K. McDonald Target Studies Meeting June 29, 2010 1 Materials for the Target System Internal Shield K. McDonald Princeton U. (June 27, 2010) Iron Plug Proton.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

WP2: Targets Proposed Outline Work Programme Chris Densham.

Advertisements

Fluidised Powder Rig Development Work by: Ottone Caretta, Peter Loveridge and Chris Denham (RAL) Tom Davies (Exeter University) Richard Woods (Gericke.

Ottone Caretta & Chris Densham Technology Business Unit Rutherford Appleton Laboratory A new idea for NuFact targets and beam dumps BENE Nov 06 – Frascati,

Mercury Chamber Update V. Graves NF-IDS Meeting October 4, 2011.

Fluidised powder target research A potential target technology for both a Superbeam and a neutrino factory CJ Densham, O Caretta, P Loveridge STFC Rutherford.

K. McDonald LEMC Workshop 22 Apr 2008 From MERIT to a Muon Collider (Front End) K.T. McDonald Princeton U. Low Emittance Muon Collider Workshop Fermilab,

Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Neutrino Factory Mercury Containment Concepts V.B. Graves 2 nd Oxford-Princeton High- Powered Target.

Neutrino Factory Target Cryostat Review Van Graves Cale Caldwell IDS-NF Phone Meeting August 10, 2010.

Neutrino Factory Mercury Flow Loop V. Graves C. Caldwell IDS-NF Videoconference March 9, 2010.

Particle Production of a Carbon/Mercury Target System for the Intensity Frontier X. Ding, UCLA H.G. Kirk, BNL K.T. McDonald, Princeton Univ MAP Spring.

Target & Capture for PRISM Koji Yoshimura On behalf of PRISM Target Group Institute of Particle and Nuclear Science High Energy Accelerator Research Organization.

1Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy MERIT Videoconference 11 Mar 2009 Neutrino Factory Cryostat 1 Concept V.B. Graves MERIT Videoconference.

Operated by Brookhaven Science Associates for the U.S. Department of Energy A Pion Production and Capture System for a 4 MW Target Station X. Ding, D.

1Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy NF/IDS Hg Vessel Layout 30 Jun 09 Cryostat 2 Front Drain Mercury Vessel Concept Matthew F. Glisson.

Pion capture and transport system for PRISM M. Yoshida Osaka Univ. 2005/8/28 NuFACT06 at UCI.

MCTF Harold G. Kirk MUTAC 5-Year Plan Review 22 August Targetry R&D in the 5-Year Plan Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Lab.

Primary Target Systems for a Muon Collider / Neutrino Factory. What has the experimental effort taught us thus far. N. Simos, H. Kirk, S. Kahn, P. Thieberger,

SHIELDING STUDIES FOR THE MUON COLLIDER TARGET NICHOLAS SOUCHLAS BNL Nov 30, 2010 ‏ 1.

KT McDonald Muon Collider 2011 June 28, The Target System Baseline K. McDonald Princeton U. (June 28, 2011) Muon Collider 2011 Telluride, CO More.

Above: Energy deposition in the superconducting magnet and the tungsten-carbide shield inside them. Approximately 2.4 MW must be dissipated in the shield.

Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Target System Update IDS-NF Plenary Meeting Arlington, VA October 18, 2011.

KT McDonald Target Studies Meeting June 14, Mechanical Issues for the Target System K. McDonald Princeton U. (June 14, 2011) Target Studies Meeting.

K. McDonald EURO Meeting 26 Mar 2009 High-PowerTargets for Neutrino Beams and Muon Colliders K.T. McDonald Princeton U. EURO Meeting CERN, March 26, 2009.

Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Target Baseline IDS-NF Plenary CERN March 23-24, 2009.

 Stephen Brooks / UKNF meeting, Warwick, April 2008 Pion Production from Water-Cooled Targets.

1Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy NMFCC Friday Meeting 10 Apr 2009 Neutrino Factory Nozzle Layouts V.B. Graves NFMCC Friday Meeting.

IDS-NF Target Studies H. Kirk (BNL) July 8, 2009.

1 Comparison of Power Depositions X. Ding, D. B. Cline, UCLA H. Kirk, J. S. Berg, BNL Collaboration Meeting July 2, 2010.

Solid Target Studies in the UK Solid Target Studies in the UK Rob Edgecock On behalf of: J.Back, E.Bayham, R.Bennett, S.Brooks R.Brownsword, O.Caretta,

K. McDonald Muon Collaboration Meeting 19 Mar 2008 Future Target System R&D Analysis (and simulation) of MERIT data is ongoing, but the success of the.

