Citizen Air Monitoring in the Houston Area Jane Laping, Executive Director Mothers for Clean Air
Commonly Used Sampling Equipment Active monitors –Citizen made bucket –Vac-U-Chamber suitcase Passive Monitors –6-liter stainless steel canister –Organic Vapor Monitor
Citizen-made Bucket
Vac-U-Tainer
Tedlar® Bag
Canister
Opening the valve on a canister
Organic Vapor Monitor
Citizen Air Monitoring Projects Texas Bucket Brigade Houston-Galveston Citizen Air Monitoring Project (H-GCAMP) Seabrook Citizens Health Induced Air Monitoring Project (SCHIAMP) Improving Environmental Quality through Cooperation (IEQC)
Houston/Galveston Citizen Air Monitoring Project (HGCAMP) Tools for Citizen Air Sampling Tools for Citizen Air Sampling
Co-located synchronous sampling
Unique partnership Agencies and citizens worked together to develop a Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) Chain of custody form Training manual Network of sample drop-off locations
HGCAMP Sampling March 2002 – March sample pairs collected Over a large geographical area Under a variety of sampling conditions With variability of sampler expertise 16 pairs excluded from analysis mostly due to insufficient sample volume
HGCAMP Sampling Sites
Data Set Used for Statistical Evaluation 67 data pairs evaluated 64 target compounds 25 compounds detected 21 compounds detected with > 1 pair of samples 2 compounds in all valid sample sets 7 compounds detected in at least 20 samples 5 gas standards analyzed by EPA and TCEQ 5 split canister samples analyzed by EPA and TCEQ
Dichlorodifluoromethane Shows good correlation
Acrylonitrile Shows poor correlation
Tedlar® bag Media Blank Contaminants Consistent contaminants Phenol N,N-dimethylacetamide Unknown alkanes TIC identified as isothiocyanatocyclohexane Sporadic contaminants Methylene chloride Benzene Toluene m/p-Xylene Numerous TICs including organic sulfides, alcohols, alkanes and acetates
6 Compounds Detected at Statistically Significant Different Concentrations in Tedlar ® Bags and Canisters (p<0.1) Vinyl Acetate (p=0.0903) N-hexane (p=0.0662) Methylene chloride (p=0.0861) Acrylonitrile (p=0.0044) 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene (p=0.0174) 1,3-butadiene (p=0.0225)
8 Compounds Not Significantly Different and Correlated (r>0.8) Styrene (r=0.9820) MTBE (r=0.9795) Dichlorodifluoromethane (r=0.9655) Chloromethane (r=0.8112) Benzene (r=0.8010) 4-methyl-2-pentanone (r=0.9621) 2,2,4-trimethylpentane (r=0.9671) 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene (r=0.9146) m/p-Xylene (corr degraded by outlier)
HGCAMP Outcome Agencies Gained equipment comparison information Provided scientific integrity Received benefit of working with citizens Citizens Learned sampling procedures Received air data for their communities Understood agency limitations Partners Opportunities for future funding
Seabrook Citizens Health Induced Air Monitoring Project (SCHIAMP)
SCHIAMP Method Perimeter sampling of Seabrook area –5 locations on perimeter 15 l and 6 l canisters used for a month –15 liter canisters changed out after 1 week –6 liter canisters changed out after 3 days
SCHIAMP Conclusions VOCs with highest concentrations: –methylene chloride –benzene –toluene –styrene Individual levels of all VOCs found were within permissible regulated levels 72 and 168 hour time-weighted averaged samples are not optimal in determining acute short term exposures
Improving Environmental Quality through Cooperation (IEQC)
Organic Vapor Monitor (OVM) Advantages of OVM –Low level concentrations –Multiple VOCs –Relatively short sample time Method –25 zip code sections –72 hour samples –4 times/year x 2 years
Expected IEQC Outcomes Air toxics inventory GIS mapping of concentrations –Source identification Enhanced communication with regulatory authorities Enhanced communication with industry
Advantages of Citizen Air Monitoring Citizens can be watch dogs for agencies Identify hot spots that require further investigation Understand exposure patterns in communities Alert industry to interests of neighbors