Fiber Loss Monitor and Carbon IP Scanner Setup and operational tips August 15 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
InnoSys Process Sequence. End Effector Components End Effector Prox Switch Load Cell Wire Conduit Crows Foot Nut Runner.
Advertisements

NLC – The Next Linear Collider Project Colorado Univ. - Boulder Calorimetry Cornell-ALCPG Calorimetry Detector Study Plans at Colorado Uriel Nauenberg.
ATF2 Interaction Point Beam Size Monitor (Shintake Monitor) Status T. Yamanaka, M. Oroku, Y. Yamaguchi, S. Komamiya ( Univ. of Tokyo ), T. Suehara, Y.
Update of EXT Stripline BPM Electronics with LCLS-style Digital BPM Processors Glen White, with slides by Steve Smith 15 December 2009 ATF2.
October 12, 2006 Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / LCLS Undulator Good Field Region and Tuning Strategy 1 Undulator Good Field Region and.
LCLS Undulators October 14, 2004 Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL MMF Review Introduction to the LCLS Undulators Heinz-Dieter Nuhn,
Manuel FahrerCMS Week TB Meeting /6 1-Shot Test Beam CERN CMS: M.Huhtinen, R.Hammarstrom, A.Macpherson CERN ATLAS, PS, Karlsruhe CMS  Overview.
1 Heinz-Dieter Nuhn 1 BFW Results June 2009 FAC BFW Results Heinz-Dieter Nuhn – LCLS Undulator Group Leader June 9, 2009.
IPBPM piezo-mover system and plans for in situ monitoring of calibration and stability Current status and plan for ATF2 Philip Bambade Laboratoire de l’Accélérateur.
-brief report of October runs and some inputs for the Nov/Dec planning – Nobuhiro Terunuma, KEK, ATF ATF session on LCWS13, Tokyo Univ., Nov. 13, 2013.
ATF2 Q-BPM System 19 Dec Fifth ATF2 Project Meeting J. May, D. McCormick, T. Smith (SLAC) S. Boogert (RH) B. Meller (Cornell) Y. Honda (KEK)
High Resolution Cavity BPM for ILC final focal system (IP-BPM) ILC2007/LCWS 2007 BDS, 2007/6/1 The University of Tokyo, KEK, Tohoku Gakuin University,
FLASH Toroid Review Progress since last meeting in April Next steps Summary Johnny Ng FLASH Coll. Mtg. 7/25/03.
1 Proposal for a Multi-Optical Transition Radiation System in ATF2 A. Faus-Golfe, D. McCormick IFIC – SLAC 11 June th TB/SGC Meeting.
Fiber Optic Transmission
Status of QBPM Electronics and Magnet Movers as of June 3 rd 2008 D. McCormick, J Nelson, G White SLAC S Boogert Royal Holloway Y. Honda, Y.Inoue KEK.
Personal strategy for ATF2 beam operation in 2009 Toshiyuki OKUGI 2009 / 7 /22 ATF2 weekly meeting.
IPBSM status and plan ATF project meeting M.Oroku.
1 Plans for KEK/ATF 1. Introduction 2. Related Instrumentations at ATF 3. Experimental Plans for Fast Kicker R&D at ATF Junji Urakawa (KEK) at ILC Damping.
IPBSM - Stability of the laser system - Nobuhiro Terunuma Feb. 12 th 2014, KEK, 17 th ATF2 project meeting.
Motivation There is a consensus that it is not possible to obtain a software (π 0 ) calibration with few days delay (this is to be verified, this is the.
LCLS-II Linac LLRF Control System – L2, L3 Zheqiao Geng Preliminary Design Review May 7, 2012.
FFS Issues in the 2011 autumn continuous operation Toshiyuki OKUGI (KEK) 1/13/2011 The 11 th ATF2 project meeting SLAC, USA.
ATF Instrumentation Status and Planning 3 December 2007 Juan Cruz, Justin May, Doug McCormick, Janice Nelson, Tonee Smith, John Wray.
Stabilization of Focus at ATF2 David Urner University of Oxford.
Status of Beam loss Monitoring on CTF3 Results of Tests on LINAC and PETS as R&D for TBL Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University Thibaut Lefevre CERN CTF3.
ATF1/2 laser-wires Stewart T. Boogert on behalf of UK Extraction line laserwire collaboration A. Aryshev, G. Blair, S. Boogert, A. Bosco, L. Corner, L.
ATF2 beam commissioning status and beam time request Toshiyuki Okugi 2008 / 11 / 12 ATF2 Commissioning Meeting.
Marc Ross Saturday, June 5, 2004 nanometer BPM status and plans.
