Apr. 4, KEK JHF-SK neutrino workshop 1 e appearance search Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (KEK - IPNS)

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Oscillation Project with Emulsion tRacking Apparatus F. Juget Institut de Physique Université de Neuchâtel Neutrino-CH meeting, Neuchâtel June

Advertisements

Simulation of Neutrino Factory beam and quasielastic scattering off electrons in the near detector Yordan Karadzhov University of Sofia “St. Kliment Ohridski”

11-September-2005 C2CR2005, Prague 1 Super-Kamiokande Atmospheric Neutrino Results Kimihiro Okumura ICRR Univ. of Tokyo ( 11-September-2005.

Takaaki Kajita ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo Nufact05, Frascati, June 2005.

Super-Kamiokande Introduction Contained events and upward muons Updated results Oscillation analysis with a 3D flux Multi-ring events  0 /  ratio 3 decay.

G. Sullivan - Princeton - Mar 2002 What Have We Learned from Super-K? –Before Super-K –SK-I ( ) Atmospheric Solar –SNO & SK-I Active solar –SK.

Near Detector Working Group for ISS Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting 24 January 2006 Paul Soler University of Glasgow/RAL.

Incoming energy crucial for your physics result, but only badly known (~50%) Incoming energy crucial for your physics result, but only badly known (~50%)

Off-axis Simulations Peter Litchfield, Minnesota  What has been simulated?  Will the experiment work?  Can we choose a technology based on simulations?

Performance of a Water Cherenkov Detector for e Appearance Shoei NAKAYAMA (ICRR, University of Tokyo) November 18-19, 2005 International Workshop on a.

CP-phase dependence of neutrino oscillation probability in matter 梅 (ume) 田 (da) 義 (yoshi) 章 (aki) with Lin Guey-Lin ( 林貴林 ) National Chiao-Tung University.

1 Evidence of Neutrino Oscillation from Super-Kamiokande and K2K Neutrino physics at Super-Kamiokande –Detector overview –Atmospheric neutrinos –Solar.

Far Detector Fiducial Volume Studies Andy Blake Cambridge University Saturday February 24 th 2007.

Background Understanding and Suppression in Very Long Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiments with Water Cherenkov Detector Chiaki Yanagisawa Stony Brook.

1 Latest CC analysis developments New selection efficiencies: –Based on C++ reco + PDFs rather than old (Fortran+reco_minos) cuts –Attempt to optimise.

Identification of neutrino oscillations in the MINOS detector Daniel Cole

Status of the OPERA experiment Yoshiaki Nonoyama Nagoya Univ.

10/24/2005Zelimir Djurcic-PANIC05-Santa Fe Zelimir Djurcic Physics Department Columbia University Backgrounds in Backgrounds in neutrino appearance signal.

T2K experiment at J-PARC Epiphany 2010D. Kiełczewska1 For T2K Collaboration Danuta Kiełczewska Warsaw University & Sołtan Institute for Nuclear Studies.

New results from K2K Makoto Yoshida (IPNS, KEK) for the K2K collaboration NuFACT02, July 4, 2002 London, UK.

Future Accelerator-based Oscillation Experiment (JHFnu, Off-axis) Changgen Yang Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing.

KEK, July 14, Donation from CERN goes to orphans of the earthquake 9 May 2011 A donation of 53,280 CHF raised by employees and friends of CERN will.

Caren Hagner CSTS Saclay Present And Near Future of θ 13 & CPV in Neutrino Experiments Caren Hagner Universität Hamburg Neutrino Mixing and.

Recent results from the K2K experiment Yoshinari Hayato (KEK/IPNS) for the K2K collaboration Introduction Summary of the results in 2001 Overview of the.

Present status of oscillation studies by atmospheric neutrino experiments ν μ → ν τ 2 flavor oscillations 3 flavor analysis Non-standard explanations Search.

Resolving neutrino parameter degeneracy 3rd International Workshop on a Far Detector in Korea for the J-PARC Neutrino Beam Sep. 30 and Oct , Univ.

Operation of and results from OPERA Ciro Pistillo LHEP Bern University CHIPP Plenary meeting Lausanne, EPFL-LPHE September

K2K NC  0 production Shoei NAKAYAMA (ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo) for the K2K Collaboration July 28, NuFact04.

Dec. 13, 2001Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Neutrino and Anti-Neutrino Cross Sections and CP Phase Measurement Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (KEK-IPNS) NuInt01,

Fermilab, May, 2003 Takaaki Kajita, ICRR, U. Tokyo ・ Introduction ・ JHF-Kamioka neutrino project -overview- ・ Physics in phase-I ・ Phase-II ・ Summary Outline.

