F Project X Overview Dave McGinnis October 12, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ISS meeting, (1) R. Garoby (for the SPL study group) SPL-based Proton Driver for Facilities SPL-based Proton Driver for Facilities at CERN:
Advertisements

ISIS Accelerator Division
PIP and the Booster Notch Bob Zwaska October 12, 2011 PIP Meeting.
1 Proton Upgrades at Fermilab Robert Zwaska Fermilab March 12, 2007 Midwest Accelerator Physics Collaboration Meeting Indiana University Cyclotron Facility.
Task Force on Project X for Muon Collider Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab.
Thomas Roser Snowmass 2001 June 30 - July 21, MW AGS proton driver (M.J. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas,
 An h=4 (30 MHz) RF system will be used for electron operation. For protons, this would correspond to h=56, and the 1 kV maximum gap voltage would only.
Nufact09-IIT 107/24/2009 Project X and a Muon Facility at Fermilab Milorad Popovic FNAL.
Re-commissioning the Recycler Storage Ring at Fermilab Martin Murphy, Fermilab Presented August 10, 2012 at SLAC National Laboratory for the Workshop on.
Linac Front-End R&D --- Systems Integration and Meson Lab Setup
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
Proton Plans at Fermilab Robert Zwaska - Fermilab Science and Engineering at Henderson- DUSEL Capstone Workshop Stony Brook University May 5, 2006 Outline.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy AGS Upgrade and Super Neutrino Beam DOE Annual HEP Program Review April 27-28, 2005 Derek I. Lowenstein.
Proton Driver at Fermilab Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab IDS-NF 7 th Plenary Meeting Oct 17-19,2011.
EDM2001 Workshop May 14-15, 2001 AGS Intensity Upgrade (J.M. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas, S.Y. Zhang) Proton.
J-PARC Accelerators Masahito Tomizawa KEK Acc. Lab. Outline, Status, Schedule of J-PARC accelerator MR Beam Power Upgrade.
December 5, Chuck Ankenbrandt Fermilab Muon Collider Design Project X as a Hi-Rep-Rate Driver for a Muon Collider Chuck Ankenbrandt.
F 1 MW Proton Beam for Neutrinos Dave McGinnis AAC Meeting May 10, 2006.
F Proton Plan Eric Prebys, FNAL Accelerator Division.
PROTON LINAC FOR INDIAN SNS Vinod Bharadwaj, SLAC (reporting for the Indian SNS Design Team)
F Project X Overview Dave McGinnis August 8, 2007.
HWDB: Operations at the Spallation Neutron Source Workshop on Accelerator Operations August 6-10, 2012 Glen D. Johns Accelerator Operations Manager.
Overview of Booster PIP II upgrades and plans C.Y. Tan for Proton Source group PIP II Collaboration Meeting 03 June 2014.
Accelerator Issues Fermilab Antiproton Experiment Keith Gollwitzer Antiproton Source Department Accelerator Division Fermilab.
Mu2e, August 15, 2007 E Prebys 1 The Steering Group and mu2e Eric Prebys.
Proton Driver Keith Gollwitzer May 31, Initial Design Overview For design purposes, the following is assumed –H - beam comes from PIP II and follow-on.
Fermilab Proton Driver Project Weiren Chou for Bill Foster Fermilab, U.S.A. October 20, 2004 Presentation at the Proton Driver Session ICFA-HB2004, Bensheim,
Fermilab Proton Driver and Muons David Johnson Fermilab Neutrino Factory Muon Collider Collaboration Meeting March 14, 2006.
PIP-II: Why a new accelerator? Paul Derwent Fermilab Community Advisory Board 23 July 2015.
Project X: 8 GeV Transfer and Injection Injection Painting Kick-off meeting Dave Johnson APC/HINS June 27, 2008 Beams-doc 3129.
Design Optimization of MEIC Ion Linac & Pre-Booster B. Mustapha, Z. Conway, B. Erdelyi and P. Ostroumov ANL & NIU MEIC Collaboration Meeting JLab, October.
1 M. Popovic If You Build It, They Will Come 8GeV CW Linac: A Staged Approach Milorad Popovic, Fermilab June 26, 2012.
