Rocket Flight Dynamics Section 1, Team 4 Student 1, Student 2, Student 3 May 5, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
University of Florida Hybrid Rocket Team’s Mile High Club
Advertisements

Vibrationdata 1 Unit 10 Sample Rate, Nyquist Frequency & Aliasing.
Systems and sensors Dr. Bertrand Dano ©Altapic.com, 2014.
TEAM 9 - MRAV DESIGN CONSTRAINTS ANALYSIS by Nick Gentry.
Preliminary Design Review. Rocket & Payload Schematic.
Northwestern University Space Technology and Rocketry Society (NUSTARS) NASA Student Launch Flight Readiness Review March 16, 2015.
E80 Final Report Section 4 Team 2 Student 1 Student 2 Student 3 Student 4 May 5, 2008.
slide 1 Measuring Natural Frequency and Non-Linear Damping on Oscillating Micro Plates ICEM 13 Alexandroupolis, Greece July 1-5, 2007 Sandia is a multiprogram.
Critical Design Review ….. Royal Ordnance,Summerfield 17 th February 2001 National Rocketry Competition 2001 Open Rocketry Association Slide 1/14.
Loop Shaping Professor Walter W. Olson
Closing Summary Design Testing Abstract Monitoring crop heath via aerial photography is a proper technique used to maximize agricultural productivity.
Pyrotechnic Shock Response
Student Launch Project Critical Design Review February 28, 2014.
Reinforcement Learning in Quadrotor Helicopters
Flight Readiness Review. Intimidator 5: 5” diameter, 10’ length, 47 lbs  Motor: Aerotech L1300R 4556 N-Sec of impulse  Predicted altitude 5203’- RockSim.
Critical Design Review. Intimidator 5: 5” diameter, 10’ length, 45 lbs  Motor: Aerotech L1300R 4556 N-Sec of impulse  Predicted altitude RockSim.
METEOR Guidance System P07106 Nov 2006 – May 2007 Project Review.
Design of a small instrumented atmospheric descent probe NASA Ames Research Center.
Vibration & System ID E80 Spring 2014 Erik Spjut.
CERN VIBRATION SENSOR PROPOSAL The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Commission under the FP7 Research Infrastructures.
Critical Design Review of “Mach Shock Reduction” Phase II January 2008 Statesville, NC.
Metra Mess- und Frequenztechnik Radebeul / Germany Piezoelectric Accelerometers Theory & Application.
“Sky Rockets in Flight” Experimental Engineering Section 1,Team 3 Student 1, Student 2, Student 3, Student 4 May 5, 2008.
April 8/9, 2003 Green Bank GBT PTCS Conceptual Design Review Instrumentation K. Constantikes.
Science Fiction. Rocket flight Centre of Mass or Centre of Gravity (CM or CG) Centre of mass is the mean or central location of all the mass of an object.
Flight Readiness Review Team Hawaii. Vehicle Properties Diameter (in)6 inches Length (in)127 inches Gross Liftoff Weight (lb)50.25 lb Launch Lug/button.
Characterization of Model Rockets in Flight Section 4, Team 1 Student 1, Student 2, Student 3 and Student 4.
The Final Project Flight Hardware and all that Jazz Prepared by Prof. Spjut Parroted by Prof. Duron.
Flight Readiness Review Student Launch Initiative SCS Rocket Team Statesville Christian School April 2, 2008.
Sérgio Ronaldo Barros dos Santos (ITA-Brazil)
University of Florida Rocket Team Critical Design Review Presentation.
Where No One Has Gone Before… E80: The Next Generation Section 1, Team 1 Student 1, Student 2, Student 3, and Student 4 May 5, 2008.
Critical Design Review- UCF Jeremy Young Anthony Liauppa Erica Terry, Emily Sachs Kristen Brightwell Gillian Smith 1.
Karman filter and attitude estimation Lin Zhong ELEC424, Fall 2010.
Professor Walter W. Olson Department of Mechanical, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering University of Toledo Loop Shaping.
Atomic Aggies CDR. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
Flight Testing Small Satellites Through High Altitude Ballooning Presented by Zach Henney 18 April 2015.
Analysis of Rocket Flights Section 4, Team 4 Student 1, Student 2, Student 3, Student 4.
E80 Section 3 Team 3 Student 1 Student 2 Student 3 Student 4 May 5, 2008.
Lecture 9: Modeling Electromechanical Systems 1.Finish purely electrical systems Modeling in the Laplace domain Loading of cascaded elements 2.Modeling.
Analysis of Rocket Flights E80 Spring 2008 Section 2, Team 2 Student 1, Student 2, Student 3, and Student 4.
HARDING UNIVERSITY FLYING BISONS A Study of Atmospheric Properties as a Function of Altitude Flight Readiness Review.
Current Works Determined drift during constant velocity test caused by slight rotation which results in gravity affecting accelerometers Analyzed data.
Turning a Mobile Device into a Mouse in the Air
Objective: To develop a fully-autonomous control system for the Q-ball based on onboard IMU/Magnetometer/Ultrasound sensory information Summer Internship.
E80 Field Experience Engineering Department Harvey Mudd College Presented by Margaret G. Brier, Ozzie Gooen, Andrew Ho, and Sara Sholes May 6, 2010 E80.
Hopper Spacecraft Simulator. The “Hopping” Concept -Land on a celestial body using engines, conduct surface operations, then re-ignite engines and ‘hop’
Advanced LIGO UK 1 IGRQA0003 LIGO-G K Modal testing facility for Advanced LIGO Caroline Cantley University of Glasgow Advanced LIGO SUS Workshop,
Quadcopters A CEV Talk. Agenda Flight PreliminariesWhy Quadcopters The Quadcopter SystemStability: The NotionSensors and FusionControl AlgorithmsThe Way.
January 14,  Length: inches  Diameter: 6 inches  Mass: oz. / lbs.  Span: 22 inches  Center of Gravity: inches 
Surviving FlightSurviving Flight  28zn0&NR=1 28zn0&NR=1.
A Low-Cost and Fail-Safe Inertial Navigation System for Airplanes Robotics 전자공학과 깡돌가
Creation of a Vibration Monitoring System
Strapdown Inertial Navigation Systems (INS) Sensors and UAVs Avionic
EE 495 Modern Navigation Systems Kalman Filtering – Part II Mon, April 4 EE 495 Modern Navigation Systems Slide 1 of 23.
Date of download: 5/31/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Schematic overview of the acquisition system. The basic principle is to use the.
Progress of Shintake Monitor (ATF2 IP-BSM) ATF2 weekly meeting 2008/9/3 Takashi Yamanaka The University of Tokyo.
Sensor Error Characteristics By: Hector Rotstein.
The Equations of Motion Euler angle rate equations:
Trajectory Analysis Student 1 Student 2 Student 3 Student 4 E80: Section 4 Team 3 Harvey Mudd College 5 May 2008.
Analysis of the Mudd III Rockets
SDOF Response to Applied Force Revision A
Medium Rocket Analysis
College of Engineering
E80 Modal Vibrations Spring 2009
Self-Standing Monopod
Joe Trefilek Jeff Kubascik Paul Scheffler Matt Rockey
Image Acquisition and Processing of Remotely Sensed Data
2019 First Nation Launch – Oral Presentation
Presentation transcript:

Rocket Flight Dynamics Section 1, Team 4 Student 1, Student 2, Student 3 May 5, 2008

Rockets Analyzed Large IMU rocket Large vibration rocket Small vibration rocket All launches at Lucerne Valley dry lake bed Altitude: 2848 feet

How the RDAS functions 6 channels of data Onboard accelerometer Onboard pressure sensor Samples at 200 Hz Runs on 9V battery supply

IMU and Vibration Sensors IMU 3 MEMS Accelerometers 3 MEMS Gyroscopes Vibration Piezoelectric strain gauges X axis Y axis Z axis

Modal Shapes Model rocket as a uniform beam At natural frequencies, distinct modal shapes Values of natural frequencies depend on beam dimensions and material properties Mode 1: Mode 2: Mode 3:.

Large IMU Rocket Launched April 26, 2008 with G339N motor RockSim used to model launch Estimated Apogee of ft

Large IMU Rocket Approximations Any point before time=0 needs to be set to zero Account for calibration drift Over thrust curve, all other sensors should be zero Noisy x and z gyroscopes have negligible effect Integration error doesn’t affect apogee

Large IMU Rocket Apogee at 5.45 seconds Made several approximations to eliminate noise Model only works until apogee

Large Vibration Rocket Launched April 19, 2008 with G69N motor Severe weathercock RockSim trajectory portrays weathercock

Large Vibration Rocket Six vibration sensors connected to RDAS Sensor 10 assumed as input 72.39cm 60.64cm 46.67cm 31.75cm cm 0 cm ADC0 ADC1 ADC2 ADC3 ADC4 ADC

Large Vibration Rocket Applied Fourier transform Treating sensor 10 as input, plotted FRF

Large Vibration Rocket Identified three resonant peaks Mode 1 assumed to be at Hz

Large Vibration Rocket Mode 2 assumed to be at Hz

Large Vibration Rocket Higher Mode at Hz

Small Vibration Rocket Launched April 19, 2008 with G104T motor Camera drew power from battery Parachute did not deploy

Small Vibration Rocket Five vibration sensors connected to RDAS Sensor 10 chosen as input 37 in 28 in 22 in 8 in 1 in ADC0 ADC1 ADC2 ADC4 ADC

Small Vibration Rocket Applied Fourier transform and 50 Hz filter Treating sensor 10 as input, plotted FRF

Small Vibration Rocket Identified two resonant frequency peaks Mode 1 assumed to be at Hz

Small Vibration Rocket Mode 2 assumed to be at Hz

Summary Large IMU Apogee at 5.45 seconds Modeled altitude at apogee of 3382 feet Large Vibration Three natural frequencies: Hz, Hz, Hz Small Vibration Two natural frequencies: Hz, Hz

Acknowledgements E80 lab professors Mary Cardenas, Reza Miraghaie, Erik Spjut, Ruye Wang, and Qimin Yang Lab proctors and Rocket Development Team Reference 1 Reference 2 Reference 3

References Miraghaie, Reza, Modal Vibration, ationLecture.pdf Remote Data Acquisition System, Spjut, Erik, Wang, Ruye, Inertial Navigation,