Teppei Katori Indiana University Rencontres de Moriond EW 2008 La Thuile, Italia, Mar., 05, 08 Neutrino cross section measurements for long-baseline neutrino.

1 Super muon-neutrino beam Takashi Kobayashi IPNS, KEK Fact02 July 1, 2002 Imperial College London Contents 1.Introduction 2.“Super-beam” long baseline.

TAUP Searches for nucleon decay and n-n oscillation in Super-Kamiokande Jun Kameda (ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo) for Super-Kamiokande collaboration Sep.

JHF-Kamioka Neutrino Oscillation Experiment using JHF 50 GeV PS Y.Itow ICRR,Univ.of Tokyo Jul27,2002 Jul27,2002 ICHEP02 Amsterdam Introduction Facility.

1 The JHF-Kamioka Neutrino experiment 1.Introduction 2.Overview of the experiment 3.Physics sensitivity in Phase-I 4.Physics sensitivity in Phase-II 5.Summary.

Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Oct. Neutrino Oscillation Experiment between JHF – Super-Kamiokande Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (Kamioka Observatory, ICRR)

Search for Electron Neutrino Appearance in MINOS Mhair Orchanian California Institute of Technology On behalf of the MINOS Collaboration DPF 2011 Meeting.

Road Map of Neutrino Physics in Japan Largely my personal view Don’t take too seriously K. Nakamura KEK NuFact04 July 30, 2004.

Search for Sterile Neutrino Oscillations with MiniBooNE

Neutrino Oscillations at Super-Kamiokande Soo-Bong Kim (Seoul National University)

1 Luca Stanco, INFN-Padova (for the OPERA collaboration) Search for sterile neutrinos at Long-BL The present scenario and the “sterile” issue at 1 eV mass.

Medium baseline neutrino oscillation searches Andrew Bazarko, Princeton University Les Houches, 20 June 2001 LSND: MeVdecay at rest MeVdecay in flight.

Accelerator-based Long-Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiments Kam-Biu Luk University of California, Berkeley and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Low Z Detector Simulations

1 Status of the T2K long baseline neutrino oscillation experiment Atsuko K. Ichikawa (Kyoto univeristy) For the T2K Collaboration.

Recent Results from Super-K Kate Scholberg, Duke University June 7, 2005 Delphi, Greece.

CP phase and mass hierarchy Ken-ichi Senda Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI) &KEK This talk is based on K. Hagiwara, N. Okamura, KS PLB.

April 26, McGrew 1 Goals of the Near Detector Complex at T2K Clark McGrew Stony Brook University Road Map The Requirements The Technique.

Search for active neutrino disappearance using neutral-current interactions in the MINOS long-baseline experiment 2008/07/31 Tomonori Kusano Tohoku University.

PAC questions and Simulations Peter Litchfield, August 27 th Extent to which MIPP/MINER A can help estimate far detector backgrounds by extrapolation.

Measuring Neutrino Oscillations with the T2K Experiment Alfons Weber University of Oxford STFC/RAL Dec-2011.

Review of experimental results on atmospheric neutrinos Introduction Super-Kamiokande MACRO Soudan 2 Summary Univ. of Tokyo, Kamioka Observatory.

XLVth Rencontres de Moriond Status of the T2K experiment K. Matsuoka (Kyoto Univ.) for the T2K collaboration Contents Physics motivations (neutrino oscillation)

Hiroyuki Sekiya ICHEP2012 Jul 5 The Hyper-Kamiokande Experiment -Neutrino Physics Potentials- ICHEP2012 July Hiroyuki Sekiya ICRR,

Neutrino Interaction measurement in K2K experiment (1kton water Cherenkov detector) Jun Kameda(ICRR) for K2K collaboration RCCN international workshop.

Observation Gamma rays from neutral current quasi-elastic in the T2K experiment Huang Kunxian for half of T2K collaboration Mar. 24, Univ.

Constraint on  13 from the Super- Kamiokande atmospheric neutrino data Kimihiro Okumura (ICRR) for the Super-Kamiokande collaboration December 9, 2004.

 CC QE results from the NOvA prototype detector Jarek Nowak and Minerba Betancourt.

T2K Experiment Results & Prospects Alfons Weber University of Oxford & STFC/RAL For the T2K Collaboration.

T2K Oscillation Strategies Kevin McFarland (University of Rochester) on behalf of the T2K Collaboration Neutrino Factories 2010 October 24 th 2010.

NNN 2011: The d Experiment Joshua Albert Duke University For the T2K Collaboration November 8, 2011.

The XXII International Conference on Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics in Santa Fe, New Mexico, June 13-19, 2006 The T2K 2KM Water Cherenkov Detector M.

Neutral Current Interactions in MINOS Alexandre Sousa, University of Oxford for the MINOS Collaboration Neutrino Events in MINOS Neutrino interactions.

