Antithrombotic Trialists’ (ATT) Collaboration. Lancet 2009;373:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leadership. Knowledge. Community. Antiplatelet Therapy for the Primary Prevention of Vascular Events Working Group: Alan D. Bell, MD, CCFP and James D.
Advertisements

ASCOT Lancet, April 2003 n=10,305 Evidence for: primary prevention of CHD and stroke in high risk, middle aged, hypertensive, male patients with TC
Protecting the heart and the kidney: Implications from the SHARP trial Dr. Christina Reith University of Oxford United Kingdom.
1 SECOND AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL BLOOD PRESSURE STUDY (ANBP-2) Enalapril/ACEI vs. HCTZ, n = 6,083 Randomized, open-label (blinded endpoint review) All CV events.
CVD prevention & management: a new approach for primary care Rod Jackson School of Population Health University of Auckland New Zealand.
Cholesterol quintile (mg/dL)
Slide Source: Lipids Online Slide Library Prospective Study of Pravastatin in the Elderly at Risk (PROSPER) 5804 patients aged 70–82.
Economic evaluation of MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group University of Oxford UK.
Lancet : doi: /S (08)60104-X Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from.
Simvastatin in Patients With Prior Cerebrovascular Disease: HPS
(N=488) Simvastatin in Patients With Prior Cerebrovascular Disease: HPS *29% RRR, p=0.001 Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group. Lancet. 2004;363:
Should we??. Aspirin is useful! It is widely used in secondary prevention It reduces the yearly risk of vascular events by about a quarter This corresponds.
VBWG HPS. Lancet. 2003;361: Gæde P et al. N Engl J Med. 2003;348: Recent statin trials: Reduction in primary outcome in patients with diabetes.
HPS: Heart Protection Study Purpose To determine whether simvastatin reduces mortality and vascular events in patients with and without coronary disease,
Aim To determine the effects of a Coversyl- based blood pressure lowering regimen on the risk of recurrent stroke among patients with a history of stroke.
SPARCL Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels trial.
Comparison of two cardiovascular risk assessment tools to determine appropriate use of aspirin as primary prevention for patients with type 2 diabetes.
Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study CARDS Dr Sachin Kadoo.
Antithrombotic Trialists’ Collaboration An updated collaborative overview of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy among high-risk patients.
Risk Ratio for Coronary Heart Disease Mortality in 59 Randomized Controlled Trials of Cholesterol-Lowering Interventions Statins0.69 ( ) n=13 (16,228/11,279)
¨ 8 European countries, 48 centres Stent implantation Double-blind randomisation n = 1005 Clopidogrel 300mg od Aspirin 325mg od Clopidogrel 75mg od Aspirin.
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration. Lancet 2010;epub 9 Nov.
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration Slide deck
Baseline Characteristics of the Patients* - Part I The ONTARGET Investigators. N Engl J Med 2008 [Epub on Mar 31]
ELIGIBILITY: MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study Increased risk of CHD death due to prior disease: Myocardial infarction or other coronary heart disease; Occlusive.
Number of participants with diabetes by trial Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' (CTT) Collaborators Lancet 2008;371:
Baseline characteristics and eligibility criteria of participating trials Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaborators Lancet 2005;366:
December 02 1 Vascular mortality: Age-specific hazard ratios for 20 mmHg lower usual SBP deaths at ages
The Use of Aspirin for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases
Flow Diagram of the Trial Selection Process Jeffrey S. Berger et al, JAMA. 2006;295:
10-year stroke prevention after successful carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic stenosis (ACST-1): a multicentre randomised trial 颈动脉内膜切除术无症状狭窄 多中心随机试验.
Over Time Additional Risk Factors Can Progress: Effect of Cholesterol and BP on CHD Risk in MRFIT Trial
Volume 376, Issue 9753, Pages (November 2010)
Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials Ungroup once.
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration Slide deck
Copyright © 2012 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies  The Emerging.
Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170 000 participants in 26 randomised trials  Cholesterol.
The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with statin therapy in people at low risk of vascular disease: meta-analysis of individual data from 27 randomised.
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration Slide deck
REVEAL: Randomized placebo-controlled trial of anacetrapib in 30,449 patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease Louise Bowman on behalf of the HPS.
The Anglo Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial
ELIGIBILITY: MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study
SEARCH Collaborative Group. Lancet 2010;epub 9 Nov
First time a CETP inhibitor shows reduction of serious CV events
ASCEND Randomized placebo-controlled trial of aspirin 100 mg daily in 15,480 patients with diabetes and no baseline cardiovascular disease Jane Armitage.
Jane Armitage on behalf of the HPS2-THRIVE Collaborative Group
Baseline characteristics of HPS participants by prior diabetes
Volume 375, Issue 9709, Pages (January 2010)
Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies  The Emerging.
Insights from the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT)
Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170 000 participants in 26 randomised trials  Cholesterol.
Aspirin in the primary and secondary prevention of vascular disease: collaborative meta- analysis of individual participant data from randomised trials 
The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with statin therapy in people at low risk of vascular disease: meta-analysis of individual data from 27 randomised.
Lipid-Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA): Results in the Subgroup of Patients with Diabetes Peter S. Sever, Bjorn Dahlöf, Neil Poulter, Hans Wedel, for the.
Volume 375, Issue 9725, Pages (May 2010)
Factor Xa Inhibitors in Coronary Artery Disease
Volume 376, Issue 9753, Pages (November 2010)
Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170 000 participants in 26 randomised trials  Cholesterol.
Baseline Characteristics by Baseline N-BNP Level
Volume 382, Issue 9894, Pages (August 2013)
Estimated 5-year rate of a first major vascular event (MVE), major coronary event (MCE),or vascular death in univariate and multivariate risk subgroups.
Cause of death Treatment-arm events, % (n=45 054)
Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies  The Emerging.
Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration. JAMA 2009;302:412-23
Effects on 11-year mortality and morbidity of lowering LDL cholesterol with simvastatin for about 5 years in 20 536 high-risk individuals: a randomised.
Comparison of Baseline Characteristics by Primary End Point
FIELD: Primary outcome
Risk Ratio A risk ratio, or relative risk, compares the risk of some health-related event such as disease or death in two groups. The two groups are typically.
Risk differences for incident stroke, coronary heart disease (CHD), and cardiovascular mortality (per 1000 person-years) by clinical risk factor in the.
Presentation transcript:

Antithrombotic Trialists’ (ATT) Collaboration. Lancet 2009;373:1849-60

Design and eligibility criteria of primary prevention trials Antithrombotic Trialists’ (ATT) Collaboration. Lancet 2009;373:1849-60

Serious vascular events in primary prevention trials-proportional effects of aspirin allocation Actual numbers for aspirin-allocated trial participants, and adjusted numbers for control-allocated trial participants, are presented, together with the corresponding mean yearly event rate (in parentheses). Participants can contribute only once to the total of serious vascular events. Rate ratios (RRs) for all trials are indicated by squares and their 99% CIs by horizontal lines. Subtotals and their 95% CIs are represented by diamonds. Squares or diamonds to the left of the solid line indicate benefi t. MI=myocardial infarction. CHD=coronary heart disease. *Myocardial infarction, stroke, or vascular death. Vascular death is coronary heart disease death, stroke death, or other vascular death (which includes sudden death, death from pulmonary embolism, and death from any haemorrhage, but in the primary prevention trials excludes death from an unknown cause). Antithrombotic Trialists’ (ATT) Collaboration. Lancet 2009;373:1849-60

events in primary prevention Trials-subgroup analyses Serious vascular events in primary prevention Trials-subgroup analyses Serious vascular events in primary prevention trials—subgroup analyses Actual numbers for aspirin-allocated trial participants, and adjusted numbers for control-allocated trial participants, are presented, together with the corresponding mean yearly event rates (in parentheses). Rate ratios (RRs) for all trials are indicated by squares and their 99% CIs by horizontal lines. Subtotals and their 95% CIs are represented by diamonds. Squares or diamonds to the left of the solid line indicate benefit. A global test for heterogeneity (χ2 on 11 degrees of freedom) is provided. Unknown values are not plotted. SBP=systolic blood pressure. DBP=diastolic blood pressure. BMI=body-mass index. CHD=coronary heart disease. *Excluding patients with a history of vascular disease. ATT Collaboration. Lancet 2009;373:1849-60

Comparison of proportional and absolute effects of aspirin in primary and secondary prevention trials Antithrombotic Trialists’ (ATT) Collaboration. Lancet 2009;373:1849-60

Selected outcomes in primary and secondary prevention trials of aspirin, by sex Actual numbers for aspirin-allocated trial participants, and adjusted numbers for control-allocated trial participants, are presented together with the corresponding mean yearly event rate (in parentheses). Rate ratios (RRs) for all trials are indicated by squares and their 99% CIs by horizontal lines. Subtotals and their 95% CIs are represented by diamonds. Squares or diamonds to the left of the solid line indicate benefi t. *Myocardial infarction, stroke (haemorrhagic or other), or vascular death. ATT Collaboration. Lancet 2009;373:1849-60

Stroke subtypes in primary and secondary prevention trials Actual numbers for aspirin-allocated trial participants, and adjusted numbers for control-allocated trial participants, are presented. Rate ratios (RRs) for all trials are indicated by squares and their 99% CIs by horizontal lines. Subtotals and their 95% CIs are represented by diamonds. Squares or diamonds to the left of the solid line indicate benefit. *Haemorrhagic, ischaemic, or unknown cause. ATT Collaboration. Lancet 2009;373:1849-60

Mortality by cause in primary prevention trials Actual numbers for aspirin-allocated trial participants, and adjusted numbers for control-allocated trial participants, are presented together with the corresponding mean yearly event rate (in parentheses). Rate ratios (RRs) for all trials are indicated by squares and their 99% CIs by horizontal lines. Subtotals and their 95% CIs are represented by diamonds. Squares or diamonds to the left of the solid line indicate benefi t. CHD=coronary heart disease. GI=gastointestinal. Antithrombotic Trialists’ (ATT) Collaboration. Lancet 2009;373:1849-60

Rate ratios (95% CI) associated with risk factors for selected outcomes in people with no known vascular disease in primary prevention trials Antithrombotic Trialists’ (ATT) Collaboration. Lancet 2009;373:1849-60

Predicted 5-year absolute eff ects of allocation to aspirin in different categories of age and sex in the primary and secondary prevention trials (ignoring non-vascular mortality) Predicted 5-year absolute eff ects of allocation to aspirin in diff erent categories of age and sex in the primary and secondary prevention trials (ignoring non-vascular mortality) Results are generally for otherwise untreated individuals; other risk reduction measures might approximately halve the vascular event rates in both aspirin (A) and control (C) groups. Three outcomes were analysed: non-fatal gastrointestinal (GI) (or other non-cerebral) bleeds in the primary prevention trials only; non-fatal vascular events in the primary trials and in the secondary trials; and vascular mortality (including any fatal bleeds) in the primary trials and in the secondary trials. For every outcome, the overall risk ratio (aspirin vs control in all participants, irrespective of age or sex) was combined with the absolute yearly risk among the controls in these four categories of sex and age. The risk ratios are those resulting from allocation to daily aspirin, so they underestimate the effects of actually taking aspirin for the whole 5-year period. MI=myocardial infarction. ATT Collaboration. Lancet 2009;373:1849-60

of coronary heart disease (CHD) (ignoring non-vascular mortality) Predicted 5-year absolute effects of allocation to aspirin in the primary prevention trials in different categories of 5-year risk (if untreated) of coronary heart disease (CHD) (ignoring non-vascular mortality) Predicted 5-year absolute effects of allocation to aspirin in the primary prevention trials in different categories of 5-year risk (if untreated) of coronary heart disease (CHD) (ignoring non-vascular mortality) Three outcomes were analysed in aspirin (A) and control (C) groups: non-fatal gastrointestinal (GI) (or other non-cerebral) bleeds when aspirin is given alone; non-fatal vascular events when aspirin is given alone and when aspirin is added to other drugs that halve risk; and vascular mortality (including any fatal bleeds) when aspirin is given alone and when aspirin is added to other drugs that halve risk. For every outcome, the overall risk ratio, irrespective of risk of coronary heart disease, was combined with the absolute yearly risk among the controls in three categories of predicted 5-year risk of a major coronary event (<5%, 5–10%, >10%). Absolute effects are estimated both directly from the data (middle column) and in the hypothetical situation in which risk is halved by statins and other primary prevention measures (right-hand column). ATT Collaboration. Lancet 2009;373:1849-60