Above: Power deposition in the superconducting magnets and the tungsten-carbide + water shield inside them, according to a FLUKA simulation Approximately.

Above: On-axis field profiles of resistive, superconducting and all magnets, and bore-tube radius r = 7.5 (B/20T) −½ cm. Above: Hoop strain ε θ in resistive.

1Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy NF Splash Mitigation 12 July 2011 Neutrino Factory Mercury Pool Splash Mitigation V.B. Graves.

Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Review of NFMCC Studies 1 and 2: Target Support Facilities V.B. Graves Meeting on High Power Targets.

Mercury Chamber Considerations V. Graves IDS-NF Target Studies July 2011.

MuTAC Review - March Solid Target Studies N. Simos Brookhaven National Laboratory.

Solid Target Options NuFACT’00 S. Childress Solid Target Options The choice of a primary beam target for the neutrino factory, with beam power of

The Front End MAP Review Fermi National Accelerator Lab August 24-26, 2010 Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory.

Front End Technologies Harold Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory February 19, 2014.

IDS-NF Mercury System Overview Van Graves IDS-NF 5 th Plenary Meeting April 9, 2010.

Target and Absorbers L2 Manager: K McDonald, Princeton U March xx, 2013 Presenter’s Name | DOE Mini-Review of MAP (FNAL, March 4-6, 2013)1 Mission Target:

Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory A MW Class Target System for Muon Beam Production AAC 2014 San Jose, Ca July 14-18, 2014.

1Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy PASI_2012_Flowing_Target_Challenges Challenges for Flowing Targets Bernie Riemer (ORNL) (Jan.

A powder jet target for a Neutrino Factory Ottone Caretta, Chris Densham (RAL), Tom Davies (Exeter University), Richard Woods (Gericke Ltd)

Proton Accelerators for Science and Innovation Workshop at Fermilab

Target R&D Kirk T McDonald Princeton University Feb. 19, 2014 February 19, 2014 KT McDonald | DOE Review of MAP (FNAL, February 19-20, 2014)1 Scope of.

KT McDonald MAP Spring Meeting May 30, Target System Concept for a Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory K.T. McDonald Princeton University (May 28, 2014)

Next generation of ν beams Challenges Ahead I. Efthymiopoulos - CERN LAGUNA Workshp Aussois, France, September 8,2010 what it takes to design and construct.

Initiatives in the Target Sector J. R. J. Bennett CCLRC, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon. OX11 0QX, UK.

Target & Capture for PRISM Koji Yoshimura Institute of Particle and Nuclear Science High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK)

KT McDonald MAP Winter Meeting (SLAC) December 5, Solid Target Options for an Intense Muon Source K. McDonald Princeton U. (December 5, 2014) MAP.

Review of Recent IDS120 Target Concepts Van Graves October 31, 2013.

KT McDonald MAP Tech Board Meeting Oct 20, The MAP Targetry Program in FY11 and FY12 K. McDonald Princeton U. (Oct 20, 2011) MAP Technical Board.

K. McDonald NFMCC Collaboration Meeting Jan 14, The Capture Solenoid as an Emittance-Reducing Element K. McDonald Princeton U. (Jan. 14, 2010)

Solid Targets for Neutron Spallation Sources Eric Pitcher Los Alamos National Laboratory Presented to: AHIPA Workshop October 20, 2009.

K. McDonald MAP Technical Board Meeting Nov 1, FY11 Target System Budget Proposal K. McDonald Princeton U. (November 1, 2010)

Carbon Target Design and Optimization for an Intense Muon Source X. Ding, UCLA H.G. Kirk, BNL K.T. McDonald, Princeton Univ MAP Winter Collaboration.

Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory The E951 Targetry Program Targetry Meeting CERN September 19, 2003.

Neutrino Factory Target Vessel Concept Update V. Graves Target Studies EVO June 12, 2012.

BENE/EURISOL-DS Joint Meeting, CERN, SwitzerlandFebruary 22, Progress in the Liquid Mercury Multi-MW Target Design Studies Y. Kadi On behalf of.

Neutrino Factory Target Cryostat Review (Update Aug 12) Van Graves Cale Caldwell IDS-NF Phone Meeting August 10, 2010.

Ids120h_side. ids120h_top ids120h_iso ids120h_end.

Target On axis field [scale /20 T] Target Magnets Decay-Channel Triplets Taper magnets.

Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Muon Production and Capture for a Neutrino Factory European Strategy for Future Neutrino Physics CERN October.

