Information, choices & professional judgement: what’s right, wrong and can be done with decision making in the health professions. Dr Carl Thompson, Department.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Depression in adults with a chronic physical health problem
Advertisements

Evaluating health informatics projects Reasons for and problems of evaluation Objective model Subjective model.
Dr Carl Thompson, University of York Lecture 1 Recognising and capturing clinical uncertainty.
Health Literacy in Palliative Care Tanja Bahro, Consortium Manager, Southern Metropolitan Region Palliative Care Consortium.
Lecture 6: error in healthcare Dr Carl Thompson, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, UK.
Nurses’ use of research information in clinical decision making in primary care Carl Thompson; Dorothy McCaughan; Pauline Raynor; Nicky Cullum; Trevor.
The counterfactual logic for public policy evaluation Alberto Martini hard at first, natural later 1.
APOLOGISING FOR MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE The role of apology in Open Disclosure Professor Prue Vines, UNSW Law.
Surgical safety is a serious public health issue About 234 million operations are done globally each year A rate of % deaths and 3-16% complications.
Medical errors in treatment of breast cancer HS Shukla Professor and HOD Department of Surgical Oncology IMS, BHU These PowerPoint presentations are free.
Design and Analysis of Clinical Study 12. Randomized Clinical Trials Dr. Tuan V. Nguyen Garvan Institute of Medical Research Sydney, Australia.
Lecture 3 The cognitive continuum
Department of Health and Human Services Measuring Clinical Lab Ordering Quality: Theory and Practice Steven M. Asch MD MPH VA, RAND, UCLA April 29, 2005.
ABCWINRisk and Statistics1 Risk and Statistics Risk Assessment in Clinical Decision Making Ulrich Mansmann Medical Statistics Branch University of Heidelberg.
Clinical decision making Carl Thompson UK, Centre for Evidence Based Nursing Editor, Evidence Based Nursing
Dr Dominique Allwood Public Health Registrar
An ABC of Drug-Related Problems RHB Meyboom, M Lindquist, ACG Egberts Drug Safety 2000;22:
IMPROVING THE DOCUMENTATION OF DIAGNOSES Carol A. Lewis.
1 GUIDELINES as a way of harmonisation in Europe: Pro’s and Con’s Prof. Dr. Jan. A. Swinkels Psychiatrist Professor in clinical guideline development in.
The effects of time and experience on nurses’ risk assessment decisions: a signal detection analysis C, Thompson 1, L, Dalgleish 2, T, Bucknall 3, C, Estabrookes.
The Nature of Disease.
Knowledge Driven Care – Realised Through Transformation Dr Simon Wallace Medical Executive Cerner UK.
Introduction To Pharmacy Practice
The Culture of Healthcare Nursing Care Processes Lecture b This material (Comp2_Unit6b) was developed by Oregon Health and Science University, funded by.
MEDICINES and Older People Hira Singh Prescribing Adviser (Middlesbrough PCT and Redcar & Cleveland PCT Medicines Management Team) March 2008.
NICE Decision Making Dr Katherine Payne North West Genetics Knowledge Park The University of Manchester
East & South East England Specialist Pharmacy Services East of England, London, South Central & South East Coast Research methods: answering questions.
Sina Keshavaarz M.D Public Health &Preventive Medicine Measuring level of performance & sustaining improvement.
Dr.F Eslamipour DDS.MS Orthodontist Associated professor Department of Oral Public Health Isfahan University of Medical Science.
Increasing Pharmacists reporting of adverse medication incidents Being Ready for new risks and Opportunities Prepared by Tim Garrett Northern Sydney Central.
European Society of Cardiology Cardiovascular diseases in women.
Economic evaluation of drugs for rare diseases CENTRE FOR HEALTH ECONOMICS K Claxton, C McCabe, A Tsuchiya Centre for Health Economics and Department of.
