VALSIM status J. Apostolakis, V. Grichine, A. Howard, A. Ribon EUDET meeting, 11 th Sept 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Particle identification in ECAL Alexander Artamonov, Yuri Kharlov IHEP, Protvino CBM collaboration meeting
Advertisements

Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
Ion Beam Analysis techniques:
MONTE-CARLO TECHNIQUES APPLIED TO PROTON DOSIMETRY AND RADIATION SAFETY F. Guillaume, G. Rucka, J. Hérault, N. Iborra, P. Chauvel 1 XXXV European Cyclotron.
Pion yield studies for proton drive beams of 2-8 GeV kinetic energy for stopped muon and low-energy muon decay experiments Sergei Striganov Fermilab Workshop.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Recent Developments in Geant4 Hadronics Geant4/Spenvis Workshop at JPL 6 November 2006 Dennis Wright.
1 Stratified sampling This method involves reducing variance by forcing more order onto the random number stream used as input As the simplest example,
Study of two pion channel from photoproduction on the deuteron Lewis Graham Proposal Phys 745 Class May 6, 2009.
Cross section measurements for analysis of D and T in thicker films Liqun Shi Institute of Modern Physics, Fudan University, Shanghai, , People’s.
Monte Carlo 2005, Chattanooga Parton String Models in Geant4 Gunter Folger, Johannes-Peter Wellisch CERN PH/SFT.
Summary of Parallel Session 3A : Hadronic Validation J. Yarba Fermilab 17th Geant4 Collaboration Workshop 9/14/
CDF Joint Physics Group June 27, 2003 Rick FieldPage 1 PYTHIA Tune A versus Run 2 Data  Compare PYTHIA Tune A with Run 2 data on the “underlying event”.
 A GEANT4-based simulation was performed of the production target, solenoid, selection channel, and spectrometer.  The acceptance was found to be 8.3x10.
Applications of neutron spectrometry Neutron sources: 1) Reactors 2) Usage of reactions 3) Spallation sources Neutron show: 1) Where atoms are (structure)
Lecture 1.3: Interaction of Radiation with Matter
Hadronic Models Problems, Progress and Plans Gunter Folger Geant4 Workshop, Lisbon 2006.
Geant4 Acceptance Suite for Key Observables CHEP06, T.I.F.R. Mumbai, February 2006 J. Apostolakis, I. MacLaren, J. Apostolakis, I. MacLaren, P. Mendez.
Future usage of quasi-infinite depleted uranium target (BURAN) for benchmark studies Pavel Tichý Future usage of quasi-infinite depleted uranium target.
Hadronic Work Plan Outline list of high priority deliverables and tentative assignments list of other main tasks and assignments milestones and.
Recent Developments in Geant4 Calice Collaboration Meeting 10 March 2010 Dennis Wright (on behalf of the Geant4 hadronic working group)
Development of the neutron counters for the Spin dipole resonance Kazuhiro Ishikawa.
Calorimeters Chapter 4 Chapter 4 Electromagnetic Showers.
Simulations on “Energy plus Transmutation” setup, 1.5 GeV Mitja Majerle
1 Status and Plans for Geant4 Physics Linear Collider Simulation Workshop III 2-5 June 2004 Dennis Wright (SLAC)
Monte Carlo methods in ADS experiments Study for state exam 2008 Mitja Majerle “Phasotron” and “Energy Plus Transmutation” setups (schematic drawings)
Systematic studies of neutrons produced in the Pb/U assembly irradiated by relativistic protons and deuterons. Vladimír Wagner Nuclear physics institute.
1 Lead glass simulations Eliane Epple, TU Munich Kirill Lapidus, INR Moscow Collaboration Meeting XXI March 2010 GSI.
Release Validation J. Apostolakis, M. Asai, G. Cosmo, S. Incerti, V. Ivantchenko, D. Wright for Geant4 12 January 2009.
Experimental Studies of Spatial Distributions of Neutrons Produced by Set-ups with Thick Lead Target Irradiated by Relativistic Protons Vladimír Wagner.
1 Background radiation studies in LHCb with GAUSS/Geant4 Giuseppe G. Daquino PH/SFT.