Commissioning Status of Shintake Monitor (IP-BSM) T. Yamanaka, M. Oroku, Y. Yamaguchi, Y. Kamiya, S. Komamiya (Univ. of Tokyo), T. Okugi, N. Terunuma,
Target Status Target installed in ISIS “Demonstrator” target in R78 Chris Booth Sheffield 7 th February 2008.
July 19, 2006VLCW-06 Vancouver1 Scint/MAPMT Muon Prototype Operation Robert Abrams Indiana University.
Mark Woodley, SLACATF2 Project March 20-21, Summary of Tuning, Corrections, and Commissioning.
IP BPM Shift Report FONT Meeting: 22 December 2014 Talitha Bromwich.
Shashlyk FE-DAQ requirements Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA FE-DAQ workshop, Bodenmais April 2009.
ATF2 Commissioning Toshiyuki Okugi 2008 / 7 /9 ATF2 beam commissioning meeting, KEK.
Target tests 1 st – 2 nd Nov. Chris Booth Sheffield 7 th December 2006.
Target Commissioning Target installed in ISIS “Demonstrator” target in R78 Initial commissioning plans Chris Booth Sheffield 11 th February 2008.
FSC Status and Plans Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA Russia workshop, ITEP 27 April 2010.
IP carbon wire scanner Status –Assembly is proceeding –Supply of 4um carbon fiber may be unusable. –4um tungsten wire can be used but could easily be broken.
First Collision of BEPCII C.H. Yu May 10, Methods of collision tuning Procedures and data analysis Luminosity and background Summary.
IP instrumentation configuration for Autumn 2010 ATF2 runs Toshiyuki OKUGI, KEK 2010 / 7/ 1 10 th ATF2 project meeting.
Multi-OTR Status A.Faus-Golfe, J.Alabau, C.Blanch, J.V.Civera, J.J.García Garrigós IFIC (CSIC-UV) D.McCormick, G.White, J. Cruz SLAC aand KEK team.
Status of ATF Fast Kicker Experiment
1 Fast kicker study Machine Time 2011/10/18~10/29(2 weeks) TB meeting 2011/01/14 T.Naito.
ATF2 beam operation status Toshiyuki OKUGI, KEK The 9 th TB&SGC meeting KEK, 3-gokan Seminar Hall 2009/ 12/ 16.
Summary of Tuning, Corrections, and Commissioning ( Short summary of ATF2 meeting at SLAC in March 2007 ) and Hardware Issues for beam Tuning Toshiyuki.
2016/3/31 Fast kicker Experiment at ATF ATF2 - 40nm beam production, measurement Extraction kicker The difficulty of the beam extraction is that the kick.
NUMI Primary Beam Review August 14, 2001 NUMI PRIMARY BEAM INSTRUMENTATION Multiwires, Loss Monitors, Toroids Gianni Tassotto.
1 ATF2 Q-BPM Magnet Movers & 1 st Pulse Calibration Progress from May 7-11 J. May, D. McCormick, T.Smith (SLAC) S. Boogert (RH)
AB/BI J. Koopman New WS design - Brain storm session 18/06/2007 1/16 New WS design - Brain storm session.
LCLS Digital BPM Processor for ATF2 Extraction Line BPMs Steve Smith 26 August 2009.
Beam Instrumentation of CEPC Yue Junhui (岳军会) for the BI Group Accelerator Center, IHEP HF2014.
Sardana/IcePAP Based Control System for elliptically polarized Undulator at Max IV 30th Tango Collaboration meeting
PHOTOTUBE SCANNING SETUP AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND Doug Roberts U of Maryland, College Park.
NMLTA Protection System Update -Loss Monitors- Arden Warner September 2 nd, 2009.
Current Status of QBPM Electronics and Magnet Movers D. McCormick, J Nelson, G White SLAC S Boogert Royal Holloway Y. Honda, Y.Inoue KEK.
Four OTRs for ATF2 OTR History Current OTR setup New OTR design.
Hardwares for commissioning 2 nd ATF2 Project Meeting KEK, Tsukuba, Japan 5/ 31/ 2006 T.Okugi (KEK)
ATF2 Status N.Terunuma, KEK
Digital Light Sources First introduced in 2001.
Plans for this week MWPC: wire stretching today
Expected hardware status and Priority of the commissioning task
Strip-line Kicker R&D at KEK-ATF
Fast Kicker R&D at ATF T.Naito(KEK) TILC09 18/April/ /11/27.
Status of muon monitor R&D and construction
T2K Run8 MUMON Summary.
Report on ATF2 Third Project Meeting ATF2 Magnet Movers ATF2 Q-BPM Electronics Is SLAC ILC Instrumentation Group a good name?
Measurement of the beam (transverse) emittances
CLIC luminosity monitoring/re-tuning using beamstrahlung ?
Presentation transcript:

Fiber Loss Monitor and Carbon IP Scanner Setup and operational tips August

Fiber loss monitor General information. Installation Calibration & tips on loss location. IP Carbon wire scanner General information. Operational Tips.

Fiber General Information The fiber is made by the Japanese company Toray. The normal use for this fiber for data transmission applications. It has a 960um core (PMMA), 40um cladding (Fluorinated Polymer) and a black jacket with a 2.2mm OD. It is designed to work with 660nm LED. Attenuation of the fiber used at ATF2 is 0.3dB/meter at 660nm.

More Info. This general type of fiber has been used at other labs like DESY and Fermi Lab. Use at SLAC as a loss monitor was begun at NLCTA and has now been installed in various parts of LCLS. The sensitivity of the fiber is better than the ½” gas filled PLIC cables used in other parts of SLAC, and because of its small size the fiber can be placed directly on the beam pipe and inside of magnets. The faster rise and fall times, make resolving discrete losses is easier. When purchased in lots 2000ft the cost of the fiber is only 75cents/meter. The cost of the fiber for the ATF2 beam line was only about $75.00.

Radiation damage Because the fiber is plastic, radiation damage is an issue. Tests done at SLAC with a cobalt source indicate that the fiber was usable to at least rads. After rads the fiber was noticeably darkened and was no longer serviceable.

Beam loss and signal amplitude The attenuation of light in the fiber is listed at 0.3db/m at 660nm. Signals produced at the end of the fiber result in lower amplitude PMT pulses. The 1 st and 2 nd fiber lengths are about 43m and 59m respectively. Signals produced near the ends of the fibers will be attenuated by as much as 18db. This variation in signal strength along the fiber makes difficult to use the fiber as an absolute loss monitor.

ATF2 installation The fiber is installed in two sections. –The 1 st piece runs from just down stream of the first extraction kicker and ends a couple meters downstream of QD20x. –The 2 nd starts at about QD16x and runs to the dump. –Each fiber is coupled to a PMT on the floor and shielded by lead. –Signals come to the old eel’s bedroom on the old septum loss monitor signal cables. Cable 3 for the 1 st fiber Cable 5 for the 2 nd. –An web interface was setup to bring the scope picture to the control room. –Remote control of the scope is desirable

Locating losses Calibrating the fiber –Tests at NLCTA have indicated that the speed of light in the fiber is about 0.67c. –This means that dividing the time between the losses on the scope by 2.49 will give the actual beam travel time between losses. dividing that number by 3.3ns/m will give the number of meters between the losses. –Referencing the fiber to locations along the beam line is best accomplished by inserting objects into the beam line. This gives an immediate shower of radiation, and earliest negative edge of this signal from the fiber marks the location of the inserted obstruction. Using this reference, the position of any other loss along the beam line can be calculated. –Screen monitors are the typical obstructions used to calibrate the fiber. Vacuum valves also produce excellent calibration signals.

ATF2 Calibration The ATF2 has only 2 profile monitors one in each section of fiber. These should be enough to provide adequate references. It is important to find the earliest signal from the obstruction. –Expanding the vertical range on the scope will show the earliest portion of the signal. Placing a cursor at this location marks the fiber signal. The location of all other losses can be determined by measuring from the first cursor. Losses typically can be pinpointed to under a meter of their actual location.

