Directive 98/83/EC « water intended for human consumption » of 3 November 1998 Ministère de la Santé, de la jeunesse, des sports et de la vie associative.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Experience of the SPS Committee in Developing and Implementing Guidelines on Equivalence Marième Fall Agriculture and Commodities Division 8 November.
Advertisements

Office International des Épizooties World Organisation for Animal Health created in 1924 in Paris.
Application of the article 45 (CLP) in France
OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES World organisation for animal health Created in 1924 in Paris, France.
EFSA’s Mission and Priorities Bernhard Berger Head of the Advisory Forum and Scientific Cooperation Unit Conference “Importance of food additives today.
European Commission, DG Environment Slide 1 Brussels, 4 April 2006 The Drinking Water Directive 1998/83/EC Presentation for the multilateral meeting with.
Regionalisation of (drinking) water price setting in Flanders APE water pricing seminar - Brussels December 4th 2014 Ingeborg Limbourg.
1 MANUFACTURING AND PRODUCTION OF BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS (ERT 455) HAZARD ANALYSIS AND CRITICAL CONTROL POINT (HACCP) SYSTEM Munira Mohamed Nazari School.
Regulatory Status of Steviol Glycosides in France An Update 1-2 July 20093rd EUSTAS Symposium Leuven Belgium1.
Supervision of the quality of water intended for human consumption by State Sanitary Inspection bodies Małgorzata Kedzierska Environmental Hygiene Dept.
ATC/EMSA/F2 Research&InnovationVertimar Vigo - Spain 1 EMSA: Its role in preventing accidental marine pollution and improving response systems Ana.
Food Safety Training Course Co-financiado:. Food safety Regulation.
Codex Guidelines for the Application of HACCP
Twinning Project “Training of water quality monitoring for State Sanitary Inspection” EU Proposal by the German Federal Ministry of Health (BMG) supported.
DENNIS CRYER Veterinary Meat Hygiene Adviser Food Standards Agency
Ministère de l'Écologie, du Développement durable, des Transports et du Logement Implementation of a national legislation.
Warschau Feb Dr. K. Luden German guidance document on §9 dealing with derogations Dr. Katrin Luden.
Food Authority „COUNTRY PROFILE“ General Review
Health and Consumers Directorate-General (DG SANCO) Howard Batho, Head of import and OIE sector Unit D1, Animal Health and Standing Committees.
Drinking water and urban waste water treatment development ÖKO Zrt. Evaluation tasks.
The European Code of Conduct on Partnership Teresa EPALZA European Commission DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion.
FRENCH GOVERNMENTAL PLANS AND NATIONAL LABOUR INSPECTORATE CAMPAIGN ON EXPOSURE OF EMPLOYEES TO HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES LABOUR GENERAL DIRECTORATE 3rd and.
Directive 98/83/EC « water intended for human consumption » of 3 November 1998 Ministère de la Santé, de la jeunesse, des sports et de la vie associative.
SMMSS - Support to Modernisation of Mongolia Standardisation System Food Chain Risk Assessment and Management - Seminar on Food Safety Ulaanbaatar / Mongolia.
UNECE Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes A unique framework for improved management of shared waters.
Regulatory Perspective on Development of
Turkey’s Experience on the Accession to ADR Convention
Research Directorate-GeneralEuropean Commission IMPROVING HUMAN RESEARCH POTENTIAL AND THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC KNOWLEDGE BASE AL- November Training and.
HiLumi LHC is co-funded by the EU FP7 Capacities Programme, Grant Agreement Svet Stavrev (EU Projects Office, CERN) Administrative Manager 17.
Module 3 Risk Analysis and its Components. Risk Analysis ● WTO SPS agreement puts emphasis on sound science ● Risk analysis = integrated mechanism to.
S tefano S oro European Commission Health and Consumer Protection DG OBLIGATION OF PRODUCERS AND DISTRIBUTORS TO NOTIFY DANGEROUS PRODUCTS.
Warsaw, 5 th November 2012 Market Surveillance System of non-food products in Poland.
/ 1 International Workshop for CIS countries “ The use of standards for fresh fruit and vegetables and dry produce in technical regulations and the application.
1 Patel Harsh C. Mech -B Roll No Environment protection act,1986:  Act to provide for the protection and improvement of environment.  It shall.
1 MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS MANAGING AUTHORITY FOR COHESION FUND (REGULATION 1164/94) MANAGEMENT OF PROJECTS, FINANCED BY COHESION.
Water Quality and Training P.Lauriola St tem Epidemiologia Ambientale Arpa Emilia-Romagna.
Aqua publica europea – ceep – EurEau Workshop on the Drinking Water Directive 7 October 2015, Milan Evaluation of the DWD – the European Commission perspective.
REVISION OF THE IPPC DIRECTIVE  DIRECTIVE ON INDUSTRIAL EMISSIONS.
Equitable access to water, Paris Access to Drinking Water in MDA Ion Shalaru, Head of Environmental Health Department, National Scientific.
EU Project: Trans-Boundary River Management Phase II for the Kura River basin – Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan
Protocol on Water and Health: added value and challenges for public participation Tsvietkova Anna MAMA-86’s Water and Sanitation Program Workshop on Water.
Directorate General for Enterprise and Industry European Commission The New Legislative Framework - Market Surveillance UNECE “MARS” Group meeting Bratislava,
DESCRIPTION OF THE MONITORING AND EVALUATION SYSTEM IN POLAND Action Plan and the Two-year NRN Operational Plans.
Energy Georgi Simeonov European Commission DG ENER, Radiation Protection Unit (D3) Justificação e Optimização das Exposições Médicas a Radiações Ionizantes.
Warsaw, 19th September 2008 Transition Facility „Training of water quality monitoring for State Sanitary Inspection” Transition Facility „Training.
Invasive Alien Species REFIT Process The perspective from European hunters Meeting of the Directors-general of Hunting and Game management – 1 st of September.
1 OIE standards: Ante- and post-mortem meat inspection Stuart A. Slorach Chair, Animal Production Food Safety Working Group Regional Seminar for OIE National.
Radiation Safety Regulations
Rural Water Programme 2006 Evaluation of Progress Jim Ganley Jim Ganley Water Services Water Services.
June 2009 Regulation on pesticide statistics Pierre NADIN ESTAT E1- Farms, agro-environment and rural development
08 March 2016 Recognised Organisation’s implementation of Article 11 Regulation (EC) No 391/2009 QACE Klaus Grensemann, Chairman Board of Directors Des.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 30 –External Relations Bilateral screening:
1. Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency Risk assessment with regard to food and feed safety Risk analysis Why risk assessment in the.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 27 –Subgroup for water quality Bilateral.
Member State Implementation of EU Directive 2009/54/EC on Natural Mineral Waters in a Member State – Experiences of a EU Member State Ilona Drulyte National.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 27 – Environment Bilateral screening:
REGULATION (EC) Nº 1223/2009 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 30 November 2009 on cosmetic products 1 Shall apply from 11.
Governmental, Legal and Regulatory Framework in Azerbaijan Republic
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
Contractual obligations
The French National Reference laboratory (NRL)
EU Reference Centres for Animal Welfare
Priorities for Health linked to OSHA work Isabel de la Mata Principal Advisor for Health European Commission.
Regional Seminar for OIE National Focal Points on Animal Production Food Safety Importance of collaboration between the Veterinary Services and industry.
Purpose Independent piece of legislation, closely integrated in a larger regulatory framework (complement to WFD): prevent deterioration protect, enhance.
SOCIAL DIALOGUE WITHIN EUPAN
SOCIAL DIALOGUE WITHIN THE SCOPE OF EUPAN
Ongoing work on CIS Guidance Article 4.7
The French National Reference laboratory (NRL)
Risk Management NDS Forum June 23rd 2010.
Presentation transcript:

Directive 98/83/EC « water intended for human consumption » of 3 November 1998 Ministère de la Santé, de la jeunesse, des sports et de la vie associative Warsaw 2-5 June 2009 Training on water quality monitoring for State Sanitary Inspection Workshop on Reporting Responsibilities for providing information to the Public in France Pierre Chantrel International Office for Water PARIS

Granting derogations : Regulatory texts The EU Directive 98/83 The EU Directive 98/83 Decree of 20 December 2001 Decree of 20 December 2001 article 24 Public Health Code Public Health Code articles R to R Ministerial order of Ministerial order of 25 Novembre 2003 Circulars Circulars DGS/SD7A n° 90 of 1st March 2004 and DGS/SD7A n° of 8th March 2006

Derogations Two conditions: Two conditions:  no risk to human health,  no other reasonable means available to guarantee the water supply. guarantee the water supply.

Derogations Only applicable to quality limits, microbiology excluded, Only applicable to quality limits, microbiology excluded, Safeguarding the consumer’s health, Safeguarding the consumer’s health, Restoring a compliant situation Restoring a compliant situation Within limited time (3 x 3 years under conditions)‏ Within limited time (3 x 3 years under conditions)‏

Derogations Safeguarding the consumer’s health: Safeguarding the consumer’s health:  maximum permissible value for the parameter concerned (methodology AFSSA based on the ADI Acceptable Daily Intake : contribution of water, alimentation and other sources for each substance; for carcinogenic substances : excess lifetime Cancer Risk),  reinforced monitoring and health control programme,  specific provisions for information.