Charged Particle Multiplicity and Transverse Energy in √s nn = 130 GeV Au+Au Collisions Klaus Reygers University of Münster, Germany for the PHENIX Collaboration.
Interactions of Hadrons and Hadronic Showers
Mitja Majerle for the “Energy Plus Transmutation” collaboration.
Recent Studies on ILC BDS and MERIT S. Striganov APD meeting, January 24.
ANITA workshop, Uppsala, december 2008 ANITA neutron source Monte Carlo simulations and comparison with experimental data Mitja Majerle Nuclear Physics.
Neutron measurement with nuclear emulsion Mitsu KIMURA 27th Feb 2013.
Summary of hadronic tests and benchmarks in ALICE Isidro González CERN EP-AIP/Houston Univ. Geant4 workshop Oct
Santa Tecla, 2-9 October 2005Marita Mosconi,FZK1 Re/Os cosmochronometer: measurements of relevant Os cross sections Marita Mosconi 1, Alberto Mengoni 2,
Simulations on “Energy plus Transmutation” setup, 1.5 GeV Mitja Majerle, V Wagner, A Krása, F Křížek This document can be downloaded.
A Summary of Physics Validations and Developments: Hadronic Dennis Wright Geant4 Collaboration Meeting Hebden Bridge, UK 13 September 2007.
Radiation study of the TPC electronics Georgios Tsiledakis, GSI.
A. Dokhane, PHYS487, KSU, 2008 Chapter1- Neutron Reactions 1 NEWS Lecture1: Chapter 0 is already on my Website.
Workshop on AstroParticle Physics, WAPP 2009 Bose Institute, Darjeeling, December 2009 Extensive Air Showers and Astroparticle Physics Observations and.
Adam Para, Fermilab, February 16, Who Cares? What is the Problem? 2 Dual Readout Total Absorption calorimeter has very good energy resolution.
Marina Golubeva, Alexander Ivashkin Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, Moscow AGeV simulations with Geant4 and Shield Geant4 with Dpmjet-2.5 interface.
1 Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN Background radiation studies using Geant4.
9 th session of the AER Working Group “f “ - Spent Fuel Transmutations Simulations of experimental “ADS” Mitja Majerle, Gael de Cargouet Nuclear Physics.
Alex Howard PH-SFT LCG-PV 10 th May 2006 Neutron Benchmark for Geant4 using TARC – initial status 1)TARC – experimental set-up and aims 2)Geant4 Simulation.
P.F.Ermolov SVD-2 status and experimental program VHMP 16 April 2005 SVD-2 status and experimental program 1.SVD history 2.SVD-2 setup 3.Experiment characteristics.
Alex Howard – Neutron Interactions – G4 Workshop Lisbon 1 11 th October 2006 Neutron Interactions 1. Neutron high energy cross-section 2. Elastic scattering.
Ali Ahmad FLUKA code validation of nuclear data required for the spallation target design in Accelerator Driven Subcritical Reactors ThorEA Meeting – Daresbury.
Monte Carlo methods in spallation experiments Defense of the phD thesis Mitja Majerle “Phasotron” and “Energy Plus Transmutation” setups (schematic drawings)
IBD Detection Efficiencies and Uncertainties
Validation of Geant4 against the TARC benchmark: Testing neutron production, transportation and interaction TARC – experimental set-up and aims Geant4.
Calorimeters at CBM A. Ivashkin INR, Moscow.
Inter-comparison of Particle production (2)
Cross-section Measurements of (n,xn) Threshold Reactions
Summary of hadronic tests and benchmarks in ALICE
for collaboration “Energy plus transmutation”
Detector Configuration for Simulation (i)
Physics Validation of LHC Simulations
p0 life time analysis: general method, updates and preliminary result
Testing Geant4 with a simplified calorimeter setup
Plans for checking hadronic energy
Hadronic physics validation of Geant4
Comparison between Geant4, Fluka and the TileCal test-beam data
The Hadrontherapy Geant4 advanced example
Performed experiments Nuclotron – set up ENERGY PLUS TRANSMUTATION
Lesson 4: Application to transport distributions
Presentation transcript:

VALSIM status J. Apostolakis, V. Grichine, A. Howard, A. Ribon EUDET meeting, 11 th Sept 2006

11 Sept 2006 VALSIM status, EUDET meeting 2 VALSIM Motivation Motivation Issues from hadronic shower simulation Issues from hadronic shower simulation Good e/pi, linearity Good e/pi, linearity Not as good shower shape Not as good shower shape –ATLAS / CMS test beam comparisons Validate relevant aspects of the hadronic models Validate relevant aspects of the hadronic models Challenges Challenges Which are the most important aspects for shower evolution ? Which are the most important aspects for shower evolution ? How well are neutrons simulated ? How well are neutrons simulated ?

11 Sept 2006 VALSIM status, EUDET meeting 3 Work items and meetings Current work Current work Study the shower evolution (in simulation) Study the shower evolution (in simulation) Comparing also between approaches Comparing also between approaches Identify key aspects for additional comparisons with data (‘thin-target’) Identify key aspects for additional comparisons with data (‘thin-target’) Extend benchmarking comparisons of neutrons (TARC) Extend benchmarking comparisons of neutrons (TARC) 3 day workshop July 2006 at CERN 3 day workshop July 2006 at CERN ‘Geant4 Physics Verification and Validation’ ‘Geant4 Physics Verification and Validation’ Concentrated on the status of hadronic V&V Concentrated on the status of hadronic V&V Visitors from KEK, SLAC, INFN, … Visitors from KEK, SLAC, INFN, …

Shower shape Summary of issues Summary of issues Ongoing verification Ongoing verification

11 Sept 2006 VALSIM status, EUDET meeting 5

11 Sept 2006 VALSIM status, EUDET meeting 6 pi 300 GeV

11 Sept 2006 VALSIM status, EUDET meeting 7 The goal is to understand the impact of the various physics processes on the development of hadronic showers, in order to improve the longitudinal (and lateral) shower profiles. To tackle this complex problem we use two complementary approaches: 1.“microscopic” : study for instance: - elastic scattering - neutron production and transportation - pion inelastic cross-sections - multiplicity and spectra. 2. “macroscopic” : monitor the observables of a simplified sampling calorimeter setup to compare different physics simulations. Shower shape studies in Geant4

11 Sept 2006 VALSIM status, EUDET meeting 8 Title Contribution To Energy deposit Per particle type

11 Sept 2006 VALSIM status, EUDET meeting 9 Spectrum Spectrum at a surface

11 Sept 2006 VALSIM status, EUDET meeting 10 Title

11 Sept 2006 VALSIM status, EUDET meeting 11 Key aspects identified Elastic hadronic process Elastic hadronic process Energy deposit in scintilators Energy deposit in scintilators Leading particle carries momentum Leading particle carries momentum Inelastic cross sections Inelastic cross sections Pion Pion Neutron production and interaction Neutron production and interaction Significant for lateral shower shape, leakage Significant for lateral shower shape, leakage probed in TARC comparisons (next) probed in TARC comparisons (next)

11 Sept 2006 VALSIM status, EUDET meeting 12 n - H elastic scattering (M. Kosov)

11 Sept 2006 VALSIM status, EUDET meeting 13 n - H elastic : d  /dt Other elastic scattering cases already considered: p-H, p-d, p-He4, p-Be

Neutrons: Comparing withTARC measurements

11 Sept 2006 VALSIM status, EUDET meeting 15 TARC – neutron validation TARC – Neutron-Driven Nuclear Transmutation by Adiabatic Resonance Crossing TARC – Neutron-Driven Nuclear Transmutation by Adiabatic Resonance Crossing Validates spallation neutron production from 2.5 and 3.5 GeV/c protons on pure lead Validates spallation neutron production from 2.5 and 3.5 GeV/c protons on pure lead Validates energy-time relationship and thermalisation of neutrons Validates energy-time relationship and thermalisation of neutrons Absolute Neutron fluence spectrum from spallation production Absolute Neutron fluence spectrum from spallation production Measures capture cross-sections on a number of specific isotopes - Measures capture cross-sections on a number of specific isotopes -

11 Sept 2006 VALSIM status, EUDET meeting 16 Experimental Set-up TARC comprises 334 tonnes of lead in a 3.3m x 3.3m x 3m cylindrical block TARC comprises 334 tonnes of lead in a 3.3m x 3.3m x 3m cylindrical block 12 sample holes are located inside the volume 12 sample holes are located inside the volume Primary particle beam is either 2.5 or 3.5 GeV/c protons Primary particle beam is either 2.5 or 3.5 GeV/c protons

11 Sept 2006 VALSIM status, EUDET meeting 17 Neutron Energy-Time Correlation Neutron energy and time are stored for the flux through a given radial shell Neutron energy and time are stored for the flux through a given radial shell Geant4

11 Sept 2006 VALSIM status, EUDET meeting 18 Neutron Energy-Time Correlation Reasonable agreement with expectation, although the low energy population is quite different between physics list (as expected) Reasonable agreement with expectation, although the low energy population is quite different between physics list (as expected) TARC simulation TARC Paper Geant4

11 Sept 2006 VALSIM status, EUDET meeting 19 Neutron Energy-Time Correlation The slope of the correlation can approximate a Gaussian distribution The slope of the correlation can approximate a Gaussian distribution Minuit errors on the mean are between 0.03 and 0.08 LHEP_HP LHEP_BIC_HP QGSP_HP LHEP_BERT_HP experiment and TARC simulation give 173±2 ● Bertini and Binary cascades are close to agreement with experiment

Fluence Blue = QBBC_HP Red = BERTINI_HP Green = LEP_HP ● Spectral fluence is determined from the energy-time correlation with cross-checks (lithium activation and He3 ionisation detectors) ● The simulated fluence is below measurement ● The bertini cascade gets closest to the data ● The spectral shape looks reasonable Energy (eV) Fluence

Additional slides

11 Sept 2006 VALSIM status, EUDET meeting 22 TARC – aims and setup Aims of experiment: Aims of experiment: neutron production by GeV protons hitting a large lead volume; neutron production by GeV protons hitting a large lead volume; neutron transport properties, on the distance scale relevant to industrial applications (reactor size); neutron transport properties, on the distance scale relevant to industrial applications (reactor size); efficiency of transmutation of 99 Tc and 129 I. efficiency of transmutation of 99 Tc and 129 I. Two types of measurements performed: Two types of measurements performed: neutron fluence measurements with several complementary techniques over a broad neutron energy range from thermal up to a few MeV; neutron fluence measurements with several complementary techniques over a broad neutron energy range from thermal up to a few MeV; neutron capture rate measurements on 99 Tc (both differential and integral measurements) and on 129 I and 127 I (integral measurements). For 99 Tc a high statistics measurement of the apparent capture cross-section was obtained up to ~1 keV. Below this energy 85% of all captures occur in a typical TARC neutron spectrum. neutron capture rate measurements on 99 Tc (both differential and integral measurements) and on 129 I and 127 I (integral measurements). For 99 Tc a high statistics measurement of the apparent capture cross-section was obtained up to ~1 keV. Below this energy 85% of all captures occur in a typical TARC neutron spectrum. The set-up is 334 tonnes of pure lead with approximate cylindrical symmetry about the beam axis. Diameter is 3.3m and length 3m. Lead volume is 29.3 m 3. The beam is introduced through a 77.2mm diameter blind hole, 1.2m long. This leads to the neutron shower being approximately centred in the middle of the 3m lead length. The lead is 99.99% pure. The set-up is 334 tonnes of pure lead with approximate cylindrical symmetry about the beam axis. Diameter is 3.3m and length 3m. Lead volume is 29.3 m 3. The beam is introduced through a 77.2mm diameter blind hole, 1.2m long. This leads to the neutron shower being approximately centred in the middle of the 3m lead length. The lead is 99.99% pure.

11 Sept 2006 VALSIM status, EUDET meeting 23 Experimental Set-up TARC comprises 334 tonnes of lead in a 3.3m x 3.3m x 3m cylindrical block TARC comprises 334 tonnes of lead in a 3.3m x 3.3m x 3m cylindrical block 12 sample holes are located inside the volume 12 sample holes are located inside the volume Primary particle beam is either 2.5 or 3.5 GeV/c protons Primary particle beam is either 2.5 or 3.5 GeV/c protons TARC simulation Geant4

11 Sept 2006 VALSIM status, EUDET meeting 24 Fluence Calculation In the TARC analysis they use a definition of fluence as follows: In the TARC analysis they use a definition of fluence as follows: For monoenergetic neutrons of velocity V and density n, the neutron flux is defined as  = Vn and is a quantity that upon multiplying by the macroscopic cross-section (  ), one obtains the neutron reaction rate per unit volume For monoenergetic neutrons of velocity V and density n, the neutron flux is defined as  = Vn and is a quantity that upon multiplying by the macroscopic cross-section (  ), one obtains the neutron reaction rate per unit volume Should not be confused with the rate of particles crossing a surface element, which is a 'current' and depends on the orientation of the direction of the particles Should not be confused with the rate of particles crossing a surface element, which is a 'current' and depends on the orientation of the direction of the particles Three procedures were used to determine the fluence: Three procedures were used to determine the fluence: 1) dN/dS perp is the number of neutrons crossing a surface element dS, with dS perp = dScos  where  is the neutron angle to the normal 2) the average fluence in a volume element dV as dl/dV, where dl is the total track length of neutrons in dV 3) Number of interactions in a detector and computing fluence as (1/  dN/dV, where dN is the number of interactions in dV The first two were used in simulation The first two were used in simulation

11 Sept 2006 VALSIM status, EUDET meeting 25 Title