Kenny A vs State Principles Georgia’s Child Welfare System must actively promote the opportunity for children to grow up with in a family. Family contacts.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of Child Protection Process Presented to: Task Force on Child Protection August 3, 2007 Bill Navas Office of Attorney General 13 th Judicial Circuit.
Advertisements

Organizational Learning for System Improvement. The Philadelphia Department of Human Services mission is to provide and promote safety, permanency, and.
Dallas CASA Court Appointed Special Advocates. Allegations of abuse and neglect Investigation by DFPS DFPS has arranged for a residence for the child.
Reinstatement of Parental Rights: The Oklahoma Experience Presented by: Judge Doris Fransein Richard, Ro’derick, and Richard Jr. Hampton Kimberly Lynn.
Family Services Division THE FAMILY CENTERED PRACTICE MODEL.
117_PAT_CM_ Putting It All Together During this review course, you will apply the knowledge, skills, and abilities learned during your training.
Subsidized Guardianship Permanency Initiative. SG Introduction Focuses on improving permanency outcomes for children in out-of-home care through a comprehensive.
Outpatient Services Programs Workgroup: Laura’s Law May 29, 2014.
1 North Dakota Children and Family Services Review Paul Ronningen, Division Director Don Snyder, Permanency Unit Manager.
Planning With Youth in Transition Tips, Tools and Techniques.
Dependency Court – A Team Approach Presen Presented by: Judge Brantley S. Clark and Carol A. Dunaway, M.S. 1.
AN OUTLINE OF IT’S ROLES AND STRUCTURE IN MATTERS OF CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES RI’s Family Court System.
Child Welfare and Education Two Systems Working Together for Foster Youth.
Child Welfare Services Family centered services to achieve well- being through ensuring self-sufficiency, support, safety, and permanence. Dual tracks-
PERMANENCY PLANNING. Permanency Planning  How is it defined?  What does it mean for parents? For children?
Return to Parent (Reunification) AdoptionPLC Fit and Willing Relative APPLA
1 Child Welfare Reform Council August 5, 2014 Transition of Children in Foster Care, Receiving Adoption Assistance and Select Youth in Juvenile Justice.
1 Child and Family Services Review Program Improvement Plan Kick-Off Division/Staff Name Date (7/30/07)
Findings From the Initial Child and Family Service Reviews
Application for Approval of Funding for Residential Placement
Permanency Enhancement Project Peoria, Illinois Jennifer La Fever Elizabeth Morgan Amy Roman
WELCOME!. INTRODUCTIONS Name Office Location? Program Area Just the Basics…We’ll be getting more info next.
Services and Resources Available for Families & Children.
FTMs and Foster Care Policy Kenny A: FTMs are to be held within 3-9 days after a child comes into care Held to make any key decisions regarding placement.
Family Court Mediation and Counselling Service of Western Australia 1 The Columbus Program and its impact on the Family Court of Western Australia Kay.
Seamless System of Information Sharing Safe Children’s Action Group Plenary Session June 26, 2002.
9/2/20151 Ohio Family and Children First An overview of OFCF structure, membership, and responsibilities.
1 Child Welfare Improvement Overview House Appropriations Subcommittee Kathryne O’Grady, Deputy Director Michigan Department of Human Services September.
April 2010 Copyright © 2010 Mississippi Department of Education Mattie T. Updated Timeline and Goals.
DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES G-FORCE MEETING May 2009.
AB490 + San Francisco County’s Interagency Agreement.
Georgia as Parent: What are the State’s Responsibilities?
Individualized Service Plan Who attends the ISP?
CHMDA/CWDA Partnership Series Child Welfare Services “It Takes a Village” Danna Fabella, Interim Director Contra County Employment and Human Services Department.
2012 Child Welfare Legislative Update Ann Ahlstrom
940: Concurrent Planning for Resource Parents. The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Resource Center Learning Objectives Participants will be able to: Define.
SSIS as a Case Management Tool Nan Beman Anne Broskoff.
Voices of Families at Team Meetings Presentation May 18, 2015 Victor Medrano, CalWorks, FCS Linkages Carol Sentell-Bassett, Child Welfare Supervisor Danielle.
1 Quality Counts: Helping Improve Outcomes for Pennsylvania’s Children & Families September 22, 2008.
PL THE PREVENTING SEX TRAFFICKING AND STRENGTHENING FAMILIES ACT WASHINGTON STATE'S RESPONSE TO THE PREVENTING SEX TRAFFICKING AND STRENGTHENING.
Georgia Georgia’s Lead Agency Plan Georgia 2 KVC Behavioral Healthcare The lead agency in the North East Region of Kansas and Metro Kansas City, Kansas.
STANDARDS FOR GUARDIANS AD LITEM Supreme Court Rule 110A.
Understanding Applicable Laws in Child Protection and Child Welfare Cases: Presentation at TCAP Tribal Courts Conference – Minneapolis August 20, 2015.
Kamala H. Shugar Assistant Attorney in Charge Oregon Department of Justice Child Advocacy Section.
SAFE AND THRIVING FOREVER FAMILIES SOONER Division of Family & Children Services G-Force Meeting June 25, 2009.
 Child in need of Protection or Services (CHIPS) › Reasonable efforts to reunite › Timelines › Permanency petition  Egregious harm › Can move right.
1 Executive Summary of the Strategic Plan and Proposed Action Steps January 2013 Healthy, Safe, Smart and Strong 1.
NOVEMBER 19 TH, AM – 12PM Resource Family Approval Project Management Team Welcome.
Public Children Services Association of Ohio SAFE CHILDREN, STABLE FAMILIES, SUPPORTIVE COMMUNITIES.
Overview of Crawford County Children and Youth Services.
Acknowledging the Past and Securing the Future. Working with birth families when Barnardos case plan is adoption Presenters Elizabeth Cox – Senior Manager.
Presentation to (((Funder))) by (((Judge Name))) (((Date))) Introduction to Legal Representation in CPS Cases.
Introduction Lila Newberry Bradley Program Director Training, Referrals, Court Liaison, Administration Lynn Goldman Managing Attorney Case Support, Private.
Hon. Carlos Villalon, Jr.. TODAYS FOCUS What is a Foster Care Case? Aren’t All Courts the Same? What is the Judge’s Role? What are the Educational Issues.
Being in Care. Joint priorities remain to… Improve outcomes for children, young people and families in Birmingham. In particular: Protect children from.
In “it” for the money? Financing Child Safety, Permanency, and Well-being January 2014.
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCEDURES TO ADDRESS NON-COMPLIANT FINDINGS RELATED TO CHILD FIND Presenter Jim Kubaiko, Director Special Education.
Child and Family Services Reviews Onsite Review Instrument.
ROSIE D. V. ROMNEY Implementing the Court Order. The Court Decision 1/26/06: Court enters sweeping decision finding Massachusetts in violation of EPSDT.
University College Cork 17 January 2013
Completing the circle: concurrent planning and the use of Family Finding, Blended perspective meetings, and family group decision making processes.
Kinship 101: Information for Relatives and “Suitable Others”
Hon. Karen R. Carroll February 12, 2018
Tuolumne County Adult Child and Family Services
Stakeholder Webinar September 20, 2018
Stakeholder Webinar September 20, 2018
Legislative update 83rd Legislature
The Preventing Sex Trafficking & Strengthening Families Act
FFTA Conversations on Family First Prevention Services Act
Children Services Committee Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Kenny A vs State Principles Georgia’s Child Welfare System must actively promote the opportunity for children to grow up with in a family. Family contacts should be maintained if non destructive. Foster Care should be temporary. The State is the primarily responsible for foster care and private providers should be strictly monitored. All children should receive the best of care. Children should be in the least restrictive, most family like setting as possible. Non family-like settings should be avoided. Foster children should get the services they need for stable placements. The Commissioner of DHR is the person in charge of child welfare.

