FSIS Directives 10,240.4, 10,240.5, and 10,300.1 Directives Regarding Sampling of Ready-to-Eat Products OPPD/PID DO Correlation 2/5/09.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
REINVENTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW (The Overview) BEGINNING SCHOOL YEAR
Advertisements

FSIS Directive 12,600.2 Reimbursable Overtime Inspection Services at Meat and Poultry Establishments OPPD/PDD District Correlation.
Angela Tanner-Dean Diana Chang OSEP October 14, 2010.
FSIS Notice Measures to Address E. coli O157:H7 at Establishments that Receive, Grind, or Otherwise Process Raw Beef Products FSIS Notice Measures.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection August 8-9, 2007.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Salmonella Initiative Program : Timeline and Verification Patrick R. Burke Senior.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 03G Fully Cooked Not Shelf Stable Tool Industry FSA Methodology Walk-through.
Complying with FSMA: What a cashew exporter to the U.S. needs to do.
January 24, 2008 Policy Development Division 1 FSIS Notice Verification of the Annual Reassessment and Establishment Training Requirements Under.
Food Safety and Inspection Service Pathogen Reduction/HACCP.
USDA-FSIS Report 2010 Fall Executive Board Conference for Food Protection John M. Hicks, Jr., DVM, MPH Risk and Innovations Management Division Office.
Exempt Research Mary Banks BS, BSN IRB Director CRC IRB and BUMC IRB.
FOOD SAFETY RELATED TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION DURING WEEKLY MEETINGS
Network security policy: best practices
1 MEASURING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE NATION’S FOODSERVICE AND RETAIL FOOD PROTECTION SYSTEM.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety Inspection Service 10/31/07OPPD; Policy Development Division1 FSIS Notice ROUTINE SAMPLING AND.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Domestic Inspection Function Public Health Information System (PHIS) Charles.
Listeria Summit - Washington, DC November RISK MANAGEMENT Current FSIS Activities Daniel Engeljohn, Ph.D. Office of Policy and Program Development.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety Inspection Service SALMONELLA SUBTYPING RESULTS IN RAW PRODUCTS FSIS Notice /3/2010 Policy Development.
Codex Guidelines for the Application of HACCP
Public Health Information System: Headquarters Session HACCP Verification.
NACMPI November 15-16, 2005 Risk-Based Inspection Dr. Barbara Masters Administrator, Food Safety and Inspection Service Philip Derfler Assistant Administrator,
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 E. Coli Checklist for Beef Operations E. coli O157:H7 - Addressing the Challenges,
Protecting Number Resources Draft Policy Advisory Council Shepherds: Marc Crandall Scott Leibrand.
DENNIS CRYER Veterinary Meat Hygiene Adviser Food Standards Agency
Alternatives 1 & 2 for Control for Listeria monocytogenes
Public Health Information System: Industry Session Inspection Verification Features  Inspection Results  Noncompliance  Inspector Notes/Agendas/MOIs/NR.
Food Safety Modernization Act Proposed Rules Tim Slawinski Food and Dairy Division Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development.
Part 4: Corrective Actions Lisa Olsen Specialist Adviser, NZ Standards.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Salmonella Initiative Program Isabel Arrington, PhD, DVM Sci. Advisor, RIMD.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE Nutrition Labeling of Single- Ingredient Products and Ground or Chopped Meat.
E. coli O157:H7 FSIS Actions Directive 10,010.1 Rev. 1 In-Plant Control Transit.
Public Health Information System: Industry Session Establishment Profile  Policy  Features Demonstration ●
1 FSIS Notice Notice of Reassesment for E. Coli O157:H7 Control And Completion of Checklist for all beef operations.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 FSA Work Flow and Next Steps EIAO Methodology Industry Walkthrough December.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE FSIS Directive PRIOR LABELING APPROVAL 1 District Correlation Meeting.
1. Directive Ongoing Verification of Product Formulation and Labeling Targeting the Eight Most Common (“Big 8”) Food Allergens Scott Seys Risk,
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 New FSA Tools EIAO Methodology Industry Walkthrough December 18, 2008 Washington,
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE Nutrition Labeling of Single- Ingredient Products and Ground or Chopped Meat.
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Human Food September 16, THE FUTURE IS NOW 1.
Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food.
Proposed Rule: 21 CFR 507 Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning Objectives Objectives and goals of a follow-up mission Requesting an IRRS follow-up mission.
FSIS Directive 10,800.1 Revision 1 District Correlation March 13, 2014 CDR Catherine Rockwell, DVM OPPD RIMS.
TOTAL COLIFORM MONITORING 40 CFR TRANSIENT NON-COMMUNITY PUBLIC WATER SYSTEMS.
ACIS 3504 Accounting Systems and Controls. 2 Dr. Linda Wallace  Office: Pamplin 3092  
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 HACCP Systems Validation NACMPI September 22-23, 2011 Washington, DC William.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 Kenneth Petersen, DVM, MPH Assistant Administrator Office of Field Operations.
1. Raw Chicken Parts Exploratory Sampling Project and Comminuted Poultry Sampling: clarifications on FAQs Nora Pihkala, DVM Risk, Innovations, and Management.
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1 THE FUTURE IS NOW.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 03J Slaughter Meat Industry FSA Methodology Walk-through December 18, 2008.
1 Daniel Engeljohn USDA, FSIS May 9, 2001 Processed Meat and Poultry Proposed Rule _________________ Listeria monocytogenes and Listeria spp.
Risk Assessment Technical Meeting Washington, DC -- February Current Listeria Policy And Risk Management Questions Daniel Engeljohn, Ph.D. Office.
FSIS Directive Verifying an Establishment's Food Safety System - Revision 4 OPPD/PDS Thursday District Correlation.
Pathogen Reduction. Comparison/Contrast n Salmonella u Performed by FSIS n E. coli u Performed by Establishment.
FSIS Employee Training & Outreach to Small & Very Small Plants FSIS Public Meeting Control of E. coli O157:H7 FSIS Employee Training & Outreach to Small.
1 Introduction to the Control of Listeria monocytogenes (Lm) in Ready-to-Eat Products; Interim Final Rule Small and Very Small Establishment Implementation.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Industry Briefing December 18, 2008 Advanced EIAO Methodology.
 This notice provides new instructions to Enforcement Investigations and Analysis Officers (EIAOs) and Public Health Veterinarians who were trained in.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 Across Establishment Ranking Concept For Processing and Slaughter February.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Overview of Trim Sampling Compliance Guidelines and Discussion Daniel Engeljohn,
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Within Establishment Public Health Risk-Based Inspection for Processing and.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 03B Raw Ground Meat Industry FSA Methodology Walk-through December 18, 2008.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection (NACMPI) Public Meeting.
Targeted Food Safety Assessments Barb Masters OFW Law September 2015.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1.
Food Safety Challenges and Benefits of New Technology Randall Huffman, Ph.D. Vice President, Scientific Affairs American Meat Institute Foundation USDA-
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Draft Labeling Policy Guidance for N- 60 Testing Claims for Boneless Beef Manufacturing.
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Human Food
PREREQUISITE PROGRAMS
Presentation transcript:

FSIS Directives 10,240.4, 10,240.5, and 10,300.1 Directives Regarding Sampling of Ready-to-Eat Products OPPD/PID DO Correlation 2/5/09

FSIS Directives 10,240.4, 10,240.5, and 10,300.1 Why were these directives revised?Why were these directives revised? To reflect changes in Agency policies relating to risk based sampling and meeting the Agency’s performance measure for LmTo reflect changes in Agency policies relating to risk based sampling and meeting the Agency’s performance measure for Lm

10,240.4 Directive Provides directions to CSIs on submitting RTE product samples under the ALLRTE and RTE001 sampling projects Provides instructions for verifying whether establishments are complying with 9 CFR Part 430

Changes to the 10,240.4 dir. CSI Responsibilities for Collecting Samples –Will collect all Lm samples scheduled at the same establishment over the same time period; This provides overall verification of an establishment’s process

Changes to the 10,240.4 dir. CSI Responsibilities for Collecting Samples –No longer required to submit intact samples after pre-shipment review; Previously, CSIs collected samples that the lab did not analyze Previously, no test results obtained

Changes to the 10,240.4 dir. CSI Responsibilities for Collecting Samples –Certain products are no longer exempt to Lm sampling under the ALLRTE sampling project (see Attachment 2) Agency revising the 10,210.1 Directive Products labeled for further processing still exempt

Changes to the 10,240.4 dir. Enforcement –The issuance of NRs based on FSIS results, depending on whether the establishment also found the positive product and held affected product; –Instructions for completing disposition of product occurring off-site