Project X RD&D Plan Beam Transfer Line and Recycler Injection David Johnson AAC Meeting February 3, 2009.
Overview of the Project X RD&D Plan Sergei Nagaitsev AAC Meeting February 3, 2009.
Proton Source & Site Layout Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Muon Accelerator Program Review Fermilab, August.
WG2 (Proton FFAG) Summary G.H. Rees. Proton Driver Working Group  Participants: M. Yashimoto, S. Ohnuma, C.R. Prior, G.H. Rees, A.G. Ruggiero  Topics:
Fermilab and Muons Proton Driver (for ν-Factory, μ + -μ - Collider, …) David Neuffer Fermilab.
Doug Michael Sep. 16, GeV protons 1.9 second cycle time 4x10 13 protons/pulse 0.4 MW! Single turn extraction (10  s) 4x10 20 protons/year 700.
Preliminary MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme Jiquan Guo for the MEIC design study team Oct. 5,
THE DESIGN OF THE AGS-BASED PROTON DRIVER FOR NEUTRINO FACTORY W.T. WENG, BNL FFAG WORKSHOP JULY 7-11, 2003 KEK, JAPAN.
June 3, 2004G.W.Foster - Proton Driver Proton Driver Project Development, Tactics & Strategy G. W. Foster Fermilab User’s Meeting June 3, 2004.
F A Fermilab Roadmap Dave McGinnis May 28, f Fermilab Roadmap - McGinnis Timelines  Divide the road map into three parallel paths  ILC - Energy.
Early Beam Injection Scheme for the Fermilab Booster: A Path for Intensity Upgrade Chandra Bhat Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory DPF2015, ANN ARBOR,
Status of Project X Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab MAP Winter Meeting - March 1, 2011.
Proton Driver Design Keith Gollwitzer Fermilab February 19, 2014.
F Possible Proton Capabilities at Fermilab Dave McGinnis April 16, 2007.
Robert R. Wilson Prize Talk John Peoples April APS Meeting: February 14,
NuFACT06 Muon Source at Fermilab David Neuffer Fermilab.
Steering Group Meeting 10:30 – 12:30 am CDT Monday, July 23, 2007 Y2K.
Protons for Neutrinos: Mid-Term and Project-X Bob Zwaska Fermilab Intensity Frontier Neutrino Working Group Meeting October 24, 2011.
F Project X: Recycler 8.9 GeV/c Extraction D. Johnson, E. Prebys, M. Martens, J. Johnstone Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee August 8, 2007 D. Johnson.
Overview of Project X ICD and RD&D Plans David Neuffer material from Paul Derwent & Sergei Nagaitsev (AAC Meeting, February 3, 2009)
Project X: Accelerators Sergei Nagaitsev September 2, 2011.
Proton Driver Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab MAP Collaboration Meeting June 20, 2013.
Fermilab SRF Linac Development Steve Holmes Workshop on High Intensity Proton Accelerators October 19, 2009.
U.S. Plans for High Power Proton Drivers Steve Holmes Fermilab Workshop on Physics with a Multi-MW Proton Source CERN May 25, 2004.
The Fermilab Roadmap, Project X, and Muon Facilities Steve Holmes NFMCC Meeting March 17, 2008.
Presenter : Yang Wu McMaster University Work conducted at IHEP.
FFAG Studies at BNL Alessandro G. Ruggiero Brookhaven National Laboratory FFAG’06 - KURRI, Osaka, Japan - November 6-10, 2006.
Project X/ILC/SRF Integrated Plan Steve Holmes Fermilab DOE Annual Science & Technology Review July 12-14, 2010.
8 GeV Linac (Project X) and mu2e Chuck Ankenbrandt Fermilab Mu2e Collaboration Meeting August 1, 2007 My Preferred title: Linac & Recycler & Accumulator.
A CW Linac scheme for CLIC drive beam acceleration. Hao Zha, Alexej Grudiev 07/06/2016.
Welcome! Robert Zwaska 23 November 2015 Workshop on Booster Performance and Enhancements.
UK Neutrino Factory Conceptual Design
Jeffrey Eldred, Sasha Valishev AAC Workshop 2016
SuperB Injection, RF stations, Vibration and Operations
FFAG Accelerator Proton Driver for Neutrino Factory
Progress towards Pulsed Multi-MW CERN Proton Drivers
A Superconducting Proton/Electron Linac
SLHC-PP kick-off meeting, CERN 9 April 2008
Presentation transcript:

f Project X Overview Dave McGinnis October 12, 2007

fMotivation  The Fermilab Main Injector has the potential to provide intense energetic proton beams that can unlock discovery opportunities in neutrino physics and flavor physics.  Future neutrino experiments will most likely require beam power exceeding 2MW at energies of 40 GeV and above.  To provide this intense beam, the proton source must be capable of providing 400kW at the 8 GeV injection energy of the Main Injector. Project X Overview - McGinnis 2

f Motivation  Currently, the relatively modern Main Injector is fed protons by an aged proton source.  The current Fermilab proton source provides on the order of 30kW for the current neutrino program and has the capability of providing up to 70kW.  Space charge tune shift at injection into the Booster limits the beam power in the current Fermilab proton source  Space charge is almost completely mitigated if the proton source is replaced by an 8 GeV Linac.  The major issue of an 8 GeV injector linac is cost.  Superconducting RF technology raises economic cross- over point between a linac and a synchrotron to the few GeV range.  Fermilab Proton Driver design. Project X Overview - McGinnis 3

f Motivation  One of the key features of the superconducting 8 GeV linac is the synergy it shares with the ILC design.  Synergy in the designs would help in both directions  The 8 GeV Linac would benefit from  Enormous engineering effort being expended on the design of the ILC main linac.  Cost savings resulting from ILC industrialization,  Technological advances from ILC R&D Project X Overview - McGinnis 4

f Motivation  ILC industrialization would benefit greatly from the construction of a superconducting 8 GeV linac.  The ILC industrialization profile outlined in the RDR calls for each region  to double production capacity over a four year program  a capacity to produce 25 cryomodules per year at the end of the fourth year.  After four years, each region would have produced over 45 cryomodules. (~2% of the ILC)  The high energy end of the superconducting 8 GeV linac requires about forty ILC-like cryo-modules.  Construction of the superconducting 8 GeV linac could serve as the impetus for ILC industrialization  Added bonus of providing a strong physics program with real discovery potential. Project X Overview - McGinnis 5

f Motivation  The 8 GeV Linac should be made to look as ILC -like as possible.  Same beam parameters 9mA with 1 ms long pulse at a rate of 5 HZ  Same configuration cryomodules for  = 1 RF distribution for  =1 Cryogenic distribution for  =1  But 2 MW requires 150x10 12 protons every 1.4 seconds at 120 GeV  24 mA x 1.0 mS = 150x10 12 protons (more klystrons)  9 mA x 2.6 mS = 150x10 12 protons (longer modulators)  9 mA x 1.0 mS = 56x10 12 electrons (ILC) Project X Overview - McGinnis 6

f Recycler as a Proton Accumulator  A holding or accumulation ring inserted between the 8 GeV Linac and the Main Injector can reduce the charge/pulse of the 8 GeV Linac to the same charge/pulse of the ILC linac.  Feed consecutive pulses of beam from the 8 Gev Linac into the Recycler every 0.2 seconds (5Hz)  The H- linac beam is stripped in the Recycler  Each Linac pulse is over-laid on top of the previous Linac pulse be re-energizing the stripping system.  Three Linac pulses is 150x10 12 protons  Extract beam from the Recycler and load the Main Injector in a single turn Project X Overview - McGinnis 7

f Project X Layout Project X Overview - McGinnis GeV fast extraction spill 1.5 x protons/1.4 sec 2 MW 8 GeV H - Linac 9mA x 1 msec x 5 Hz 8 GeV extraction 1 second x 2.25 x protons/1.4 sec 200 kW Stripping Foil Recycler 3 linac pulses/fill Main Injector 1.4 sec cycle Single turn 8 GeV GeV ILC Style Linac 0.6 GeV Front End Linac

f H- Injection Project X Overview - McGinnis 9 End 1 st injection End 2 nd injection End 3 rd injection Foil (injected beam) Closed orbit movement Move off foil Start injection Stripping foil Closed orbit

f 8 GeV Physics Program  The other advantage to stripping in the Recycler is that the stripping system is available to the Linac while the Main Injector is ramping.  There is 0.8 seconds left before the Recycler needs to be reloaded for the Main injector  Load and spill 4 pulses for an 8 GeV physics program  Upgrade Paths  9 mA x 1 ms x 5 Hz = 360 kW at 8 GeV  9 mA x 3 ms x 10 Hz = 2100 kW at 8 GeV  27 mA x 1 ms x 10 Hz = 2100 kW at 8 GeV Project X Overview - McGinnis 10

f Proton Flux Project X Overview - McGinnis 11

f Proton Beam Power Project X Overview - McGinnis 12

f What is Project X?  The basic scheme is an 8 GeV linac operating with ILC-like parameters (9mA x 1mS x 5Hz)  0.6 GeV Front End linac  0.6 – 8 GeV ILC style linac  Stripping and accumulation in the Recycler  Beam distributed  to the Main Injector for acceleration to (up to) 120 GeV  to an 8 GeV program.  Components  0.6 GeV Front End linac – 8 GeV ILC style linac  8 GeV transfer line and H- Injection  Recycler as a proton accumulator and stripping ring  Extraction system form the Recycler  Main Injector  120 GeV Targeting system Project X Overview - McGinnis 13

f Schedule  2008: CD-0  Assume the decision for CD-0 will be quick since this is the only US accelerator project.  6 months of design work & 100 page report is enough.  2009:  Work on (engineering) design report.  Start R&D (MI cavities, stripping laser, RFQ,...)  2010:  Finish design report. CD-1.  R&D on production scale.  R&D should be 30% of project costs  2011:  Preliminary Engineering Design Funding  CD2 and CD3  2012: Real funding starts: 25% of project funding  2013: More construction: 35%  2014: "Finish" construction 35%  2015: Commissioning & retrofits 5% of project 14 Project X Overview - McGinnis

f Project X Report for the Steering Group Project X Overview - McGinnis 15

f Workshop Project X Overview - McGinnis 16

f Project X Motivation  Physicists have told us we need 2MW at 50 GeV and above.  This type of beam power is best done with a superconducting linac  We want to align ourselves with the ILC linac (synergy in both directions)  To do 2 MW we need 150x10 12 protons per pulse in the MI.  The ILC type linac can only source 50x10 12 protons per pulse  Inserting a stripping ring between the Linac and the Main Injector allows us to accumulate charge from the linac which allows us to use the ILC linac design. Project X Overview - McGinnis 17

f Summary  Project X is an intense 8 GeV proton source that provides beam for the Fermilab Main Injector and an 8 GeV physics program.  The source consists of an 8 GeV superconducting linac that injects into the Recycler where multiple linac beam pulses are stripped and accumulated.  The use of the Recycler reduces the required charge in the superconducting 8 GeV linac to match the charge per pulse of the ILC design so that much of the ILC technology can be used in the design.  This benefit comes at the expense of space charge and stability issues in the Recycler that arise by storing beam in the Recycler. Using transverse and longitudinal phase space painting along with 2 nd harmonic RF, space charge tune shift is less than 0.05  Although there are many challenging technical issues to building an intense protons source, these issues are surmountable. Project X Overview - McGinnis 18