Hashing and Hash-Based Index. Selection Queries Yes! Hashing  static hashing  dynamic hashing B+-tree is perfect, but.... to answer a selection query.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
External Memory Hashing. Model of Computation Data stored on disk(s) Minimum transfer unit: a page = b bytes or B records (or block) N records -> N/B.
Advertisements

CS4432: Database Systems II Hash Indexing 1. Hash-Based Indexes Adaptation of main memory hash tables Support equality searches No range searches 2.
Hash-Based Indexes Jianlin Feng School of Software SUN YAT-SEN UNIVERSITY.
Hash-based Indexes CS 186, Spring 2006 Lecture 7 R &G Chapter 11 HASH, x. There is no definition for this word -- nobody knows what hash is. Ambrose Bierce,
1 Hash-Based Indexes Module 4, Lecture 3. 2 Introduction As for any index, 3 alternatives for data entries k* : – Data record with key value k – –Choice.
Hash-Based Indexes The slides for this text are organized into chapters. This lecture covers Chapter 10. Chapter 1: Introduction to Database Systems Chapter.
Database Management Systems 3ed, R. Ramakrishnan and J. Gehrke1 Hash-Based Indexes Chapter 11.
Database Management Systems 3ed, R. Ramakrishnan and J. Gehrke1 Hash-Based Indexes Chapter 11.
CPSC 404, Laks V.S. Lakshmanan1 Hash-Based Indexes Chapter 11 Ramakrishnan & Gehrke (Sections )
ICOM 6005 – Database Management Systems Design Dr. Manuel Rodríguez-Martínez Electrical and Computer Engineering Department Lecture 11 – Hash-based Indexing.
Access Methods for Advanced Database Applications.
Advanced Data Structures NTUA Spring 2007 B+-trees and External memory Hashing.
Chapter 11 (3 rd Edition) Hash-Based Indexes Xuemin COMP9315: Database Systems Implementation.
6. Files of (horizontal) Records
Hash Indexes: Chap. 11 CS634 Lecture 6, Feb
Index tuning Hash Index. overview Introduction Hash-based indexes are best for equality selections. –Can efficiently support index nested joins –Cannot.
ICS 421 Spring 2010 Indexing (2) Asst. Prof. Lipyeow Lim Information & Computer Science Department University of Hawaii at Manoa 2/23/20101Lipyeow Lim.
B+-trees and Hashing. Model of Computation Data stored on disk(s) Minimum transfer unit: page = b bytes or B records (or block) If r is the size of a.
Arch (A) Tented Arch (T) Whorl (W) Loop (U or R) The four main classes of fingerprints Loop (60%) Arch/Tented Arch (6%) Whorl (34%) Other (Less than 1%)
B-trees - Hashing. 11.2Database System Concepts Review: B-trees and B+-trees Multilevel, disk-aware, balanced index methods primary or secondary dense.
1 Hash-Based Indexes Yanlei Diao UMass Amherst Feb 22, 2006 Slides Courtesy of R. Ramakrishnan and J. Gehrke.
B+-tree and Hashing.
B+-tree and Hash Indexes
1 Hash-Based Indexes Chapter Introduction  Hash-based indexes are best for equality selections. Cannot support range searches.  Static and dynamic.
FALL 2004CENG 3511 Hashing Reference: Chapters: 11,12.
1 Hash-Based Indexes Chapter Introduction : Hash-based Indexes  Best for equality selections.  Cannot support range searches.  Static and dynamic.
Chapter 10,11 Indexes 11. Hash-based Indexes
1 Database Systems ( 資料庫系統 ) December 6/7, 2006 Lecture #9.
1 Database Systems ( 資料庫系統 ) November 8, 2004 Lecture #9 By Hao-hua Chu ( 朱浩華 )
Database Management Systems 3ed, R. Ramakrishnan and J. Gehrke1 Tree- and Hash-Structured Indexes Selected Sections of Chapters 10 & 11.
Index tuning-- B+tree. overview Overview of tree-structured index Indexed sequential access method (ISAM) B+tree.
Database Management 7. course. Reminder Disk and RAM RAID Levels Disk space management Buffering Heap files Page formats Record formats.
Database Management Systems 3ed, R. Ramakrishnan and J. Gehrke1 Hash-Based Indexes Chapter 11 Modified by Donghui Zhang Jan 30, 2006.
Introduction to Database, Fall 2004/Melikyan1 Hash-Based Indexes Chapter 10.
1.1 CS220 Database Systems Indexing: Hashing Slides courtesy G. Kollios Boston University via UC Berkeley.
Static Hashing (using overflow for collision managment e.g., h(key) mod M h key Primary bucket pages 1 0 M-1 Overflow pages(as separate link list) Overflow.
Database Management Systems 3ed, R. Ramakrishnan and J. Gehrke1 Indexed Sequential Access Method.
Database Management Systems, R. Ramakrishnan and J. Gehrke1 Hash-Based Indexes Chapter 10.
B+-Trees and Hashing, R. Ramakrishnan and J. Gehrke; extended and significantly revised by Ch. Eick 1 B+-Trees and Hashing Techniques for Storage and Index.
B-Trees, Part 2 Hash-Based Indexes R&G Chapter 10 Lecture 10.
1 Database Systems ( 資料庫系統 ) November 28, 2005 Lecture #9.
Chapter 5 Record Storage and Primary File Organizations
Hash-Based Indexes. Introduction uAs for any index, 3 alternatives for data entries k*: w Data record with key value k w w Choice orthogonal to the indexing.
Database Applications (15-415) DBMS Internals- Part IV Lecture 15, March 13, 2016 Mohammad Hammoud.
Database Management 7. course. Reminder Disk and RAM RAID Levels Disk space management Buffering Heap files Page formats Record formats.
COP Introduction to Database Structures
Hash-Based Indexes Chapter 11
Hashing CENG 351.
Database Management Systems (CS 564)
Introduction to Database Systems
B+-Trees and Static Hashing
External Memory Hashing
Tree- and Hash-Structured Indexes
CS222: Principles of Data Management Notes #8 Static Hashing, Extendible Hashing, Linear Hashing Instructor: Chen Li.
Hash-Based Indexes R&G Chapter 10 Lecture 18
Hash-Based Indexes Chapter 10
B-Trees, Part 2 Hash-Based Indexes
CS222P: Principles of Data Management Notes #8 Static Hashing, Extendible Hashing, Linear Hashing Instructor: Chen Li.
Hashing.
Hash-Based Indexes Chapter 11
Index tuning Hash Index.
Database Systems (資料庫系統)
LINEAR HASHING E0 261 Jayant Haritsa Computer Science and Automation
Index tuning Hash Index.
Database Systems (資料庫系統)
Hash-Based Indexes Chapter 11
Chapter 11 Instructor: Xin Zhang
Tree- and Hash-Structured Indexes
CS222/CS122C: Principles of Data Management UCI, Fall 2018 Notes #07 Static Hashing, Extendible Hashing, Linear Hashing Instructor: Chen Li.
Presentation transcript:

Hashing and Hash-Based Index

Selection Queries Yes! Hashing  static hashing  dynamic hashing B+-tree is perfect, but.... to answer a selection query (ssn=10) needs to traverse a full path. In practice, 3-4 block accesses (depending on the height of the tree, buffering) Any better approach?

Hashing  Hash-based indexes are best for equality selections. Cannot support range searches.  Static and dynamic hashing techniques exist; trade-offs similar to ISAM vs. B+ trees.

Static Hashing  # primary pages fixed, allocated sequentially, never de-allocated; overflow pages if needed.  h(k) MOD N= bucket to which data entry with key k belongs. (N = # of buckets) h(key) mod N h key Primary bucket pages Overflow pages 1 0 N-1

Static Hashing (Contd.)  Buckets contain data entries.  Hash fn works on search key field of record r. Use its value MOD N to distribute values over range 0... N-1.  h(key) = (a * key + b) usually works well.  a and b are constants; lots known about how to tune h.  Long overflow chains can develop and degrade performance.  Extendible and Linear Hashing: Dynamic techniques to fix this problem.

Extendible Hashing  Situation: Bucket (primary page) becomes full. Why not re-organize file by doubling # of buckets?  Reading and writing all pages is expensive!  Idea: Use directory of pointers to buckets, double # of buckets by doubling the directory, splitting just the bucket that overflowed!  Directory much smaller than file, so doubling it is much cheaper. Only one page of data entries is split. No overflow page!  Trick lies in how hash function is adjusted!

Example 13* LOCAL DEPTH GLOBAL DEPTH DIRECTORY Bucket A Bucket B Bucket C 10* 1*7* 4*12*32* 16* 5* we denote r by h(r). Directory is array of size 4. Bucket for record r has entry with index = `global depth’ least significant bits of h(r); –If h(r) = 5 = binary 101, it is in bucket pointed to by 01. –If h(r) = 7 = binary 111, it is in bucket pointed to by 11.

