Tools for Technical, Business & Consumer Analysis in AT Product Development: Expanding the Need to Knowledge Model Joseph P. Lane, Center on KT4TT University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
KT for TT – Ensuring Technology- based R&D matters to Stakeholders
Advertisements

Acknowledgements Funding Partners:University at Buffalo (UB) & National Disability Authority (NDA Project Mentors:Prof. Joe Lane (UB), Dr. Ger Craddock(CEUD/NDA)
Begin with Knowledge Translation; Have the End – Technology Transfer – in Mind Begin with Knowledge Translation; Have the End – Technology Transfer – in.
Overview of Technology Transfer Process RERC on Technology Transfer University at Buffalo.
Achieving Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer: Implications for Evaluation Presenter: Vathsala I. Stone University at Buffalo/
TTO Role in University / Corporate Partnership
How to Translate Knowledge in Three States: Discovery, Invention, Innovation Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer University.
Getting from Knowledge to Action: Effectively communicating Research & Development value to multiple Stakeholder Groups. Joseph Lane & John Westbrook RESNA.
Innovation in Universal Design “Universal integration of research, education, innovation and enterprise at DIT GrangeGorman” Joseph P. Lane, University.
Need to Knowledge Model: A framework for achieving market Innovations through sponsored R&D Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology.
KT for TT – Ensuring Use and Impact from Technology R&D Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer University at Buffalo.
Industry – The missing link between S&T Policy and Societal Benefit. Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer University.
From Theory to Practice: Operationalizing Knowledge Translation for Successful AT Commercialization Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for.
Winning your next proposal: “Buzz Tactics” to increase the chances of success Joseph Lane, Jennifer Flagg, James Leahy Center on Knowledge Translation.
Best Practices in Technology Transfer Jennifer L Flagg Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer University at Buffalo.
KT for AT: Knowledge Translation Tools for R&D Projects Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer
Toolkit for Mainstreaming HIV and AIDS in the Education Sector Guidelines for Development Cooperation Agencies.
Expanding Product Accessibility with Primary Market Research Techniques Jennifer L Flagg Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer, University.
Addressing ethnic inequalities in health service access, experience and outcomes through the critical mobilisation and application of evidence This project.
1 Tracer Study: University Graduates and Labor Market Project Manager Prof. Dr. Eng. Radu Mircea Damian University Graduates and Labor Market Romanian.
Managing & Communicating Knowledge in Three States Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer School.
Analytic Tools: Ensuring industry relevance for university-based R&D projects intending transfer. Joseph P. Lane & James Condron Center on Knowledge Translation.
Bridging the Evidence Gap: Level Of Knowledge Use Survey - LOKUS as a Validated Instrument Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology.
Bridging the Deliverable Gap: Improving Government’s approach to innovation intending social benefit. Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for.
The Case for Industry Leadership in STI Policy Implementation. Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer
Knowledge Translation Conference KT Solutions for Overcoming Barriers to Research Use Hosted by SEDL’s Center on Knowledge Translation for Disability and.
The KT4TT Knowledge Base: Steps and Supporting Evidence to Improve Your Process! Webcast sponsored by SEDL September 29, 2010, 2:00 pm (Central) / 3:00.
Technology Transfer Principles: Methods, Knowledge States and Value Systems Underlying Successful Technological Innovation Joseph P. Lane, Director Center.
Is One Minute Madness?? Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer University at Buffalo.
Evidence-based Management of R&D Projects Intending Market Deployment Joseph P. Lane, Director Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer.
OutcomeObjectivesResearch questionsOutputs Activities Smallholder families adopt technology packages that improve food, nutrition and income security 1.To.
Developing/Commercializing a New Product? KT4TT Center is Here to Assist!! James A. Leahy Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer (KT4TT)
Stages of Research and Development
Stephen Bauer NIDILRR Program Officer
Knowledge Translation Outcome Measurement
Four Models to Guide AT Projects Intending Innovative Technology Development Outcomes Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer.
A prospective study of the translational process in the technology development and transfer projects of NIDILRR’s technology grantees: a qualitative study.
Where do Market Innovations come from? Not the Stork!
From Theory to Practice: Operationalizing Knowledge Translation for Successful AT Commercialization Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation.
KT for AT: Knowledge Translation Tools for R&D Projects
Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer
The Social Model for A/T Technology Transfer – AAATE 2010 “From Problem Identification to Social Validation: An Operational Model” Joseph P. Lane,
Bridging the Deliverable Gap: Improving Government’s approach to innovation intending social benefit. Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation.
Need to Knowledge Model: A framework for achieving market Innovations through sponsored R&D Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology.
Translating New Knowledge from Technology Based Research Projects: an End-of-Grant Intervention Evaluation Study. Rationale and Methods Vathsala I. Stone.
Managing & Communicating Knowledge in Three States
Joseph P. Lane, University at Buffalo
A prospective study of the translational process in the technology development and transfer projects of NIDILRR’s technology grantees: a qualitative study.
Expanding Product Accessibility with Primary Market Research Techniques Jennifer L Flagg Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer, University.
Four Models to Guide AT Projects Intending Innovative Technology Development Outcomes Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer.
Tools for Technical, Business & Consumer Analysis in AT Product Development: Expanding the Need to Knowledge Model Joseph P. Lane, Center on KT4TT.
Joseph P. Lane & James Condron
Disseminating, Tracking and Evaluating New Knowledge in P&O
Dr. Maria de Mello, President
Joseph Lane & John Westbrook
Industry – The missing link between S&T Policy and Societal Benefit.
Best Practices in Technology Transfer
Three States of Knowledge in Technological Innovation
Knowledge Translation Outcome Measurement
The Case for Industry Leadership in STI Policy Implementation.
AEA Annual Meeting , Nov , 2009 Achieving Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer: Implications for Evaluation Presenter: Vathsala I. Stone.
Is One Minute Madness?? Joseph P. Lane
RESNA 2018 Annual Conference
Knowledge Translation Across RERC Activities
Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer
Reconciling Government Policies and Programs with Public Expectations: The Case of Innovation in AT Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation.
Knowledge Utility results from Rigor in Methods & Relevance in Content
The Need to Knowledge (NtK) Model: Orienting Scholar “Technology Grantees” to Best Practices in Transfer & Commercialization Joseph P. Lane, Director.
Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer
Presentation transcript:

Tools for Technical, Business & Consumer Analysis in AT Product Development: Expanding the Need to Knowledge Model Joseph P. Lane, Center on KT4TT University at Buffalo (SUNY), USA

Need to Knowledge (NtK) Model Orientation – Actors in innovation process “need to know”: Problem/Solution; Methods/Outputs; Stakeholder’s roles; Goal in context of technology for socio-economic impacts. Integration – Product Development Managers Association (PDMA) New Product Development practices (implementation); Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Knowledge to Action Model (communication). Validation – Stage-Gate structure populated with supporting evidence (1,000+) excerpts drawn from a scoping review of relevant academic and industry literature published since 1985.

NtK Model Utility Clarifies processes and mechanisms underlying technology-based Innovation, by integrating academic & industry literature. Establishes linkages between three distinct methods and their respective knowledge outputs for implementation/communication. Offers structure to sponsors & grantees for program/project planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation.

Users requested more details on Technical & Business Analyses NtK Steps call for various types of analyses across all three Phases (R, D &P) and in all nine Stages, while Grantees are typically familiar with only a sub-set of them. Technical, Market and Customer analyses address three different yet equally critical issues for technological innovation so they must be planned and conducted. Time to supplement “what to do” Literature with “how to do” Tools.

Ireland/USA Partnership Dr. James Condron – Biomedical Engineer, Dublin Institutes of Technology. Professor Eugene Coyle, School of Engineering, DIT. Dr. Gerald Craddock & James Hubbard, National Disability Association, Ireland. Jennifer Flagg & Michelle Lockett, University at Buffalo, USA.

Five Competency Categories Electrical/electronic engineering tools: measurement systems, design and testing systems and mass manufacturing tools. Material science tools: required to make the choice for a particular manufacturing material or to examine the characteristics of a potential material. Mechanical engineering tools: encompasses the generation and application of heat and mechanical power and the design, production, and use of machines and tools. Business tools: such as quantifying customer requirements, benchmarking, marketing tools, business feasibility, process improvement and return on investment. Inclusive/Universal Design tools: to ensure that the widest possible audience will be considered in the design process, regardless of age, size, ability or disability.

Type/Range of Tools

Distribution of 79 Tools by Group

Screen Image of Tool Summary

NtK Model’s Toolbox Go to tools for Technical, Marketing and Customer Analyses

NtK Model Publications Lane, J & Flagg, J. (2010) “Translating 3 States of Knowledge: Discovery, Invention & Innovation.” Implementation Science, 5, 1, Stone, V. & Lane J (2012). “Modeling the Technology Innovation Process: How the implementation of science, engineering and industry methods combine to generate beneficial socio-economic impacts.” Implementation Science, 7, 1, Lane, JP (2012). The Need to Knowledge Model: An operational framework for knowledge translation and technology transfer. Technology and Disability, 24,187– Flagg, J, Lane, J., & Lockett M. (2013) “Need to Knowledge (NtK) Model: An Evidence-based Framework for Generating Technology-based Innovations.” Implementation Science, 8, 21,

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This is a presentation of the Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer, which is funded by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, U.S. Department of Education, under grant #H133A The opinions contained in this presentation are those of the grantee and do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S. Department of Education.