Are (exogenous) interferons really necessary? Peter Ferenci Medical University of Vienna.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Current Status and Benefits of Therapy for Chronic Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Fuad AM Hasan Department Of Medicine Faculty of Medicine Kuwait University.
Advertisements

Future Trials of Hepatitis C Therapy in the HIV Co-infected Stephen D. Shafran, MD, FRCPC, FACP Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases.
Future Directions in HCV Therapy Eric Lawitz, MD, AGAF,CPI Medical Director, The Texas Liver Institute Clinical Professor of Medicine University of Texas.
What’s new in HCV genotype 2? Alessandra Mangia S.Giovanni Rotondo,ITALY PARIS HEPATITIS CONFERENCE January 2012.
Protease and Polymerase Inhibitors for the Treatment of Hepatitis C
HCV resistance Understanding the mechanism and Prevention
WHAT FUTURE FOR RIBAVIRIN? Mitchell L Shiffman, MD Chief, Hepatology Section Medical Director, Liver Transplant Program Virginia Commonwealth University.
Direct Acting Antivirals: What are they
The new Treatments Dr John F Dillon. Curing one person Curing a population one person at a time.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Sofosbuvir + Peginterferon + Ribavirin in Genotype 2 or 3 LONESTAR-2 Phase 2 Treatment Experienced Lawitz E, et.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Telaprevir in Treatment Experienced GT-1 REALIZE (Study 216) Phase 3 Treatment Experienced Zeuzem S, et al. N Engl.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Telaprevir in Treatment Naïve GT-1 ADVANCE (Study 108) Phase 3 Treatment Naïve Jacobson IM, et. al. N Engl J Med.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir +/- Ribavirin in HCV Genotype 1 ION-2 Phase 3 Treatment Experienced Source: Afdhal N, et.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Simeprevir + PEG + RBV in Treatment-Naïve Genotype 1 QUEST-2 Trial Phase 3 Treatment Naïve Manns M, et al. Lancet.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Simeprevir + PEG + RBV in Treatment-Naïve Genotype 1 QUEST-1 Trial Phase 3 Treatment Naïve Jacobson IM, et al.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study PEG alfa-2a + RBV versus PEG alfa-2a versus INF + RBV APRICOT STUDY Phase 3 Treatment Naïve, Chronic HCV and HIV.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study 3D (Ombitasvir-Paritaprevir-Ritonavir + Dasabuvir) + RBV in GT1 TURQUOISE-I.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Telaprevir in Treatment Naïve GT-1 ILLUMINATE (Study 111) Phase 3 Treatment Naïve Sherman KE, et. al. N Engl J.
Hepatitis web study H EPATITIS W EB S TUDY H EPATITIS C O NLINE Simeprevir (Olysio) Prepared by: David Spach, MD & H. Nina Kim, MD Last Updated: October.
The Future: Is Ribavirin Still Useful? David Nelson, MD Professor of Medicine, Microbiology, and Molecular Genetics Associate Dean, Clinical Research and.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir in Treatment-Experienced GT1 with Cirrhosis SIRIUS Phase 2 Treatment Experienced Bourliere.
Hepatitis C Genotype 3 Paris 2012 Graham R Foster Professor of Hepatology Queen Marys School of Medicine Barts and The London.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Simeprevir in HIV Coinfection, GT-1 C212 Trial Phase 3 Treatment Naïve and Treatment Experienced Dieterich D, et.
Edited by Morris Sherman MD BCh PhD FRCP(C) Associate Professor of Medicine University of Toronto Protease Inhibitors in Chronic Hepatitis C: An Update.
Slide 1 of 8 From MG Peters, MD, at Los Angeles, CA: April 22, 2013, IAS-USA. IAS–USA Marion G. Peters, MD John V. Carbone, MD, Endowed Chair Professor.
Hepatitis web study H EPATITIS W EB S TUDY H EPATITIS C O NLINE Boceprevir (Victrelis) Prepared by: David Spach, MD & H. Nina Kim, MD Last Updated: March.
HEPATITIS C CO-INFECTION
Stefan ZEUZEM.
Future HCV Treatment Paradigms Mark Sulkowski, MD Professor of Medicine Medical Director, Viral Hepatitis Center Divisions of Infectious Diseases and Gastroenterology/
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Boceprevir in Treatment Experienced RESPOND-2 Phase 3 Treatment Experienced Bacon BR, et al. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:
Gastroenterology Volume 142, Issue 4, April 2012, Pages 790–795 Tom W. Chu.
