Drafting of Claims - The Tailor’s Scissors Edoardo Pastore European Patent Office Torino, 13-14 October 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Managing Intellectual Property Assets in International Business Anil Sinha, Counsellor, SMEs Division World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)
Advertisements

Understanding patent claims (b)Heating element for a washing machine.
Guided Exercises: Inventive Step
W W W W W HOW (Why, When, Who, Where, What, How) Read a Patent!
The German Experience: Patent litigation and nullification cases
BLAW 2010 Patent Project Part 1I. Why do we have patent laws?
Industrial Property the Patent system
Protection of Computer Software and Databases Arkadiusz Kwapisz, Examiner Patent Examination Department Patent Office of the Republic of Poland Software-implemented.
Invention Spotting – Identifying Patentable Inventions Martin Vinsome June 2012.
© 2010 Woodcock Washburn LLP Patents and Technology Protection “Everything You Wanted to Know About IP – But Were Afraid to Ask” University of Hawai’i.
Software Protection & Scope of the Right holder Options for Developing Countries Presentation by: Dr. Ahmed El Saghir Judge at the Council of State Courts.
Rodolphe Bauer, Frédéric Dedek, Gareth Jenkins, Cristina Margarido
Understanding patent claims (f) Drug for the treatment of cancer.
Meyerlustenberger Rechtsanwälte − Attorneys at Lawwww.meyerlustenberger.ch European Patent Law and Litigation Guest Lecture, Health and Intellectual Property.
Utility Requirement in Japan Makoto Ono, Ph.D. Anderson, Mori & Tomotsune Website:
Patentability of Software and Business Methods A UK and EPO Update Richard Davis Hogarth Chambers May 13, 2011
Dr. Michael Berger, European Patent Attorney © Michael Berger Intellectual Property (IP): Patents for Inventions.
ΟΡΓΑΝΙΣΜΟΣ ΒΙΟΜΗΧΑΝΙΚΗΣ ΙΔΙΟΚΤΗΣΙΑΣ DRAFTING THE APPLICATION FOR THE GRANT OF A PATENT OR UMC DRAFTING THE APPLICATION FOR THE GRANT OF A PATENT OR UMC.
Patent Protection in Europe
Understanding patent claims (e) Electrical power converter.
Categories of Claims in the Field of CII Edoardo Pastore European Patent Office Torino, October 2011.
Quiz: "Would you grant these patent applications?" Edoardo Pastore Patent Examiner, Cluster Computers European Patent Office Torino, October 2011.
European Patent Applicants Filing in China Common Mistakes Zheng Li Zhongzi Law Office September, 2014.
“Inventing the Future” – The Role of Utility Models and Patents in Leveraging Technical Innovation in the Market Place Kingston, Jamaica Jun 4 - 6, 2012.
Restriction & Double Patenting Mojdeh Bahar, J.D., M.A., CLP Chief, Cancer Branch Office of Technology Transfer National Institutes of Health U.S. Department.
1 Patent Law in the Age of IoT The Landscape Has Shifted. Are You Prepared? 1 Jeffrey A. Miller, Esq.
PatentEng-Berkeley-Lavian Week 6: Validity and Infringement 1 Patent Engineering IEOR 190G CET: Center for Entrepreneurship &Technology Week 6 Dr. Tal.
Patent Application Procedures in Europe by Dr. Ulla Allgayer Patent Attorney in Munich Germany.
Seminar Industrial Property Protection Prague, 4 June 2003 Patent Protection in Europe Heidrun Krestel Liaison Officer Member States Co-operation Programmes.
Heli PihlajamaaLondon, Director Patent Law (5.2.1) Clarity - Article 84 EPC.
Appeals in patent examination and opposition in Germany Karin Friehe Judge, Federal Patent Court, Munich, Germany.
Introduction to Patents Anatomy of a Patent & Procedures for Getting a Patent Margaret Hartnett Commercialisation & IP Manager University.
Varian Australia Pty Ltd – Some Patenting Issues David Carmichael 6 th May 2004.
Espacenet and Patent Searching Dr Karen Ryan Patent Examiner 22 September 2011.
Intellectual Property Law © 2007 IBM Corporation EUPACO 2 – The European Patent Conference 16 May 2007 Patent Quality Roger Burt IBM Europe.
Hamre, Schumann, Mueller & Larson, P.C U.S. Patent Claims By James A. Larson.
Summary on Patents Josiah Hernandez.
Revisions to Japanese Patent Law Before the law was revised, a Divisional Applications could not be filed after a Notice of Allowance 2.
Oppositions, Appeals and Oral Proceedings at the EPO Michael Williams.
Patentable Subject Matter Donald M. Cameron. 2 Patents: The Bargain Public: gets use of invention after patent expires Inventor/Owner: gets limited monopoly.
1 Patent Claim Interpretation under Art. 69 EPC – Should prosecution history be used to interpret the patent? presented at Fordham 19th Annual Conference.
Robert J. Hart CPA, EPA, FBCS Proposal for a Directive on the patentability of computer- implemented inventions  Commission proposal - 20 February 2002.
Conference on Intellectual Property Rights for SMEs organized by TAIEX in co-operation with WIPO and the Turkish Patent Institute Istanbul, 10.
Welcome and Thank You © Gordon & Rees LLP Constitutional Foundation Article 1; Section 8 Congress shall have the Power to... Promote the Progress.
PATENTS, INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, AND INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS Presented By: Navdeep World Trade Organization.
Supreme Court Decision: Product-by-Process Claims AIPLA Annual Meeting 2015 IP Practice in Japan Pre-Meeting Seminar Yoshiki KITANO Japan Patent Attorneys.
. The criterion of inventive step. Definition of Inventive step Sometimes, it is the idea of using established techniques to do something which no one.
1 TOPIC III - PATENT INVALIDATION PROCEDURES EU-CHINA WORKSHOP ON THE CHINESE PATENT LAW HARBIN, SEPTEMBER 2008 Dr. Gillian Davies.
M a i w a l d P a t e n t a n w a l t s G m b H München Düsseldorf Hamburg New York Page 1 The patentability of business methods and software-related inventions.
A CP patent in European policy Dr Ali Al-fatlawi.
Patent filing and tips on patent drafting Makerere University – July 7, 2016 Kagwa John Marius – Examiner Patents.
Managing IP Risk in the Supply Chain - Identifying The Weakest Link 02/11/2016 Time: – Dr N. Imam Partner at Phillips & Leigh Registered UK.
PCT-FILING SYSTEM.
Patenting innovative products
Key Principles for Patenting in the Land of LENR
International Conference on Judicial Protection of IPR
Options to Protect an Invention: the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) and Trade Secrets Hanoi October 24, 2017 Peter Willimott Senior Program Officer WIPO.
International Conference on Judicial Protection of IPR
Patentability of AI related inventions
The Spanish doctrine of equivalents after alimta®
Global Innovation Management Workout on Writing a Patent
Finding and Understanding Patents
Protection of AI Inventions in Japan
National remedies and national actions
Understanding patent claims (b) Heating element for a washing machine
Unity of invention – outcome of the IP5 work MEETING OF INTERNATIONAL AUTHORITIES – QUALITY SUBGROUP Camille Bogliolo (PCT Affairs) and Luigi Petrucci.
Claim drafting strategies when filing a European patent application or entering the European phase of a PCT-application Christof Keussen
Finding and Understanding Patents
What You Didn’t Know That You Didn’t Know About Patents
Influence of AI creations on the IP rules
Presentation transcript:

Drafting of Claims - The Tailor’s Scissors Edoardo Pastore European Patent Office Torino, October 2011

The presentation and in particular the treatment of the examples reflects the personal opinion of the authors and does in no means prejudice any Examination Division or Opposition Division working on related applications. Disclaimer: 2

The Claims - Function Why are there claims? The extent of the protection conferred by a European Patent shall be determined by the terms of the claims (Art. 69(1)). The claims shall define the matter for which protection is sought (Art. 84): –be clear –be concise –be supported by the description 3

The Claims - Function What should a claim comprise? The claims shall define the matter for which protection is sought (Art. 84) in terms of the technical features of the invention (R. 43(1)). 4

The Claims - Subject-Matter What can a claim cover? The subject-matter of a claim should beArt. 52(1) –new, inventive and industrially applicable –in all fields of technology It should not relate to –exclusions from patentability or "non-inventions" Art. 52(2) –exceptions to patentabilityArt. 53 5

Example – The Tailor's Scissors State of the art: knife, pocket knife Problem: The tailor finds it difficult to cut paper and fabric because the fabric and paper bend while being cut. Invention: 6

Example – The Tailor's Scissors Possible Claims to the Tailor's Scissors: - Cutting means which can cut paper without bending it. - Cutting means which better cutting paper and fabric. The claims are not valid because they are unclear. They do not define any structural technical means which achieve the claimed result. 7

Example – The Tailor's Scissors Another possible claim to the Tailor's Scissors: Cutting means which comprises - two straight cutting elements, - each one comprises an eye ring at one end, whereby the cutting elements are fixed to each other at an intermediate position. The claim is formally correct! And it also covers some variants which – without any doubt – are about to be developed: eye ring 8

Example – The Tailor's Scissors variants covered by the scope of the claim: 9 Once it occurs to the plumber to equip his "cutting means” with an insulating material, he will need to request a licence from the tailor in case he wants to produce them. Even there is the possibility for the plumber of getting a patent for the improvement if considered inventive!

Example – The Tailor's Scissors Unfortunately when formulating his claim, the tailor did not anticipate the "cutting means" needed by the gardener or the butcher and so his claim does not cover them! does not have ring-shaped grips! cutting element is not straight! Therefore, neither the gardener not the butcher infringe the tailor's claim. They could produce and sell their "cutting means", and the tailor could not stop them, and also cannot ask for "royalties”. 10

Example – The Tailor's Scissors If it had occurred to the tailor - that the eye rings are not essential for cutting the fabric or the paper, or - that the cutting elements cut anyway even without being straight, he could have thought of other claims, which allowed to “chase up” all his competitors: 1.Cutting means comprising two cutting elements, which are fixed to each other at an intermediate position. (independent) 2.Cutting means according to claim 1, in which at least one of the cutting elements comprises an eye ring at one end. (dependent) 11

Example – The Tailor's Scissors...still escapes the office worker, who didn't like the scissors very much, since they make the cutting edges to irregular, and who therefore invented (and patented) the paper guillotine! What about making the claim broader? Cutting means comprising two elements, which are fixed to each other, whereby at least one element comprises a blade. 12

Example – The Tailor's Scissors However... the modified claim: Cutting means comprising two elements, which are fixed to each other, whereby at least one element comprises a blade.... is not valid for lack of novelty as the state of the art already shows a pocket knife! 13

Any Questions? Thank you for your attention! 14