THE ROLE OF DSMB’s in CLINICAL RESEARCH Data and Safety Monitoring Monitoring.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Investigator Responsibilities in Clinical Research
Advertisements

The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
THE NIH RECOMBINANT DNA 2002 GUIDELINES East Carolina University September 5, 2007.
Susan Burner Bankowski, M.S., J.D. Chair, OHSU IRB
Regulatory Clinical Trials Clinical Trials. Clinical Trials Definition: research studies to find ways to improve health Definition: research studies to.
What is a Data and Safety Monitoring Plan and how do I get one? Presented by Office of Human Research Protection.
Evidence, Ethics, and the Law Ronnie Detrich Wing Institute.
Ethical Considerations when Developing Human Research Protocols A discipline “born in scandal and reared in protectionism” Carol Levine, 1988.
Clinical Trials Medical Interventions
Pediatric Ethics Subcommittee of Pediatric Advisory Committee, September 10, 2004 Analysis of Research Protocols Involving Children: Combining Subparts.
Subject Selection and Recruitment David Wendler Department of Clinical Bioethics NIH, USA.
Capturing and Reporting Adverse Events in Clinical Research
Use of Children as Research Subjects What information should be provided for an FP7 ethical review?
Introduction to Research
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 1 Brookhaven National Laboratory Protocol Compliance Monitoring Darcy Mallon May 7, 2009.
Ethical Issues in Research
Defining Unanticipated Problems Involving Risks to Subjects or Others (UPIRSO)
Continuing Review VA Requirements Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.) Program Analyst Program for Research Integrity Development and Education (PRIDE)
Who’s the Boss? Faculty Advisor or Principal Investigator Supervision versus Student Investigator or Study Coordinator Responsibilities Gwenn Snow, MS,
Adverse Events, Unanticipated Problems, Protocol Deviations & other Safety Information Which Form 4 to Use?
Clinical Trials. What is a clinical trial? Clinical trials are research studies involving people Used to find better ways to prevent, detect, and treat.
Idara C.E.. Three ethical principles guides research with human participants. principle of Autonomy 1. The principle of Autonomy requires investigators.
SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS REPORTING Elizabeth Dayag IRB Administrator Naval Medical Center Portsmouth.
International Research & Research Involving Children K. Lynn Cates, MD Assistant Chief Research & Development Officer Office of Research & Development.
Testing People Scientifically.  Clinical trials are research studies in which people help doctors and researchers find ways to improve health care. Each.
Adverse Events and Unanticipated Problems Presented by: Karen Jeans, PhD, CCRN, CIP COACH Program Analyst.
THE ROLE OF DSMB’s in CLINICAL RESEARCH Data and Safety Monitoring Monitoring.
Reporting Unanticipated Problems and Adverse Events: A Change in Policy Mary A. Banks RN, BS, BSN Director, BUMC IRB Wednesday, November 14, 2007.
Unanticipated Problems Potentially Involving Risks to Subjects or Others Research Protections Office Serving UVM and FAHC Updated April 2012.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) for Human Subject Protections: Working with the IRB Erin McClure, PhD Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.
Help us Help you: IRB Policy Updates Susan Bankowski, MS, JD IRB Chair.
Investigational Drugs in the hospital. + What is Investigational Drug? Investigational or experimental drugs are new drugs that have not yet been approved.
GCP & ETHICS COMMITTEES Ravi Rengachari Vector Control Research Centre PONDICHERRY.
Planning for Data and Safety Monitoring: Developing Your Study-specific DSMP OCR/GCRC Clinical Research Seminar November 15 th, 2006 Mary-Tara Roth, RN,
The Institutional Review Board: A Community College Toolkit Dr. Geri J Anderson.
IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.
The Linguistics Department Institutional Review Board Committee Silvina Montrul, chair Fred Davidson Irene Koshik Ryan Shosted September 22, 2008.
The Research Subject Advocate (RSA). Pictured, left to right: Andrea Saltzman, RN; Enrico Cagliero, MD; Debi Dunkless.
Retha Britz Copyright 2013 All rights reserved for this presentation 1 Other important considerations for RECs Retha Britz.
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم جامعة أم درمان الإسلامية كلية الطب و العلوم الصحية - قسم طب المجتمع مساق البحث العلمي / الدفعة 21 Basics of Clinical Trials.
NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.
Continuing Review Presented by: Karen Jeans, PhD, CCRN, CIP Program Analyst, COACH.
Yadvindera (Bobby) Bains MD Director of Radiation Oncology, Laredo Medical Center Adjunct Associate Professor, Dept of Radiation Oncology, University of.
CUNY Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) School of Professional Studies April 18, 2013
Criteria For Approval 45 CFR CFR Minimized risks Reasonable risk/benefit ratio Equitable subject selection Informed consent process Informed.
Enrollment and Monitoring Procedures for NCI Supported Clinical Trials Barry Anderson, MD, PhD Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program National Cancer Institute.
APPROVAL CRITERIA AN IRB INFOSHORT MAY CFR CRITERIA FOR IRB APPROVAL OF RESEARCH In order for an IRB to approve a research study, all.
Introduction to Research. Purpose of Research Evidence-based practice Validate clinical practice through scientific inquiry Scientific rational must exist.
Idara C.E.. Three ethical principles guides research with human participants. principle of Autonomy 1. The principle of Autonomy requires investigators.
The IBC is: The Institutional Biosafety Committee (aka Biohazards Committee)
GCP (GOOD CLINICAL PRACTISE)
Bussara Sukpanichnant, Human Subject Protection Office, USAMD-AFRIMS Unanticipated Problems 15 th FERCAP International Conference 24 Nov 15 Nagasaki, Japan.
Instructions for New IRB Continuing Review (Progress) Report
Safety of the Subject Cena Jones-Bitterman, MPP, CIP, CCRP
Introduction Review and proper registration of Human Gene Transfer protocols is very complex. A protocol goes through rigorous review by multiple Committees.
Dartmouth Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) Data Safety Monitoring and Reporting requirements Brown Bag Series: Noon / First Tuesday of the Month.
Susan Sonne, PharmD, BCPP Chair, MUSC IRB II
Back to Basics – Approval Criteria
Research Compliance and Institutional Review Boards
Risk Determinations and Research with Children
What is a Data and Safety Monitoring Plan and how do I get one?
THE ROLE OF DSMB’s in CLINICAL RESEARCH
Safety of the Subject Cena Jones-Bitterman, MPP, CIP, CCRP
To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the screen changes and you.
SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS REPORTING
To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the screen changes and you.
CUNY Human Research Protection Program (HRPP)
Ethical Considerations for Pediatric Clinical Investigations
Policy on Prompt Reporting
Protocol Approval Criteria
Presentation transcript:

THE ROLE OF DSMB’s in CLINICAL RESEARCH Data and Safety Monitoring Monitoring

Data and Safety Monitoring NIH Policy NIH Policy Each Institute/Center should have a system for the appropriate oversight and monitoring of the conduct of clinical trials Each Institute/Center should have a system for the appropriate oversight and monitoring of the conduct of clinical trials Must ensure the safety of participants and Must ensure the safety of participants and Should protect the validity and integrity of the data for all NIH-supported/conducted trials Should protect the validity and integrity of the data for all NIH-supported/conducted trials

DATA and SAFETY MONITORING Clinical Trials have a relationship between participants and investigators Clinical Trials have a relationship between participants and investigators Both must fulfill certain obligations Both must fulfill certain obligations

Data and Safety Monitoring Participants: Participants: Must be fully informed of the study requirements throughout the study Must be fully informed of the study requirements throughout the study Should comply with the rigors of the research protocol or be allowed to withdraw from participation Should comply with the rigors of the research protocol or be allowed to withdraw from participation

Data and Safety Monitoring Investigators: Investigators: Must protect the health and safety of participants Must protect the health and safety of participants Inform participants of information relevant to their continued participation Inform participants of information relevant to their continued participation Pursue the research objectives with scientific diligence Pursue the research objectives with scientific diligence

Data and Safety Monitoring Every clinical trial should have provision for data and safety monitoring Every clinical trial should have provision for data and safety monitoring The size of the monitoring committee depends upon the nature, size, and complexity of the clinical trial The size of the monitoring committee depends upon the nature, size, and complexity of the clinical trial The Principal Investigator was expected to perform the monitoring function but may have had others to help The Principal Investigator was expected to perform the monitoring function but may have had others to help

Data and Safety Monitoring It was recommended that every clinical trial, even those that pose little likelihood of harm have an external monitoring body It was recommended that every clinical trial, even those that pose little likelihood of harm have an external monitoring body

Data Safety Monitoring Boards Establishment of Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) is required for multi-site clinical trials involving interventions that entail potential risk to the participants Establishment of Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) is required for multi-site clinical trials involving interventions that entail potential risk to the participants The functions and oversight of such activities are distinct from the requirement for study review and approval by an IRB The functions and oversight of such activities are distinct from the requirement for study review and approval by an IRB

