A Regression Analysis of Student Motivation and the Effect of SI on Student Success Kathryn Beck Graduate Student, Applied Economics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Elaine Gerber & AJ Kelton, Montclair State University & Tracy Chu,
Advertisements

Division I Must Graduate from high school; Complete these 16 core courses: 4 years of English 3 years of math (algebra 1 or higher) 2 years of natural.
Achieving the Dream: Baseline Data Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Assessment December 2007 Research Report No
Institutional and Student Characteristics that Predict Graduation and Retention Rates Braden J. Hosch, Ph.D. Director of Institutional Research & Assessment.
Institutional Research & Effectiveness Who Are the Freshmen at Austin Peay? Institutional Research & Effectiveness Ellen Smyth May 2009.
Income and Child Development Lawrence Berger, University of Wisconsin Christina Paxson, Princeton University Jane Waldfogel, Columbia Univerity.
College Completion: Roadblocks & Strategies Appalachian Higher Education Network Conference Asheville, NC – June 10-12, 2014 Presented by: Zornitsa Georgieva.
Supplemental Instruction & Tutoring Center for Student Achievement January 16, 2013.
The Creation of Two Comparison Groups to Facilitate Evidence-Based Decision Making Prepared and Presented by Keith Wurtz Dean, Institutional Effectiveness,
Prof. Dr. Rainer Stachuletz
1 Research Method Lecture 11-1 (Ch15) Instrumental Variables Estimation and Two Stage Least Square ©
The Effect of Supplemental Instruction on Transfer Student Success in STEM Courses National Institute for the Study of Transfer Students January 26, 2012.
Transforming Student Learning in Chemistry and Physics with Supplemental Instruction Jordan D. Mathias and Mitch H. Weiland April 30, 2013.
UNCW’s Westside Hall A Center for Student Support Programs.
(SI) Supplemental Instruction MSJC Results SP’09 Source: MSJC MVC Math & District SI Coordinator – Janice Levasseur - Compiled: MSJC R&P Dept. – XCHAS.
Dual Credit and Advanced Placement: Do They Help Prepare Students for Success in College? Mardy Eimers, Director of Institutional Research & Planning Robert.
Regular Versus Shorter University Orientations: A Comparison of Attendee Make-up Carla Abreu-Ellis & Jason Brent Ellis.
Early Selection in Hungary A Possible Cause of High Educational Inequality Daniel Horn research fellow Institute of Economics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
How Much of a “Running Start” Do Dual Enrollment Programs Provide Students? James Cowan & Dan Goldhaber Center for Education Data & Research (
 Senior timeline  Graduation Plans  College Information  Career Planning  College Selection & Admissions  SAT & ACT  Financial Aid.
1 (SI) Supplemental Instruction MSJC – SJC & MVC Results Spring 2009 Basic Skills Initiative Source: MSJC MVC Math Coordinator – Janice Levasseur Compiled:
Has Public Health Insurance for Older Children Reduced Disparities in Access to Care and Health Outcomes? Janet Currie, Sandra Decker, and Wanchuan Lin.
TULSA COMMUNITY COLLEGE Julie Woodruff, Associate Professor of English Mary Millikin, Director of Institutional Research representing the AtD Data Team.
Dr. Joni L. Swanson Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum and Instruction Geneseo CUSD #228 Geneseo, IL
Measuring the Education Level of California Community College Students’ Parents: Current Status and Preliminary Findings Tom Leigh, Ph.D. Atsuko Nonoyama,
The Redesigned Elements of Statistics Course University of West Florida March 2008.
Online Course Evaluations Is there a perfect time? Presenters: Cassandra Jones, Ph.D., Director of Assessment Michael Anuszkiewicz, Research Associate.
John Whitmer Updated: Research Findings Logging on for Higher Achievement Research.
Evan Picton, Research Analyst Wenatchee Valley College.
1 (SI) Supplemental Instruction MSJC – MVC Results FALL 2008 Basic Skills Initiative Source: MSJC MVC Math Coordinator – Janice Levasseur Compiled: MSJC.
