New Evidence on Energy Education Effectiveness Jackie Berger 2008 ACI Home Performance Conference April 8, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Low-Income Energy Efficiency: Brantford Power’s Conserving Homes Program The History The Barriers The Benefits The Program The Results The Lessons Learned.
Advertisements

1 The Potential For Implementing Demand Response Programs In Illinois Rick Voytas Manager, Corporate Analysis Ameren Services May 12, 2006.
Impacts of Consumer Education Based Programs Jackie Berger 2008 National Energy and Utility Affordability Conference Denver, CO June 17, 2008.
Energy Savings Opportunities in Controls, Lighting, Air Conditioning, Water Heating and Refrigeration Chuck Thomas, P.E. CEM Lead Engineer.
Automated Demand Response Pilot 2005/2004 Load Impact Results and Recommendations Final Report © 2005 Rocky Mountain Institute (RMI) Research & Consulting.
Experience you can trust Statewide Multifamily Rebate Program: Findings & Recommendations CALMAC Meeting Pacific Energy Center October 17, 2007.
2005 LIEE Impact Evaluation Final Report January 23, 2007 Presentation to the Low Income Oversight Board West Hill Energy and Computing, Inc. with Ridge.
Are Building Codes Effective at Saving Energy? Evidence from Residential Billing Data in Florida Grant D. Jacobsen UC Santa Barbara Matthew J. Kotchen.
NJ Comfort Partners Evaluation Jackie Berger August 21, 2014.
CONSUMER PROTECTIONS AND SERVICE QUALITY March 14, 2011.
New Evidence on Energy Education Effectiveness A. Tamasin Sterner Pure Energy Lancaster, PA
Achieving High Savings from Low-Income Energy Efficiency Programs David Carroll and Jackie Berger ACI Conference – May 2015.
Climate & Usage, Health & Safety Lessons Learned ESAP Workshop #1 October 17, 2011.
So it all boils down to ‘$ and Sense’ No matter what your motivation energy conservation can be argued form both the dollar and sense position.
Elements of Ratepayer-Funded Low-Income Programs Affordable Comfort May 2005 Jacqueline Berger, APPRISE Incorporated Suzanne Harmelink, WI Energy Conservation.
2008 National Energy Assistance Survey NEADA Winter Meeting February 3, 2009 Jackie Berger Prepared for NEADA By.
Honey, I’m Home - How Are Electricity Prices for Tomorrow? Lawrence Kotewa Project Manager, Community Energy Cooperative April 13, 2005 Community Energy.
Capacity Impacts of Energy Efficiency What We Know and What We Don’t Know March 11, 2014.
Performance Metrics for Weatherization UGI LIURP Evaluation Yvette Belfort Jackie Berger ACI Home Performance Conference April 30, 2014.
National Study of Low Income Energy Programs Lessons for Connecticut January 29, 2008 David Carroll - APPRISE Roger Colton – Fisher, Sheehan, and Colton.
1 Clients As a Resource in Energy Education Jackie Berger David Carroll 2004 Affordable Comfort April 28, 2004.
Energy Efficiency Workshop Saving Energy & Lowering Utility Bills Copyright © 2010 Portland General Electric Inc. All rights reserved.
WAP 101 Jackie Berger David Carroll June 14, 2010.
1 Seattle City Light Residential Sector Background: Key Facts from the RCCS February 2013 “C”
Client Communication and Energy Education Jackie Berger ACI NJ March 5, 2010.
Why Data Matters! Building and Sustaining a Business Case Kansas City NEUAC June 18, 2014.
Residential Behavior Programs RTF Subcommittee Ryan Firestone September 17, 2015.
Comprehensive Usage Reduction Program Evaluation Affordable Comfort 2007 Jacqueline Berger.
1 Overview of the Proposed Energy Education Study Presentation to the LIOB September 26, 2011 Sacramento, California.
How Energy Efficiency Can Reduce Bill Subsidization Affordable Comfort, April 2007 John Augustino, Honeywell Jacqueline Berger, APPRISE Susan Moser, Ohio.
Pre $754 Post $557$377 v $278 Florida Solar Energy Center Typical Projected Annual Energy Use for 70 Florida Homes Retrofit Status Cond Area Ft 2 Average.
Measures that Save The Most Energy Jackie Berger David Carroll ACI New Jersey Home Performance Conference March 5, 2010.
Energy Behavior – Lessons from Low-Income Education Programs David Carroll, Jackie Berger ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings August 20,
Demand Side Management Programs National Energy and Utility Affordability Conference Denver, Colorado David Carroll June 18, 2008.
Ratepayer Funded Low-Income Energy Programs Performance and Possibilities 2007 NLIEC David Carroll, APPRISE Jacqueline Berger, APPRISE Roger Colton, Fisher,
Measures that Save The Most Energy Jackie Berger David Carroll ACI New Jersey Home Performance Conference January 25, 2007.
1Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy David Carroll APPRISE National WAP Evaluation: Savings and Opportunities for Baseload Electric.
Achieving Higher Savings in Low-Income Weatherization Jacqueline Berger 2015 IEPEC Conference ― Long Beach, California.
BGE Limited Income Pilot Programs - Evaluation ACI Home Performance Conference March 2012.
EMV Results for online Energy Education Study conducted by Lei Wang, PhD October 2011.
Energy Education in the Home Jackie Berger 2014 BECC December 9, 2014.
Non-Energy Benefits Estimating the Economic Benefits of the Ohio Electric Partnership Program 2006 ACI Home Performance Conference May 25, 2006 Jackie.
Comparison of Pooled and Household-Level Usage Impact Analysis Jackie Berger Ferit Ucar IEPEC Conference – August 14, 2013.
2009 Impact Evaluation Concerns ESAP Workshop #1 October 17, 2011.
11/23/ Residential Sector Load Forecast Impacts of Codes, Standards and Market Changes Preliminary Estimates June 19, 2002.
Why should we save energy? Americans now spend over $700 billion on energy Americans now spend over $700 billion on energy Energy demand is expected to.
Coordination of LIHEAP with State and Utility Payment Assistance Programs NEUAC Conference June 28, 2011 Jackie Berger.
Why Data Matters Building and Sustaining a Business Case NEAUC Conference June 18, 2014.
Lincoln GET REAL! Typical Annual Direct Energy Costs for Large New England Household ($ per year) For 12,000 kWh electricity, 168 MMBtu gas&oil, and 2.
Impact of Energy Efficiency Services on Energy Assistance NEUAC Conference June 18, 2014.
Repeat LIHEAP Recipients 2013 NEUAC Conference Jackie Berger.
Electric / Gas / Water Summary of Final Evaluation Report Prepared by: John Cavalli, Itron Beatrice Mayo, PG&E July 27, Express Efficiency Program.
1 Consumer Feedback Putting it all Together David Carroll 2007 ACI April 25, 2007.
EmPower MD Act overview and Demand Response Training EmPower Maryland.
 Audit process  Customer survey results  Study of audited homes  Conclusions / recommendations.
© 2007, Itron Inc. Statistically Adjusted End-Use Model Overview & Thoughts about Incorporating DSM into a Forecast May 4, 2009 Frank A. Monforte, Ph.D.
Research, Evaluation, and Performance Measurement
Best Practices in Residential Energy Efficiency
Evaluating Weatherization Programs
Smart Thermostats Opportunities for Energy Savings
Evaluating Impact Do it Right or Not At All
Understanding & Improving Energy Affordability in New Jersey
Health and Safety Investments to Increase Energy-Saving Opportunities
What have we learned from Performance Data reported in FY 2015?
WAP Warm Climate Weatherization: Opportunities for Energy Savings
Health and Safety Investments to Increase Energy-Saving Opportunities
Understanding New York’s Low- to Moderate Income Market Segment
NEADA 2018 National Energy Assistance Survey
Evaluating Low-Income Programs Why and How
Jackie Berger Home Performance Conference April 3, 2019
Presentation transcript:

New Evidence on Energy Education Effectiveness Jackie Berger 2008 ACI Home Performance Conference April 8, 2008

Presentation Outline Description of Program and Evaluation Study Motivation Study Results Conclusion Future research 3

PECO LIURP – Program and Evaluation 4

Program Description PECO LIURP – Low Income Usage Reduction Program Run by utilities in PA PUC requires annual evaluation Education and energy efficiency measures Baseload and heating jobs 5

2005 LIURP Impacts #Pre-UsePost-UseSavings% Savings Electric Baseload (kWh) 4,55111,18810,0731, % Electric Heat (kWh) 19721,95620,3261, % Gas Heat (ccf) 1,1641,2061, % 6

CFL Impacts Savings (kWh) Cost/ Home $/Unit Saved Measure Life $/Unit Saved Over Lifetime 953 (±173) $68$ $0.02 $274$0.29$0.07 7

Study Methodology 8

Survey Research Methodology Stratification for sample selection –Job type Electric baseload – only CFLs Gas heating – only CFLs on electric side –Electric supplemental heat Used at the time of service delivery Not used at the time of service delivery 9

Survey Research Methodology Stratification for sample selection –Energy Savings Removed top and bottom 5% in each of 4 groups Divided each group into top, middle, and bottom savers 10

Survey Research Methodology Customer Type Electric Supplemental Heat Electric Savings Number Selected Electric Baseload Yes Top Third65 Middle Third65 Bottom Third65 No Top Third65 Middle Third65 Bottom Third65 Gas Heat Yes Top Third61 Middle Third62 Bottom Third61 No Top Third65 Middle Third65 Bottom Third65 TOTAL SAMPLE769 11

Survey Research Methodology Customer Type Electric Supplemental Heat Electric Savings Completes Electric Baseload Yes Top Third 1828% Middle Third 2234% Bottom Third 1828% No Top Third 2031% Middle Third 1828% Bottom Third 1523% Gas Heat Yes Top Third 1830% Middle Third 2337% Bottom Third 2033% No Top Third 2031% Middle Third 2437% Bottom Third 1828% TOTAL SAMPLE 23430% 12

Savings by Job Type and Household Characteristics 13

Electric Savings by Job Type and HH Characteristics Obs. Mean Electric Savings (kWh) Electric Savings Group (kWh Change) LargeMediumLowSmallIncrease <=- 1, , >250 All Customers %25%10%12%22% Baseload1111,13138%24%10% 18% Gas Heat %26%11%13%26% Elec Supp. Heat1181,07838%23%11%8%20% No Elec Supp. Heat %28%10%16%24% 14

Electric Savings by Job Type and HH Characteristics Baseload/ Gas Heat Elec Supp. Heat Obs. Mean Electric Savings (kWh) Electric Savings Group (kWh Change) LargeMediumLowSmallIncrease <=- 1, , >250 Baseloadyes581,27540%26%12%5%17% Baseloadno %23%8%15%19% Gas Heatyes %20%10% 23% Gas Heatno %32%11%16%29% 15

Electric Savings by Job Type and HH Characteristics Obs. Mean Electric Savings (kWh) Electric Savings Group (kWh Change) LargeMediumLowSmallIncrease <=- 1, , >250 Air Conditioning Central %24%11%7%22% Window/Wall %25%11%14%24% None % 6%12% 16

Electric Savings by Job Type and HH Characteristics Baseload/ Gas Heat AC TypeObs. Mean Electric Savings (kWh) Electric Savings Group (kWh Change) LargeMediumLowSmallIncrease <=- 1, , >250 BaseloadCentral %20%10%5%20% Baseload Window/ Wall %25%11%13%18% BaseloadNone %44%0%11% Gas HeatCentral %29%11%9%26% Gas Heat Window/ Wall %25%10%15%28% Gas HeatNone891638%25%13% 17

Savings by Reports on Education Provided and Actions Taken 18

Electric Savings by Energy Education Reported Obs. Mean Electric Savings (kWh) All Customers Review bills? yes no91826 Recommend actions to save energy? yes no Estimate $ savings from each action recommended? yes no91780 Estimate total $ savings from all actions? yes no