Data and Safety Monitoring Principles of monitoring data and safety in studies include: Principles of monitoring data and safety in studies include: Physiologic, toxicity, and dose-finding studies—Phase I Physiologic, toxicity, and dose-finding studies—Phase I Efficacy studies—Phase II Efficacy studies—Phase II Efficacy, effectiveness and comparative trials—Phase III Efficacy, effectiveness and comparative trials—Phase III

Data and Safety Monitoring Monitoring should be commensurate with the degree of risk involved Monitoring should be commensurate with the degree of risk involved A data and safety monitoring committee should determine safe and effective conduct and A data and safety monitoring committee should determine safe and effective conduct and Recommend conclusion of the trial when significant benefits or risks have developed or Recommend conclusion of the trial when significant benefits or risks have developed or The trial is unlikely to be concluded successfully The trial is unlikely to be concluded successfully

Data and Safety Monitoring Risk associated with participation in research must be minimized to the extent practical Risk associated with participation in research must be minimized to the extent practical Size and complexity will determine if a single person or a committee is needed to oversee the study Size and complexity will determine if a single person or a committee is needed to oversee the study

Data and Safety Monitoring Performance of Data and Safety Monitoring Performance of Data and Safety Monitoring 1. Is to protect the integrity of the system for monitoring trial data and participant safety 2. Monitoring must be performed on a regular basis 3. Conclusions of the monitoring must be reported to the IRB and the Research Subject Advocate Committee (RSA) on the GCRC

Data and Safety Monitoring IRB/RSA responsibilities IRB/RSA responsibilities May direct who shall perform the monitoring activities May direct who shall perform the monitoring activities May direct the composition of the monitoring group including that: May direct the composition of the monitoring group including that: the PI is not to chair the Data and Safety Monitoring Board nor be the single person doing the monitoring the PI is not to chair the Data and Safety Monitoring Board nor be the single person doing the monitoring

Data and Safety Monitoring Plan All protocols receiving GCRC support are required to have a Data and Safety Monitoring Plan which All protocols receiving GCRC support are required to have a Data and Safety Monitoring Plan which 1. Monitors the progress of the research study and the safety of participants 2. Plans for assuring compliance with requirements for reporting adverse events

Data and Safety Monitoring Plan 3. Plans for assuring that any action resulting in a temporary or permanent suspension of the clinical trial is reported to all responsible parties 4. Plans for assuring protocol compliance and data accuracy

Data and Safety Monitoring Plan The plan should include the following: The plan should include the following: 1. Committee chair and members 2. Frequency of evaluation 3. Method of detecting adverse events 4. How adverse events will be scored

Data and Safety Monitoring Plan Adverse event reporting requirements Adverse event reporting requirements A description of interim efficacy analysis if appropriate A description of interim efficacy analysis if appropriate Distribution of Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) reports—must go to GCRC RSA for review Distribution of Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) reports—must go to GCRC RSA for review

Data and Safety Monitoring Plan Specifics of the plan will depend upon the nature, size, complexity and risk of the clinical trial Specifics of the plan will depend upon the nature, size, complexity and risk of the clinical trial A monitoring committee is required to determine safe and effective conduct A monitoring committee is required to determine safe and effective conduct Or to recommend conclusion of the trial when significant benefits or risks have developed Or to recommend conclusion of the trial when significant benefits or risks have developed

Data and Safety Monitoring Plan and Board Single individual—if trial is small with little risk Single individual—if trial is small with little risk IU GCRC has decided that the Principal Investigator cannot be the chair of the DSMB and cannot be the only monitor of a research study in order to eliminate any potential conflict IU GCRC has decided that the Principal Investigator cannot be the chair of the DSMB and cannot be the only monitor of a research study in order to eliminate any potential conflict

Data and Safety Monitoring Plan and Board A description of the plan and the composition of the monitoring board are required at the time of the GCRC submission. A description of the plan and the composition of the monitoring board are required at the time of the GCRC submission. This description should be included in Section G of the GCRC application This description should be included in Section G of the GCRC application

Data and Safety Monitoring Plan and Board Description should include: Description should include: 1. DSMB chair and members 2. How frequently the study will be evaluated 3. The method of detecting adverse events 4. How events will be scored

Data and Safety Monitoring Plan and Board 5. Adverse event reporting requirements 6. A description of interim efficacy analysis if appropriate 7. The distribution of DSMB reports

Significant Risk Protocols Definition of Risk is a complex sum of individual contributors to the overall risk of participation in the study Definition of Risk is a complex sum of individual contributors to the overall risk of participation in the study

Significant Risk Protocols Risk to study subjects may be thought of as encompassing aspects of: Risk to study subjects may be thought of as encompassing aspects of: 1. Study design 2. Potential for loss of confidentiality 3. And the nature of the study population involved

Significant Risk Protocols The risk of the intervention is a function of the potential for adverse events (AE) and the severity of adverse events The risk of the intervention is a function of the potential for adverse events (AE) and the severity of adverse events 1. The potential for adverse events includes the expected frequency of adverse events 2. When the frequency of AEs is unknown or identifying the frequency of AEs is one of the endpoints of the trial such as Phase I trials, the risk is higher

Significant Risk Protocols The severity of adverse events should also be considered independent of the frequency of AEs The severity of adverse events should also be considered independent of the frequency of AEs 1. Study procedures which are not expected to lead to frequent AEs, but include the possibility of severe AEs, confer higher risk

Significant Risk Protocols The amount of experience with the study intervention also affects the risk, since the risk of AEs may not be fully defined. The amount of experience with the study intervention also affects the risk, since the risk of AEs may not be fully defined.

Significant Risk Protocols Study Population Study Population Participation of vulnerable subjects confers greater risk than non vulnerable populations Participation of vulnerable subjects confers greater risk than non vulnerable populations 1. Examples include children under 18, prisoners, and employees of the workplace

Significant Risk Protocols Normal volunteer populations require special consideration since any intervention confers greater risk than would be experienced by subjects not participating in a study Normal volunteer populations require special consideration since any intervention confers greater risk than would be experienced by subjects not participating in a study

Significant Risk Protocols The gravity of loss of confidentiality The gravity of loss of confidentiality Loss of confidentiality for study participants in genetic studies, studies of stigmatized conditions, or studies where loss of confidentiality could lead to social harms may be considered high risk Loss of confidentiality for study participants in genetic studies, studies of stigmatized conditions, or studies where loss of confidentiality could lead to social harms may be considered high risk

Significant Risk Protocols Physical, emotional and psychosocial harms Physical, emotional and psychosocial harms Example: a genetic study which might lead to a diagnosis of or identify a predisposition for a serious disease in study participants would be considered high risk such as Huntington’s disease Example: a genetic study which might lead to a diagnosis of or identify a predisposition for a serious disease in study participants would be considered high risk such as Huntington’s disease A study including known illegal drug users could be considered high risk since loss of confidentiality of study participants could lead to great social harm A study including known illegal drug users could be considered high risk since loss of confidentiality of study participants could lead to great social harm

Significant Risk Protocols Significant Risk may be conferred by the degree of severity of a single consideration or the combined weight of several considerations Significant Risk may be conferred by the degree of severity of a single consideration or the combined weight of several considerations By mandate, all studies using GCRC facilities or resources which are considered to be of significant risk will be required to establish an independent data safety monitoring board By mandate, all studies using GCRC facilities or resources which are considered to be of significant risk will be required to establish an independent data safety monitoring board

Significant Risk Protocols Independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board Independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board Is made up of at least one member who is not directly involved with the study Is made up of at least one member who is not directly involved with the study Should not be a member of the PIs or co-PIs division within a given department Should not be a member of the PIs or co-PIs division within a given department If the PI is a division director, then the DSMB cannot be made up of more junior members of his or her division If the PI is a division director, then the DSMB cannot be made up of more junior members of his or her division

Significant Risk Protocols Studies requiring an Independent DSMB Studies requiring an Independent DSMB Early clinical trials Early clinical trials All Phase I studies All Phase I studies Phase II studies unless they involve low risk interventions Phase II studies unless they involve low risk interventions Studies of devices or invasive techniques with which the PI or the community has little experience Studies of devices or invasive techniques with which the PI or the community has little experience Gene Therapy trials Gene Therapy trials

Significant Risk Protocols Genetic Studies Genetic Studies Studies that examine more than 20 genetic loci Studies that examine more than 20 genetic loci Studies which seek to examine stigmatized conditions Studies which seek to examine stigmatized conditions Lethal or disabling diseases for which no treatment is available Lethal or disabling diseases for which no treatment is available Or conditions where loss of confidentiality within the study could lead to serious emotional, psychological, or social consequences. Or conditions where loss of confidentiality within the study could lead to serious emotional, psychological, or social consequences.

Significant Risk Protocols Studies in vulnerable populations Studies in vulnerable populations Children under 18 Children under 18 Prisoners Prisoners Decisional-impaired subjects involving more than minimal risk Decisional-impaired subjects involving more than minimal risk Studies that involve administering agents manufactured on campus Studies that involve administering agents manufactured on campus

The Role of DSMB’s in Clinical Research Produced and Presented by Carole Weir, RN, MSN Directors Edward Liechty, MD Peter Schwartz, MD The Research Subject Advocate Committee