Feb. 25, 2004For Discussion Only -- Faculty Senate Attachment FSMA B 1 ATTENDANCE PROPOSAL Sinclair Community College April 1, 2004 (This is.
Are the number of bedrooms and number of bathrooms significant predictors of monthly rent in the multiple regression model we estimated in class? Jill.
Fall 2011NEnd of Fall 2011 GRCC GPA FTIACs with HS GPA 3.00 or higher 2, FTIACs with HS GPA below ,
Staying On Course: Building a Culture of Academic Success.
Low-income Adults in Profile: Low-income Adults in Profile: Improving Lives Through Higher Education Bryan Cook ACE Center for Policy Analysis.
CONTINUOUS ENROLLMENT BY THE NUMBERS. A 4-year Data Profile THE STUDENTS ENROLLMENT STATUS PERFORMANCE RESULTS BEST PRACTICES ENGAGEMENT.
MSJC Fall 2009 BSI Supplemental Instruction (SI) MSJC SI Coordinator: Janice Levasseur, M.S. MVC Math Center Coordinator Instructor of Mathematics.
MAP the Way to Success in Math: A Hybridization of Tutoring and SI Support Evin Deschamps Northern Arizona University Student Learning Centers.
AMATYC 2015 Self-Paced Mastery Learning for Developmental Mathematics The Community College of Baltimore County Lisa Brown Assistant Professor Tejan Tingling.
Identifying At-Risk Students With Two- Phased Regression Models Jing Wang-Dahlback, Director of Institutional Research Jonathan Shiveley, Research Analyst.
Early Selection in Hungary A Possible Cause of High Educational Inequality Daniel Horn research fellow IE-HAS and ELTEcon
Does Age Effect Grade Point Average? By Amanda Darrow and Dennis de Melo.
5 Education for All Development Issues in Africa Spring 2007.
1 MSJC Instructional Presentation TBD, 2008 Supplemental Instruction (SI) MSJC - MVC Fall’06 - Spring’07 - Fall’07 - Spring’08 Source: MSJC MVC Math Coordinator.
CHS ~ “Jump Start” ~ AACC Transitional Strategies: Breaking Down the Barriers.
1 Empirical methods: endogeneity, instrumental variables and panel data Advanced Corporate Finance Semester
Does Regular Exercise Improve GPA? By Kristin Miller, Patrick Ruhr, and Amna Sultan Introduction Through conversations with friends and other students,
Undergraduate Student Persistence & Graduation advisor UI/WSU Advising Symposium September 9, 2011 Joel Michalski, Ph.D. Candidate & Karla Makus, Academic.
Template provided by: “posters4research.com” Academic Performance and Persistence of Undergraduate Students at a Land-Grant Institution: A Statistical.
Does High School Homework Increase Academic Achievement? Charlene Marie Kalenkoski Texas Tech University Sabrina Wulff Pabilonia U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Chris Douse Director, ODMA Spring Purpose To study the effectiveness of the Crossroads program through an assessment of IPFW’s institutional data.
HLC Academy on Student Persistence and Completion – A Presentation on Statistical Analyses of Illinois Tech Data May 24, 2016 Illinois Institute of Technology.
Abstract Improving student success in postsecondary education is a key federal, state, and university objective that is inseparable from the focus on increasing.
The Process The Results The Repository of Assessment Documents (ROAD) Project Sample Characteristics (“All” refers to all students enrolled in ENGL 1551)
Academic Performance and Persistence of Washington State University Students Vicki A. McCracken, Professor, School of Economic Sciences Fran Hermanson,
David E. Meltzer and Matthew I. Jones Arizona State University
SI Programs & Retention: A Return on Investment
Student Entry Information Cumulative1 2nd Semester
Our mission is to provide programs that enhance learning and facilitate academic excellence for all UNT students.
MSJC Supplemental Instruction (SI)
The Impact, Costs, and Benefits of NC’s Early College Model
Instrumental Variables and Two Stage Least Squares
Undergraduate Retention
Instrumental Variables and Two Stage Least Squares
Access Center Assessment Report
[title of your research project]
Sage Hall Academic Success Center Suite 170
Instrumental Variables and Two Stage Least Squares
MSJC Fall 2009 BSI Supplemental Instruction (SI)
CSP Student Tutorial Services 61% Increase in Student Utilization!
Presentation transcript:

