11 One vs Three Years of Adjuvant Imatinib for Operable Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor A Randomized Trial Joensuu H, Eriksson M, Sundby Hall K, et al.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (bev) vs FOLFIRI plus bev
Advertisements

First Efficacy Results of a Randomized, Open- Label, Phase III Study of Adjuvant Doxorubicin Plus Cyclophosphamide, Followed by Docetaxel with or without.
GIST Research at Fox Chase Cancer Center Margaret von Mehren, MD.
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor GIST New Therapeutic Approaches Prof. Mohamed Abdulla A. Professor of Clinical Oncology Kasr El-Aini School of Medicine.
Comparison of INSTI vs PI  FLAMINGO  GS  ACTG A5257.
Major sites of GIST metastases:
Whom to treat and how long to treat after resection of GIST Professor John R Zalcberg Chief Medical Officer & Director, Division of Cancer Medicine Peter.
CO-I KNTM/K i CzS M. Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center-Institute of Oncology Medical University of Warsaw; Warsaw, POLAND Medical University of Gdansk;
Joint Hospital Surgical Grand Round (25 Jan 2014) Lok Hon Ting (Prince of Wales Hospital)
The Effect of Zoledronic Acid (ZOL) on Aromatase Inhibitor-Associated Bone Loss in Postmenopausal Women with Early Breast Cancer Receiving Adjuvant Letrozole:
Copyright © 2011 Research To Practice. All rights reserved. Interest in Topics Related to the Treatment of Patients with CML (Percent Responding 9 or 10)
HERA: KEY DESIGN ELEMENTS, RESULTS AND FUTURE PLANS NSABP 17 SEPTEMBER 2005 Brian Leyland-Jones Minda De Gunzberg Professor of Oncology, McGill University,
Phase III study of first-line XELOX plus bevacizumab (BEV) for 6 cycles followed by XELOX plus BEV or single agent (s/a) BEV as maintenance therapy in.
Challenging Cases in Cancer: Integration of Findings from ASCO 2007 Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Charles D. Blanke, MD, FACP Associate Professor of.
Intergroup trial CALGB 80101
ESMO/ECCO Presidential Session III
Capecitabine versus Bolus 5-FU/Leucovorin as Adjuvant Therapy for Colon Cancer: X-ACT Trial Results James Cassidy, MD Colorectal Cancer Update Think Tank.
Best first ? The ATAC completed treatment analysis Professor Jack Cuzick Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, London, UK.
Predicting toxicity for patients with advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) treated with imatinib mesylate : an EORTC/ISG/AGITG randomized trial.
NHL13: A Multicenter, Randomized Phase III Study of Rituximab as Maintenance Treatment versus Observation Alone in Patients with Aggressive B ‐ Cell Lymphoma.
Axel Grothey, MD Professor of Oncology Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minnesota Strategies to Improve Patient Outcomes in Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction.
Relation of tumor pathologic and molecular features to outcome after surgical resection of localized primary gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST): Results.
T Andre, E Quinaux, C Louvet, E Gamelin, O Bouche, E Achille, P Piedbois, N Tubiana-Mathieu, M Buyse and A de Gramont. Updated results at 6 year of the.
Two Year Estimate of Overall Survival in COMBI-v, a Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Combination of Dabrafenib and Trametinib With Vemurafenib.
Twelve vs. 36 months of adjuvant imatinib as treatment of operable GIST with a high risk of recurrence: Final results of a randomized trial (SSGXVIII/AIO)
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077.
An Ongoing Phase 3 Study of Bosutinib (SKI-606) versus Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Gambacorti-Passerini.
Lenalidomide Is Safe and Active in Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM) 1 Updated Results from a Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Phase 1b/2 Study.
Extended adjuvant treatment with anastrozole: results from the ABCSG Trial 6a R Jakesz, H Samonigg, R Greil, M Gnant, M Schmid, W Kwasny, E Kubista, B.
Final Efficacy Results from OAM4558g, a Randomized Phase II Study Evaluating MetMAb or Placebo in Combination with Erlotinib in Advanced NSCLC Spigel DR.
AVADO TRIAL David Miles Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Middlesex, United Kingdom A randomized, double-blind study of bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel.
Cetuximab plus FOLFIRI in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: the influence of KRAS and BRAF biomarkers on outcome: updated data from the CRYSTAL.
‘Arimidex’, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination (ATAC) trial: Completed Treatment Analysis.
Switching to Nilotinib in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase with Suboptimal Cytogenetic Response on Imatinib: Results from the LASOR.
CV-1 Trial 709 The ISEL Study (IRESSA ® Survival Evaluation in Lung Cancer) Summary of Data as of December 16, 2004 Kevin Carroll, MSc Summary of Data.
until tumour progression until tumour progression
Low Dose Decitabine Versus Best Supportive Care in Elderly Patients with Intermediate or High Risk MDS Not Eligible for Intensive Chemotherapy: Final Results.
1 A Randomized, Multi-Center Phase III Trial of Irinotecan in Combination with Three Different Methods of Administration of Fluoropyrimidine with Celecoxib.
HERA TRIAL: 2 Years versus 1 Year of Trastuzumab After Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Women with HER2-Positive Early Breast Cancer at 8 Years of Median Follow-Up.
Chemoimmunotherapy with Fludarabine (F), Cyclophosphamide (C), and Rituximab (R) (FCR) versus Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR) in Previously Untreated and.
Phase II Multicenter Study of Single-Agent Lenalidomide in Subjects with Mantle Cell Lymphoma Who Relapsed or Progressed After or Were Refractory to Bortezomib:
Mok TS, Wu SL, Thongprasert S, et al. Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2009;361: Gefitinib Superior.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage*: The 2015 Annual Meeting of the CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, December 8-12, 2015 San Antonio, Texas.
Javier Martin-Broto, Silvia Calabuig, Jordi Rubió, Antonio Gutierrez, José Duran, Florencia García, Javier Martinez Trufero, Joan Maurel, Xavier García.
Romidepsin in Association with CHOP in Patients with Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma: Final Results of the Phase Ib/II Ro-CHOP Study Dupuis J et al. Proc ASH.
POPLAR: Atezolizumab Improved Survival vs Docetaxel in Patients With Advanced NSCLC and Increasing Levels of PD-L1 Expression CCO Independent Conference.
Adjuvant autologous renal tumour cell vaccine and risk of tumour progression in patients with renal- cell carcinoma after radical nephrectomy: phase III,
Pomalidomide + Low-Dose Dexamethasone (POM + LoDex) vs High-Dose Dexamethasone (HiDex) in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM): MM-003 Analysis.
A cura di Filippo de Marinis
CCO Independent Conference Highlights
CCO Independent Conference Highlights
Alessandra Gennari, MD PhD
LUX-Lung 3 clinical trial
Risk Stratification (Miettinen) Mutational status results (N=50)
Rosell R et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 7503.
CREATE-X: Adjuvant Capecitabine in HER2-Negative Breast Cancer
SIRveNIB: Randomized Phase III Trial of Selective Internal Radiation Therapy vs Sorafenib in Locally Advanced HCC CCO Independent Conference Highlights*
ESPAC-4: Adjuvant Gemcitabine/ Capecitabine Improves 5-Yr Survival vs Gemcitabine Alone in Resected Pancreatic Ductal Carcinoma CCO Independent Conference.
KEYNOTE-012: Durable Efficacy With Pembrolizumab in PD-L1–Positive Gastric Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting*
Trifluridine/Tipiracil (TAS-102) Improves Survival in Patients With Metastatic CRC and Mild Renal/Hepatic Impairment: Subgroup Analysis of RECOURSE CCO.
Harrison CN et al. Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 59.
Dimopoulos MA et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract LBA-6.
Joensuu H et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract LBA1.
until tumour progression until tumour progression
Fenaux P et al. Lancet Oncol 2009;10(3):
First efficacy and safety results from XELOX-1/NO16966, a randomised 2x2 factorial phase III trial of XELOX vs FOLFOX4 + bevacizumab or placebo in first-line.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Intervista a Filippo de Marinis
LV5FU2-cisplatin followed by gemcitabine or the reverse sequence in metastatic pancreatic cancer: Preliminary results of a randomized phase III trial (FFCD.
Adjuvant chemotherapy after potentially curative resection of metastases from colorectal cancer. A meta-analysis of two randomized trials E Mitry, A Fields,
Presentation transcript:

11 One vs Three Years of Adjuvant Imatinib for Operable Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor A Randomized Trial Joensuu H, Eriksson M, Sundby Hall K, et al. JAMA. 2012;307(12):1265–1272

2 Imatinib for 12 months An open-label Phase III study Imatinib for 36 months Follow-up Random Assignment 1:1 Stratification: 1) R0 resection, no tumor rupture 2) R1 resection or tumor rupture Joensuu H et al. JAMA 2012;307(12):1265–1272 N=400 SSGXVIII/AIO: Design

3 SSGXVIII/AIO: Methods HPF, high-power field of the microscope. 1.Joensuu H et al. JAMA 2012;307(12):1265– Fletcher CD et al. Hum Pathol 2002;33:459–465 3.Joensuu H. Hum Pathol 2008;39:1411−1419. Endpoints 1 Primary RFS Secondary Treatment safety OS GIST-specific survival Treatment 1 Imatinib 400 mg/d (12 vs 36 months) Key inclusion criteria 1 Histologically confirmed GIST, KIT-positive High risk of recurrence according to the modified consensus criteria 2,3  Tumor size >10 cm or  Tumor mitosis count >10/50 HPF or  Size >5 cm and mitosis count >5/50 HPF or  Tumor rupture before surgery or at surgery

4 SSGXVIII/AIO: Patient Disposition *Three patients who withdrew consent were excluded Joensuu H et al. JAMA 2012;307(12):1265–1272 Category12 Months n (%) 36 Months n (%) Randomized (Feb 2004 to Sep 2008)200 Included in ITT population* − No GIST at pathology review5 (3)10 (5) − GIST metastases at study entry13 (7)11 (6) Included in efficacy population Included in safety population (SP) Discontinued assigned treatment (SP)29 (15)63 (32) − GIST recurred during treatment4 (2)12 (6) − Adverse event15 (8)27 (14) − Patient preference0 (0)11 (6) − Tumor histology not GIST6 (3) − Other reason4 (2)7 (4)

5 SSGXVIII/AIO: Baseline Characteristics (ITT Population) *Per 50 high power fields **Available for 366 (92%) out of the 397 tumors Joensuu H et al. JAMA 2012;307(12):1265–1272 Characteristic 12-Month (n=199) 36-Month (n=198) Median age (range), years 62 (23–84) 60 (22–81) Male, %52 49 ECOG performance status 0, %85 86 Gastric primary tumor, %49 53 Median tumor size (range), cm 9 (2–35) 10 (2–40) Median mitosis count (central)*10 (0−250) 8 (0−165) Tumor rupture, %18 22 GIST gene mutation site, %** – KIT exon – KIT exon – PDGFRA exon 1221 – PDGFRA exon – PDGFRA exon 18 mutation D842V97 – Wild type10 7

6 SSGXVIII/AIO: Baseline Characteristics (ITT Population) Characteristic 12-Month (n=199) 36-Month (n=198) Modified Consensus Classification Risk Group. % – High8991 – Intermediate84 – Low risk12 – Very low risk00 – Not available23 Joensuu H et al. JAMA 2012;307(12):1265–1272

7 SSGXVIII/AIO: RFS Events and Deaths (ITT Population) Event12-Month (n=199) No. (%) 36-Month (n=198) No. (%) RFS events (recurrences or deaths) 84 (42) 50 (25) Deaths 25 (13)12 (6) – From GIST14 (7) 7 (4) – Another cause11 (6) 5 (3) Median follow-up time: 54 months (from the date of randomization to the date of data cut-off, Dec 31, 2010) Joensuu H et al. JAMA 2012;307(12):1265–1272

8 SSGXVIII/AIO: Recurrence-Free Survival (ITT Population) Joensuu H et al. JAMA 2012;307(12):1265– year survival : 36 months, 86.6% 12 months, 60.1% 5-year survival : 36 months, 65.6% 12 months, 47.9% Percentage Time Since Randomisation, y 36 Months of imatinib Months of imatinib HR, 0.46 (95% CI, ) Log-rank P<.001 No. of patients 36 Months of imatinib 12 Months of imatinib

