XFEL BC Review Meeting, 18/12/2006, Christopher Gerth Christopher Gerth, Michael Röhrs, Holger Schlarb DESY Hamburg Optics Layout of the Diagnostic Sections.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Update of RTML, Status of FNAL L-band and CLIC X-band BPM, Split SC Quadrupole Nikolay Solyak Fermilab (On behalf of RTML team) LCWS2010 / ILC 10, March.
Advertisements

Christopher Gerth, Michael Röhrs, Holger Schlarb DESY Hamburg Optics for Diagnostic Section BC1 in the European XFEL.
1 Bates XFEL Linac and Bunch Compressor Dynamics 1. Linac Layout and General Beam Parameter 2. Bunch Compressor –System Details (RF, Magnet Chicane) –Linear.
P. Emma, SLACLCLS Commissioning – Sep. 22, 2004 Linac Commissioning P. Emma LCLS Commissioning Workshop, SLAC Sep , 2004 LCLS.
P. Emma, SLACLCLS FAC Meeting - April 29, 2004 Linac Physics, Diagnostics, and Commissioning Strategy P. Emma LCLS FAC Meeting April 29, 2004 LCLS.
FFAG Workshopfermilab April 2005 f Summary: FFAG WORKSHOP nonscaling electron model muon FFAGs C. Johnstone Fermilab.
Cecile Limborg-Deprey Injector October Injector Physics C.Limborg-Deprey Diagnostics and Commissioning GTL measurements.
Review of the European XFEL Bunch Compression System Summary Torsten Limberg.
Low Emittance RF Gun Developments for PAL-XFEL
Orbit Control For Diamond Light Source Ian Martin Joint Accelerator Workshop Rutherford Appleton Laboratory28 th -29 th April 2004.
The Overview of the ILC RTML Bunch Compressor Design Sergei Seletskiy LCWS 13 November, 2012.
W. Decking, M. Dohlus, C. Gerth, A. Krasnov, S. Lederer, T. Limberg, N. Mildner, D. Noelle FEL Beam Dynamics Meeting, XFEL Bunch Compressor.
SPPS, Beam stability and pulse-to-pulse jitter Patrick Krejcik For the SPPS collaboration Zeuthen Workshop on Start-to-End Simulations of X-ray FEL’s August.
LCLS Accelerator SLAC linac tunnel research yard Linac-0 L =6 m Linac-1 L  9 m  rf   25° Linac-2 L  330 m  rf   41° Linac-3 L  550 m  rf  0°
Winni Decking XFEL Beam Collimation and Switchyard Review Introduction FEL-Beam-Dynamics Group
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Beam Dynamics and FEL Simulations for FLASH Igor Zagorodnov and Martin Dohlus Beam Dynamics Meeting, DESY.
XFEL-INJ1/2 DUMPS Remarks / Requirements, Injector Beam Dynamic Review Meeting, DESY, Mon. 23. October 2006 ‹#› XFEL - INJ 1/2.
EMMA Extraction / Diagnostic line Bruno Muratori STFC, Daresbury Laboratory 01/09/08.
Bruno Muratori (for the EMMA team) STFC, Daresbury Laboratory EMMA commissioning 02/09/08.
1 H. Hayano for the ATF collaboration Low Emittance Beam Generation in ATF H. Hayano for the ATF collaboration BPM electronics improvement emittance tuning.
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre POST-LINAC BEAM TRANSPORT AND COLLIMATION FOR THE UK’S NEW LIGHT SOURCE PROJECT D. Angal-Kalinin,
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Extended ALICE Injector J.W. McKenzie, B.D. Muratori, Y.M. Saveliev STFC Daresbury Laboratory,
Y. Roblin, D. Douglas, F. Hannon, A. Hofler, G. Krafft, C. Tennant EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF OPTICS SCHEMES AT CEBAF FOR SUPPRESSION OF COHERENT SYNCHROTRON.