T2K : New physics results

Preliminary T2K beam simulation using the G4 2km detector

Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (KEK - IPNS)

Prospects of J-PARC Neutrino Program

Naotoshi Okamura (YITP) NuFact05

Toward realistic evaluation of the T2KK physics potential

Conventional Neutrino Beam Experiment : JHF – Super-Kamiokande

Presentation transcript:

Apr. 4, KEK JHF-SK neutrino workshop 1 e appearance search Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (KEK - IPNS)

Apr. 4, 2001JHF-SK neutrino KEK2 Three Active Neutrino & Mass Degeneration Scenario :  m 2 12 <<  m 2 13 ~  m 2 23 Present Limit: sin 2 2  13 <10  m 2 ~3x10 -3 eV 2 Obtained by CHOOZ (PALO VERDE) experiment Neutrino Beam is Essentially Pure  (  : e e appearance search = small  13 search  to e oscillation search  ~0.5 from SK Atm.

Apr. 4, 2001JHF-SK neutrino KEK3 Appearance Signal e C.C. interaction Single Fussy Ring Cherenkov Angle ~ 42 o e e +- shower

Apr. 4, 2001JHF-SK neutrino KEK4 BG(1):  C.C. interaction Sharp Ring Edge Cherenkov Angle < 42 o    easy to reject

Apr. 4, 2001JHF-SK neutrino KEK5   →2  : 2 Shower Rings 2 rings overlap A ring is too weak Not Reproduce E BG(2): N.C.  0 production   →  2 showers Single Ring

Apr. 4, 2001JHF-SK neutrino KEK6  0 production Sudden raise from E ~500MeV  (w/  0 )/  (total) E (GeV)

Apr. 4, 2001JHF-SK neutrino KEK7 e selection SK Atm official selection (single-ring e-like): Fully Contained (No Anti-counter Activity) Only one ring is reconstructed PID likelihood is e-like (Showering) No Muon Decay Electron Evis > 100MeV OAB 2 o  C.C.  N.C.Beam e Osc ’ d e Generated ring e-like red. eff.0.1%6.1%23.4%67.5%  m 2 =3x10 -3 eV 2, sin 2 2  e=0.05  Too Much!

Apr. 4, 2001JHF-SK neutrino KEK8 Tight e/  0 separation  0 BG tend to have a forward peak cos  e : Large for BG 2 nd ring for the signal is fake E(  2 )/E(  1 +  2 ): Large for BG Likelihood diff. between 1-ring and 2-rings Invariant mass

Apr. 4, 2001JHF-SK neutrino KEK9 e/  0 separation efficiency OAB 2 o  C.C.  N.C.Beam e Osc ’ d e Generated ring e-like red. eff.0.1%6.1%23.4%67.5% e/  0 sep red.eff.0.03%0.6%7.5%50.4%  m 2 =3x10 -3 eV 2, sin 2 2  e=0.05

Apr. 4, 2001JHF-SK neutrino KEK10  0 contamination Black: Single-ring e-like ~2% Green: Standard  0 rejection~0.2% Red: More tight  0 rejection~0.1% E (GeV) Eff. Identified as e

Apr. 4, 2001JHF-SK neutrino KEK11 BG(3):  C.C.   +N  e could be a source of BG Energy threshold > 3 GeV  Negligibly small

Apr. 4, 2001JHF-SK neutrino KEK12 Expected Signal & BG distribution Reconstruct E as Quasi-Elastic interaction Apply Energy Cut 0.4GeV< E <1.2GeV (OAB2 o ) OAB2 o 5year

Apr. 4, 2001JHF-SK neutrino KEK13 Sensitivity for Mixing Angle sin 2 2   e sensitivity

Apr. 4, 2001JHF-SK neutrino KEK14 Sensitivities Sensitive down to sin 2 2   e >3x10  m 2 =3x10 -3 eV 2 By tuning E, sensitive down to sin 2 2   e >5x10 -3 in all allowed  m 2 atm  sin 2 2  13 >1x10 -2

Apr. 4, 2001JHF-SK neutrino KEK15 Sensitivities (2)

Apr. 4, 2001JHF-SK neutrino KEK16 Comparison to Other Projects MINOS: Too high E  CC→  →e may be a serious BG OPERA(,ICARUS) Target physics is different (  app.) Much more high E Small Far Detector

Apr. 4, 2001JHF-SK neutrino KEK17 Summary ~1 GeV neutrino beam + SK(Water Cherenkov) seems to be a best solution to search: 0.01 < sin 2 2  13 <  m 2 atm. Expected sensitivity: sin 2 2  13 ~ 90%C.L. JHFnu-SK has much higher sensitivity for e appearance search than MINOS and OPERA.