Series 3 Dec 2013.
A collaborative project between the Florida Department of Education and the University of South Florida PS/RtI Train the Trainers Regional Meetings.
Shelby County Schools Common Core Modules for Social Studies/History Grades 6-12.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Southern Regional Education Board High Schools That Work Jo Kister, SREB Consultant Archived Information.
Building Bridges: Embedding outcome evaluation in national and state TA delivery Ella Taylor Diane Haynes John Killoran Sarah Beaird August 1, 2006.
1 One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Module 3 Study: Analyze Data Set Goals and Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice.
Project Evaluation for MSP Targeted Partnerships Eric R. Banilower Horizon Research, Inc.
Unpacking the Australian Professional Standard for Principals and the Leadership Profiles “If you don’t have a powerful point of view about what high quality.
Scaling Up in Illinois Illinois STS Team Deb Kunz Brenda Melcher Barbara Sims.
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES & PPGES Strategy Team.
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
Adaptive Leadership in Changing Curricular Times Secondary Curriculum Leaders Tuesday, April 13.
Introducing the Leadership Profiles. Session aims Affirm a focus on leadership learning Introduce the Leadership Profiles Explore the Interactive Leadership.
National Professional Standards for Teachers. Focus Role of the Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership Background on the National Professional.
APR 2014 Report: Data, Analysis and Action Plan for Full Accreditation.
Learning Goals, Scales, and Learning Activities Clarity and Purpose.
Welcome TDEC Professional Learning December 22,
CSDCDecember 8, “More questions than answers.” CSDC December 8, 2010.
Teaching and Learning Cycle and Differentiated Instruction A Perfect Fit Rigor Relevance Quality Learning Environment Differentiation.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Leading through a Time of Change
The School Turnaround Group
Kansas Leads the World in the Success of Each Student.
Jean Scott & Logan Searcy July 22, MEGA
Implementing Race to the Top
February 21-22, 2018.
Presentation transcript:

0 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute What makes implementation difficult? TodaysMeet.com/delivery

1 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute How do we get from red to green? The Assessment Framework Likelihood of Success Red Amber/Red Amber/Green Green Highly problematic – requires urgent and decisive action Problematic – requires substantial attention, some aspects need urgent attention Mixed – aspect(s) require substantial attention, some good Good – requires refinement and systematic implementation Key Quality of planning Capacity to drive progress Evidence of progress JudgementRatingRationale Summary

2 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute One answer comes from a surprising place

3 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute “Deliverology” is a flexible methodology that can help you strengthen implementation across the board 1 What are we trying to do? 2 How are we planning to do it? 3 At any given moment, how will we know whether we are on track to succeed? 4 If we’re not on track, what are we going to do about it?

4 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute Why might Deliverology help? It’s proven It’s practical It’s accessible

5 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute The method was first invented and proven in the UK “…a mandate for reform… and an instruction to deliver ”

6 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute Tony Blair and his government achieved some remarkable results Percent of targets on track during Tony Blair’s second term

7 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute In the last five years, these proof points have spread to American education K-12 partners Higher education partners Both

8 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute Kentucky undertook the approach in 2010… Screenshot of KDE Delivery Website

9 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute …and has since seen large gains in college and career readiness… CCR trajectory with targets and baselines 38.0% 47.2% 54.0% 62.2%

10 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute Hawai’i adopted the approach in 2012 Hawai’i’s three goals and six strategies Academic Review Teams Common Core Comprehensive Student Support System Formative Instruction/Data Teams Educator Effectiveness Induction and Mentoring

11 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute The state has gone from high risk status in Race to the Top to a success story…

12 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute …and has achieved encouraging results for students (1 of 2) Source: Hawai’i P20 Partnerships for Education

13 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute …and has achieved encouraging results for students (2 of 2) Source: Hawai’i P20 Partnerships for Education

14 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute Why might Deliverology help? It’s proven It’s practical It’s accessible

15 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute “Deliverology” consists of 15 essential elements Plan for delivery Develop a foundation for delivery Understand the delivery challenge A.Evaluate past and present performance B.Understand drivers of performance and relevant activities A.Determine your reform strategy B.Set targets and establish trajectories C.Produce delivery plans A.Establish routines to drive and monitor performance B.Solve problems early and rigorously C.Sustain and continually build momentum Drive delivery A.Define your aspiration B.Review the current state of delivery C.Build the delivery unit D.Establish a “guiding coalition” 2341 Create an irreversible delivery culture 5 A. Build system capacity all the time B. Communicate the delivery message C. Unleash the “alchemy of relationships”

16 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute The approach includes a number of tools that you can apply to your work The Assessment Framework Likelihood of Success Red Amber/Red Amber/Green Green Highly problematic – requires urgent and decisive action Problematic – requires substantial attention, some aspects need urgent attention Mixed – aspect(s) require substantial attention, some good Good – requires refinement and systematic implementation Key Quality of planning Capacity to drive progress Evidence of progress JudgementRatingRationale Summary

17 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute When planning goes wrong, why does it go wrong? TodaysMeet.com/delivery

18 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute A good plan is like a good map “The more accurate the map, the more it resembles the territory. The most accurate map would be the territory, and thus would be perfectly accurate and perfectly useless” -Neil Gaiman

19 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute But it’s not enough for the plan to be in your head

20 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute 1.Prioritized Reform Strategies 2. Targets and Trajectories Delivery Plans 3. Delivery Chains The delivery methodology includes tools that help you avoid these challenges

21 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute These tools help states get clear about what they are doing and how Sample tool: Strategy Profile R OW W HAT IS IT ? DescriptionDescribe the strategy and its purpose in a sentence or two Link to goal(s)On which goals will the strategy have a significant impact? Rationale / Theory of ActionWhy/how do we believe it will have that impact? ScaleHow many students, teachers, campuses, etc. will it affect? Resources requiredWhat people, time, money and technology will be needed for successful implementation? Definition of success / Desired outcome What would success look like for this specific strategy and by when? Estimate of ImpactScale x Efficacy = Impact. Of those affected, how many additional will achieve the outcome we desire? MilestonesWhat are the key events (5 or fewer) in the rollout of this strategy?