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre POST-LINAC BEAM TRANSPORT AND COLLIMATION FOR THE UK’S NEW LIGHT SOURCE PROJECT D. Angal-Kalinin,
XFEL Beam Dynamics Meeting Bolko Beutner, DESY Velocity Bunching Studies at FLASH Bolko Beutner, DESY XFEL Beam Dynamics Meeting
T. Limberg Position of the 3rd Harmonic System. Injector (with first Bunch Compression Stage) 2 European XFEL MAC May 2010 T. Limberg.
Winni Decking Summary of the 1 st Beam Line Review Meeting Injector ( ) Review the status of: beam dynamics understanding and simulations.
Post-LH Diagnostic Line for LCLS-II P. Emma, M. Woodley, Y. Nosochkov, Feb. 26, 2014 Steal beam at Hz with y -kicker after LH (  y = 15 mm) Bend.
P I T Z Photo Injector Test Facility Zeuthen Design consideration of the RF deflector to optimize the photo injector at PITZ S.Korepanov.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Christopher Gerth & Christopher Behrens Mini-Workshop on Longitudinal Diagnostics for FELs 11/12 March 2013, PSI, Villigen TDS induced energy spread.
Construction, Commissioning, and Operation of Injector Test Facility (ITF) for the PAL-XFEL November 12, 2013 S. J. Park, J. H. Hong, C. K. Min, I. Y.
What did we learn from TTF1 FEL? P. Castro (DESY).
X-band Based FEL proposal
Wir schaffen Wissen – heute für morgen PSI, March 2013 Paul Scherrer Institut PSI / DESY / KIT Mini-Workshop on Longitudinal Diagnostics for FELs.
MAX IV linac overview and scope of automation Sara Thorin.
PAL-XFEL Commissioning Plan ver. 1.1, August 2015 PAL-XFEL Beam Dynamics Group.
Applications of transverse deflecting cavities in x-ray free-electron lasers Yuantao Ding SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory7/18/2012.
ESLS Workshop Nov 2015 MAX IV 3 GeV Ring Commissioning Pedro F. Tavares & Åke Andersson, on behalf of the whole MAX IV team.
Frank Stulle, ILC LET Beam Dynamics Meeting CLIC Main Beam RTML - Overview - Comparison to ILC RTML - Status / Outlook.
Primary Beam Lines for the Project at CERN
Beam dynamics for an X-band LINAC driving a 1 keV FEL
Sara Thorin, MAX IV Laboratory
LCLS2sc MAD files: Injector to Bypass Line
Slice Parameter Measurements at the SwissFEL Injector Test Facility
6D Characterization of Witness Beam before Injection in LWFA
Longitudinal Diagnostics for start-up
Thermal emittance measurement Gun Spectrometer
Experience with diagnostics
LCLS Linac Update Brief Overview L1 & BC1 Progress LTU & E-Dump Status Continuing Resolution Impact.
Diagnostics overview and FB for the XFEL bunch compressors
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Simulation Calculations
Advanced Research Electron Accelerator Laboratory
FEL-Beam-Dynamics Group
Linac/BC1 Commissioning P
LCLS Commissioning P. Emma, et al
High Level Physics Applications for LCLS Commissioning
Modified Beam Parameter Range
Laser Heater Integration into XFEL. Update.
Linac Diagnostics Patrick Krejcik, SLAC April 24, 2002
Linac Physics, Diagnostics, and Commissioning Strategy P
LCLS Injector/Diagnostics David H. Dowell, SLAC April 24, 2002
Diagnostics RF and Feedback
Linac Diagnostics Commissioning Experience
XFEL Beam Dynamics Activity at CANDLE
Specifications for the XFEL Beam Switchyard Kickers
Bunch Compressor Beam Line Optics
Injector Physics C.Limborg-Deprey Feb.8th 2006
Presentation transcript:

XFEL BC Review Meeting, 18/12/2006, Christopher Gerth Christopher Gerth, Michael Röhrs, Holger Schlarb DESY Hamburg Optics Layout of the Diagnostic Sections BC1 & BC2

XFEL BC Review Meeting, 18/12/2006, Christopher Gerth General Layout of Diagnostic Section BC1 OTR1 Wire Scanner Tcav x Tcav y 15° L = 42.5 m ~ N*180° +90° to Tcav. x Matching section Acceleration Modules Measurement of the correlated and residual energy spread of the bunch Tuning of 3rd harmonic cavity D = -2m,  OTR = 0.3 m, Res.: ~ 7.9 keV time energy 125keV E=500MeV Slice energy spread 3.9 GHz off 3.9 GHz on Multi-screen slice emittance measurements Transverse Deflecting Structures for bunch profile and slice emittance measurements 500 MeV 100  m 7mm 15mm kicker enable single bunch measurements Phase space tomography Slice emittance measurements Off-axis screen design Slice emittance diagnostics and dump section have major impact on lattice layout

XFEL BC Review Meeting, 18/12/2006, Christopher Gerth 1.Optimisation of lattice layout for slice emittance measurement 2.Optics layout / matching and integration in overall lattice (matching with Mad8) 3.Add Dump section 4.Add other special and standard diagnostics 5.Sensitivity study, integration into S2E simulations (to be done) Diagnostic Section BC1 Outline Diagnostic Section BC2 1.Specific requirements (what is different?) 2.Optics layout / matching

XFEL BC Review Meeting, 18/12/2006, Christopher Gerth Operation modes for Diagnostic Section BC1 FEL mode - parasitic - Commissioning of long pulse trains - On-line beam characterisation - Correction of drifts (in x and y plane) Medium beta function at TCAV (~15-25 m) Low space charge & chromatic effects Longitudinal resolution: < 1/10 of rms bunch length ~ 30 fs Slice emittance measurement using kickers (optic 1) Projected emittance measurement (optic 2) FEL mode 2 High Resolution - (parasitic) - High resolution longitudinal profile and slice emittance (one plane) High beta function at one TDS (>50m) / special optic (optic 3) Small beta function at screen with 90 deg phase adv. Longitudinal resolution: < 10fs Dump mode 1 Energy spread - not parasitic - Precise determination of RF phases & amplitudes - Studies of collective effects on longitudinal phase space Dipole to dump is switched on Small horizontal and vertical beta at OTR and large dispersion (optic 4) Relative energy resolution at screen ΔE/E ~ (uncorrelated energy spread) Single bunch mode Dump mode 2 Long pulses - not parasitic - Commissioning of LLRF upstream BC1 - Studies of orbit stability and energy variation across macro-pulse Dipole to dump is switched on Large beta function at dump screen (optic 5) Up to 800us operation (1Hz) High resolution BPM based energy measurement across macro-pulse Operation modes and lattice optics:

XFEL BC Review Meeting, 18/12/2006, Christopher Gerth Layout Optimization for slice emittance measurements Variables: Locations of OTR screens Phase advance Ψ FODO of FODO lattice Phase advance Ψ TDS between TDSs and FODO lattice Soft criteria (simplicity & flexibility): Symmetrical FODO lattice (same phase advance in x and y) Total length < 12 m max 3 cells max 6 OTR screens (4 per plane) OTR screens in the centre of drifts TDSx / TDSy 12 m Ψ FODO Ψ TDS Ψ FODO Main criteria: Precision of slice emittance values Longitudinal resolution

XFEL BC Review Meeting, 18/12/2006, Christopher Gerth Optimization Slice Emittance Measurements 3 FODO cells / 4 screens in each plane For each FODO cell phase advance exist several solutions with a specific combination of phase advances from the horizontal and vertical TDS to the FODO lattice! Longitudinal resolution Emittance error

XFEL BC Review Meeting, 18/12/2006, Christopher Gerth Optics Layout Diagnostic Section 1 Slice emittance measurements (optic 1) 3 FODO cells Matching into Linac TDSx / TDSy 67 deg 113 deg Resolution in x and y: long. Profile: 15 fs, slice emittance: 37 fs 45 o / 45 o

XFEL BC Review Meeting, 18/12/2006, Christopher Gerth Optics Layout Diagnostic Section 1 Projected emittance/ commissioning (optic 2) 6 FODO cells: All phase advances between 22.5 and 90 deg can be matched! Linac

XFEL BC Review Meeting, 18/12/2006, Christopher Gerth Optics Layout Diagnostic Section 1 Slice emittance measurements 76 deg (optic 3) 3 FODO cells Matching into Linac TDSy ßy = 52m Resolution only in y: long. Profile: 11 fs, slice emittance: 16 fs 92 o 76 o / 76 o

XFEL BC Review Meeting, 18/12/2006, Christopher Gerth Resolution Slice Emittance Measurement r Q : normalised shunt impedence P 0 : Input power at TDS 1 MHz bunch rep rate Streak Strength of Transverse Deflecting Structure A factor of 1.6 would be gained at 1 MHz bunch rep rate Resolution in x and y: long. Profile: 9 fs, slice emittance: 23 fs

XFEL BC Review Meeting, 18/12/2006, Christopher Gerth Horizontal kicker Vertical kicker FODO lattice 6 off-axis OTR screens (y and x) 3 cells = 11.4 m OTR1OTR3OTR5OTR2OTR4OTR6 VK2 HK2 VK1 45deg 76deg HK1OTR1 OTR1 HK1OTR2 OTR3 HK2OTR4 OTR4 HK2OTR6 OTR6 45deg 76deg VK1OTR1 OTR2 VK1OTR2 OTR3 VK2OTR4 OTR4 VK2OTR6 OTR5 Horizontal slice emittance / vertical streak Vertical slice emittance / horizontal streak HK1 Screen / Kicker arrangement (1)

XFEL BC Review Meeting, 18/12/2006, Christopher Gerth Horizontal kicker Vertical kicker FODO lattice 6 off-axis OTR screens (y and x) 3 cells = 11.4 m OTR1OTR3OTR5OTR2OTR4OTR6 VK2 HK2 VK1 Horizontal slice emittance / vertical streak Vertical slice emittance / horizontal streak HK1 Screen / Kicker arrangement (2) 45deg 76deg HK1OTR1 OTR1 HK1OTR2 OTR3 HK2OTR4 OTR4 HK2OTR6 OTR6 45deg 76deg VK1OTR1 OTR2 VK1OTR2 OTR3 VK2OTR4 OTR4 VK2OTR6 OTR5 Bend plane of BCs defines the OTR arrangement

XFEL BC Review Meeting, 18/12/2006, Christopher Gerth Screen / Kicker arrangement (1) Special OTR screen arrangement in FODO section

XFEL BC Review Meeting, 18/12/2006, Christopher Gerth Special OTR screen stations in FODO section: Camera perpendicular to screen to get full resolution over entire screen (no limitation by field of depth) Screen / Kicker arrangement (1) 7mm 15mm

XFEL BC Review Meeting, 18/12/2006, Christopher Gerth Diagnostic mode 2: Energy Spread (optic 4) Values at screen: ßx = m ßy = m Dy = m → ΔE/E ~ 1.5*10-5 ΔE ~ 7.2 keV ε N = 1*10-6 µm Goal: ΔE/E ~ → ΔE ~ 5keV from meas. at FLASH Laser Heater (30 keV) Higher order effects? Chromaticity? Needs to be studied Max length due to dump location

XFEL BC Review Meeting, 18/12/2006, Christopher Gerth BC Dumps: Thermal Limits Average Heating Courtesy of M Schmitz, MIN

XFEL BC Review Meeting, 18/12/2006, Christopher Gerth Diagnostic mode 3: Long pulse trains (optic 5) ßx = 1825 m ßy = 1192 m Dy = 3 mm Beam size 1mm

XFEL BC Review Meeting, 18/12/2006, Christopher Gerth Sketch of BC1-Dumpmodule (C-Cu version) 500MeV density [kg/l] volume (max. estimate) mass (max. estimate) Graphite core~ 2 120cm*  *(5cm)²=9l ~ 20kg Cu back stop~ 9 20cm*  *(20cm)²=25l ~ 230kg Cu radial layer~ 9 120cm*  *[(20cm)²-(5cm)²]=140l ~ 1250kg Concrete shield~ 2 220cm*  *(60cm)² - 140cm*  *(20cm)² =2300l ~4600kg total 220cm*  *(60cm)²=2500 l ~ 6100 kg Vacuum pumping Cu 20cm  13.9x 0 Cu 8cm  5R M 8cm  5R M Cooling Water 0.4m  2.7m  1.4m  0.4m Temp. Sensor Cabling Graphite 120cm*1.7g/cm³/   4.8x 0 10cm  NW63 OTR Profile Monitor Window 0.4m Concrete all around  1.2m Courtesy of M Schmitz, MIN

XFEL BC Review Meeting, 18/12/2006, Christopher Gerth Module stay clear Diagnostic Dump BC1

XFEL BC Review Meeting, 18/12/2006, Christopher Gerth Diagnostic Dump BC1 Courtesy of N Meiners, MEA Restricted safety route Restricted operation with full bunch trains due to activation (2 1Hz) Electronics may need local shielding

XFEL BC Review Meeting, 18/12/2006, Christopher Gerth VK1 HK1 VK2 HK2 Dipole 2.5m 22 Quads Booster Linac FODO lattice TDS-xTDS-y Diagnostic Section Engineering layout (1)