Health General Directorate (Ministry of Health)‏ Regional environmental health divisions of MoH CIRE: Inter-Regional Epidemiological divisions of InVS InVS : National Institute of Epidemiological Surveillance AFSSA: Food Safety Agency = expertise Agency in the domain of drinking water Regional level National level - investigate epidemiological issues - operate quantitative risk assessements epidemiological investigations expertise Risk evaluation and management

Risk evaluation : AFSSA AFSSA (French Food Safety Agency) : AFSSA (French Food Safety Agency) :  2004 « Evaluation of Health Risks due to the overtaking of limits and guide values in drinking water »  Risk evaluation for: _ Antimony –Chlorites –Fluorures –Lead –Arsenic –Selenium –Vinyle Chlorure  2008 : 20 substances - Aluminium - Sulfates - Chlorures - Benzo[a]pyrene and PAH - Nickel - Copper

Derogations Restoring a compliant situation: Restoring a compliant situation:  plan for necessary remedial measures,  work timetable.

Application for a derogation  under Article R ° of the Public Health Code Remedial measures are taken that can correct the situation within 30 days and The duration of non-compliance didn’t exceed 30 days over the last 12 months  under Article R ° of the Public Health Code Remedial measures are taken but cannot correct the situation within 30 days Or The duration of non-compliance exceeded 30 days over the last 12 months

Application for a derogation : Information relative to the context : Information relative to the context :  Parameters concerned  Reasons and justification for derogation  Results of sanitary survey :  results of monitoring by the PPPRWS  results of official health control by MoH  Maximum permissible value requested for the parameter concerned In case of application under Art. R ° :  Duration of previous derogations, including, if any, granted during previous 12 months

Application for a derogation : Information relative to the distribution unit : Information relative to the distribution unit :  identification  Description of system :  production  treatment  distribution  Volume/day and population supplied  Information relative to food industries supplied, if any  Any other relevant information for evaluation of the risk

Application for a derogation : Information relative to the monitoring by the PPPRWS Information relative to the monitoring by the PPPRWS Programme of measures for restoring quality Programme of measures for restoring quality Under Art ° and under Art ° :  Description of the solution envisaged to restore quality Under Art ° : must include  Timeschedule  Cost estimate  Indicators  on measures implementation  on results : monitoring results and MoH control results

Application for a derogation : Information to the population Information to the population  Existing and forecasted means for information relative to the derogation  Existing and forecasted health advice to the population, and specifically groups at risk In case of application for a 2 nd or 3 rd derogation In case of application for a 2 nd or 3 rd derogation  Report(s) on the previous derogation (s)‏

Granting derogations Granted by Prefect’s order: Granted by Prefect’s order:  maximum permissible value for the parameter concerned,  reinforced monitoring and health control programme,  specific provisions for information.

Granting derogations Before Granting a derogation Before Granting a derogation  The Prefect consults the CODERST Environmental, Sanitary and Technological risks Committee (Departemental Hygiene Committee)‏ After Granting a derogation After Granting a derogation  The Prefect informs the MoH in case  Unit > 5000 inhabitants  2 nd derogation (incl. Report on 1st derog.)‏ In case of 3rd derogation In case of 3rd derogation  The Prefect consults the CODERST  Transmits the request to the MoH (incl. Report on previous derog.)‏  The MoH transmits to the EU Commission

Granting derogations (recap. diagram)‏ R ° : Remedial measures are taken but the situation cannot be corrected within 30 days or the duration of non-compliance exceeded 30 days over the last 12 months R ° : Remedial measures are taken and the situation can be corrected within 30 days and the duration of non-compliance was less than 30 days over the last 12 months Possible derogation (max. duration: 3 years)‏ Application made 6 months before the end of the 1st derogation Granted by the Prefect after advice from CSHPF + AFSSA 2nd derogation (max. duration: 3 years)‏ Application made 8 months before the end of the 2nd derogation granted by the Prefect after advice from CSHPF + AFSSA and the European Commission 3rd derogation max : 3 years Report Granted by the Prefect who specifies the duration, maximum permissible value the improvement plan, reinforced control + public information Possible derogation with a « simplified procedure » granted by Prefect ’s Order Report

Derogations: information to the Public Remedial measures are taken but the situation cannot be corrected within 30 days or the duration of non-compliance exceeded 30 days over the last 12 months Remedial measures are taken and the situation can be corrected within 30 days and the duration of non-compliance was less than 30 days over the last 12 months Possible derogation (max. duration: 3 years)‏ 2nd derogation (max. duration: 3 years)‏ 3rd derogation max : 3 years Report Information to the Public done under Art. R of Public Health Code Prefect ensures that PPPRWS informs : - relatively to the derogation, quality limits, time,… - the conditions, measures,… - and advise the population or groups of population at specific risk. « simplified procedure » Information to the Public done under Art. R of Public Health Code by the PPPRWS Report

Ministère de la Santé, de la jeunesse, des sports et de la vie associative Warsaw 2-5 June 2009 Training on water quality monitoring for State Sanitary Inspection THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION Pierre Chantrel International Office for Water PARIS