A Regression Analysis of Student Motivation and the Effect of SI on Student Success Kathryn Beck Graduate Student, Applied Economics

Supplemental Instruction, SI Academic Support Program – Historically difficult courses – High DFW rates SI Sessions for review and study – Example: Business Statistics 1

Main Questions Does attending SI affect student achievement in a course? – How does SI affect the DFW rate? – Should the program be eliminated or extended?

Theories Attending SI will improve a student’s final grade and increase understanding in the given course – Aid in future courses and increase graduation rates Attending SI may be worse for students who are better off studying differently

Empirical Issues; Endogeneity Motivation – Correlation with attending SI (upward bias) At-risk students – Correlation with attending SI (downward bias) Unclear as to which direction the bias is causing

Literature Review Correlations Only The International Center for Supplemental Instruction Empirical Models Blanc, Debuhr, and Martin (Journal of Higher Education, 1983) Bowles & Jones (Digital 2003)

University of Wisconsin, Rock County Located in Janesville, WI (pop: 60,000) One of 13 campuses of the UW Colleges Enrollment (Fall 2013): 1,120 Average class size: 24 Student profile: 52% part-time 33% non-traditional

SI at UW Rock County Since SI sections offered in conjunction with ten different courses 10 SI leaders 30% participation rate in twice-weekly sessions Mean Course GPA SI participants:2.46 Non-SI participants:1.93

Data University of Wisconsin Rock County – Student data from Spring 2011 until Fall 2013 – 824 total observations

Model 1: Baseline Model Value-Added Education Production Function X ijt denotes a vector of student level characteristics for student i in class j in t semester Z jt denotes a vector of course level characteristics for j class in t semester ( βα…) are estimated coefficients

Model 2: IV Estimation 1 st Stage: – Where W itj includes the instrumental variables 2 nd Stage:

Results Baseline Models: – With all imputations, attendance is significant – Without imputations, attendance not significant IV Estimations: – With all imputations, attendance significant – Without imputations, not significant – Without variables that have missing, attendance is significant

Table 1: Baseline Models ImputationsNo Imputations SI Attendance *** (0.010) (0.015) ACT *** (0.014) (0.02) HS GPA 0.272*** (0.082) 0.212* (0.12) Class Size (0.006) (0.009) Female * (0.087) (0.119) Minority *** (0.138) * (0.192) Credits Enrolled 0.038*** (0.015) 0.038* (0.021) N Unit of Observation is the numberof SI attended. The number in parenthesis is the standard error. *,**,***: Significant at the 10,5, and 1% level, respectively

Table 2: IV, First Stage ImputationsNo Imputations Age 0.100*** (0.0289) (0.158) Miles (in %) (0.117) (0.15) Likeliness 0.476*** (0.121) 0.564*** (0.162) ACT (0.049) 0.05 (0.059) HS GPA (0.303) (0.388) Class Size (0.023) ** (0.038) Female 0.973*** (0.323) 0.87* (0.449) Minority (0.574) (0.686) Credits Enrolled (0.054) (0.076) N F-Test Unit of Observation is the numberof SI attended. The number in parenthesis is the standard error. *,**,***: Significant at the 10,5, and 1% level, respectively

Table 3: IV, Second Stage ImputationsNo Imputations SI Attendance 0.198*** (0.057) (0.089) ACT 0.057*** (0.015) (0.02) HS GPA 0.297*** (0.083) (0.121) Class Size (0.007) (0.011) Female *** (0.121) (0.161) Minority *** (0.147) ** (0.202) Credits Enrolled 0.041*** (0.016) (0.021) N Over-ID Test Unit of Observation is the number of SI attended. The number in parenthesis is the standard error. *,**,***: Significant at the 10,5, and 1% level, respectively

Table 4: IV, First Stage Imputations Age 0.116*** (0.028) Average Size of SI 0.463*** (0.170) Class Size (0.023) Female 1.21*** (0.302) Minority (0.56) Credits Enrolled (0.054) N704 F-Test17.07 Unit of Observation is the number of SI attended. The number in parenthesis is the standard error. *,**,***: Significant at the 10,5, and 1% level, respectively

Table 5: IV, Second Stage Imputations SI Attendance 0.232*** (0.072) Average Size of SI (0.071) Class Size (0.008) Female -0.33** (0.132) Minority -0.66*** (0.162) Credits Enrolled 0.07*** (0.017) N704 Over-ID Test Unit of Observation is the number of SI attended. The number in parenthesis is the standard error. *,**,***: Significant at the 10,5, and 1% level, respectively

Summary Running Baseline Models: – Attending SI is significant for larger sample with imputations included – Without imputations and reduced sample, attendance is no longer significant IV Models: – Age, Logmiles, and Likeliness as instruments – Correlated with Attending SI – Uncorrelated with final grade – Smaller Samples, nothing significant – Without missing variables, attendance is significant

All Observations5 or More Sessions0 Sessions Final Grade 2.07 (1.22) 2.79 (0.98) 1.89 (1.25) Female 0.45 (0.498) 0.64 (0.48) (0.495) Minority (0.281) (0.323) (0.276) Sophomore Status> (0.494) 0.58 (0.496) (0.486) Credits Enrolled (3.2) (3.33) (3.26) ACT (3.24) (2.86) (3.31) HS GPA 2.93 (0.58) 2.95 (0.665) 2.93 (0.573) Previous College GPA 2.71 (0.47) 2.79 (0.433) (0.48) Already SI Participant (0.273) (0.408) (0.209) Required Course (0.491) (0.503) (0.486) Expected Grade (4pt ) 3.36 (0.56) 3.45 (0.527) 3.34 (0.565) Female Professor (0.498) (0.377) (0.498) Class Size (8.68) (8.51) (8.59) Average Size of SI 2.59 (1.22) (0.897) 2.32 (1.22) Same Day as Class 0.54 (0.498) (0.484) (0.5) Female SI Leader (0.494) (0.434) (0.50) Section Average GPA 2.09 (0.338) 2.15 (0.359) 2.05 (0.33) N Appendix

Variables