Yaakov Shaked, Roey Pomeranz and Avi Pe’er Department of Physics and BINA Center for Nano-technology, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 52900, Israel

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quantum optical effects with pulsed lasers
Advertisements

Parametric Down-conversion and other single photons sources December 2009 Assaf Halevy Course # 77740, Dr. Hagai Eisenberg 1.
Optical sources Lecture 5.
Microscopy Outline 1.Resolution and Simple Optical Microscope 2.Contrast enhancement: Dark field, Fluorescence (Chelsea & Peter), Phase Contrast, DIC 3.Newer.
Experimental work on entangled photon holes T.B. Pittman, S.M. Hendrickson, J. Liang, and J.D. Franson UMBC ICSSUR Olomouc, June 2009.
Observation of the relativistic cross-phase modulation in a high intensity laser plasma interaction Shouyuan Chen, Matt Rever, Ping Zhang, Wolfgang Theobald,
Quantum Coherent Control with Non-classical Light Department of Physics of Complex Systems The Weizmann Institute of Science Rehovot, Israel Yaron Bromberg,
Durham University – Atomic & Molecular Physics group
Entanglement and Bell’s Inequalities
What’s so Special about a Laser?
Optical Field Mixing. Oscillating Polarisation Optical polarisation Fundamental polarisation SH Polarisation Constant (dc) polarisation.
Indistinguishability of emitted photons from a semiconductor quantum dot in a micropillar cavity S. Varoutsis LPN Marcoussis S. Laurent, E. Viasnoff, P.
Optical Coherence Tomography Zhongping Chen, Ph.D. Optical imaging in turbid media Coherence and interferometry Optical coherence.
Ghost Imaging Sean Crosby Supervisor: Associate Professor Ann Roberts Optics Annual Talks 8 March 2005.
Quantum Entanglement and Bell’s Inequalities Kristin M. Beck and Jacob E. Mainzer Demonstrating quantum entanglement of photons via the violation of Bell’s.
Cavity QED as a Deterministic Photon Source Gary Howell Feb. 9, 2007.
Phase and Amplitude Control Ability using Spatial Light Modulators and Zero Path Length Difference Michelson Interferometer Michael G. Littman, Michael.
OPT OPT 253 Quantum Optics Laboratory, Final Presentation Wednesday, December 10 th 2008 By Carlin Gettliffe.
Chapter 25: Interference and Diffraction
Chapter 5: Wave Optics How to explain the effects due to interference, diffraction, and polarization of light? How do lasers work?
Study and characterisation of polarisation entanglement JABIR M V Photonic sciences laboratory, PRL.
Demonstration of Sub- Rayleigh Lithography Using a Multi-Photon Absorber Heedeuk Shin, Hye Jeong Chang*, Malcolm N. O'Sullivan-Hale, Sean Bentley #, and.
TOF Mass Spectrometer &
Single-shot characterization of sub-15fs pulses with 50dB dynamic range A. Moulet 1, S.Grabielle 1, N.Forget 1, C.Cornaggia 2, O.Gobert 2 and T.Oksenhendler.
1 Waves, Light & Quanta Tim Freegarde Web Gallery of Art; National Gallery, London.
The wave nature of light Interference Diffraction Polarization
Lab 12 Atomic spectra and atomic structure
Spectroscopic Line Shapes Of Broad Band Sum Frequency Generation Himali Jayathilake Igor Stiopkin, Champika Weeraman, Achani Yatawara and Alexander Benderskii.
Pure-state, single-photon wave-packet generation by parametric down conversion in a distributed microcavity M. G. Raymer, Jaewoo Noh* Oregon Center for.
Intra-cavity Pulse Shaping of Mode-locked Oscillators Shai Yefet, Naaman Amer and Avi Pe’er Department of physics and BINA Center of nano-technology, Bar-Ilan.
Andrey V. Zamyatin Femtosecond Ultra-Broadband Light Sources 4119 Twilight Ridge, San Diego, CA 92130, USA Tel:: (858) Fax:: (858) :
Femto-second Measurements of Semiconductor Laser Diodes David Baxter
Second Harmonic (SH) Radiation from Twined ZnO Single Nanorods (NR) in Transmission Geometry. Presented by: Aaron Ricca Dr. S. W. Liu.
Quantum Imaging with Undetected Photons
Basic electromagnetics and interference Optics, Eugene Hecht, Chpt 3.
1/10 Tatsuya KUME Mechanical Engineering Center, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK) ATF2-IN2P3-KEK kick-off meeting (Oct. 10, 2006) Phase.
Quantum Optics: Single Photon Interference. Recap on quantum optics The principle of Wave-particle duality says that light behaves like a particle and.
Quantum Optics II – Cozumel, Dec. 6-9, 2004
Under the Influence of Spectral Entanglement: Polarization-Entanglement Swapping and Fusion Gates Travis Humble * and Warren Grice, Oak Ridge National.
Measuring the Wave-Function of Broadband Bi-Photons
Enhancing the Macroscopic Yield of Narrow-Band High-Order Harmonic Generation by Fano Resonances Muhammed Sayrac Phys-689 Texas A&M University 4/30/2015.
We have experimentally observed a similar qualitative behavior by measuring the ratio between the CW and ML intra-cavity powers as a function of Z for.
Conditions for Interference
Kerr-lens Mode Locking Without Nonlinear Astigmatism Shai Yefet, Valery Jouravsky and Avi Pe’er Physics Department and the Institute of Nanotechnology.
Electron Spectrometer: Status July 14 Simon Jolly, Lawrence Deacon 1 st July 2014.
Quantum Imaging MURI Kick-Off Meeting Rochester, June 9-10, Entangled state and thermal light - Foundamental and applications.
Chapter 3 Postulates of Quantum Mechanics. Questions QM answers 1) How is the state of a system described mathematically? (In CM – via generalized coordinates.
Carmen Porto Supervisor: Prof. Simone Cialdi Co-Supervisor: Prof. Matteo Paris PhD school of Physics.
Multi-photon Absorption Rates for N00N States William Plick, Christoph F. Wildfeuer, Jonathan P. Dowling: Hearne Institute for Theoretical Physics, LSU.
QUANTUM OPTICS LAB IAP, UNIVERSITÄT BERN Qudit Implementations with Energy-Time Entangled Photons 1 Bänz Bessire Quantum Optics Lab – The Stefanov Group.
Date of download: 6/25/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. (a) Cartoon of flip-chip InGaAs FPA with InP substrate. SWIR light passes through.
QUANTUM OPTICS LAB IAP, UNIVERSITÄT BERN Characterization and manipulation of frequency entangled qudits 1 Bänz Bessire Quantum Optics Lab – The Stefanov.
Date of download: 6/30/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Trans-cis conformational change of the azo-dyes under light irradiation. (a) Equivalent.
§8.4 SHG Inside the Laser Resonator
Four wave mixing in submicron waveguides
Spontaneous Parametric Down Conversion
Nergis Mavalvala Aspen January 2005
Quantum Teleportation
Quantum Information with Continuous Variables
Sapun H. Parekh, Young Jong Lee, Khaled A. Aamer, Marcus T. Cicerone 
Squeezed Input Interferometer
Proof of the Existence of Photons
Kinesin Moving through the Spotlight: Single-Motor Fluorescence Microscopy with Submillisecond Time Resolution  Sander Verbrugge, Lukas C. Kapitein, Erwin.
N.Kukhtarev, T.Kukhtareva, P.Land, J.H. Caulfield, and J.Wang
Volume 104, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
by A. Sipahigil, R. E. Evans, D. D. Sukachev, M. J. Burek, J
Integrated photonic platform for quantum information with continuous variables by Francesco Lenzini, Jiri Janousek, Oliver Thearle, Matteo Villa, Ben Haylock,
Optical π phase shift created with a single-photon pulse
Fig. 2 The experimental setup.
Presentation transcript:

Yaakov Shaked, Roey Pomeranz and Avi Pe’er Department of Physics and BINA Center for Nano-technology, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 52900, Israel Measuring Entanglement by Attempting to Undo it with Ultra-Broadband Bi-Photons Abstract: We demonstrate a unique source of ultra broadband bi-photons with a correlation time of sec, emitting an ultra-high flux of >10 12 time-energy entangled photon-pairs per second. Using a pairwise “Mach-Zehnder” interferometer we fully characterize the quantum state of the bi-photons (amplitude and phase), and show that the interference visibility is a direct measure for the bi-photons purity. We support our results with a theoretical model, which fully reconstructs the observed square root dependence of the fringe visibility on internal loss. (a) Bi-photons produced in a first non-linear (NL) crystal via spontaneous parametric down conversion (SPDC) enter an identical second NL crystal together with the original pump, and are either enhanced by further down conversion (DC), or up-converted back to the pump, depending on the relative phase between the pump and the bi-photons. Since the two possibilities for bi-photon generation, in the first or second NL crystal, are indistinguishable, their probability amplitudes interfere quantum mechanically. Thus, the setup is analogous to a Mach- Zehnder interferometer (b) for bi-photons, where the crystals represent two-photon beam splitters that couple the pump and DC fields. Bi-photons are generated in the 1st crystal (12mm long PPKTP), pumped by a single-frequency diode laser at 880 nm with up to 1 W power. Reflection of the bi-photons from mirrors M2 and M3 is accompanied by a spectral phase shift. Both bi- photons and pump enter the 2nd identical crystal. The resulting bi-photons spectrum is measured by a home-built spectrometer composed of a prism (SF11) and a CCD IR camera. The last mirror (M4) separates the pump from DC light, allowing a pump power measurement. Attenuation is achieved either before the 1st crystal by a half-wave plate and polarizer beam splitter, or between the two crystals with a polarizer P1, and a polarizer P2 in front of the camera. The inset shows a measured intensity spectrum of the ultra-broadband bi-photons after the first crystal. Interpretation Conceptually, the second nonlinear medium serves as a physical detector of entanglement, where the existence of an entangled pair is detected by attempting to annihilate it. Since this operation affects bi-photons, only, the fringe contrast is a direct measure of the bi-photon purity, thereby providing a method to measure entanglement by attempting to undo it. By attenuating the bi-photon (and pump) field between the two crystals we reduce the single photon flux linearly, but the ”surviving” bi-photon flux quadratically, thereby reducing the quantum bi-photon state purity and reducing the pairwise interference visibility. We compare this scenario with attenuation of the two fields before the first crystal reducing the bi-photon flux but not the quantum bi-photon state purity, and indeed the interference visibility remains constant. Interference visibility Vs. loss Measured interference visibility as a function of attenuation with corresponding theoretical fits before the first crystal (squares + dotted fit) and between crystals (circles + solid fit). Results Two calibrated fringe spectra with a  phase shift between them (blue and dotted green lines), and the corresponding calculated spectral phase  2 of the bi- photons (red line). Concept Experimental layout Pairwise interference of bi-photons (CCD image) ArXiv: ArXiv: [physics.optics]