10,240.5 Directive Provides instructions to EIAOs for collecting samples under the Routine Risk- based Lm (RLm) Sampling Program The sampling program includes the collection of food contact, environmental, and product samples, and completing a FSA

Changes to the RLm Sampling Program Agency will select establishments from a list of those establishments producing 95% of the volume of meat and poultry products –Previously, establishments selected using a risk-based algorithm

EIAO Responsibilities for Collecting Samples under RLm No longer required to submit and complete the validation checklist– it is now in the new EIAO tool –FSIS is using a new FSA methodology –New methodology collects findings in a configuration that allows for data analysis

EIAO Responsibilities for RLm Sample Scheduling A change in the number of sample units collected depending on the establishment size –Previously, the number of units collected was based on the number of lines in the establishment up to a maximum of 5 units –More effectively allocates Agency resources

EIAO Responsibilities for RLm Sample Scheduling A change in the number of sample units collected depending on the establishment size –EIAOs are to collect 3 sample units from large establishments, 2 sample units from small establishments, and 1 sample unit from very small establishments –Based on establishment size in the HACCP preamble (61 FR 38806)

EIAO Responsibilities for RLm Sample Scheduling Randomly select the shift on which to collect the sample –Select the 1 st, 2 nd, or 3 rd shift Monday through Thursday, or the 1 st shift Friday within the week identified in the monthly RLm Scheduling Memo

EIAO Sample Collection Responsibilities The addition of brine sampling –Methodology in the 10,300.1 Directive –Food contact sample if the brine comes in direct contact with unpackaged product or with product in a permeable or semi- permeable casing –Environmental sample if the product is in an impermeable casing, or otherwise packaged

EIAO Sample Submission Responsibilities The removal of the requirement to submit intact samples after pre-shipment review –Previously, EIAOs collected samples that the lab did not analyze and results were not obtained –Submit samples after the establishment has completed all interventions, unless the establishment has any intervention based on microbiological test results

Directive 10,300.1 The purpose of this directive is to provide direction to EIAOs on collecting product, food contact, and environmental samples using the IVT Methodology The Agency will now include brine sampling as part of the IVT methodology

Background Agency will schedule an IVT for cause at the discretion of the DM Conduct IVT in conjunction with a food safety assessment RLm sampling program

Definitions Food Contact Surface Sample –EIAOs may consider aprons and gloves food contact surfaces if the EIAO observes direct contact of the apron or glove with the product Environmental Surface Sample Brine samples may be either food contact or environmental

Pre-Sample Collection Planning Contact the establishment at least 48 hours before IVT sample collection, or if needed enough time for the establishment to hold the product Collect no more than 5 units –Sample all lines if the establishment has less than 5 lines

Pre-Sample Collection Planning If an establishment does not produce product on a line on the day of the IVT –EIAO can still sample the line –Sample under the CONT project code –State that the line is not in use under block 28

Pre-Sample Collection Planning If an establishment uses brine: –Collect 1 brine sample per unit –Collect a maximum of 5 brine samples

Notifying the Lab and OCIO Requests forms and supplies through the IVT scheduling mailbox Make every effort to contact the lab 2 weeks before conducting the IVT sampling Request brine sampling supplies

Notifying the Lab and OCIO Use a separate form for each sample the EIAO collects Use the correct form for the type of sample taken Don’t change the project code on the form Order extra forms for additional samples

Sample Collection Responsibilities Entrance meetings Conduct the IVT as early as possible during the FSA Guidelines for collecting food contact and environmental samples –Recent sanitation problems –Lines or areas that tested positive Examples of places to sample

Sample Collection and Submission Responsibilities Sampling Using SpongeSicles for Food Contact and Environmental Sampling Liquid Sampling for Brine Submit samples without waiting for the establishment to conduct pre-shipment review Submit samples after the establishment has applied all interventions except for a microbiological testing intervention

Enforcement If the establishment held the product or maintained control of the product pending its own test results, and FSIS and the establishment found the product positive for Lm, EIAOs are to verify the establishment performs the appropriate corrective actions as part of the FSA

Enforcement The Agency will only conduct an FSA as a result of a positive food contact or product sample from an RLm collection activity if 6 months has elapsed since the previous FSA. However, the Agency may elect to conduct an IVT.