Electric Savings by Number of Letters Read How many of the LIURP monthly energy saving letters have you read? Obs. Mean Electric Savings (kWh) All Most35900 Some44627 One/None17552 Don’t Remember Letters

Electric Savings By Reported Actions What energy-saving actions have you been able to take since the provider came to your home? (Action mentioned with greatest expected savings) Obs. Mean Electric Savings (kWh) Avoid space heaters72253 Disconnect unused refrigerators/freezers81395 Reduce use of electric dryer41250 Use CFLs Accept LIURP services Turn off unused lighting Turn off unused television/computer17777 Other/don’t know15518 Alter thermostat settings15369 Weatherization measures37365 New appliances4203 None13 21

Electric Savings by Reduced Appliance Use Reduced use of _____ as a result of participating in the program? Obs. Mean Electric Savings (kWh) All Customers Electric space heater** yes no Air conditioner yes no97723 Electric dryer yes71995 no Dishwasher yes64641 no

Electric Savings by Reduced Appliance Use Reduced use of _____ as a result of participating in the program? Obs. Mean Electric Savings (kWh) All Customers Dehumidifier yes no Number of lights left on all night* yes no Lights yes no

Electric Savings by Number of Hours CFLs Used Average number of hours CFLs are used Obs. Mean Electric Savings (kWh) Don’t Know

Savings by Program Ratings and Reported Savings 25

Electric Savings by Most Important Program Benefit What do you feel is the most important benefit of the program? Obs. Mean Electric Savings (kWh) Lower Energy Bills Energy Education69796 Safer/More Comfortable Home17769 Specific Services23671 Lower Energy Use24523 New Appliances6433 Compliant31318 Don’t Know

Electric Savings by Energy Education Rating How helpful was LIURP in teaching about energy use and ways to save energy? Obs. Mean Electric Savings (kWh) Very Helpful Somewhat Helpful69645 Of Little Help Don’t Know

Electric Savings by Report of Energy Savings Has your household reduced its overall energy usage as a result of the program? Obs. Mean Electric Savings (kWh) Yes No/Don’t Know44667 Is your PECO bill higher, lower, or unchanged since receipt of energy services? Obs. Mean Electric Savings (kWh) Lower Unchanged56706 Higher29660 Don’t Know

Electric Savings by Program Satisfaction AllBaseloadGas Heat Energy Education Obs. Mean Electric Savings (kWh) Obs. Mean Electric Savings (kWh) Obs. Mean Electric Savings (kWh) Very Satisfied Somewhat Sat Dissatisfied Don’t Know LIURP Very Satisfied Somewhat Sat Dissatisfied Don’t Know

Multivariate Analysis 30

Multivariate Analysis Variable Education Reports Behavior Changes Education Satisfaction All Factors Baseload Job-524*-508*-493*-542* Electric Space Heat-424*-451* Provider Reviewed Bills Provider Recommended Actions to Save Energy Provider Estimated Savings from Each Action Provider Estimated Savings from Actions Overall Respondent Read All Letters Respondent Read Most Letters Reduced Electric Space Heater Use-502*-472* Reduced AC Use Reduced Electric Dryer Use Reduced Number of Lights Left on All Night Reduced Use of Dehumidifier Uses CFLs 7 or More Hours Per Day on Average LIURP Very Helpful Teach How Reduce Use Reduced Use as a Result of LIURP Very Satisfied with Energy Education

Summary and Conclusion 32

Summary Expected relationships found –Energy education provided –Attention to follow-up materials –Behavior changes –Hours of CFL usage –Energy education ratings –Usage and bill savings 33

Conclusion New evidence for –Impact of energy education on energy usage –Accuracy of customer reports Energy education quality Changes in energy use behavior Need larger sample size!! 34

Contact Jackie Berger Director of Program Evaluation APPRISE 32 Nassau Street, Suite 200 Princeton, NJ