EPA’s Proposed Federal Clean Power Plan Steve Burr AQD, SIP Section October 6, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cleaner Air Set-Asides (CASA) February 14, 2006 DRAFT Illinois Environmental Protection Agency / Bureau of Air.
Advertisements

Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) CAIR Requirements for SIPs Office of Air and Radiation March 2005.
EPA’S DRAFT GUIDELINES TO STATES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF STATE 111(d) PLANS MIDWESTERN POWER SECTOR COLLABORATIVE JUNE 17, 2014 FRANZ LITZ PROGRAM CONSULTANT.
EPA’s Clean Power Plan Proposed Rules for Reducing GHG Emissions from Power Plants Presentation to ACPAC June 16,
NARUC 2015 Winter Meeting February 16, 2015 Combined Heat and Power and the Clean Power Plan Bruce Hedman Institute for Industrial Productivity.
Canada’s Offset System for Greenhouse Gases Dean Stinson O’Gorman New Brunswick Climate Change Hub meeting October 7, 2009.
Bob McConnell, EPA Region 1
1 NBS-M017 – 2013 CLIMATE CHANGE: GOVERNANCE AND COMPLIANCE Electricity Market Reform Aims to integrate both the Wholesale and Low Carbon Electricity Markets.
Indiana’s Clean Energy Credit Program (Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Set-aside) Roger Letterman Sr. Environmental Manager Office of Air Quality.
1.  What is a Renewable Energy Credit (REC)?  What are they used for?  Who uses them?  How is REC ownership tracked?  What is the Renewable Portfolio.
CHEAPER AND CLEANER: Using the Clean Air Act to Sharply Reduce Carbon Pollution from Existing Power Plants, Delivering Health, Environmental and Economic.
World Bank Experience with Power Sector Baselines Workshop on CDM Methodologies for Grid-Connected Power Projects Buenos Aires, 8 December 2004 Fernando.
1 Regulatory Concepts Related to the Control of NOx and SOx From Fossil- fired Electric Generating Units Air Quality Technical Advisory Committee Meeting.
Clean Power Plan EPA’s Clean Power Plan An overview of EPA’s proposed rules and the implications for the future Presented by: David Crews SVP - Power Supply.
David C. Schanbacher, P.E. TNRCC Air Program Coordinator Renewable Energy Credit Trading Program.
1 Implementation of the Solar RPS in New Jersey ABA Renewable Energy Panel November 16, 2005 Jan Pepper.
Electric Reliability and the Clean Power Plan Branden Sudduth Director, Reliability Planning W ESTERN E LECTRICITY C OORDINATING C OUNCIL.
EPA’s Final Clean Power Plan: Overview Steve Burr AQD, SIP Section September 1, 2015.
CDM Projects: Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Projects Project cycles and Technical Issues.
Air Quality Benefits from Energy Conservation Measures Anna Garcia April 2004.
Clean Power Plan - Final Rule Overview Mark Leath, PE Prepared for - Missouri Air Conservation Commission September 24, 2015.
The Regulatory Assistance Project 50 State Street, Suite 3 Montpelier, VT Phone: web: Tracking Renewable Energy for.
ALTERNATIVES TO BART -TRADING- Lily Wong USEPA – Region 9 September 1, 2005.
Clean Air Act Section 111(d) Indiana State Bar Association Utility Law Section September 4, 2014 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE Commissioner IN Department.
EPA’s Clean Power Plan: Compliance Options and Engagement Opportunities Vicki Arroyo, Executive Director Gabe Pacyniak, Mitigation Program Manager Lissa.
EPA’s Proposed Clean Power Plan House Committee on Natural Resources and Environment February 12, 2015 Tegan B. Treadaway Assistant Secretary Office of.
Deliberative, Pre-decisional – Do Not Quote, Cite or Distribute 1 Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Trading.
September 17, 2002 Van Jamison, POWAIR and Global Environment and Technology Foundation POLLUTION PREVENTION TEMPLATES WESTAR Technical Conference Snowbird,
Indiana Energy Conference EPA Clean Power Plan—111(d) November 13, 2014 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE, Commissioner IN Department of Environmental Management.
Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) CAIR Model Cap and Trade Rules: Unique Elements and Flexibilities Office of Air and Radiation March 2005.
Overview of EPA’s Final Clean Air Act Section 111(d) Emissions Guidelines for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Existing Electric Generating Units Overview.