Kenny A vs State A Presentation by The Georgia Association of Homes and Services for Children July 13, 2005 Summary and Analysis

Planning Child will have an CCFA within 24 hours after the 72 hour hearing. A Family Team Meeting will be held in 3-9 days. Within 25 days of placement, a Multidisciplinary Team will evaluate recommendations from FTM Within 30 days, a case plan will be delievered to Juvenile Court Judge. Permanency Reports will be made after 13 months in care. After 18 months in care, child will be assigned a Specialized Case Manager.

Placement DFCS will conduct a needs assessment for Fulton and Dekalb Counties. Secured through a RFP Process Expert to evaluation what services are needed.

Reimbursement Rates Effective July 1, 2005 all foster parents (public and private) will be reimbursed at the following rates: Ages 0-6 $13.78 Ages Ages 13 or older 17.75

Reimbursement Rate Taskforce Establishment of a Taskforce to establish a rate structure to establish meaurable outcomes for foster children. To make recommendations about Level of Care (revisions or replacement). Consider various pilots in the State. Move toward Performance Based Contracting. Members: James L. Kunz, Howard A. Peters III and Becky Butler. Recommendations in 120 days of signing.

Most Appropriate Placements Assessments in 30 days or less. Counties will have placement process in place. Placed according to assessed needs. Within 50 miles of their home. No child in an emergency or temporary placement for more than 30 days. Siblings placed together when possible. No child in a foster home with more than 3 foster children or 6 children total.

Fairness Hearing The deadline for submitting written comments on and objections to the proposed settlement agreement is Thursday, September 1, Parties and other interested persons or groups may write to the Court at the following address: Luther P. Thomas, Clerk United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Richard B. Russell Federal Building and Courthouse 75 Spring Street SW Atlanta, GA Persons who wish to speak at the fairness hearing must file their request with the Clerk of the Court by September 9, 2005 and indicate briefly whether they wish to provide a comment or an objection, and briefly state the nature of the comment or objection.

Group Care Restrictions Capacity is measured by total number of children on a campus. No child under six. No child age 6 to 12 without written approval of State Social Services Director. No child age 6 – 12 on a campus with more than 12 children. Clothing needs is responsibility of DHR.

Health Screenings Physical Health Denatl health Mental Health EPSDT/Georgia Health Check Program

Single SACWIS Fully implemented with a plan by December 31, 2005.

Caseloads In one year: CPS case manager – 12 cases Ongoing Case manager – 17 cases Placement case manager – 15 cases Adoption case manager – 16 cases Case Manager Supervisor – 5 case managers

Supervision of Contract Agencies No corporal punishment allowed. Agencies required to report data every 6 months. Yearly licensing reviews. Review of 5% of agencies foster homes or 10 homes whatever is greater.

Child Placing Agencies All foster parents have same standards.

Outcome Measures 95% of CPS investigations commensed in 24 hours. 95% of CPS investigations completed in 30 days. 99% of CPS investigations will have face to face with victim. No more than 8.6% of foster children will reenter care. No more than.57% of foster children will be a victim of abuse. 98% of foster homes will be non corporal punishment.

Outcome Measures 95% of foster children will have diligent search for relatives Permanency by adoption, reunification, kinship care or permanent guardianship No more than 5% adoption disruptions. 80% placed with siblings 95% have less than 2 moves. 90% placed within 50 miles of home.

More Measures Graduation rates increased. 98% of foster homes approved fully.

Accountability Accountability Agents: –James T. Dimas –Sarah Morrison

Fairness Hearing Dates for Kenny A v. Perdue comment period and fairness hearing The fairness hearing for Wednesday, September 21, 2005 at 1:30pm. At the fairness hearing Judge Shoob will determine whether the proposed settlement is fair, reasonable and adequate, according to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and if it is, the final Consent Decree can be approved. Judge Shoob’s courtroom is on the 17 th floor of the Richard B. Russell Federal Building located at 70 Spring St. SW

Settlement Briefing by B.J. Walker and Ira Lustbader Sponsored by Voices for Georgia’s Children Georgia PBS – 14 th Street, Atlanta July 26 at 10:00 a.m. RSVP Parker Lee (404) or