Low Cost Safety Improvements Pooled Fund Study Advanced Street Name Signs Dr. James Jenness, Westat.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
P RACTICES TO M ANAGE T RAFFIC S IGN R ETROREFLECTIVITY NCHRP Project Synthesis Topic Paul Carlson June 21, 2011.
Advertisements

CURVE SPEED ADVANCED WARNING SIGNS
Revisions to Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates.
January 8, 2014 FMATS College Road Corridor Study FMATS Technical Committee Update.
1 Element 1: The Systemic Safety Project Selection Process Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process.
Flashing Yellow Arrows Joel McCarroll, Region 4 Traffic Manager on behalf of Edward L. Fischer State Traffic Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation.
Safety at Signalized Intersections. Signalized Intersections FHWA Safety Focus Areas 2.
Overview of 2009 MUTCD. Tom McDonald, PE Safety Circuit Rider Iowa LTAP.
Florida Department of Transportation, November 2009
LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Practitioner Workshop The Tools – Traffic Signals – Session #7.
2009 MUTCD (Final Rule) Revisions Incorporated into the 2009 MUTCD Revisions to Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates.
Pedestrian Safety Countermeasures Deployment and Evaluation: Las Vegas Case Study Shashi Nambisan Director, InTrans & Professor of Civil Engineering Iowa.
1 Channelization and Turn Bays. 2 Island Channelization flush, paved, and delineated with markings – or unpaved and delineated with pavement edge and.
Office of Highway Safety Highway Factors David Rayburn.
Incorporating Safety into the Highway Design Process.
Lec 14, Ch.8, pp : Intersection control and warrants (objectives) Know the purpose of traffic control Know what MUTCD is and what’s in it Know what.
Teresa Krenning, P.E. St. Louis District. National Rank WWD Fatal Crashes StateAverage FrequencyPercent of U.S. Total Texas3814% California2610% Florida218%
Module Use research and appropriate methods for selecting effective countermeasures and targeting diverse cultural and geographic populations. Countermeasure.
Murray Boulevard and Farmington Road Intersection Sirisha Kothuri Wei Feng Ping Guo Meead Saberi CEE 550 Transportation Safety Analysis.
ITS to Address Non-Signalized Rural Intersection Safety Ray Starr, Assistant State Traffic Engineer Intelligent Transportation Systems Section Minnesota.
Office of Traffic, Safety, and Operations Application Guidelines Warning Signs Signing Plan Design (At-Grade) June 20, 2012.
8-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS The Tools – Traffic Signals – Session #8.
Safety and Design National Technical Services Team 1 Systematic Approach to Intersection Safety May 11, st Annual Missouri Traffic and Safety Conference.
Low Cost Safety Improvements Pooled Fund Study (PFS) presented by Kim Eccles, P.E. Senior Engineer, VHB.
. Efforts to Reduce Crashes on County Roads in Iowa.
Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology Chapter 2 Signing Overview Traffic Signs 101 November 20, 2014.
1-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Practitioner Workshop Introduction – Session #1.
E N T E R P R I S E Developing Consistency in ITS Safety Solutions – Intersection Warning Systems ENTERPRISE PROJECT OVERVIEW JUNE 15, 2011.
SE&A GTS – Ga r d n e r T ra n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m s © Siemens E&A, GTS Kittelson Associates, Inc. Protected Permitted Left Turn Displays NCHRP.
University of Maryland Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering By G.L. Chang, M.L. Franz, Y. Liu, Y. Lu & R. Tao BACKGROUND SYSTEM DESIGN DATA.
2-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS The Tools – Identification of High Crash Locations – Session #2.
Low-Cost Safety Improvements Pooled Fund Study FUTURE DIRECTION Annual TAC Meeting,2007 Roya Amjadi FHWA, Turner-Fairbank Research Center.
1 CEE 763 Fall 2011 Topic 1 – Fundamentals CEE 763.
Patrick Hasson Federal Highway Administration Midwestern Resource Center Engineering Safer Intersections.
9-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Practitioner Workshop Exercise C – Session #9.
How would a truck get through? Any suggestions?. No parking allows access.
E N T E R P R I S E Developing Consistency in ITS Safety Solutions – Intersection Warning Systems Project Overview December 2011.
Unsignalized Intersections Safety at Unsignalized Intersections.
How do we focus on the future in our urban environments?
Minimum Sign Retroreflectivity Requirements Updated August 2012 with compliance date revisions.
6-Answers-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Practitioner Workshop Exercise – Part A – Session #6.
Public Safety Committee September 28, 2015 David O. Brown Chief Of Police Pedestrian Safety.
Donald E. Howe, P.E. Division of Traffic Operations California Department of Transportation Minimum Sign Retroreflectivity Requirements New.
Low Cost Safety Improvements Pooled Funds Study Safety of Lane/Shoulder Width Combinations on Two-Lane Rural Roads Dr. Frank Gross, Vanasse Hangen Brustlin.
NCHRP Crash Reduction Factors for Traffic Engineering and ITS Improvements UNC HSRC VHB Ryerson University (Bhagwant and Craig)
INTERSECTION WARNING SYSTEMS Jon Jackels Mn/DOT ITS Program Engineer Traffic Topics April 7, 2011.
Low Cost Safety Improvements Pooled Fund Study Combination Centerline and Edgeline Rumble Strips Dr. Frank Gross, VHB.
Jason J. Siwula, PE – Safety Engineer HSIP HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT SIGNING.
AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan Development & Implementation Status 2004 Traffic Records Forum David M. Smith Senior Transportation Specialist, Office.
HSIS Annual Meeting, 10/2006 NCHRP 17-30: Traffic Safety Evaluation of Nighttime and Daytime Work Zones Raghavan Srinivasan Forrest Council.
1 Evaluation of Low-Cost Safety Improvements (ELCSI) Pooled Fund Study Roya Amjadi, Highway Research Engineer FHWA, Turner-Fairbank Research Center 10/24/08.
Lives Saved by FHWA Roadway Safety Programs Forrest Council.
Intersection Control Chapter 8 Dr. TALEB AL-ROUSAN.
SHSP INTERSECTION EMPHASIS AREA. Emphasis Area Definition  The term intersection crash is defined as a crash which occurs just before, just after or.
Connecting South Dakota and the Nation Access Management Training Brooke White, Access Management Engineer.
LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Practitioner Workshop The Tools – Identification of High Crash Locations – Session #2.
Low Cost Safety Improvements Pooled Fund Study Analytical Basics Dr. Bhagwant Persaud.
NC Local Safety Partnership Evaluation Methods. Workshop Roadmap Program Background and Overview Crash Data Identifying Potential Treatment Locations.
Saving the King Street Bicycle Boulevard
us 30 and SR 603 – Ashland county September 7, PUBLIC meeting
Revisions to Part 7 – Traffic Control for School Areas
Evaluation of Michigan’s Engineering Improvements for Older Drivers
Safety Effects of Marked vs
SCOHTS Meeting June 15-17, 2011.
Flashing Yellow Arrows for Permissive Left Turns – Is It for You?
Intersection Conflict Warning Systems
Results and Status of State Crash Analyses
SCOHTS Meeting June 15-17, 2011.
Ambient Monitoring Initial Report
Presentation transcript:

Low Cost Safety Improvements Pooled Fund Study Advanced Street Name Signs Dr. James Jenness, Westat

Overview u Background u Status of Data Collection u Study Design u Remaining Data Needs u Evaluation Considerations

Background u Ranked 14 th u NCHRP Report 500 Series Older Driver Guidebook u Older drivers are more involved in intersection crashes than other drivers u Older drivers exhibit excessive vehicle-braking at/before intersections Provide advance guide signs and street name signs Photo Source: NCHRP Report 500 Series Volume 9

Background u Tried, low cost, short-term implementation u Target crashes l All intersection related l Rear-end l Late lane changes l Night l Older drivers u Consistent signing across jurisdictions also important Provide advance guide signs and street name signs Photo Source: NCHRP Report 500 Series Volume 9

Background u Differing methods to provide street names in advance of intersection: Photo source: NCHRP Report 500 Series Volume 9 and North Carolina Dept of Transportation ( l Green and white Advance Street Name signs l MUTCD W3-3 advance traffic control signs with W16-8 supplemental warning plaques

Data Collection

Status of Data Collection u Massachusetts l Blanketed strategy across four districts in 2004 l 200 sites included in the study Over 400 installed Lack of ADT data limited sample l Limited crash data l 500 intersection-years of before crash data l 250 intersection-years of after crash data

Status of Data Collection l Crash data from l 400 intersection-years of before crash data l 300 intersection-years of after crash data u North Carolina l Blanketed strategy in Cary, NC in 2001 l 100 sites included in the study

Study Design u Required Sample Size l Minimum: 803 intersection-years per period Detect a 5 percent reduction in total crashes with 95 percent confidence l Desirable: 2,031 intersection-years per period Detect a 10 percent reduction in older driver crashes with 95 percent confidence

Study Design u Assumptions l 7.0 crashes per intersection per year in the before period, of which 9 percent involve older drivers Crash rate based on preliminary data from MA sites, older-driver share based on Toronto data l Before and after periods are of equal length l Equal number of intersection-years for treatment and reference sites

Remaining Data Needs u Minimum: Need 450 more after intersection- years u Desirable: Need 1,130 before intersection- years and 1680 after intersection-years for older driver u Need additional installations

Evaluation Considerations u Do not have large enough sample size u Comparing two methods of signing u Limited ADT data in Massachusetts

Questions?