Workshop The science and methodologies behind HTA, diversity and commonality across the EU Achieving more patient centred HTA in different countries.
Why providing information for evidence based decision making by nurses is a bad idea… Carl Thompson UK Department of Health, Senior Research Fellow.
An Introduction to Health Promotion Policy, Programming and Approaches Sue Thompson Lecturer in Adult Nursing University of Nottingham.
Component 2: The Culture of Health Care Unit 9: Sociotechnical Aspects: Clinicians and Technology Lecture 1 This material was developed by Oregon Health.
Nurses use of research information in clinical decision making
Can we ever make nursing decisions “evidence based”? Carl Thompson UK, Centre for Evidence Based Nursing.
February February 2008 Evidence Based Medicine –Evidence Based Medicine Centre –Best Practice –BMJ Clinical Evidence –BMJ Best.
1 CHAPTER 2 Decision Making, Systems, Modeling, and Support.
What is a non-inferiority trial, and what particular challenges do such trials present? Andrew Nunn MRC Clinical Trials Unit 20th February 2012.
IMPROVING PRODUCTIVITY BY FOCUSSING ON QUALITY OF CARE - A PROGRAMME OF RESEARCH AT THE HOSPITAL Dr Gill Clements Roger Killen March 2006.
Introduction For best practice, clinicians must make numerous decisions during the therapeutic process Clinical reasoning: “ Complex multi-faceted cognitive.
2nd Concertation Meeting Brussels, September 8, 2011 Reinhard Prior, Scientific Coordinator, HIM Evidence in telemedicine: a literature review.
Evidence Based Practice RCS /9/05. Definitions  Rosenthal and Donald (1996) defined evidence-based medicine as a process of turning clinical problems.
Introduction to Healthcare and Public Health in the US The Evolution and Reform of Healthcare in the US Lecture b This material (Comp1_Unit9b) was developed.
Standard 10: Preventing Falls and Harm from Falls Accrediting Agencies Surveyor Workshop, 13 August 2012.
Introduction.
Decision Analytic Approaches for Evidence-Based Practice M8120 Fall 2001 Suzanne Bakken, RN, DNSc, FAAN School of Nursing & Department of Medical Informatics.
BEST PRACTICE PORTAL BEST PRACTICE PORTAL project presentation to the Scientific Committee Ferri et al Lisbon, 16th July 2010.
TNEEL-NE Stuart J. Farber, MD. Slide 2 Connections: Patient Centered Decision Making TNEEL-NE Facilitating patient-centered decision making requires nurses.
Clinical Reasoning. Clinical Reasoning in Differential Diagnosis Experts use 3 main methods or a combination:  Analytic or Hypothetico-deductive  Non-analytic.
This study proposes to explore the concept of empowerment combined with the clinical experience on final year nursing students.This study proposes to explore.
Jan 2002 EDMA The central role of the Medical Laboratory in a World of Managed Health An EDMA presentation of the benefits of in vitro testing as a basis.
Medicines adherence Implementing NICE guidance 2009 NICE clinical guideline 76.
Jamie Hayes. Clinical Trial Patient ? Real Patient ?
Introduction 2. Pharmaceutical care is a professional patient care practice, which, when provided as an organized service, is experienced, documented,
Solving Problems Together. OBJECTIVES At the end of this Lecture the student will be able to 1. Discuss the use of face work and politeness theory in.
Efficacy and Safety of Medicines
Evidence-based Medicine
8. Causality assessment:
Implementation of Clinical Guidelines Author: dr. Martin Rusnák
3. Key definitions Multi-partner training package on active TB drug safety monitoring and management (aDSM) July 2016.
Nurs 430 Part 6: Critical Thinking
Shared Decision-Making: Partnering With Your Clinician
Nurs 425 Decision Making in Clinical Practice
Effectively Training Parents in Behavior Analytic Interventions
Policy Change Department of Veterans Affairs
Tobey Clark, Director*, Burlington USA
Careers in Psychology Module 3.
Presentation transcript:

Information, choices & professional judgement: what’s right, wrong and can be done with decision making in the health professions. Dr Carl Thompson, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, UK Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research Visiting Scholar

What are we talking about? Not tasks and not activity per se Not tasks and not activity per se The weighting of information (professional judgement) The weighting of information (professional judgement) Using these weighed pro’s and con’s to make choices (clinical decisions) Using these weighed pro’s and con’s to make choices (clinical decisions)

Why worry about decision making and judgement? They contribute to They contribute to health gain health gain Mortality and morbidity Mortality and morbidity Professional power Professional power Patient involvement Patient involvement Decisions and Judgements are the ‘black box’ in healthcare. Decisions and Judgements are the ‘black box’ in healthcare. Boundaries and the ball park are shifting Boundaries and the ball park are shifting

Cognitive inputs Organisational factors Social factors Patient values As well as: Resources Research knowledge Uncertainty Policy Time Control over decision elements

The good news Given conditions of irreducible uncertainty most decisions are good enough Given conditions of irreducible uncertainty most decisions are good enough People apply the same rules to professional decision making as they do in real life – this is a good thing! People apply the same rules to professional decision making as they do in real life – this is a good thing!

The Bad News Within unavoidable events in healthcare are avoidable events Within unavoidable events in healthcare are avoidable events Cognitive shortcuts lead to systematic errors… Cognitive shortcuts lead to systematic errors… Simply relying on clinical experience is not enough Simply relying on clinical experience is not enough

Does bad judgement matter? USA 44-98,000 deaths – “To Err is Human” USA 44-98,000 deaths – “To Err is Human” Australia 250,000 adverse events Australia 250,000 adverse events 50,000 permanent disability 50,000 permanent disability 10,000 deaths “Iatrogenic Injury in Australia” 10,000 deaths “Iatrogenic Injury in Australia” Denmarkconfirmed 9% of admissions Denmarkconfirmed 9% of admissions N.Z. confirmed 10% of admissions N.Z. confirmed 10% of admissions UK11% of admissions UK11% of admissions 850,000 adverse events 850,000 adverse events deaths & permanent disability deaths & permanent disability Between 7 and 8.4 additional bed days per adverse event Between 7 and 8.4 additional bed days per adverse event

Why do they happen… Was there a prior intention to act? Was there intention in action? Involuntary or no intentional action Spontaneous or subsidiary action Did the actions proceed as planned? Unintentional action (slip or lapse) Did the actions achieve their desired end? Intentional but mistaken action Successful action No Yes

What can be done More sophisticated maps of the ‘black box’ More sophisticated maps of the ‘black box’ Develop what we know works Develop what we know works Decision supportive technologies Decision supportive technologies Education and training in handling uncertainty Education and training in handling uncertainty

ANALYSIS INTUITION Quality Of intuition Quality Of Analysis Least Precise/ explicit Definition of concepts Specification of relationships Measurement of magnitudes most Precise/ explicit MODE “7” KNOWLEDGE non- clinical expert descriptive case randomised scientific GENERATION cognitive judgement consensus (positive) control controlled experiment “judgement” judgement model study trial DECISION non-cognitive clinical expert decision MAKING “decision” judgement consensus (normative) decision model © dowie2002

Social judgement modelling

Example: shock cue profiles in orthogonal design 20 cue profiles in orthogonal design BP, Pulse, Resps, Urine Output, GCS. BP, Pulse, Resps, Urine Output, GCS. 3 levels (abnormal, normal, equivocal) 3 levels (abnormal, normal, equivocal) Left side from regression of 100 cases in ITU Left side from regression of 100 cases in ITU 45 students pre-post intervention (lecture and web-based teaching materials – targeted) 45 students pre-post intervention (lecture and web-based teaching materials – targeted)

Using (refining and evaluating) effective interventions Multifaceted interventions (combine 2 or more of audit and feedback, reminders, local consensus processes, marketing) Multifaceted interventions (combine 2 or more of audit and feedback, reminders, local consensus processes, marketing) Interactive educational meetings Interactive educational meetings Reminders Reminders Educational outreach visits Educational outreach visits

Decision support Function Example AlertingHighlighting out of range (either too high or too low laboratory values) RemindingReminding the clinician to schedule a cervical smear CritiquingRejecting an inappropriate order for a new drug InterpretingAnalysing an electrocardiogram PredictingCalculating the risk of mortality from a severity of illness score DiagnosingListing a differential diagnosis for a patient with chest pain AssistingTailoring the antibiotic choices for patients with STDs SuggestingGenerating suggestions for adjusting a mechanical ventilator in an Intensive Therapy Unit. FacilitatingProviding a forum for interaction, model building and joint negotiation of treatment.

Better education Right knowledge for professional activity? Right knowledge for professional activity? A Role for learning new ‘languages’: A Role for learning new ‘languages’: Collecting and interpreting evidence (statistics; information science) Collecting and interpreting evidence (statistics; information science) Dealing with uncertainty (probability theory) Dealing with uncertainty (probability theory) Making decisions (economics and decision theory) Making decisions (economics and decision theory)

‘Accept the fact of uncertainty and learn to live with it. Since no magic will provide certainty, our plans must be made without it’: Roberta Wohlstetter (1962) ‘There is nothing more profitable for a person than to take good counsel with oneself; for even if the event turns out contrary to one’s hopes, still one’s decision was right’: Herodotus