9 Excluded: consent withdrawn, no GIST at pathology review, or overt metastases at study entry SSGXVIII/AIO: RFS in Efficacy Population 3-year survival : 36 months, 88.1% 12 months, 62.1% 5-year survival : 36 months, 67.4% 12 months, 50.3% Joensuu H et al. JAMA 2012;307(12):1265–1272 HR, 0.46 (95% CI, ) Log-rank P< Months of imatinib 12 Months of imatinib Percentage Time Since Randomisation, y 36 Months of imatinib Months of imatinib No. of patients

10 Joensuu H et al. JAMA 2012;307(12):1265–1272 No. of PatientsNo. of EventsHR 12-mo Group 36-mo Group 12-mo Group 36-mo Group (95% CI) Age, y ≤ ( ) > ( ) Tumor site Stomach ( ) Other ( ) Tumor size, cm ≤ ( ) > ( ) Mitotic count/50 HPF Local ≤ ( ) > ( ) Central ≤ ( ) > ( ) Tumor rupture No ( ) Yes ( ) Completeness of surgery R ( ) R ( ) Tumor mutation site KIT exon ( ) KIT exon ( ) Wild type ( ) Other ( ) P Value < < < < < < SSGXVIII/AIO: RFS in Subgroups Favors 36 mo of Imatinib Favors 12 mo of Imatinib HR (95% CI)

11 Joensuu H et al. JAMA 2012;307(12):1265– year survival : 36 months, 96.3% 12 months, 94.0% 5-year survival : 36 months, 92.0% 12 months, 81.7% HR, 0.45 (95% CI, ) Log-rank P =.02 Percentage Time Since Randomisation, y 36 Months of imatinib 12 Months of imatinib SSGXVIII/AIO: Overall Survival (ITT Population) 36 Months of imatinib Months of imatinib No. of patients

12 SSGXVIII/AIO: Treatment Safety  Cardiac AEs and second malignancies were low and comparable in both treatment arms Joensuu H et al. JAMA 2012;307(12):1265–1272 No. (%) All GradesGrade 3 or 4 Events 12-mo Group (n = 194) 36-mo Group (n = 198) P Value a 12-mo Group (n = 194) 36-mo Group (n = 198) P Value a Any event 192 (99.0) 198 (100.0) (20.1) 65 (32.8).006 Hematological Anemia Leukopenia 140 (72.2) 67 (34.5) 159 (80.3) 93 (47.0) (0.5) 4 (2.1) 1 (0.5) 6 (3.0) > Nonhematological Periorbital edema Fatigue Nausea Diarrhea Muscle cramps Leg edema 115 (59.3) 94 (48.5) 87 (44.8) 85 (43.8) 60 (30.9) 64 (33.0) 147 (74.2) 96 (48.5) 101 (51.0) 107 (54.0) 97 (49.0) 81 (40.9).002 > < (0.5) 2 (1.0) 3 (1.5) 1 (0.5) 2 (1.0) 1 (0.5) 4 (2.0) 2 (1.0) > >.99 Biochemical Elevated blood lactate dehydrogenase Elevated serum creatinine 84 (43.3) 59 (30.4) 119 (60.1) 88 (44.4) a Fisher exact test

13 SSGXVIII/AIO: Conclusions Compared with 1 year of treatment, 3 years of adjuvant imatinib significantly improves RFS and OS for patients with GIST who are at a high risk of recurrence after surgery Adjuvant imatinib is relatively well tolerated; severe adverse events are infrequent This trial has established 3 years of 400 mg imatinib as the new standard of care for adjuvant treatment of patients with high-risk GIST  Both the US Food and Drug Administration and European commission approved label updates that include 3-year duration for adjuvant treatment of KIT+ GIST patients  The National Comprehensive Cancer Network updated recommendations to include 3 years of adjuvant imatinib therapy as the new standard of care for KIT+ GIST patients Joensuu H et al. JAMA 2012;307(12):1265–1272