Time between losses equals distance divided by C. Calculating the distance between beam losses from signals on fiber distance between losses is 10m Beam pipe 1 st loss 2 nd loss 0.67 c distance between losses on fiber is also 10m distance traveled on the fiber by the first pulse in the time the beam takes to travel 10m is about 33ns x0.67c =6.6m Total distance between the two light pulses on the fiber is 10m+6.6 m = 16.6m. Total time between the pulses is 16.6m/0.67c=83ns. This is the time on the scope Time for the beam to travel 10m is 33ns. Dividing the time between pulses on the scope (83ns) by 2.49 yields the correct beam travel time fiber

Time between profile monitor signal and down stream loss signal = 152ns 152ns/2.49=61ns between loss signals 61e-9sec /3.3e-9sec/m= 18.5m Profile monitor loss signal Down stream loss signal Fast rise time of 5 to 7ns indicates a single point loss Slow rise time of greater than 7ns indicates beam loss over a longer distance Inflection, points to an additional loss

Loss Locating Tips Find a reference point. –Insert a device into the beam –Expand the horizontal and vertical scope scale to locate to locate the very start of the loss. –Place a scope cursor there to mark the location. Then remove the device. Measure the time to other losses –Use the other cursor to find the time to the other losses. –Calculate the distance from the device that was inserted into the beam line the other losses. Only negative slopes are losses. – Look for small losses in the positive slope portion of the waveform Observe the fall times. –Single point losses have a fall time of about 7ns. Fall times greater than that are from consecutive losses. –Look for slope inflections in the fall times from consecutive losses.

Carbon/ Tungsten IP scanner Overview The IP scanner was assembled from two different wire scanners used in the SLAC FFTB. –The 45 degree scanner’s slide moves 1um /step. This translates into a wire motion of.707um/step. The vertical slide and wire moves 100nm/step. –Additionally the vertical scanner has a pneumatic actuator that moves the fork quickly to the in position where the wire scan is started. The 45 degree scanner’s three 5um carbon wires were replaced with three10um tungsten wires. It was felt that the 10 um wires would provide a better signal for large initial beam sizes. These wires measure X, Y, sizes and coupling. The vertical scanner has three 5um carbon wires. One wire is horizontal while the other two are at deg to the horizontal wire.

Each scanner has a LVDT that is used to position the wires for the start of a scan. The resolution of the LVDTs is not great enough to be used during a scan. Step counts are used to provide the wire position during a scan. At this time, the motion of the scanners is provided by Joerger camac modules. The maximum speed of the motors must be set with the F17 command to 6009 (hex) Overview cont.

Vertical and Horizontal scanner fork relative positions Forks are displaced in Z by about 1.5 cm

Camac Joerger stepper motor modules. Control software by ATF personnel Wire scanner speeds must be reinitialized after crate power is cycled. The f17 =6009 a=0 command is sent to both modules. SLAC 2ch LVDT read back chassis PLC ADC Electronics for Control of IP scanner

Detectors The main detector for the Carbon scanner is the Shintake monitor detector. Other options for detectors are: – Old Laser Wire detector. –The fiber loss monitor. (signal needs to placed into a gated ADC)

Initial setup and Operation Once a stable orbit is obtained through the IP, the position of the wires with respect to the beam can be determined. 45 degree scanner –Has an range of motion of about 24mm from the out to the in limit switch. –Wire is moved into the beam. Max linear speed is about 200um /sec. –First wire in is the diagonal wire. When detector signal is observed LVDT readout in mm is recorded. –The process is repeated for the vertical and horizontal wires. Vertical scanner –The air cylinder is activated and the fork is moved into the beam. –This scanner only has a range of motion of about mm and a maximum speed of 20um/sec. –Depending on the location of the beam, the vertical slide will have to be moved in or out to find the position of the beam. –If no beam signal is found with in the range of the mm, an access can be made to adjust the range of the pneumatic actuator. –Alternatively the beam can be moved to find the wires. This will indicate which direction the pneumatic actuator will have to be adjusted.

Summary Fiber loss monitor –Fibers installed and producing signals. –Determining the actual location of a loss requires careful observation and measurements of the signals Carbon IP scanners –Are mechanically ready but need operational detectors. –Need to find the position of the wires with respect to the beam.