XFEL BC Review Meeting, 18/12/2006, Christopher Gerth VK1 HK1 VK2 HK2 CSR T1 T2 EOSD BAM ABCM Beam Position Monitor orbit feedback 9 Vertical / 9 Horizontal Correctors 2 Vertical / 2 Horizontal Kickers Dipole TDS-xTDS-y 2 Collimators for kicked bunches ABCM OTR / Wire Scanner Station special in FODO lattice 2.5m 22 Quads Booster Linac Laser table Bread board FODO lattice SR Alignment laser RES Diagnostic Section Engineering layout (2)

XFEL BC Review Meeting, 18/12/2006, Christopher Gerth VK1 HK1 VK2 HK2 CSR T1 T2 EOSD BAM ABCMTDS-xTDS-y ABCM 2.5m Booster Linac FODO lattice SR Alignment laser RES 10 modules 3.8 m 5 modules 7.6 m Lattice can be divided into modules: Diagnostic Section Engineering layout (3)

XFEL BC Review Meeting, 18/12/2006, Christopher Gerth 8 times more streak strength of TDS required: scales with energy (0.5-2 GeV) and bunch length ( um) → operation 1MHz Only 1 TDS foreseen → horizontal streak given by dump Optical Replica Synthesizer (ORS) needs to be integrated FODO cell length = 7.6 m → only 2 FODO cells Layout of Diagnostic Section BC2

XFEL BC Review Meeting, 18/12/2006, Christopher Gerth HK1 VK1 HK2 2.5m Main Linac FODO lattice TDS-x Diagnostic Section Engineering layout (1) TDS-x ModulatorRadiator Dispersive Section ORS laser VK2 4.8 m

XFEL BC Review Meeting, 18/12/2006, Christopher Gerth Optics Layout Diagnostic Section 1 Slice emittance measurements 76 deg (optic 1) 2 FODO cells Matching into Linac TDSy ßy = 47m Resolution only in y: long. Profile: 11 fs, slice emittance: 11 fs 68 o 22 o / 76 o

XFEL BC Review Meeting, 18/12/2006, Christopher Gerth Diagnostic mode 2: Energy Spread (optic 4) Values at screen: ßx = 10.5 m ßy = 8.0 m Dy = -2.2 m → ΔE/E ~ 2.1*10-5 ΔE ~ 40 keV ε N = 1*10-6 µm Goal: ΔE/E ~ → ΔE ~ 5keV from meas. at FLASH Laser Heater (30 keV) Higher order effects? Chromaticity? Needs to be studied Max length due to dump location

XFEL BC Review Meeting, 18/12/2006, Christopher Gerth Conclusions (1): Conclusions For which bunch rep rate, 5MHz or 1MHz, shall the on-line slice emittance diagnostics be designed in BC1: Desired resolution can easily be reached at 1 MHz but is just at the theoretical limit for 5 MHz. Kickers with the required kick strength for 1MHz are in operation in several machines at DESY (‘off-the-shelf’). 5 MHz would requires new design and prototype development. If standard FEL operation will be 5 MHz slice emittance diagnostics cannot be operated parasitically if designed for 1 MHz (or might not be used if resolution is not sufficient). If standard FEL operation will be 1 MHz one would lose at least a factor of 1.6 in resolution if designed for 5 MHz

XFEL BC Review Meeting, 18/12/2006, Christopher Gerth Conclusions (2): Conclusions Dump defines the horizontal streak direction in BC2. If the BCs are installed vertically slice emittance could be measured in the bend plane of BCs. Number of quads in current layout BC1 was 22 now 22 BC2 wsa 13 now 19 Layout of the dignostics sections can be arranged in modules. Components can be prealigned and tested. This saves time during installation and commissioning. Layout of BC1 diagnostic section almost finalized. After beam dynamic and sensitivity studies (2 months) the vacuum and engineering layout could be started New lattice layout requires slightly more space BC1: 1.5 m in BC m in diag section = 2.4 m BC2: 1.0 m in BC m in diag section* = 2.5 m * Additional FODO cell for 45 deg lattice requires 7.6 m more space

XFEL BC Review Meeting, 18/12/2006, Christopher Gerth Optics Layout Diagnostic Section 1 Projected emittance/ commissioning (optic 2) Thanks to Markus Huening (TDS calculations) Norbert Meiners (Tunnel layout) Michael Schnitz (Dump) Frank Obier (Kicker) Dirk Noelle (Standard Diagnostics) Bernhard Schmidt (Special Diagnostics) Albrecht Leuschner (Radiation Safety) Winni, Nina, Vladimir (Lattice layout & matching)