MURI: Integrated Fusion, Performance Prediction, and Sensor Management for Automatic Target Exploitation 1 Dynamic Sensor Resource Management for ATE MURI.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Probability and the Web Ken Baclawski Northeastern University VIStology, Inc.
Advertisements

Bayesian Belief Propagation
Pseudo-Relevance Feedback For Multimedia Retrieval By Rong Yan, Alexander G. and Rong Jin Mwangi S. Kariuki
Statistical Machine Learning- The Basic Approach and Current Research Challenges Shai Ben-David CS497 February, 2007.
1 ECE 776 Project Information-theoretic Approaches for Sensor Selection and Placement in Sensor Networks for Target Localization and Tracking Renita Machado.
A Hierarchical Multiple Target Tracking Algorithm for Sensor Networks Songhwai Oh and Shankar Sastry EECS, Berkeley Nest Retreat, Jan
MULTISENSOR FUSION  Architecture (US-JDL/UK-TFDF)  Feature Space (Data representations, Task-specific, feedback)  Dimensionality (Communication bandwidth.
Hierarchical mission control of automata with human supervision Prof. David A. Castañon Boston University.
Oklahoma State University Generative Graphical Models for Maneuvering Object Tracking and Dynamics Analysis Xin Fan and Guoliang Fan Visual Computing and.
On Systems with Limited Communication PhD Thesis Defense Jian Zou May 6, 2004.
Large Scale Navigation Based on Perception Maria Joao Rendas I3S, CNRS-UNSA.
Particle Filter Speed Up Using a GPU High Performance Embedded Computing Workshop MIT Lincoln Labs By John Sacha & Andrew Shaffer Applied Research Laboratory.
Tracking Objects with Dynamics Computer Vision CS 543 / ECE 549 University of Illinois Derek Hoiem 04/21/15 some slides from Amin Sadeghi, Lana Lazebnik,
Probabilistic Robotics
Chess Review May 11, 2005 Berkeley, CA Tracking Multiple Objects using Sensor Networks and Camera Networks Songhwai Oh EECS, UC Berkeley
A Probabilistic Approach to Collaborative Multi-robot Localization Dieter Fox, Wolfram Burgard, Hannes Kruppa, Sebastin Thrun Presented by Rajkumar Parthasarathy.
1 Integration of Background Modeling and Object Tracking Yu-Ting Chen, Chu-Song Chen, Yi-Ping Hung IEEE ICME, 2006.
Arizona State University DMML Kernel Methods – Gaussian Processes Presented by Shankar Bhargav.
Bayesian Filtering for Robot Localization
Helsinki University of Technology Adaptive Informatics Research Centre Finland Variational Bayesian Approach for Nonlinear Identification and Control Matti.
Muhammad Moeen YaqoobPage 1 Moment-Matching Trackers for Difficult Targets Muhammad Moeen Yaqoob Supervisor: Professor Richard Vinter.
Decentralised Coordination of Mobile Sensors School of Electronics and Computer Science University of Southampton Ruben Stranders,
Machine Learning CUNY Graduate Center Lecture 3: Linear Regression.
4.x Performance Technology drivers – Exascale systems will consist of complex configurations with a huge number of potentially heterogeneous components.
Particle Filtering in Network Tomography
Summary Alan S. Willsky SensorWeb MURI Review Meeting September 22, 2003.
BraMBLe: The Bayesian Multiple-BLob Tracker By Michael Isard and John MacCormick Presented by Kristin Branson CSE 252C, Fall 2003.
Computer vision: models, learning and inference Chapter 19 Temporal models.
Team Exploration vs Exploitation with Finite Budgets David Castañón Boston University Center for Information and Systems Engineering.
From Bayesian Filtering to Particle Filters Dieter Fox University of Washington Joint work with W. Burgard, F. Dellaert, C. Kwok, S. Thrun.
Tracking with Unreliable Node Sequences Ziguo Zhong, Ting Zhu, Dan Wang and Tian He Computer Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota Infocom 2009.
MURI: Integrated Fusion, Performance Prediction, and Sensor Management for Automatic Target Exploitation 1 Optimal, Robust Information Fusion in Uncertain.