Update on the HCV Antiviral Pipeline Todd S. Wills, MD SPNS HCV Treatment Expansion Initiative Evaluation and Technical Assistance Center Infectious Disease.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Telaprevir BID versus q8 in Treatment Naïve GT-1 OPTIMIZE (Study C211) Phase 3 Treatment Naïve Buti M, et al. Gastroenterology.
Terapia dell’Epatite cronica HCV correlata: Peg-IFN/ribavirina e che altro? L’infettivologia del terzo millennio: non solo AIDS Paestum maggio 2006.
ELECTRON  Design SOF + RBV Randomisation* 1 : 1 : 1 : 1 Open-label ELECTRON Study: SOF-based therapy for genotypes 1, 2 and 3 W8W4W12 ≥ 19 years Chronic.
How to optimize treatment of G4 patients?. Case: 26 Y male, HCV positive on pre-employment Transfused at age 3 for hemolysis due to G6PD deficiency »ALT.
Response Guided Therapy Fabien Zoulim Hepatology Department & INSERM Unit 1052, Lyon University Lyon, France.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Daclatasvir-Asunaprevir-Beclabuvir in Genotype 1 Cirrhotics UNITY-2 Study Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced.
Maria Buti Hospital General Universitario Vall Hebron Barcelona-. Spain Relapser or Non Responder? Chronic Hepatitis C.
How to optimize treatment of G1 patients? Prof. G. K. K. Lau 2012.
NS5A and polymerase inhibitors Mark Sulkowski, MD Professor of Medicine Johns Hopkins University Baltimore Maryland
Randomisation* 2 : 1 Double blind *Randomisation was stratified on genotype (1a or 1b or other) and IL28B genotype (CC, CT or TT) N = 133 N = 260 W24W48.
How to manage G1 relapsers and non-responders George V. Papatheodoridis, MD Associate Professor in Medicine & Gastroenterology 2nd Department of Internal.
How to avoid a resistance issue with the first generation protease inhibitors ? O. Lada PHD Service d’Hépatologie et INSERM CRB3, AP-HP Hopital Beaujon,
UNITY-1 DCV/ASV/BCB No randomisation Open-label UNITY-1 Study: daclatasvir/asunaprevir/beclabuvir in genotype 1 without cirrhosis  Design W12 ≥ 18 years.
Hepatitis C Nonresponders
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Sofosbuvir + Peginterferon + Ribavirin in Genotype 2 or 3 LONESTAR-2 Phase 2 Treatment Experienced Lawitz E, et.
AASLD 2010 HCV Feedback October 29 - November 2, 2010 Boston, Massachusetts Dr Allister J Grant Consultant Hepatologist Leicester Liver Unit.
> 18 years Chronic HCV infection Genotype 1 Failure (relapse) to 4, 6 or 8 weeks of GZR/EBR + SOF in C-SWIFT Part A Compensated cirrhosis assessed by liver.
Open-label W24 ≥ 18 years Chronic HCV infection All genotypes HCV RNA ≥ 10,000 IU/ml Liver transplantation months earlier Child Pugh ≤ 7 and MELD.
Placebo + PR W24 DCV + PR Placebo + PR Yes Dore GJ. Gastroenterology 2015;148: COMMAND GT2/3 COMMAND GT2/3 Study: daclatasvir + PEG-IFN + RBV for.
 Design Randomisation* 2 : 1 Double blind *Randomisation was stratified on genotype (1a vs 1b) and ILB28 genotype (CC or non-CC) N = 134 N = 257 W24W48.
36 year old HCV+ woman, Risk factor: occasional IVDU 15 years ago First treatment with PEG-IFN/RBV in 2002 –only qualitative PCR available : positive at.
Hepatitis web study H EPATITIS W EB S TUDY H EPATITIS C O NLINE Simeprevir (Olysio) Prepared by: David Spach, MD & H. Nina Kim, MD Last Updated: July 14,
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Elbasvir-Grazoprevir in Treatment-Naïve HCV Genotype 1, 4 or 6 C-EDGE Treatment Naïve (TN) Phase 3 Treatment Naïve.
Stefan Zeuzem, MD Professor of Medicine Chief, Department of Medicine JW Goethe University Hospital Frankfurt, Germany Future Generations: Understanding.
R2. 임형석 / Pf. 김병호. I NTRODUCTION Chronic hepatitis C infection 130~150 million worldwide 7 genotypes genotype 1 predominates(about 70% in USA): most difficult.
Paris, 30 & 31 January 2012 Robert Flisiak Department of Infectious Diseases and Hepatology Medical University of Białystok, Poland Overview of clinical.
Future Trials of Hepatitis C Therapy in the HIV Co-infected
DAA’s in the treatment of HCV: The Beginning of the end or the end of the beginning for HCV?
LEAGUE-1 study: daclatasvir + SMV + RBV for genotype 1
Resistance to Direct Acting Antiviral Therapy
Therapeutic Background & Study Rationale
Daclatasvir + Peg/RBV in Treatment-Naïve Genotype 4 COMMAND-4 Study
Volume 59, Issue 4, Pages (October 2013)
Obiettivi e strategie di un
Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir +/- Ribavirin in HCV Genotype 1 ION-2
LEPTON Study: SOF/VEL + GS-9857 genotype 1 or 3 Phase II
ASPIRE Study: SMV + PEG-IFN + RBV for genotype 1 experienced patients
Telaprevir in Treatment Experienced GT-1 PROVE3
Presentation transcript:

Are (exogenous) interferons really necessary? Peter Ferenci Medical University of Vienna

Treatment of chronic non-A,non-B hepatitis with recombinant human alpha interferon. A preliminary report JH Hoofnagle, KD Mullen, DB Jones, V Rustgi, A Di Bisceglie, M Peters, JG Waggoner, Y Park, and EA Jones Volume 315: December 18, 1986 December 18, 1986 Effect of interferon on experimental vaccinia and herpes-simplex virus infections in rabbits' eyes. CANTELL K, TOMMILA V. Lancet Sep 24;2(7152):682-4

Role of interferon-alfa in treatment of hepatitis?  Mode of action immune-modulatory (dose dependent!) antiviral antiproliferative  IFN-sensitivity IL28B Nullresponse….

100% 0% 1st dose 14–28 Days HCV RNA Maintenance phase Detection limit Time Course of Virological Response to IFN Therapy in Patients With CHC Inhibition of viral replication Immune system elimination of infected cells ? Induction phase Ferenci P 1999

NK cells and response to IFN therapy in patients with CHC Ahlenstiehl et al, Gastroenterology 2011

HCV Life Cycle and DAA Targets Adapted from Manns MP, et al. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2007;6: Receptor binding and endocytosis Fusion and uncoating Transport and release (+) RNA Translation and polyprotein processing RNA replication Virion assembly Membranous web ER lumen LD ER lumen LD NS3/4 protease inhibitors NS5B polymerase inhibitors Nucleoside/nucleotide Nonnucleoside *Role in HCV life cycle not well defined NS5A* inhibitors

INFORM-1 study: proof of concept study, combination of a PI (danoprevir, DNV) with the polymerase inhibitor mericitabine (MCB) 48w1d4d7d14d 500 mg BID MCB 100 mg TID DNV B n=8/ mg BID MCB 200 mg TID DNV D n=8/4 TF (non-null) 1000 mg BID MCB 600 mg BID DNV E n=8/2 TF (null) 1000 mg BID MCB 900 mg BID DNV F n=8/2 Naive 1000 mg BID MCB 900 mg BID DNV G n=8/2 Naive P/R (Peg-IFN + RBV) 100 mg TID DNV 500 mg BID MCB 100 mg TID DNV A n=8/0 Active/placebo 500 mg BID MCB 200 mg TID DNV 1000 mg BID MCB 100 mg TID DNV C n=16/2 TF = IFN-treatment failuresGane EJ et al. Lancet 2010

Median Log 10 HCV RNA Change from Baseline (IU/mL) Days –6 –5 –4 –3 –2 – MCB (mg BID) / DNV (mg) Placebo 500 BID / 100 TID 1000 BID / 100 TID 500 BID / 200 TID 1000 BID / 200 TID 1000 BID / 600 BID (pEVR) 1000 BID / 900 BID (TF - Null) 1000 BID / 900 BID (Naive) Gane EJ et al. Lancet 2010 Median change from baseline by treatment group Cohorts B–G

Naive and Null Responders with a BID Oral Regimen of RG7128 and RG7227 Median Log 10 HCV RNA (IU/mL) Days Limit of Detection TF - Nulls Naives RG mg BID + RG mg BID Gane et al, Lancet <LLOQ<LLOD Nulls Naives Nulls Naives 63

GS Tegobuvir Alone, With RBV, or With PegIFN/RBV in GT1 Tx-Naive Patients –Phase II study of tegobuvir (GS-9190), an NS5B nonnucleoside polymerase inhibitor, and GS-9256, an NS3 protease inhibitor as part of HCV therapy Zeuzem S, et al. AASLD Abstract LB-1. GS mg BID + Tegobuvir 40 mg BID (n = 16) † Wk 48 Wk 4 GS mg BID + Tegobuvir 40 mg BID + RBV* † (n = 15) PR* (n = 16) PR* (n = 15) GS mg BID + Tegobuvir 40 mg BID + PR* (n = 15) PR* (n = 15) Part A Part B (nonrandomized) Treatment-naive patients with GT1 HCV *PegIFN alfa-2a 180 µg/wk; weight-based RBV mg/day. † PegIFN/RBV started early if virologic breakthrough.

GS Tegobuvir Alone, With RBV, or With PegIFN/RBV: Virologic Response Zeuzem S, et al. AASLD Abstract LB-1. HCV RNA ResponseGS Tegobuvir (n = 15) GS Tegobuvir + RBV (n = 13) GS Tegobuvir + PegIFN/RBV (n = 14) Median maximal change from baseline, log 10 IU/mL Achieved nadir ≤ 25 IU/mL, % Day 14 HCV RNA ≤ 25 IU/mL, % Day 28 HCV RNA ≤ 25 IU/mL (RVR), % Tegubovir requires both pegIFN and RBV program terminated due to safety issues

ZENITH: telaprevir (PI) + VX-222 (NNI) ± Peg-IFN/RBV in treatment-naive G1 patients *Based on a 10 day healthy volunteer DDI study; when combined with telaprevir, VX-222 doses of 100 mg and 400 mg provide VX-222 plasma exposures equivalent to 250 mg and 750 mg bid. Nelson D, et al. AASLD Abstract LB-14. Week012 Telaprevir 1125 mg bid VX mg bid* Telaprevir 1125 mg bid VX mg bid* RBV Peg-IFN alfa-2a Telaprevir 1125 mg bid VX mg bid* Telaprevir 1125 mg bid VX mg bid* RBV Peg-IFN alfa-2a D N=30 RBV Peg-IFN alfa-2a RVR2-guided Week 36 A N=18 B N=29 C N=29 DDI = drug-drug interaction; NNI = non-nucleoside inhibitor; Peg-IFN = peginterferon alfa; PI = protease inhibitor; RBV = ribavirin

ZENITH: telaprevir (PI) + VX-222 (NNI) ± Peg-IFN/RBV in treatment-naive G1 patients *Based on a 10 day healthy volunteer DDI study; when combined with telaprevir, VX-222 doses of 100 mg and 400 mg provide VX-222 plasma exposures equivalent to 250 mg and 750 mg bid. Nelson D, et al. AASLD Abstract LB-14. DUAL regimens terminated Week012 Telaprevir 1125 mg bid VX mg bid* Telaprevir 1125 mg bid VX mg bid* RBV Peg-IFN alfa-2a Telaprevir 1125 mg bid VX mg bid* Telaprevir 1125 mg bid VX mg bid* RBV Peg-IFN alfa-2a D N=30 RBV Peg-IFN alfa-2a RVR2-guided Week 36 A N=18 B N=29 C N=29

Telaprevir 1125 mg bid VX mg bid* RBV E/F (E G1b N=23; F G1a N=23) Enrolment complete ZENITH: telaprevir (PI) + VX-222 (NNI) ± Peg-IFN/RBV in treatment-naive G1 patients *Based on a 10 day healthy volunteer DDI study; when combined with telaprevir, VX-222 doses of 100 mg and 400 mg provide VX-222 plasma exposures equivalent to 250 mg and 750 mg bid. Nelson D, et al. AASLD Abstract LB-14. DUAL regimens terminated Week012 Telaprevir 1125 mg bid VX mg bid* Telaprevir 1125 mg bid VX mg bid* RBV Peg-IFN alfa-2a Telaprevir 1125 mg bid VX mg bid* Telaprevir 1125 mg bid VX mg bid* RBV Peg-IFN alfa-2a D N=30 RBV Peg-IFN alfa-2a RVR2-guided Week 36 A N=18 B N=29 C N=29

ZENITH: telaprevir + VX-222 ± Peg-IFN/RBV SVR12 data SVR12, % –No patient in either QUAD arm experienced viral breakthrough. However, 2 patients relapsed in Arm C (7%) and 2 patients (including 1 patient who received only 1 week of treatment) in Arm D (7%) Nelson D, et al. AASLD Abstract LB-14.

MATTERHORN: study design weeks F/U Quad: MCB 1000mg + DNVr 100/100mg + P/R F/U Cohort B: Null Responders A2 A3 IFN free: MCB 1000mg + DNVr 100/100mg + R A1 Triple: DNVr 100/100mg + P/R IFN free: MCB 1000mg + DNVr 100/100mg + R Quad: MCB 1000mg + DNVr 100/100mg + P/R B1 B2 F/U Cohort A: Partial Responders Phase 2, randomized within cohort, open-label, parallel study of 2 cohorts N= 420 (70 pts/arm) Quad: MCB 1000mg + DNVr 100/100mg + P/R F/U B P/R Stratification by: »IL28B (CC, CT, TT) »G1a/1b

MATTERHORN: study design weeks F/U Quad: MCB 1000mg + DNVr 100/100mg + P/R F/U Cohort B: Null Responders A2 A3 IFN free: MCB 1000mg + DNVr 100/100mg + R A1 Triple: DNVr 100/100mg + P/R IFN free: MCB 1000mg + DNVr 100/100mg + R Quad: MCB 1000mg + DNVr 100/100mg + P/R B1 B2 F/U Cohort A: Partial Responders Phase 2, randomized within cohort, open-label, parallel study of 2 cohorts N= 420 (70 pts/arm) Quad: MCB 1000mg + DNVr 100/100mg + P/R F/U B P/R Stratification by: »IL28B (CC, CT, TT) »G1a/1b GT1a

Zeuzem S, et al. AASLD Abstract LB-15 Phase 2b SOUND-C2: BI (PI) + BI (NNI) ± RBV in treatment naive G1 patients –Randomization stratified by HCV subtype (G1a vs G1b) and IL28B genotype (rs CC vs non-CC) –52% of patients were male, 98% White, 38% G1a, 85% had baseline HCV RNA ≥800,000 IU/mL, 10% had compensated cirrhosis, and 25% had IL28B genotype CC Randomization Naive, CHC, G1 N=362 Weeks BI mg tid BI mg qd RBV BI mg tid BI mg qd RBV Follow-up BI mg tid BI mg qd Follow-up BI mg bid BI mg qd RBV Follow-up BI mg tid BI mg qd RBV Follow-up

SOUND-C2: preliminary SVR in treatment Arm A (16 week treatment duration, BI BI RBV in treatment naive G1 patients) (n=81) Proportion of patients (%) Zeuzem S, et al. AASLD Abstract LB-15

BMS BMS Alone or With PegIFN/RBV in GT1 Null Responders Lok A, et al. NEJM Prior null responders with GT1 HCV (N = 21) BMS mg QD + BMS mg BID (n = 11) Wk 72 Wk 24 Follow-up BMS mg QD + BMS mg BID + PR* (n = 10)  Open-label, randomized, placebo-controlled phase IIa trial  BMS : NS5A polymerase inhibitor Follow-up *PegIFN alfa-2a 180 µg/wk; weight-based RBV mg/day.

HCV RNA Levels in Groups A and B. Lok AS et al. N Engl J Med 2012;366:

BMS /BMS in Japanese G1b null responders: virological response –1 subject discontinued at Week 2; HCV RNA was undetectable after 24 weeks’ follow-up –No apparent association between detection of baseline RAVs and virological outcome LLOQ = lower limit of quantification (15 IU/mL); RAV = resistance-associated variants Patients (%) RVRcEVREOTRSVR12SVR24 Chayama K, et al. Hepatology 2011; DOI: /hep

PSI-7977 ELECTRON: PSI RBV study design for treatment-naive G2/3 –Treatment-naive, non-cirrhotic, age ≥18 years –HCV RNA >50,000 IU/mL –Allowed concurrent methadone use –Stratified by HCV genotype and IL28B genotype –Randomized 1:1:1:1 into IFN sparing or IFN-free Weeks PSI RBV PSI RBV + Peg-IFN PSI RBV + Peg-IFN PSI RBV SVR12 N=10 Gane EJ, et al. AASLD Abstract 34

PSI-7977 ELECTRON: IFN-free PSI RBV achieves 100% SVR12 Gane EJ, et al. AASLD Abstract 34 PSI-7977 RBV 12 weeks PEG PSI-7977 RBV 8 weeks PEG PSI-7977 RBV 4 weeks PEG PSI-7977 RBV NO PEG Time, week N%<LODN N N 29/11827/8888/9898/ / /101009/910010/ / /101009/910010/ / / / /10100

26 NS5A NS5B NS2 NS3 NS4B CYCLOPHILIN A IS ESSENTIAL FOR HCV REPLICATION AND IS INHIBITED BY ALISPORIVIR Gallay PA. Clin Liver Dis 2009;13:403–417 ALISPORIVIR Inhibition of replication Replication of new viral RNA NS5A NS5B NS2 NS3 NS4B CypA CypA

Phase 2b VITAL-1: alisporivir IFN-free therapy in G2/3 treatment-naive patients Pawlotsky JM, et al. AASLD Abstract LB-11 Viral response defined by HCV RNA < 25 IU/mL; sc = subcutaneous injection Randomization Screening ALV1000 ALV600R ALV800R ALV-P PR Loading 1 week RVRHCVEVREOTRSVR12SVR24RNA BL Week ALV 600 mg bid + RBV 400 mg bid ALV 600 mg bid + RBV 400 mg bid ALV 600 mg bid + Peg-IFN sc weekly RBV 400 mg bid + Peg-IFN 180 mg sc weekly ALV 1000 mg qd ALV 600 mg qd + RBV 400 mg bid ALV 800 mg qd + RBV 400 mg bid ALV 600 mg qd + Peg-IFN 180 mg sc weekly ≥25 IU/mL ALV 600 mg qd+ RBV 400 mg bid + Peg-IFN sc weekly ALV 600 mg qd+ RBV 400 mg bid + Peg-IFN sc weekly ALV 600 mg qd+ RBV 400 mg bid + Peg-IFN sc weekly ALV 600 mg qd+ RBV 400 mg bid + Peg-IFN sc weekly

Phase 2b VITAL-1: ALV IFN-free treatment maintains HCV RNA negative response to week 12 Pawlotsky JM, et al. AASLD Abstract LB-11 Viral response by <LOQ; Analysis for patients who had Week 12 HCV RNA assessment RCR patients On IFN-free treatment IFN-free week 12 results: ALV %; ALV800R 37%; ALV600R 41% Non-RCR patients with Add-on IFN from week 6 Add-on IFN to non-RVR patients shows rapid response Week Proportion of patients (%) ALV 1000 mg (n=55) ALV 600 mg + RBV (n=49) ALV 800 mg + RBV (n=51) ALV 1000 mg (n=22) ALV 600 mg + RBV (n=30) ALV 800 mg + RBV (n=37) Week Proportion of patients (%) % 100% 92%

Summary IFN-free therapy –All combinations in early development –SVR close to 100% in G1b –SVR 100% Genotype 2/3 patients –RBV required –Shortening of treatment –role of IL28B Polymorphisms?

–If no new safety signals are detected IFN-free therapy of hepatitis C may became reality in 2015 Outlook IFN-free therapy

–If no new safety signals are detected IFN-free therapy of hepatitis C may became reality in 2015 Outlook IFN-free therapy and we have reached the “holy grail” of hepatology

NK cells in HCV infection and response to IFN therapy in patients with CHC

NK cells and response to IFN therapy in patients with CHC Ahlenstiehl et al, Gastroenterology 2011

cellular response to HCV infection HCV virus activated kinase IRF-3 IRF-7 IFN production IFN receptor IFN responding genes antiviral proteins