Handling Inserts  Find bucket where record belongs.  If there’s room, put it there.  Else, if bucket is full, split it:  increment local depth of original page  allocate new page with new local depth  re-distribute records from original page.  add entry for the new page to the directory

Example: Insert 21, then 19, 15 13* LOCAL DEPTH GLOBAL DEPTH DIRECTORY Bucket A Bucket B Bucket C 2 Bucket D DATA PAGES 10* 1*7* 2 4*12*32* 16* 15* 7* 19* 5*  21 =  19 =  15 = *

2 4*12*32* 16* Insert h(r)=20 (Causes Doubling) LOCAL DEPTH GLOBAL DEPTH Bucket A Bucket B Bucket C Bucket D 1* 5*21*13* 10* 15*7*19* (`split image' of Bucket A) 20* 3 Bucket A2 4*12* of Bucket A) 3 Bucket A2 (`split image' 4* 20* 12* 2 Bucket B 1*5*21*13* 10* 2 19* 2 Bucket D 15* 7* 3 32* 16* LOCAL DEPTH GLOBAL DEPTH 3 32* 16*

Points to Note  20 = binary Last 2 bits (00) tell us r belongs in either A or A2. Last 3 bits needed to tell which.  Global depth of directory: Max # of bits needed to tell which bucket an entry belongs to.  Local depth of a bucket: # of bits used to determine if an entry belongs to this bucket.  When does bucket split cause directory doubling?  Before insert, local depth of bucket = global depth. Insert causes local depth to become > global depth; directory is doubled by copying it over and `fixing’ pointer to split image page.

Comments on Extendible Hashing  If directory fits in memory, equality search answered with one disk access; else two.  100MB file, 100 bytes/rec, 4K pages contains 1,000,000 records (as data entries) and 25,000 directory elements; chances are high that directory will fit in memory.  Directory grows in spurts, and, if the distribution of hash values is skewed, directory can grow large.  Multiple entries with same hash value cause problems!  Delete: If removal of data entry makes bucket empty, can be merged with `split image’. If each directory element points to same bucket as its split image, can halve directory.

Linear Hashing  A dynamic hashing scheme that handles the problem of long overflow chains without using a directory.  Directory avoided in LH by using temporary overflow pages, and choosing the bucket to split in a round-robin fashion.  When any bucket overflows split the bucket that is currently pointed to by the “Next” pointer and then increment that pointer to the next bucket.

Linear Hashing – The Main Idea  Use a family of hash functions h 0, h 1, h 2,...  h i (key) = h(key) mod(2 i N)  N = initial # buckets  h is some hash function  h i+1 doubles the range of h i (similar to directory doubling)

Linear Hashing (Contd.)  Algorithm proceeds in `rounds’. Current round number is “Level”.  There are N Level (= N * 2 Level ) buckets at the beginning of a round  Buckets 0 to Next-1 have been split; Next to N Level have not been split yet this round.  Round ends when all initial buckets have been split (i.e. Next = N Level ).  To start next round: Level++; Next = 0;

Linear Hashing - Insert  Find appropriate bucket  If bucket to insert into is full:  Add overflow page and insert data entry.  Split Next bucket and increment Next.  Note: This is likely NOT the bucket being inserted to!!!  to split a bucket, create a new bucket and use h Level+1 to re- distribute entries.  Since buckets are split round-robin, long overflow chains don’t develop!

Example: Insert 43 (101011) 0 h h 1 ( This info is for illustration only!) Level=0, N= Next=0 PRIMARY PAGES 0 h h 1 Level= Next=1 PRIMARY PAGES OVERFLOW PAGES * 36* 32* 25* 9*5* 14*18* 10* 30* 31*35* 11* 7* 44* 36* 32* 25* 9*5* 14*18* 10* 30* 31*35* 11* 7* 43* ( This info is for illustration only!)

Example: End of a Round 0 h h 1 22* Next= Level=0, Next = 3 PRIMARY PAGES OVERFLOW PAGES 32* 9* 5* 14* 25* 66* 10* 18* 34* 35*31* 7* 11* 43* 44*36* 37*29* 30* 0 h h 1 37* Next= PRIMARY PAGES OVERFLOW PAGES 11 32* 9*25* 66* 18* 10* 34* 35* 11* 44* 36* 5* 29* 43* 14* 30* 22* 31*7* 50* Insert 50 (110010) Level=1, Next = 0

LH Search Algorithm  To find bucket for data entry r, find h Level (r):  If h Level (r) >= Next (i.e., h Level (r) is a bucket that hasn’t been involved in a split this round) then r belongs in that bucket for sure.  Else, r could belong to bucket h Level (r) or bucket h Level (r) + N Level must apply h Level+1 (r) to find out.

Example: Search 44 (11100), 9 (01001) 0 h h 1 Level=0, Next=0, N= PRIMARY PAGES 44* 36* 32* 25* 9*5* 14*18* 10* 30* 31*35* 11* 7* ( This info is for illustration only!)

Level=0, Next = 1, N=4 ( This info is for illustration only!) 0 h h PRIMARY PAGES OVERFLOW PAGES * 36* 32* 25* 9*5* 14*18* 10* 30* 31*35* 11* 7* 43* Example: Search 44 (11100), 9 (01001)