Legal & Regulatory Classification of Broadband Demystifying Title II.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Status of broadband in the US High speed lines as of December 2008: –102 million total high speed connections 84% were faster than 200 kbps in both directions.
Advertisements

1 Regulation of the Internet: The Hows and Whys of Telecommunications Reform John Windhausen President, Telepoly Consulting Wendy Wigen Policy Analyst,
Open Access in CCSF Report to Telecommunications Commission December 20, 1999.
Earl Comstock President and CEO COMPTEL. The World Has Changed FCC adopts Cable Modem Order and Supreme Court upholds FCC in Brand X FCC adopts Wireline.
The status of broadband FCC defines –High-speed lines that deliver services at speeds in excess of 200 kbps in at least one direction –Advanced services.
Net Neutrality, What Else? Wim Nauwelaerts Partner Hunton & Williams.
Net Neutrality presented by: Brian G. Riesen What Is It? Service providers should remain “end-to-end neutral” The Two Sides: Telecoms (against) View.
The Old Rules Just Don’t Fit Anymore: A Panel Discussion on the Proposed Revision of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 John Windhausen, Jr., Past President,
John Windhausen, Telepoly Consulting Cathy Sloan, Computer and Communications Industry Association May 19, 2010.
Net Neutrality1. Definition Net Neutrality can be broadly defined as the policy of Internet Service Provider’s (ISP’s) and Telecom Carriers treating all.
Presentation by Tony Perez to Seattle Citizens Technology and Telecommunications Advisory Board March 11, 2014.
Broadband’s Triple Play The National Broadband Plan, the Comcast Decision, and the Google/Verizon Proposal Jim Chen Dean and Professor of Law University.
ACM ADVOCACY REPORT Where Does The Alliance’s Agenda Stand? What Can, And Should, You Be Doing? Gerry Lederer ACM Advocate.
Better TV for all.. Jeff Blum Senior Vice President and Deputy General Counsel
Continuing Uncertainty Under FCC Network Neutrality Rules Prof. Barbara A. Cherry Indiana University Presented at EDUCAUSE Live! Webcast January 26, 2011.
Regulation and Innovation October 7, Issues  The Internet is a public network ;  Net neutrality  Can it be regulated? How?  Why should it.
Net Neutrality – An Overview – Bob Bocher Technology Consultant, WI Dept of Public Instruction, State Division for Libraries ,
Federal Communications Commission Policy Statement Adopted Aug. 5, 2005Released: Sept. 25, 2005.
What you talk 'in bout?. Net Neutrality prevents Internet providers from blocking, speeding up or slowing down Web content based on its source, ownership.
Net Neutrality Questions. What if? Customer Lamps for Less Luxurious Lumination Telephone Company Welcome to lamps [click] [dial tone] Welcome to Luxurious.
What you talk 'in bout?. For instance, AT&T decided to get into the Radio business in They used the station WEAF and its affiliates as an experimental.
Position Paper: The Case For Universal Broadband Access By James Kim.
Net Neutrality. Tussle Who’s battling? What’s at issue? Is it contained?
VoIP Voice over Internet Protocol or “It is not Voice over IP; it is Everything over IP…” Bob Pepper, FCC.
Competing visions of the NII and the 1996 Act. Visions for a National Information Infrastructure –Who will build it? –Who will pay for it? –What role.
Network neutrality is the idea that all internet traffic should be treated equally. It does not matter who is downloading and what is being downloaded.
Policy Update: Where Will the Regulators Fall? Jeff Kuhns, The Pennsylvania State University Garret Sern, EDUCAUSE.
Municipal Broadband: Why & How Public Power Systems are Deploying Fiber-to-the-Home Networks Congressional Briefing Thursday, September 25, 2003 American.
Mass Media and the New Media Technologies Devereux, Ch. 3.
Net Neutrality vs. Common Carrier Laws Is Google being Hypocritical?
Before there were commissions Judicial regulation Direct legislative regulation Local franchise regulation.
Funding Broadband & Net Neutrality Implications for the State Lynn Notarianni PUC Telecom Section Chief
Net Neutrality The debate in the US and in the EU Balázs BARTÓKI-GÖN CZY.
Questions about broadband What do we do about broadband services? –Why didn’t the ILECs deploy DSL faster? Could regulation be to blame? –How do we get.
