THE ANALYSIS OF FRACTURE SURFACES OF POROUS METAL MATERIALS USING AMT AND FRACTAL GEOMETRY METHODS Sergei Kucheryavski Artem Govorov Altai State University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FRACTAL DIMENSION OF BIOFILM IMAGES
Advertisements

Applications of one-class classification
Area and perimeter calculation using super resolution algorithms M. P. Cipolletti – C. A. Delrieux – M. C. Piccolo – G. M. E. Perillo IADO – UNS – CONICET.
PCA for analysis of complex multivariate data. Interpretation of large data tables by PCA In industry, research and finance the amount of data is often.
DIMENSIONALITY REDUCTION: FEATURE EXTRACTION & FEATURE SELECTION Principle Component Analysis.
Automatic classification of weld cracks using artificial intelligence and statistical methods Ryszard SIKORA, Piotr BANIUKIEWICZ, Marcin CARYK Szczecin.
Math Modeling Final Project APPLICATIONS of FRACTALS Advisor: Professor Alber Fang Qi Pu Wan Xue Rui FRACTAL LANDSCAPES FRACTAL IMAGE COMPRESSION.
Ole Mathis Kruse, IMT Feature extraction techniques to use in cereal classification Department of Mathematical Sciences and Technology 1.
S-SENCE Signal processing for chemical sensors Martin Holmberg S-SENCE Applied Physics, Department of Physics and Measurement Technology (IFM) Linköping.
Mining for High Complexity Regions Using Entropy and Box Counting Dimension Quad-Trees Rosanne Vetro, Wei Ding, Dan A. Simovici Computer Science Department.
São Paulo Advanced School of Computing (SP-ASC’10). São Paulo, Brazil, July 12-17, 2010 Looking at People Using Partial Least Squares William Robson Schwartz.
T T02-06 Histogram (6 SD) Purpose Allows the analyst to analyze quantitative data by summarizing it in sorted format, scattergram by observation,
Surface Variation and Mating Surface Rotational Error in Assemblies Taylor Anderson UGS June 15, 2001.
Data mining and statistical learning, lecture 4 Outline Regression on a large number of correlated inputs  A few comments about shrinkage methods, such.
Dimension reduction : PCA and Clustering Slides by Agnieszka Juncker and Chris Workman.
Detecting Image Region Duplication Using SIFT Features March 16, ICASSP 2010 Dallas, TX Xunyu Pan and Siwei Lyu Computer Science Department University.
Course Website: Computer Graphics 11: 3D Object Representations – Octrees & Fractals.
Methods: Cryo-Electron Microscopy Biochemistry 4000 Dr. Ute Kothe.
T T02-04 Histogram (User Selected Classes) Purpose Allows the analyst to analyze quantitative data by summarizing it in sorted format, scattergram.
PATTERN RECOGNITION : PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS ANALYSIS Prof.Dr.Cevdet Demir
Multifractals in Real World
55:148 Digital Image Processing Chapter 11 3D Vision, Geometry Topics: Basics of projective geometry Points and hyperplanes in projective space Homography.
Using black and white models for classification of medical images Sergei Kucheryavski, Altai State University, Russia
כמה מהתעשייה? מבנה הקורס השתנה Computer vision.
Chapter 2 Dimensionality Reduction. Linear Methods
Chaos Theory and the Financial Markets Why Do Fractals Matter ?
G. M. Estavillo1, D. Harris-Pascal1, M. Eberius3, R. Furbank2 and B. J
BACKGROUND LEARNING AND LETTER DETECTION USING TEXTURE WITH PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS (PCA) CIS 601 PROJECT SUMIT BASU FALL 2004.
A Novel Method for Burst Error Recovery of Images First Author: S. Talebi Second Author: F. Marvasti Affiliations: King’s College London
Discriminative Local Binary Patterns for Human Detection in Personal Album.
Image Processing and Pattern Recognition Jouko Lampinen.
EDGE DETECTION USING MINMAX MEASURES SOUNDARARAJAN EZEKIEL Matthew Lang Department of Computer Science Indiana University of Pennsylvania Indiana, PA.
Probing anisotropic expansion history of the universe with CMBR Ajit M. Srivastava Institute of Physics Bhubaneswar Work done with: Ranjita K. Mohapatra,
Construction of a calibration model stable to structural changes in a grain analyzer P.A. Luzanov, K.A.Zharinov, V.A.Zubkov LUMEX Ltd., St. Petersburg,
Probabilistic & Statistical Techniques Eng. Tamer Eshtawi First Semester Eng. Tamer Eshtawi First Semester
Descriptive Statistics vs. Factor Analysis Descriptive statistics will inform on the prevalence of a phenomenon, among a given population, captured by.
Propagation Models Large scale models predict behavior averaged over distances >>  Function of distance & significant environmental features, roughly.
Estimation of age in forensic medicine using multivariate data analysis Ivan Belyaev Altai State University, Barnaul, Russia Sergey Kucheryavsky.
Two Variable Statistics Introduction To Chi-Square Test for Independence.
Low-Dimensional Chaotic Signal Characterization Using Approximate Entropy Soundararajan Ezekiel Matthew Lang Computer Science Department Indiana University.
Procedure for calculating 2D and 3D Fractal Dimension, including some test-case results and potential applications August 2012 T Murphy.
Computer Graphics and Image Processing (CIS-601).
Geo479/579: Geostatistics Ch4. Spatial Description.
Topic: Quadratics and Complex Numbers Grade: 10 Key Learning(s): Analyzes the graphs of and solves quadratic equations and inequalities by factoring, taking.
Cluster validation Integration ICES Bioinformatics.
Infra-red Technique for Damage Tolerant Sandwich Structures W.Wang 1 J.M.Dulieu-Barton 1, R.K.Fruehmann 1 and C.Berggreen 2 1 Faculty.
Multivariate Analysis and Data Reduction. Multivariate Analysis Multivariate analysis tries to find patterns and relationships among multiple dependent.
PATTERN RECOGNITION : PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS ANALYSIS Richard Brereton
THE HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGING APPROACH
Principal Component Analysis (PCA)
Principal Component Analysis Zelin Jia Shengbin Lin 10/20/2015.
Principal Components Analysis ( PCA)
1 What did we learn before?. 2 line and segment generation.
Automatic Classification for Pathological Prostate Images Based on Fractal Analysis Source: IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, VOL. 28, NO. 7, JULY.
Minimum spanning tree diameter estimation in random sensor networks in fractal dimension Students: Arthur Romm Daniel Kozlov Supervisor: Dr.Zvi Lotker.
Outline Sampling Measurement Descriptive Statistics:
Outlier Processing via L1-Principal Subspaces
Simulation-Based Approach for Comparing Two Means
Principal Component Analysis (PCA)
Principal Component Analysis
Quality Control at a Local Brewery
Digital Holographic Microscopy for Quantitative Visualization
Descriptive Statistics vs. Factor Analysis
Electronic Door Unlock with Face Recognition
Dimension reduction : PCA and Clustering
Principal Component Analysis
6A Types of Data, 6E Measuring the Centre of Data
CENG 789 – Digital Geometry Processing 11- Least-Squares Solutions
Data Driven SIMCA – more than One-Class Classifier
Review and Importance CS 111.
Presentation transcript:

THE ANALYSIS OF FRACTURE SURFACES OF POROUS METAL MATERIALS USING AMT AND FRACTAL GEOMETRY METHODS Sergei Kucheryavski Artem Govorov Altai State University Barnaul, Russia

Ideal life Fractured specimen Fracture surface picture Image Processing and Analysis A priory information about deformation behavior Possible cause of Deformation and fracture

Deformation Structure of Porous Metals Deformation stages (Optical microscope) Fracture surfaces (Electronic microscope)

Known methods  Traditional methods Classical statistics methods (i.e. Mean Absolute Deviation) Textural features methods  Alternative methods Fractal analysis The AMT technique

Fractal geometry  Fractals: irregular, fragmented objects self-similar objects  Fractal geometry methods simulation complex objects like trees, clouds and so on measure of self-similarity quantitative description of irregular, complex structure – fractal dimension D f

Housdorf dimension  = 1 – for squares, cubes  =  /4 – for circles  =  /6 – for spheres D – Housdorf dimension

Fractal dimension N – number of cells

Fractal dimension  Advantages: D – can be considered as the measure of roughness, irregularity of surface The results showed the dependencies between fractal dimension of fracture surfaces and their porosity were obtained  Disadvantages: Some time there is no chance to calculate D It works bad with surfaces that have a small D (from 2 to 2.2) It works bad with noised images

AMT – Angle Measure Technique Algorithm: 1.Image is unfolded into 1D digitized line. 2.A number of points – A – are randomly chosen along the line. 3.For all scales S from 1 to N: Find points B and C – points of intersection of circle with radius S and line; For each point A the Angle and Y-Difference are measured; For all measuring the Mean Angle (MA) and Mean Y Difference (MDY) are calculated. 4.The AMT-spectrum (dependencies of MA and MDY on scale S) is plotted.

AMT-Spectra example

AMT Features  AMT transform the 2D image into 1D spectra without losses the structure information  AMT can be used for data compression  AMT is highly sensitive  Using PCA or PLS for AMT-spectra one can analyze and classify the structures

Fractal Analysis vs. AMT 1. Is there any correlations between fractal dimension of surfaces and their AMT-spectra? 2. Is it possible to use AMT for noised images of surfaces? 3. Apply the AMT to analyze the fracture surfaces of porous metals

Software  Fractal software simulation - C++ program (Diamond-Square Algorithm)  Fractal dimension calculations – C++ program (Box-Counting Algorithm)  AMT-analysis – MATLAB macros (Jun Huang, Telemark University College)  PCA-analysis – The Unscrumbler ®

Simulated fractal surfaces D = 2.1 D = 2.4 D = 2.6 D = 2.9

The results of PCA of AMT spectra 225 specimen with D f from 2.1 to 2.9

The results of PCA of AMT spectra Outliers detection and scores w/o outliers

The results of PCA of AMT spectra The result for specimen with D=2.1 and 2.9

Conclusions  PCA-analysis of AMT-spectra of fractal surfaces allow to make a classification depending on fractal dimension  Scores plot shows that the “clouds” of samples with D<2.5 are overlapped  Score plot shows that the samples with greater D are arranged closely than others

Fractal analysis vs. AMT. Noised images  The real fracture surfaces is differ from simulated fractal surfaces first of all with presence of noise – because of imperfection of devices, external influence and so on.  The task is to add the noise to simulated fractal surfaces and to compare fractal analysis and AMT results.

Simulated surfaces with Gauss noise Original D: 2.1 Calculated D: 2.8 Original D:2.3 Calculated D:2.7 Original D:2.5 Calculated D:2.7 Original D:2.9 Calculated D:2.8

AMT results - Noised Images - w/o Noise

AMT-results - Noised Images - w/o Noise

Conclusions  Fractal analysis doesn’t allow to classify noised images – the calculated and initial fractal dimension are in not close agreement  PCA-results of AMT-spectra of noised images show that “clouds” of samples with equal D are more overlapped and stretched along PC1  In further investigations one can use the fractal dimension of surface as an additional variable in PCA analysis