BNL solenoid capture workshop: magnet challenges are not trivial Summarized by Tengming Shen

KT McDonald MAP Spring Meeting May 30, Target System Concept for a Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory K.T. McDonald Princeton University (May 28, 2014)

ENERGY FLOW AND DEPOSITION IN A 4-MW MUON-COLLIDER TARGET SYSTEM

Tungsten Powder Test at HiRadMat Scientific Motivation

Neutrino Factory Mercury Catcher Concept

Outline: Why now ? What ? How ?

Presentation transcript:

K. McDonald Target Studies Meeting June 29, Materials for the Target System Internal Shield K. McDonald Princeton U. (June 27, 2010) Iron Plug Proton Beam Nozzle Tube SC-1 SC-2 SC-3 SC-4 SC-5 Exit Beam Window Mercury Pool Water-cooled Tungsten Shield Mercury Jet Resistive Magnets Neutrino Factory Study 2 Target Concept Splash Mitigator

K. McDonald Target Studies Meeting June 29, General Issues Baseline beam power on target is 4 MW. Where is this power dissipated?  15% in the (high-Z) target.  75% in the internal shield of the target system (including dump and Cu magnet).  10% in the front end (downstream of the target system exit beam window). Should some of the “front-end” magnets also have internal shields? Issues: Heating/quenching of the superconducting magnets. Radiation damage to/failure of the superconducting magnets Activation of materials (which must eventually be disposed of) Failure modes of the target system in which radioactive materials might be released. Design principle regarding activation: ALARA = “As low as reasonably achievable”. But, what is “reasonable”? Best to use low-Z materials. Thickness of a low-Z shield  6-10 times that that of high-Z.  (?) 10-fold higher cost of target system if use low-Z (graphite/water) shield. If make target low-Z, but use high-Z shield, reduce activation by only  10%. Baseline remains high-Z target and high-Z shield. The internal shield must be cooled by fluid flow: Water or (?) mercury or (?) Pb/Bi. The coolant should enter and exit the upstream end of the target system.

K. McDonald Target Studies Meeting June 29, Candidate Shield Materials The shield operates primarily via dE/dx loss of traversing charged particles. High-energy neutrons and K long are little shielded. Figure of merit is MeV/cm = density  MeV/(g/cm 2 ). For shields based on  1-mm-diameter spheres + liquid, assume liquid is 40% by volume. Random sphere packing: Tungsten + water is not so good, tantalum is OK: I found one paper that says tungsten carbide is fairly good in water: Tungsten and tungsten carbide spheres are actually composites, with lower than maximal density for commercial grade. Tantulum spheres are available at full density. Radiation damage to the compound WC may be an issue.  Tantalum may be the best high-Z material.

K. McDonald Target Studies Meeting June 29, Shield Material Comparision MaterialDensity (g/cm 3 ) dE/Dx (min I) (MeV/(g/cm 2 ) Figure of Merit Z eff LH Graphite Water Graphite/water Mercury Pb/Bi eutectic Ta spheres Ta/water Ta/Pb/Bi Ta/mercury W spheres16(-18?) W/water W/Pb/Bi W/mercury WC spheres WC/water WC/mercury WC/Pb/Bi Comments: Comparison assumes the density  dE/dx is the relevant figure of merit. Ta/mercury or Ta/Pb/Bi is best. Pure mercury shield is very favorable. Pure lead has properties similar to Pb/Bi Pb liquid above 328  C. Pb/Bi liquid above 128  C. Ta/water still viable (equivalent to pure Pb/Bi). Graphite/water shield must be very thick. Z eff for use in Geant/MARS.

K. McDonald Target Studies Meeting June 29, Open Issues Shield with high-Z material and liquid coolant is required. Is a liquid-metal coolant acceptable? Pb, Pb/Bi, Hg? If liquid-metal coolant not acceptable, probably must use low-Z solid target (and longer high- field solenoid). If liquid-metal coolant is acceptable, then probably favorable to use liquid-metal target/beam dump. For now, I consider the baseline to be liquid-metal target, beam dump and shield coolant. Should the shield be pure liquid metal, or, say, Ta/liquid metal? I believe that both of these options should be explored. Option for water-cooled shield can be considered without (I think) major extra effort. Solid-target option could be considered as part of water-cooled shield option. Need greater effort on mechanical design of shield/beam dump (and magnets, iron plug,...) Need spec as to maximum allowable head load per meter in superconducting magnet from secondary particles. Need coordinated effort on coolant flow (flow path, stagnant regions, required pressure…) Opportunity exists for collaboration with Peles group at RPI, which studies heat transfer in microchannels: If water cooling, advantageous to use boiling (2-phase) flow; can this be controlled in our environment?