Presentation to RGGI Stakeholder Group September 21, 2005.
Clean Power Plan: Overview of Proposed Federal Plan and Model Rules Clean Power Plan: Overview of Proposed Federal Plan and Model Rules Air Quality Committee.
Clean Power Plan – Now What? OCTOBER 16, 2015 FALL PR-MR & MARKETING MEETING.
NTAA Webinar 10/15/2015. Summary 2 Climate change is a threat in the U.S. -- We are already feeling the dangerous and costly effects of a changing climate.
National Tribal Air Association Webinar October 15, 2015.
Clean Power Plan TENNESSEE MINING CONFERENCE AGENDA November 3, 2015 John Myers Director, Environmental Policy and Regulatory Affairs.
Clean Power Plan Compliance Pathways
EPA’s Greenhouse Gas Rules NOVEMBER 6, Overview Greater stringency overall: 32 percent vs. 30 percent reductions by 2030; setting the stage post-2030.
Air Quality Management Comparison of Cap-and-Trade, Command-and Control and Rate-Based Programs Dr. Ruben Deza Senior Environmental Engineer Clean Air.
2005 NSR Regulation Changes Dwight Wylie. Old Units vs. New Units  There is a broad disparity between air pollution control requirements and emissions.
EPA Workshop for Environmental Justice Communities December, 2015.
Clean Energy Incentive Program Michigan Energy Optimization Collaborative October 20, PRESENTATION.
FINAL CLEAN POWER PLAN Before the Virginia Energy Efficiency Council Virginia Department of Environmental Quality November 12, 2015.
Proposed Federal Plan & Model Trading Rules Training for Tribal Communities Farmington, New Mexico | Tuba City, Arizona December 7 – 10, 2015.
Regulatory Framework Options 1. State Measures without Emission Standards Pros  Affected EGUs not subject to federally enforceable requirements unless.
Clean Energy Incentive Program (CEIP) Training for Tribal Communities Farmington, New Mexico | Tuba City, Arizona December 7 – 10, 2015.
2/27/ % below 2005 by 2020 cap and trade 11/15/2007 set emissions targets by 11/15/08 ~60-80% cuts by ???? (2040?) cap and trade; C inventory, reporting.
Philippine Feed-In Tariff System Implementation 1.
EPA Workshop for Environmental Justice Communities December, 2015.
Impacts of Environmental Regulations in the ERCOT Region Dana Lazarus Planning Analyst, ERCOT January 26, 2016.
Proposed Carbon Pollution Standard For New Power Plants Presented by Kevin Culligan Office of Air Quality Planning And Standards Office of Air and Radiation.
Clean Power Plan EW Tim Wilson Director of Energy Supply Services.
Incentives for Low-Income Energy Efficiency in the Clean Power Plan Karen Palmer Energy Efficiency, Conservation and Low-Income Households Knoxville, TN.
© 2015 Haynes and Boone, LLP Overview of the EPA Clean Power Plan Suzanne Beaudette Murray February 19, 2016 Tulane Environmental Law Summit.
Clean Power Plan Insights for Pennsylvania Jeffrey Anderson, Paul Fischbeck, Haibo Zhai, David Rode Department of Engineering and Public Policy Carnegie.
Viability of Carbon Capture and Sequestration Retrofits for Existing Coal- fired Power Plants under an Emission Trading Scheme CEDM Annual Meeting May.
Clean Power Plan Kyra Moore Director, Air Pollution Control Program Prepared for: Midwest Energy Policy Conference October 6, 2015.
The Clean Power Plan.  Standards of Performance for GHG Emissions from New, Modified, and Reconstructed Stationary Sources (111(b)).  Carbon Pollution.
Western State Targets and Key Issues Patrick Cummins, CNEE September 10, 2015.
Regional Implications of the Clean Power Plan Lanny Nickell Midwest Energy Policy Conference October 6 th,
State and Regional GHG Initiatives What are the individual states doing to mitigate GHG emissions? What are the common elements? and regional differences?
Creating A Greener Energy Future For the Commonwealth Clean Heat & Power in Massachusetts John Ballam, P.E. Manager of Engineering & the CHP Program MA.
© 2016 Portland General Electric. All rights reserved. I NTEGRATED R ESOURCE P LAN 2016 OPUC Meeting April 21, 2016.
Integrated Resource Plan 2016
Summary Climate change is a threat in the U.S. -- We are already feeling the dangerous and costly effects of a changing climate – affecting people’s.
Clean Energy Incentive Program (CEIP)
Key Findings and Resource Strategy
City Council April 30, 2018 Item 13
Regional Climate Alliances Spring 2008
Presentation transcript:

EPA’s Proposed Federal Clean Power Plan Steve Burr AQD, SIP Section October 6, 2015

Slide 2 Overview  Mass-Based Components – CPP Requirements – Proposed Federal Plan Implementation  Rate-Based Components – CPP Requirements – Proposed Federal Plan Implementation  Federal Plan and Model Rule

Overview 3

Slide 4 Mass-Based Plan Elements EEmissions Budget AAllocation of Allowances MMonitoring, Reporting, and Recordkeeping (MRR) Requirements TTracking System PProcess for Demonstrating Compliance RRequirements to Address Leakage CCEIP (optional) EEM&V for RE and EE (depending on plan type)

Slide 5 Mass-Based Plan: Budget  Federal Plan: Single-State Goal  EPA lacks authority to adopt “new source complement” Arizona Mass-Based Goals (short tons CO 2 ) Interim Final 33,061,997 30,170,150

Slide 6 Mass-Based Plan: Allocation  How allowances work:  Allowances vs. ERCs

Slide 7 Mass-Based Plan: Allocation  CPP: Plan must include “provisions” – For allocation of allowances for each compliance period for each EGU (including set-asides) – For adjusting allocations – Allowing or restricting banking – Prohibiting “borrowing”  Federal Plan – Based on EGU’s share of generation – 3 set-asides: 2 to address leakage (below) + CEIP – Unlimited banking allowed

Slide 8 Mass-Based Plan: Allocation  Federal Plan (cont’d) – If EGU does not operate for 2 consecutive calendar years, would only receive allowances for “limited number of years” Specific proposal: after 2 consecutive years without operation, no allowances in next compliance period; EPA seeks comments on alternatives Implications for NGS, Four Corners, AZ EGUs How are retirements before 2022 treated? – States may replace EPA determined allocation system with state-developed provisions

Slide 9 Mass-Based Plan: MRR  CPP – CEMS for hourly CO2 emissions (with some exceptions) – Sum hourly emissions for compliance period – Monitoring of net electricity output also required. (Why?)  Federal Plan – Same – Requires “Designated Representative” to certify all reports

Slide 10 Mass-Based Plan: Tracking System  CPP – Electronically record Allocation of allowances Transfers of allowances Surrender and retirement of allowances for compliance – Provide internet-based, public access to information relating to “eligible resources” – May provide for transfers to or from an EPA- approved or –administered system  Federal Plan – Designated Representative = Authorized Account Representative

Slide 11 Mass-Based Plan: Demonstrating Compliance  CPP – Demonstrate compliance by holding in tracking system allowances ≥ emissions in short tons  Federal Plan – Allowances available for deduction for a compliance period Allocated for year in compliance period or prior compliance period (no borrowing) Held in EGU’s compliance account as of “allowance transfer deadline” (May 1 after end of compliance period) – EPA deducts allowances until Amount deducted = total emissions from facility’s EGUs; or No allowances remain (i.e. there are excess emissions) – If excess emissions, EPA will deduct 2X shortfall

