doc.: IEEE /0815r3 Submission July 2008 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 1 VHT SG July 2008 Report Date: Authors:

doc.: IEEE /0815r3 Submission July 2008 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 2 Patent Policy Following 5 slides

doc.: IEEE /0815r3 Submission July 2008 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 3 Instructions for the WG Chair The IEEE-SA strongly recommends that at each WG meeting the chair or a designee: –Show slides #1 through #4 of this presentation –Advise the WG attendees that: The IEEE’s patent policy is consistent with the ANSI patent policy and is described in Clause 6 of the IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws; Early identification of patent claims which may be essential for the use of standards under development is strongly encouraged; There may be Essential Patent Claims of which the IEEE is not aware. Additionally, neither the IEEE, the WG, nor the WG chair can ensure the accuracy or completeness of any assurance or whether any such assurance is, in fact, of a Patent Claim that is essential for the use of the standard under development. –Instruct the WG Secretary to record in the minutes of the relevant WG meeting: That the foregoing information was provided and that slides 1 through 4 (and this slide 0, if applicable) were shown; That the chair or designee provided an opportunity for participants to identify patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) and/or the holder of patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) of which the participant is personally aware and that may be essential for the use of that standard Any responses that were given, specifically the patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) and/or the holder of the patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) that were identified (if any) and by whom. –The WG Chair shall ensure that a request is made to any identified holders of potential essential patent claim(s) to complete and submit a Letter of Assurance. –It is recommended that the WG chair review the guidance in IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual and in FAQs 12 and 12a on inclusion of potential Essential Patent Claims by incorporation or by reference. Note: WG includes Working Groups, Task Groups, and other standards-developing committees with a PAR approved by the IEEE-SA Standards Board. (Optional to be shown)

doc.: IEEE /0815r3 Submission July 2008 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 4 Participants, Patents, and Duty to Inform All participants in this meeting have certain obligations under the IEEE-SA Patent Policy. Participants: –“Shall inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of each “holder of any potential Essential Patent Claims of which they are personally aware” if the claims are owned or controlled by the participant or the entity the participant is from, employed by, or otherwise represents “Personal awareness” means that the participant “is personally aware that the holder may have a potential Essential Patent Claim,” even if the participant is not personally aware of the specific patents or patent claims –“Should inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of “any other holders of such potential Essential Patent Claims” (that is, third parties that are not affiliated with the participant, with the participant’s employer, or with anyone else that the participant is from or otherwise represents) –The above does not apply if the patent claim is already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance that applies to the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group Quoted text excerpted from IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws subclause 6.2 Early identification of holders of potential Essential Patent Claims is strongly encouraged No duty to perform a patent search Slide #1

doc.: IEEE /0815r3 Submission July 2008 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 5 Patent Related Links All participants should be familiar with their obligations under the IEEE-SA Policies & Procedures for standards development. Patent Policy is stated in these sources: IEEE-SA Standards Boards Bylaws IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual Material about the patent policy is available at Slide #2 If you have questions, contact the IEEE-SA Standards Board Patent Committee Administrator at or visit This slide set is available at

doc.: IEEE /0815r3 Submission July 2008 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 6 Call for Potentially Essential Patents If anyone in this meeting is personally aware of the holder of any patent claims that are potentially essential to implementation of the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group and that are not already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance: –Either speak up now or –Provide the chair of this group with the identity of the holder(s) of any and all such claims as soon as possible or –Cause an LOA to be submitted Slide #3

doc.: IEEE /0815r3 Submission July 2008 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 7 Other Guidelines for IEEE WG Meetings All IEEE-SA standards meetings shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable laws, including antitrust and competition laws. –Don ’ t discuss the interpretation, validity, or essentiality of patents/patent claims. –Don ’ t discuss specific license rates, terms, or conditions. Relative costs, including licensing costs of essential patent claims, of different technical approaches may be discussed in standards development meetings. –Technical considerations remain primary focus –Don ’ t discuss or engage in the fixing of product prices, allocation of customers, or division of sales markets. –Don ’ t discuss the status or substance of ongoing or threatened litigation. –Don ’ t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed … do formally object See IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual, clause and “Promoting Competition and Innovation: What You Need to Know about the IEEE Standards Association's Antitrust and Competition Policy” for more details. Slide #4

doc.: IEEE /0815r3 Submission July 2008 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 8 Agenda Items for the Week Review of initial PAR feedback Prepare official response to feedback – c, individuals –EC/other WG feedback due to by Tuesday 5 PM –Official WG response due to EC by Wednesday 5 PM Review EC presentation Review PAR tutorials Selection of Task Group letters Update PARs based on feedback SG/WG motion on PARs SG/WG motion on response to feedback SG/WG motion on SG extension Joint meeting with c