CALEA Discussion Internet2 Joint Techs July 19, 2006 Doug Carlson Executive Director, Communications & Computing Services New York University
Testimony before the Florida House Committee on Utilities and Telecommunications Thomas M. Koutsky Co-Founder and Resident Scholar Phoenix Center March.
Federal Communications Commission (FCC). The FCC is a United States government agency and was established by the Communications Act of The FCC is.
By: Matt Klena Nathan Crapis. The principle that Internet service providers (ISP’s) should enable access to all content and applications regardless of.
Transforming Education Through Information Technologies Casey Lide Focus on IP Telephony February 26,1999 Focus.
CROATIAN REGULATORY AUTHORITY FOR NETWORK INDUSTRIES (HAKOM) DO WE NEED NET NEUTRALITY REGULATION? Marina Brkljačić, CROATIAN REGULATORY AUTHORITY FOR.
Neither Fish Nor Fowl: New Strategies for Selective Regulation of Information Services A Presentation at the 35 th Annual Telecommunications Policy Research.
The Digital Revolution and The Global E-Marketplace Chapter 25 Matakuliah: J0474 International Marketing Tahun: 2009.
Title II Reclassification What it means to rural communities.
1 Managing the Transition to IP-Based Public Phone Networks in the United States Joe Gillan CRNI November 22, 2013 Gillan Associates.
December 16, FCC Treatment of VoIP Russ Hanser Special Counsel to the Chief Competition Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Federal Communications.
The Framework for Privacy Policies in the UK: Is telling people what information is gathered about them part of the framework? Does it need to be? Emma.
CALEA Discussion Institute for Computer Policy and Law June 28, 2006 Doug Carlson Executive Director, Communications & Computing Services New York University.
Implications of VoIP TC 310 May 28, Questions from Reviews Duty to Interconnect Reciprocal compensation Line of business v statutory line of business.
LAW OF COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY FALL 2015 © 2015 MICHAEL I. SHAMOS Regulatory Law Michael I. Shamos, Ph.D., J.D. Institute for Software Research School of.
Overview of Network Neutrality Kyle D. Dixon Senior Fellow & Director, Federal Institute for Regulatory Law & Economics The Progress & Freedom Foundation.
VoIP Regulation: State and Federal Developments MARK J. O’CONNOR Lampert, O’Connor & Johnston, P.C. Session EI-05 January 23, :30 – 2:15 pm.
VoIP Regulation: State and Federal Developments LAMPERT & O’CONNOR, P.C K Street NW, Suite 700 Washington, DC (202)
Spectrum and the Concept of Net Neutrality Todd D. Daubert Partner Kelley, Drye & Warren, LLP.
+ BY: Falynn Elizabeth Lannert AP American Government 1 st Hour.
Network Neutrality Juergen Hahn MIS 304 November 23, 2010.
Policies that Fuel New Technology Adoption Eric Stark Associate Administrator, Office of Policy Analysis and Development Associate Administrator, Office.
Legislative and Regulatory Strategies for Providing Consumer Safeguards in a Convergent Marketplace Legislative and Regulatory Strategies for Providing.
VoIP Regulation Klaus Nieminen TKK Table of Contents Background EU Regulatory Framework Objectives, PATS and ECS definitions VoIP Classification.
Issues in New Media: Net Neutrality. What is “net neutrality?” What is Net Neutrality? (Video)(Video) Net Neutrality (Video)(Video) Save the Internet!
IEEE & Expansion of 1994's Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA) & Security Services Information Technology Department 2 December.
ICT Developments in Lao PDR Mr. Snith XAPHAKDY Director Telecom Division Ministry of Communication, Transport, Post and Construction. Lao P.D.R.
Network Neutrality: An Internet operating principle which ensures that all online users are entitled to access Internet content of their choice; run online.
Assistive Technology Laws by: Family Center on Technology and Disability.
Comparative Telecommunications Law Spring, 2007 Prof. Karl Manheim 3: Competition Copyright © 2007.
Constructing An Effective Statutory & Regulatory Framework for Broadband Networks Phoenix Center Symposium December 1, 2005 Disclaimer: Views presented.
Legal Framework for Broadband Internet Access Notice of Inquiry June 17, 2010.
The Broadband Pricing working Group
Class 7 Network Industries, Spring, 2014 The Pole Attachments Act
Federal Court Systems: Supreme Court
Presentation transcript:

Legal & Regulatory Classification of Broadband Demystifying Title II

Overview Two lines of FCC decisions and the resulting federal court cases  classification of computer services  ancillary authority Two categories of federal statutes  statutory definitions for the FCC  congressional mandates to the FCC What does it mean for broadband?  re-shaping universal service funds for today’s technologies  implementation of other national broadband plan policies

What does the FCC regulate? “interstate and foreign commerce in communication by wire and radio….” 47 U.S.C. § 151 FCC typically oversees transmission of communications – transport of voice, video, or data – via wired and wireless It typically does not regulate the content of those communications  The classification issue and “net neutrality” debates do not change that fundamental precept

Prior FCC Classification Decisions FCC Computer Inquiries: mid 1960s - mid 1990s  For further reading on the Computer inquiries…. For further reading Congress adopts in 1996 Telecommunications Act the basic framework of Computer decisions “Modern” FCC decisions  Cable Modem (2002)  DSL (2005)  Wireless Broadband (2007) U.S. Supreme Court decision in Brand X (2005)  Affirmed FCC discretion to make this decision

1996 Telecommunications Act Common Carrier background Definitions in the 1996 Act [47 U.S.C. § 153]  “telecommunications” means the transmission…of information of the user’s choosing  “telecom. service” means the offering of telecommunications for a fee directly to the public...regardless of the facilities used  “information service” means…generating, acquiring, storing, transforming, processing, retrieving, utilizing, or making available information via telecommunications…but does not include any use of any such capability for the management, control, or operation of a telecommunications system or…service

In plainer language…. A Title II service is a telecommunications service: one that transmits information of the user’s choosing vs. Information services – such as , web browsing, DNS lookup – use transmission and transport capacity to get to your computer, but involve something more

Title I and Ancillary Authority There is no such thing as a Title I service; there merely are communications and information services that do not fit within these other Titles and definitions Ancillary authority doctrine began with cable television, before Congress passed laws dealing directly with Cable

Flash Forward to 2010 Comcast/BitTorrent Blocking 2008 FCC order prohibits blocking, relying on open Internet “principles” 2010 Federal Appeals Court Decision in Comcast v. FCC  Court decides FCC did not demonstrate ancillary authority over broadband Internet access in that 2008 FCC order

FCC Response Chairman Genachowski’s “Third Way”Third Way FCC General Counsel Austin Schlick provides even more detail on the approach more detail Classification as Title II necessary for FCC to have jurisdiction to:  promote broadband deployment & adoption  protect consumers online  truth-in-billing / transparency / privacy / disabilities  preserve the open Internet

National Broadband Plan Purposes Propose to apply some provisions from Title II of the Communications Act to broadband Internet access 201, 202, and 208 – reasonable rates and terms 222 – privacy of customer information 254 – universal service 255 – access by persons with disabilities Without classification of broadband as Title II, USF for broadband is far more difficult 47 U.S.C. § 254(c)(1): “Universal service is an evolving level of telecommunications services…” 47 U.S.C. § 254(e): “only an eligible telecommunications carrier…shall be eligible to receive…universal service….”

For more information: Matt Wood Associate Director