Person detection, tracking and human body analysis in multi-camera scenarios Montse Pardàs (UPC) ACV, Bilkent University, MTA-SZTAKI, Technion-ML, University.
Particle Filters.
Forward-Scan Sonar Tomographic Reconstruction PHD Filter Multiple Target Tracking Bayesian Multiple Target Tracking in Forward Scan Sonar.
HQ U.S. Air Force Academy I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Improving the Performance of Out-of-Order Sigma-Point Kalman Filters.
Energy-Efficient Signal Processing and Communication Algorithms for Scalable Distributed Fusion.
Value of Information 1 st year review. UCLA 2012 Kickoff VOI Kickoff ARO MURI on Value-centered Information Theory for Adaptive Learning, Inference, Tracking,
Virtual Vector Machine for Bayesian Online Classification Yuan (Alan) Qi CS & Statistics Purdue June, 2009 Joint work with T.P. Minka and R. Xiang.
Cooperative Air and Ground Surveillance Wenzhe Li.
Maximum a posteriori sequence estimation using Monte Carlo particle filters S. J. Godsill, A. Doucet, and M. West Annals of the Institute of Statistical.
1 Value of information – SITEX Data analysis Shubha Kadambe (310) Information Sciences Laboratory HRL Labs 3011 Malibu Canyon.
MURI Annual Review, Vanderbilt, Sep 8 th, 2009 Heterogeneous Sensor Webs for Automated Target Recognition and Tracking in Urban Terrain (W911NF )
Information Theory for Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks (ITMANET): The FLoWS Project Competitive Scheduling in Wireless Networks with Correlated Channel State Ozan.
Multi-Speaker Modeling with Shared Prior Distributions and Model Structures for Bayesian Speech Synthesis Kei Hashimoto, Yoshihiko Nankaku, and Keiichi.
MURI Telecon, Update 7/26/2012 Summary, Part I:  Completed: proving and validating numerically optimality conditions for Distributed Optimal Control (DOC)
Boosted Particle Filter: Multitarget Detection and Tracking Fayin Li.
Sequential Monte-Carlo Method -Introduction, implementation and application Fan, Xin
MURI: Integrated Fusion, Performance Prediction, and Sensor Management for Automatic Target Exploitation 1 Integrated Fusion, Performance Prediction, and.
Energy-Efficient Signal Processing and Communication Algorithms for Scalable Distributed Fusion.
Thrust IIB: Dynamic Task Allocation in Remote Multi-robot HRI Jon How (lead) Nick Roy MURI 8 Kickoff Meeting 2007.
Introduction to Sampling Methods Qi Zhao Oct.27,2004.
The Unscented Particle Filter 2000/09/29 이 시은. Introduction Filtering –estimate the states(parameters or hidden variable) as a set of observations becomes.
Smart Sleeping Policies for Wireless Sensor Networks Venu Veeravalli ECE Department & Coordinated Science Lab University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Resource Optimization for Publisher/Subscriber-based Avionics Systems Institute for Software Integrated Systems Vanderbilt University Nashville, Tennessee.
Machine Reasoning and Learning Workshops III and IV Kickoff Wen Masters Office of Naval Research Code 311 (703)
Online Multiscale Dynamic Topic Models
SENSOR FUSION LAB RESEARCH ACTIVITIES PART I : DATA FUSION AND DISTRIBUTED SIGNAL PROCESSING IN SENSOR NETWORKS Sensor Fusion Lab, Department of Electrical.
Variational filtering in generated coordinates of motion
Tracking Objects with Dynamics
MURI Kickoff Meeting Randolph L. Moses July 21, 2006
Analytics and OR DP- summary.
Particle Filtering for Geometric Active Contours
MULTISENSOR FUSION Architecture (US-JDL/UK-TFDF) Feature Space
MURI Annual Review Meeting Randy Moses November 3, 2008
Innovative Front-End Signal Processing
Course: Autonomous Machine Learning
Dynamical Statistical Shape Priors for Level Set Based Tracking
MURI Kickoff Meeting Randolph L. Moses November, 2008
Overview: Chapter 2 Localization and Tracking
Presentation transcript:

MURI: Integrated Fusion, Performance Prediction, and Sensor Management for Automatic Target Exploitation 1 Dynamic Sensor Resource Management for ATE MURI Kickoff Meeting Integrated Fusion, Performance Prediction, and Sensor Management for Automatic Target Exploitation David A. Castañón July 21, 2006

2 MURI: Integrated Fusion, Performance Prediction, and Sensor Management for Automatic Target Exploitation Critical ATE Challenges Detect/classify reactive agile targets Low RCS, inhomogeneous clutter, complex environments, short exposure times, … Exploit new sensing capabilities Multiple heterogeneous platforms Multi-modal sensing Dynamic, steerable platform trajectories, sensing modes, focus of attention In support of ATE mission objectives Generate appropriate actionable information in a timely manner with limited resources Select actions based on performance models of sensing, signal and information processing

3 MURI: Integrated Fusion, Performance Prediction, and Sensor Management for Automatic Target Exploitation What is needed: A scalable theory of active sensor control for ATE Addressing heterogeneous, distributed, multi-modal sensor platforms Incorporating complex ATE performance models and real time information Integrating multiple ATE objectives from search to classification Scalable to theater-level scenarios with multiple platforms, large numbers of objects Robust to model errors and adaptive to new information and models Providing the “active” control of distributed sensor resources to support missions of interest

4 MURI: Integrated Fusion, Performance Prediction, and Sensor Management for Automatic Target Exploitation Adaptive Sensor Management for ATE Dynamics include objects of interest and sensors Hierarchy of control: where sensors are and what information they collect Key: actions selected based on information state Dynamical System Potential Observations Sig. Proc., Estimation/ Fusion Sensor Management Info. State Platform guidance Desired measurements Processing Control

5 MURI: Integrated Fusion, Performance Prediction, and Sensor Management for Automatic Target Exploitation Our Approach: Model-Based Approach View sensor management as a control/ optimization problem However, this requires models to... Represent information state Predict how information state will change as a consequence of actions Evaluate potential changes with respect to mission objectives Select observations/actions adaptively in real time

6 MURI: Integrated Fusion, Performance Prediction, and Sensor Management for Automatic Target Exploitation Representation Key ATE information: location and type of objects of interest and uncertainties Standard representations (JMPs, Particles, …) Problem: Many objects  very high dimensional space of possible information states Hard to precompute or learn policies Problem: need type information representation compatible with multi-sensor, multi-modal fusion Observe features, not types Incorporate hierarchical inferencing with graphical models

7 MURI: Integrated Fusion, Performance Prediction, and Sensor Management for Automatic Target Exploitation Prediction Statistical models of how information changes in response to sensing actions May have insufficient domain information to specify Insufficient data for empirical estimation of statistics such as densities Not adequate sampling for estimation of density May be adequate for support of density?

8 MURI: Integrated Fusion, Performance Prediction, and Sensor Management for Automatic Target Exploitation Evaluation Ideally, would relate information state to mission objectives Tracking accuracy, classification costs, … Hard to integrate objectives, specify time horizon Alternative: use information theoretic metrics Entropy variations, information rates

9 MURI: Integrated Fusion, Performance Prediction, and Sensor Management for Automatic Target Exploitation Selection Combinatorial explosion in possible actions as number of objects increases Various types of policies Static (Myopic): Current actions selected to optimize immediate improvement in information Dynamic: Current actions selected to optimize information over a sequence of times Open-loop policies: sequences of actions Closed-loop policies: sequences of contingent actions based on information

10 MURI: Integrated Fusion, Performance Prediction, and Sensor Management for Automatic Target Exploitation Promising Results - 1 Aggregation of information state: evolving on simpler lower dimensional space Identifiable from physics and experimental data Learn intrinsic dimensions of prior (shape) spaces, and posterior (likelihood) spaces (Costa-Hero ’05)

11 MURI: Integrated Fusion, Performance Prediction, and Sensor Management for Automatic Target Exploitation Promising Results - 2 Task-driven dimensionality reduction Develop low- dimensional feature spaces that come close to intrinsic information space Generate predictive statistical models for feature evolution CCDR

12 MURI: Integrated Fusion, Performance Prediction, and Sensor Management for Automatic Target Exploitation Promising Results - 3 Information-based Sensor Management for tracking in complex clutter Given collection of sensors, select set of measurements to maximize information collected over period of time to track multiple objects Combinatorial optimization Receding horizon policy

13 MURI: Integrated Fusion, Performance Prediction, and Sensor Management for Automatic Target Exploitation Simulation Results objects moving independently Probability of detection dependent on position (e.g. due to obscuration) Observation consists of detection flag and, if detected, a linear Gaussian measurement of position Information state propagated using unscented Kalman filter

14 MURI: Integrated Fusion, Performance Prediction, and Sensor Management for Automatic Target Exploitation Promising Results - 4 Scalable multi-object sensor management through hierarchical pricing Distributes heterogeneous sensor resources across targets Provides performance lower bound for classification problems (simple inference) Prices: used to satisfy utilization constraints Resource Price Update Target 1 Subproblem Target N Subproblem Prices Utilization Feedback strategy for target subproblems used to estimate utilization for price updates

15 MURI: Integrated Fusion, Performance Prediction, and Sensor Management for Automatic Target Exploitation Simulation Results Two radars, one low- and one high-resolution imaging Different durations/mode 250 seconds of observation time 100 objects, 3 types Comparison of myopic information-based algorithm, dynamic pricing algorithm and bound Weighted classification error cost Optimal local allocation Learning local Allocation off-line

16 MURI: Integrated Fusion, Performance Prediction, and Sensor Management for Automatic Target Exploitation What we’ll be doing I: Topics where we’re up and running - 1 Apply general Dimensionality Reduction framework to radar sensing context (shape, measurement…) Develop predictive sensor models based on aggregate features Evaluate accuracy of framework by simulating simple imaging, tracking, or detection task Extend information-based sensor management approach Kinematic + ID Heterogeneous sensors/modes

17 MURI: Integrated Fusion, Performance Prediction, and Sensor Management for Automatic Target Exploitation What we’ll be doing I: Topics where we’re up and running - 2 Extension of hierarchical sensor management (SM) using pricing to search/track/ID Multi-mode scheduling, passive/active sensing Learning sequential decision strategies with limited data Finite state machine representation Performance bounds on SM strategies Information-theoretic and optimization bounds Depending on resource constraints, network

18 MURI: Integrated Fusion, Performance Prediction, and Sensor Management for Automatic Target Exploitation What we’ll be doing II: Topics on the Horizon - 1 Integration of SM algorithms with Fusion graphical models for information state evolution Learning approaches for density representation, performance prediction and optimization Dimensionality reduction for side information and likelihood function spaces Approximations to optimal performance prediction Approximations to optimal sensing/mobility actions Extensions of SM algorithms to incorporate trajectory and signal processing control Multiple time scale control Aggregate models for trajectory control

19 MURI: Integrated Fusion, Performance Prediction, and Sensor Management for Automatic Target Exploitation What we’ll be doing II: Topics on the Horizon - 2 Robust SM algorithms with unknown models Integrated parametric/non-parametric models Adaptive real-time learning/refinement Hybrid SM algorithms using learning and real-time resource allocation Focus on multi-modal, multi-sensor missions 3D classification, search and track Extensions of SM to broad area sensors Act on areas instead of objects Different paradigms Performance bounds for general SM systems Extensions of earlier results