doc.: IEEE /0815r3 Submission July 2008 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 9 Tentative Agenda for the Week Monday July 14 th, 8:00 – 11:00 –Patent policy, etc. –Set agenda –Review from May –Discussion of timeline –Call for submissions –Review of initial PAR feedback –Review PAR tutorials (60GHz) –Task group letters –Presentations –Review EC presentation –Review PAR tutorials (<6 GHz) Monday July 14 th, 19:30 – 21:30 –Joint meeting with c on 60 GHz PAR Tuesday July 15 th, 16:00 – 18:00 –Reaffirm agenda –Review of additional PAR feedback –Update PARs based on feedback –Presentations Wednesday July 16 th, 8:00 – 10:00 –Reaffirm agenda –Review of additional PAR feedback –Update PARs based on feedback –Prepare official response to feedback & motion –PAR motion –Presentations Thursday July 17 th, 8:00 – 10:00 –Reaffirm agenda –Update PARs based on WG feedback, if necessary –Presentations Thursday July 17 th, 10:30 – 12:30 –Reaffirm agenda –Update PARs based on WG feedback, if necessary –PAR motion, if necessary –SG extension motion –12:00 Review time line Goals for September Conference calls –Presentations

doc.: IEEE /0815r3 Submission July 2008 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 10 Review from May <6 GHz PAR & 5C’s development –Presentations 11-08/0499r0, VHTL6 Throughput Metric Thoughts, Darwin Engwer 11-08/0535r0, PHY and MAC Throughput Analysis with 80 MHz for VHT below 6 GHz, Minyoung Park –PAR & 5C’s proposal discussion lead by Marc de Courville 11-08/464r4, Below 6GHz 11vht PAR scope and purpose discussion 11-08/609r3, Proposal for PAR and 5 Criteria for Very High Throughput (VHT) SG for below 6 GHz operation 60 GHz PAR & 5C’s development –Presentations 11-08/591r0, Background Information on Amendment and Standard, Eldad Perahia 11-08/632r0, VHT 60 GHz Channel Model Recommendation, Vinko Erceg –PAR & 5C’s proposal discussion lead by Gal Basson 11-08/223r5, Proposal for PAR and 5 Criteria for Very High Throughput (VHT) SG for 60 GHz Proposal process –08/579r0, Towards an Improved Proposal Development Process for VHT, Rolf De Vegt Motion for VHT60 and VHTL6 PARs approved by SG and WG Goals for July –Presentations related to “call for submissions” Should be prepared for presentation in the first VHT time slot –Update PAR’s & 5C’s based on feedback –Complete work on PAR & 5 C’s and re-submit motion to WG

doc.: IEEE /0815r3 Submission July 2008 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 11 Review from Conference Calls Conference call on May 22 –Discussion on Task Group letter codes Conference call on July 19 –Joint conference call with c –08/724r0, Response to c Questions, Eldad Perahia

doc.: IEEE /0815r3 Submission July 2008 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 12 PAR Forms In May SG & WG approve PARs and 5C’s in 08/225r3 and 08/609r3 to be sent to EC NesCom online form was slightly different than those forms 08/715 and 08/716 contain a copy of the PARs from the NesCom form 08/806 and 08/807 added the 5C’s to the 08/715 and 08/716 –We will continue editing these submissions

doc.: IEEE /0815r3 Submission July 2008 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 13 Time Line May 2007 (Interim) –Initial meeting July 2007 (Plenary) –Presentations –WG approval of SG extension to Nov Sept 2007 (Interim) –Presentations Nov 2007 (Plenary) –Presentations –SG motion for extension to March Jan 2008 (Interim) –Presentations –Initial version of PAR & 5 C’s Mar 2008 (Plenary) –Presentations –Work on PAR & 5 C’s –SG/WG/EC motion for extension to July May 2008 (Interim) –final version of PAR & 5 C’s –WG approval June 2008 –EC submission by June 17 July 2008 (Plenary) –WG re-approval (if necessary) –SG/WG/EC motion for extension to Sept –EC approval on July 18 Aug 2008 –NesCom submission by Aug 8 Sept 2008 (Interim) –VHT TG’s unofficially begin –NesCom meeting on Sept 17 Nov 2008 (Plenary) –Task Group’s officially start

doc.: IEEE /0815r3 Submission July 2008 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 14 Call for Submissions Information on following subjects will assist us in creating a PAR and 5 Criteria: –Market needs, applications, usage scenarios –Technology & feasibility MAC efficiency evaluation and enhancements, including evaluation of 11n MAC with higher PHY rates PHY enhancements to 11n new MAC & PHY technology –Requirements metrics (i.e. throughput, network capacity, spectral efficiency, range) coexistence / interoperability –Spectrum availability & regulatory options relationship with IMT-Advanced

doc.: IEEE /0815r3 Submission July 2008 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 15 Submissions VHT SG PAR Feedback from Individuals, Eldad Perahia, 08/812r0 Response to c Questions on VHT60 PAR, Eldad Perahia, 08/724r1 EC report, Eldad Perahia, 08/813r0 60 GHz Tutorial, Eldad Perahia, 08/814r0 <6 GHz Tutorial, Marc De Courville, 08/825r0 Channel Modeling for 60 GHz WLAN Systems, Alexander Maltsev, 08/0811r0 Backward Compatible or Not?, Junghoon Jee, 08/790r0 Some Ambiguities about Throughput Conditions in PAR, Minho Cheong, 08/821r vht-vhtl6-par-feedback-discussion.ppt