22 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute The approach includes a number of tools that you can apply to your work The Assessment Framework Likelihood of Success Red Amber/Red Amber/Green Green Highly problematic – requires urgent and decisive action Problematic – requires substantial attention, some aspects need urgent attention Mixed – aspect(s) require substantial attention, some good Good – requires refinement and systematic implementation Key Quality of planning Capacity to drive progress Evidence of progress JudgementRatingRationale Summary

23 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute What is capacity? TodaysMeet.com/delivery

24 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute Capacity is a tricky term to define

25 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute A simple (if not universal) definition can help Capacity is a combination of the skill and will of individuals or teams to make the change you need them to make.

26 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute A delivery chain helps you to get clear about roles, responsibilities, and the capacity needed to reach the field at scale StateRegionalDistrictSchoolClassroom This chain shows the mechanisms for implementation for the CCSS in one state. SEA SEA Curriculum Vendors Regional Network Teams and Curriculum Staff CCSS Assessment Vendors Website Curriculum modules, sample items, other materials Other Curriculum Vendors All other Districts Sups and curriculum staff Large and Districts and Charters with NTEs RICS Students Teachers Coaches and Teacher Leaders Principals and APs Manage Train Provide materials Consult CCSS Instruction State assessments and results Non-state professional development

27 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute It helps states to develop their theories of action about how education workforce development will actually occur County Delivery Chain for Observer Norming District SchoolClassroom Students Talent Mgmt. (12) Coaches (36) State Students Teachers ILDs (12) Principals (~200) Observers (100+) Train Coach Train: shared language Improve performance All able to observe and come to consistent conclusions; shared language ; more effective instruction Train: shared language Provide supports Receive strong, consistent feedback about how to improve  Improve instruction Train: shared language ▪ Potentials Risks/Weaknesses: – Are coaches’ norming sessions consistent? – Are principals getting required training on language and norming? – Is training/support too compliance oriented and not focused enough on how to coach people to improve?

28 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute The approach includes a number of tools that you can apply to your work The Assessment Framework Likelihood of Success Red Amber/Red Amber/Green Green Highly problematic – requires urgent and decisive action Problematic – requires substantial attention, some aspects need urgent attention Mixed – aspect(s) require substantial attention, some good Good – requires refinement and systematic implementation Key Quality of planning Capacity to drive progress Evidence of progress JudgementRatingRationale Summary

29 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute Why is it so hard to measure progress in our work? TodaysMeet.com/delivery

30 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute The big dilemma is the disconnect between how often outcome data are available and how often we have to make decisions

31 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute This results in some awkward situations What do the 2013 NAEP results say now?

32 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute It helps to expand our definition of “evidence”… Already available Availability Created by you Form Quantitative StatisticsNew Collections Field workArtifacts Qualitative

33 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute …and to think of a spectrum from inputs to outcomes Student learning outcomes: Did students learn as a result? Field use of new knowledge and skills: Are they changing practice? Organizational support and change: Are they set up for success? Field learning: Did they learn what is expected of them? Field reaction: Did they like it? Milestones completed: What did we do? These questions can be asked of stakeholders at each level of the State’s education system: teachers, school leaders, district leaders and regional leaders. Framework for Understanding Implementation Progress

34 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute Kentucky has used these tools to creatively track progress on TLE implementation This map and tree map show Kentucky check list items by district Total Items Jefferson County

35 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute Other states have developed educator surveys to gather evidence of implementation progress Principal Survey Question During your most recent 5-10 visits to English/Language Arts classrooms, how often did you observe the following practices? ConsistentlySometimesRarelyNever I don’t know Not applicable The use of text-dependent questions Students writing about texts using personal experiences The use of texts that were the appropriate level of complexity The use of pre-reading strategies to help students fully understand a text prior to reading it Students developing arguments based on the texts they’ve read The use of academic vocabulary during instruction Teacher Survey Question Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements regarding the feedback you received after receiving a classroom observation. a)The feedback was timely b)The feedback included concrete actions that I can take within my classroom c)The feedback included suggestions to implement the Common Core better d)The feedback related to the information drawn from student data based on common interim assessments or student work e)The feedback directed me to resources that will help me improve my practice f)The feedback included suggestions to help me improve my instructional practice SAMPLE SURVEY QUESTIONS

36 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute Once you have the evidence, you also have to decide what to do with it Overall Likelihood of Success AttractPrepareSupportRetain and Extend State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State

37 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute Why might Deliverology help? It’s proven It’s practical It’s accessible

38 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute If this overview interested you, you’ll have an opportunity to dive deeper on some of the components during the summit The Assessment Framework Likelihood of Success Red Amber/Red Amber/Green Green Highly problematic – requires urgent and decisive action Problematic – requires substantial attention, some aspects need urgent attention Mixed – aspect(s) require substantial attention, some good Good – requires refinement and systematic implementation Key Quality of planning Capacity to drive progress Evidence of progress JudgementRatingRationale Summary Tuesday Breakout: “Implementation: Elements of Delivery Planning” Wednesday Breakout: “Managing the Implementation of Initiatives”

Thank