Slide 12 Mass-Based Plan: Leakage  What is leakage? – “emissions from new sources, beyond the emissions expected from new sources if existing EGUs were given standards of performance in the form of the subcategory-specific emission performance rates” [ (b)(5)]

Slide 13 Mass-Based Plan: Leakage  CPP Options – Regulate new EGUs under state-only program together with existing affected EGUs under a mass- based 111(d) plan (“new source complement”) – Allocation method that counteracts incentives to shift generation to new EGUs – Provide demonstration that leakage is unlikely to occur in a particular state

Slide 14 Mass-Based Plan: Leakage  Federal Plan Allocation Adjustments – Output-based allocation adjustments Provides existing EGUs incentive to generate more to receive more allowances, aligning incentive with new sources Proposed to be available only to NGCC Eligible NGCC would receive allowances = net generation > 50 % of net summer capacity x allocation rate of 1,030 lb/MWh-net Proposed AZ set-aside = 4,197,813 – Allowance set-aside for post-2012 RE: 5 % from annual allowances (1,508,538 in 2030 for Arizona) Only utility scale wind, solar, geothermal power or utility scale hydropower qualify – Unused set-aside allowances allocated to eligible generation on pro-rata basis

Slide 15 Mass-Based Plan: CEIP  CPP – Eligible Projects Located in or benefit a state implementing CEIP Commence construction (RE) or operation (EE) after submission of final plan During , either (a) generate metered MWh from any wind or solar resource or (b) result in quantified and verified electricity savings through demand side EE in low-income communities – ERCs RE Projects: For every 2 MWh generated, project receives 1 ERC from state and 1 matching ERC from EPA EE Projects: For every 2 MWh generated, project receives 2 ERCs from state and 2 matching ERCs from EPA  Federal Plan – Includes CEIP – EPA takes state role of creating RE and EE set-asides

Slide 16 Mass-Based Plan: EM&V  CPP: Required in mass-based plan, if includes – Set-aside for RE to address leakage; or – CEIP  Federal Plan – Includes both RE set-aside to address leakage and CEIP for RE and EE – Therefore includes EM&V for EE – Why doesn’t federal plan allow ERCs for EE in Rate-Based rules?

Slide 17 Rate-Based Plan Elements  Rate-Based Emission Standards  Method for Calculating Adjusted Rate  Identification of Eligible Resources  Certification of Eligible Resources  Issuance of Emission Rate Credits  MRR (same as for mass-based)  Evaluation, Measurement & Verification  Tracking System (same as for mass-based)

Slide 18 Rate-Based Plan: Standards  Federal Plan Standards: Subcategory-Specific Performance Rates National Performance Rates (lbs CO 2 /MWh) SubcategoryInterimFinal Fossil Steam1,5341,305 NGCC

Slide 19 Rate-Based Plan: Calculation Method

Slide 20 Rate-Based Plan: Eligible Resources  CPP – Installed or implemented after 1/1/2013 – Connected to and delivers energy or saves electricity on grid – Located in: Rate-based state For RE only, in mass based state and delivered with intention to meet load in rate-based state – Categories RE: wind, solar, geothermal, hydro, wave, tidal Qualified biomass Waste-to-energy Nuclear CHP Demand-side EE Other included in state plan and approved by EPA

Slide 21 Rate-Based Plan: Eligible Resources  Federal Plan Limited to – On-shore utility scale wind – Utility scale solar photovoltaics – Concentrated solar power – Geothermal power – Nuclear energy – Utility scale hydropower

Slide 22 Rate-Based Plan: Certification and Issuance  CPP and Federal Plan: Eligibility Application Credit Application ERC DESK Eligible? No ERCs No Yes Do Project Verified? No ERCs No ERCs

Slide 23 Rate-Based Plan: Certification and Issuance

Slide 24 Rate-Based Plan: Certification and Issuance

Slide 25 Rate-Based Plan: EM&V  CPP – Eligibility Application EM&V Plan Verification report from independent verifier – Credit Application M&V Report Verification report from independent verifier  Federal Plan – 30 pages of detail in both Mass-Based and Rate- Based rules – Accreditation process for independent verifiers

Overview 26