doc.: IEEE /0815r3 Submission July 2008 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 16 Agenda for Monday July 14 th Patent policy, etc. Set agenda Review from May Discussion of timeline Call for submissions Review of initial PAR feedback Review EC presentation Review PAR tutorials Task group letters Presentations

doc.: IEEE /0815r3 Submission July 2008 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 17 Presentations for Monday July 14 th 60 GHz Tutorial, Eldad Perahia, 08/814r0 Response to c Questions on VHT60 PAR, Eldad Perahia, 08/724r1 VHT SG PAR Feedback from Individuals, Eldad Perahia, 08/812r0 Backward Compatible or Not?, Junghoon Jee, 08/790r0 Some Ambiguities about Throughput Conditions in PAR, Minho Cheong, 08/821r2

doc.: IEEE /0815r3 Submission July 2008 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 18 Minutes for Monday July 14 th Reviewed 60GHz tutorial Reviewed responses to c feedback –Minor modifications to responses –No objections to resulting responses –Will be re-reviewed on Tues Reviewed individual feedback –Reviewed speculative edits of PARs based on feedback –No objections to resulting edits –Will be re-reviewed on Tues Task group letters strawpoll –Choose one: Ac, ad: 8 Cc, cd: 17

doc.: IEEE /0815r3 Submission July 2008 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 19 Agenda for Tuesday July 15 th Patent policy, etc. Set agenda Review of PAR feedback Presentations 5:15 Jon Rosdahl will bring the official feedback to us Review new feedback

doc.: IEEE /0815r3 Submission July 2008 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 20 Presentations for Tuesday July 15 th vht-vhtl6-par-feedback-discussion.ppt Channel Modeling for 60 GHz WLAN Systems, Alexander Maltsev, 08/0811r1

doc.: IEEE /0815r3 Submission July 2008 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 21 Minutes for Tuesday July 15 th 08/855 – VHTL6 mods –5.5 edits - no objection –17.5.3a – minor edits, no objection 08/0811r1 –Discussion on 60 GHz channel model

doc.: IEEE /0815r3 Submission July 2008 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 22 Agenda for Wednesday July 16 th Set agenda Review new PAR feedback and responses 08/880 (1:30) –5 sets of comments –Initial review allotting 15 minutes per set –Return to open comment sets after initial review of all sets Review PAR modifications (15 min) Motion for PAR and responses (15 min)

doc.: IEEE /0815r3 Submission July 2008 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 23 Minutes for Wednesday July 16 th Review new PAR feedback and responses 08/880 Review VHTL6 PAR –Minor edits –Addition issues in 08/821r3 Review VHTL60 PAR –Added examples to Additional Explanatory Notes comments –No further objection

doc.: IEEE /0815r3 Submission July 2008 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 24 Strawpoll: do you support modifying the 500 Mbps throughput value in the VHTL6 PAR to meet IMT- Advanced requirements? –Yes: 15 –No: 44 –Abs: 20

doc.: IEEE /0815r3 Submission July 2008 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 25 PAR Motion Believing that the PAR and Five Criteria contained in the documents referenced below meet IEEE-SA guidelines, Request that the updated PARs and Five Criterias contained in 08/806r3 and 08/807r3 be sent to IEEE 802 Executive Committee (EC) for EC approval to submit to NesCom. Also request that the document 08/880r1 be sent to the IEEE 802 EC as the WG responses to comments received on the version of the PAR and 5C previously circulated. –Move: Darwin Engwer –Second: John Barr –Vote Y: 61, N: 0, Abs: 14

doc.: IEEE /0815r3 Submission July 2008 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 26 Agenda for Thursday July 17 th Set agenda Discuss further feedback to PAR and response EC presentation SG Extension Motion Conference calls and topics Goals for September

doc.: IEEE /0815r3 Submission July 2008 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 27 Minutes for Thursday July 17 th

doc.: IEEE /0815r3 Submission July 2008 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide , change no to yes (Are there other standards or projects with a similar scope) – Mbps in 2.4 GHz PAR did not list as having similar scope –Frequency band and data rate are not metrics indicating similarity in scope Change “Addresses coexistence with other systems in the band” to “Ensure coexistence with IEEE c.” – c PHYs: SC –PSK –OOK –DAMI HSI OFDM AV OFDM –Coexistence between c PHYs?

doc.: IEEE /0815r3 Submission July 2008 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 29 SG Extension Motion Request the IEEE 802 LMSC to extend the Very High Throughput Study Group. –Move: Darwin Engwer –Second: Dick Roy –Vote Y: 55, N: 0, Abs: 0

doc.: IEEE /0815r3 Submission July 2008 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 30 Goals for September Officer elections (will occur in WG) If necessary, –Update PAR’s & 5C’s based on feedback from EC or NesCom –Complete work on PAR & 5 C’s and re-submit motion to WG At least first session as VHT joint meeting If possible split into VHT60 and VHTL6 and begin Task Group work Topics –TG process –Technical contributions

doc.: IEEE /0815r3 Submission July 2008 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 31 Conference call times Continue conference call times: –Weekly on Thursday’s, 11:00 Eastern Time –two hour Topics: