Reload PFV September 12, 2012. Reload PFV  Concern that need to be addressed:  The RC need to have an option in PFV to allow gradual reload of markets.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2 Draft of proposed metrics for the WEQ BPS to conduct analysis and evaluation of the Parallel Flow Visualization pilot project. (PFV Pilot)
Advertisements

1. ***Confidential*** Concerns Tag Non Firm Option October 10, 2010 Bert Bressers 2.
Flowgate Allocation Method Examples of Proportional Curtailment of FIRM PTP and GTL Houston, December 1-2, 2010.
Parallel Flow Visualization Data Requirements Parallel Flow Visualization Data Requirements NERC ORS Meeting Toronto, Ontario September 23-24, 2009 Jim.
Parallel Flow Visualization and Flowgate Allocations Equity Concerns of Non-Market Transmission Owners Equity Concerns of Non-Market Transmission Owners.
Commercial Implications of ERR Calculations Option 3 method vs. Transaction method.
Parallel Flow Visualization/Mitigation Proposal
Flowgate Allocation Method
Flowgate Allocation Method Examples of Proportional Curtailment of FIRM PTP and GTL Minneapolis, November 10-11, 2010.
Future NERC Congestion Management Tool Option 3A (Proposed by NERC/NAESB TLR TF) 5/11/2005.
Interchange Distribution Calculator Working Group (IDCWG) Update IDCWG October 12 th, 2011.
©2005 PJM 1 Redispatch Credit NERC/NAESB TLR Task Force Feb 2-3, 2005 Houston, Texas Operations Reliability Subcommittee Feb 8-9, 2005 Scottsdale, AZ.
1 Credit for Redispatch Small Group Review of Unconstrained MFs NAESB BPS Meeting December 14-15, 2011.
Interchange Distribution Calculator Working Group (IDCWG) Update NAESB BPS Yasser Bahbaz – IDCWG Chair September 13 th, 2012.
Business Practices Subcommittee Update February 2, 2010.
Business Practices Subcommittee Update April 30, 2012.
Overview Seams Coordination Process. 2 Introduction Midwest ISO Non-profit organization that manages the reliable flow of electricity across much of the.
FEBRUARY 27, 2013 BY NARINDER K SAINI ED SKIBA BPS-CO-CHAIRS Parallel Flow Visualization Overview 1.
Will CO2 Change What We Do?
QSE Managers Working Group Meeting Notes 9 April, 2010 Report to WMS 21 April, 2010 David Detelich - Chairperson.
Enhanced Curtailment Calculator (ECC) Jeremy West Sr. Operations Engineer.
Congestion Management in a Market Environment 2 nd CIGRE / IEEE PES International Symposium San Antonio, Texas October 5, 2005 Kenneth W. Laughlin.
UFMP methodology changes in the updated webSAS February 2015 A video presentation reviewing the webSAS UFMP methodology changes going into effect March.
NERC Congestion Management Congestion Management Option 3 Vendor Meeting Julie Pierce – NERC IDCWG Chair.
Business Practices Subcommittee
Peak RCCo Performance Metrics Draft –November 2013.
Market design and market power in wholesale electricy markets Guido Cervigni IEFE-Bocconi University, Milan CEEM – Summer School on Economics of electricity.
Business Practices Subcommittee Update Executive Committee Meeting February 18, 2014.
Market Evolution Program Day Ahead Market Project How the DSO Calculates Nodal Prices DAMWG October 20, 2003.
Bill Hellinghausen EDF Trading North America
Flowgate Allocation Option Parallel Flow Visualization Business Practices Subcommittee Meeting June , 2010.
Parallel Flow Visualization Project NERC ORS Meeting May 4, 2011.
January 21, 2010 Security Constrained Economic Dispatch Resmi Surendran.
Transmission Congestion Management – IDC Granularity Option 3A Larry Kezele and Jeff Norman June 28, 2005 NERC/NAESB TLR Subcommittee.
NAESB WHOLESALE ELECTRIC QUADRANT BUSINESS PRACTICES SUBCOMMITTEE ACTIVITIES UPDATE TO JOINT ELECTRIC SCHEDULING SUBCOMMITTEE JANUARY 5, 2012 BY ED SKIBA.
© Property of ERCOT /17/20041 RTCA, CAM, and SFT Presented by: John Adams November 17, 2004.
2013 Wind Conference. Congestion Management & Communication Processes CJ Brown.
Generator Prioritization Option Parallel Flow Visualization Business Practices Subcommittee Meeting June , 2010.
Interchange Distribution Calculator Working Group (IDCWG) Update Yasser Bahbaz IDCWG Chair BPS Update September 13 th, 2011.
OPSI Annual Meeting October 13, Session 6 Reliability Pricing Model: Are Further Changes Necessary? Reluctantly…yes But States should also be.
Floyd Trefny, P.E. Director of Wholesale Market Design Nodal Market Tools to Manage Wind Generation January 29, 2009 Presentation to the Renewables Technology.
NAESB BPS Yasser Bahbaz– IDCWG Chair January 5 th, 2016.
ECE 476 Power System Analysis Lecture 13: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Responsive Reserve Service Deliverability Review September 15,
Parking Lot Item 19. BPS Bert Bressers 10/31/2011 Firm rights of resources that have a Firm priority to what load (Sink area granularity)
RDTF June 1, Purpose “The effect of the Shadow Price cap for the Power Balance Constraint is to limit the cost calculated by the SCED optimization.
Proposal for Consideration Regarding Holistic Solution to Congestion Irresolvable in SCED Issue:How do you identify when constraint is irresolvable Proposal:Adopt.
NAESB BPS UPDATE TO EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AUGUST 21, 2012 BY NARINDER K SAINI ED SKIBA BPS-CO-CHAIRS PARALLEL FLOW VISUALIZATION PROJECT 1.
©2003 PJM 1 Presentation to: Maryland Public Service Commission May 16, 2003.
1 Parallel Flow Visualization Goals NAESB BPS Meeting September 15-16, 2010.
RELIABILITY COORDINATOR TOPICS 2006 FRCC SYSTEM OPERATOR SEMINAR.
Interchange Distribution Calculator Working Group (IDCWG) Update
Wind Management at MISO
Consolidated EIM Initiatives from 2017 Roadmap Issue Paper
Phase Angle Limitations
Real-Time Co-optimization of Energy & Ancillary Services
Frank Koza – PJM Dave Zwergel – Midwest ISO
ERCOT – Southern Cross Transmission ROS/WMS Working Group Assignments
Unscheduled Flow Administrative Subcommittee Report
Illustrative Examples of the impact of the Individual Salary Cap
Energy and Ancillary Services Design Stream Working Group Meeting 6
Impact Calculation – BPS Issues
PJM & Midwest ISO Market-to-Market Coordination (APEx Conference 2007)
Mgr. Interconnection Reliability Initiatives
Enhanced Curtailment Calculator (ECC)
UFMP methodology changes in the updated webSAS
Two-Tier Firm Curtailment Overview
NERC Congestion Management
Presentation transcript:

Reload PFV September 12, 2012

Reload PFV  Concern that need to be addressed:  The RC need to have an option in PFV to allow gradual reload of markets and non markets during TLR level 3, 4 or 5 events.  Without the option of a gradual reload in PFV, a reload situation without capping the net impact of markets and non markets could cause an unexpected sudden increase of the real time loading of the flow gate above the SOL that was not anticipated by the RC and could not have been anticipated by the RC.  The RC doesn’t know how much economic dispatch potential of markets and non-markets was temporary re-dispatched during a TLR level 3, 4 or 5 event to resolve the congestion and maintain the flow gate loading below limit.

Current hour Next hour GTL Real time TLR in effective several hours TLR 3A re-issued or TLR 5A GTL Next hour TAGS Impact CH 100% reload Other SOL Flow gate Other value CH TAGS Impact 100% reload Real time MW total flow Flow gate Forecasted Flow Next hour Potential GTL impact Potential economic dispatch of markets and non-markets that was temporary re-dispatched to resolve the congestion. Unknown to the RC how much Calculation for next hour CONCERN MW

Current hour Next hour GTL Real time TLR in effective several hours TLR 3A re-issued GTL Next hour TAGS Impact CH 100% reload Other SOL Flow gate Other Value CH TAGS Impact 100% reload Real time MW total flow Flow gate Forecasted Flow Next hour Potential GTL impact Calculation for next hour PFV allows RC to set a max flow Target for reload. Net GTL Target Market / Non Market SOLUTION MW

Reload PFV  Solution  PFV software allows the RC to set a max flow Target for a reload situation. (see example previous slide)  In that situation the Markets and Non-Markets will still get a net GTL Target that is higher than their current hour net GTL impact. The Target will be based on their current impacts calculated from real time plus a calculated reload value.  The reload value will be allocated to the GTL of Markets and non- Markets based on their >5% FWD impact. For TLR level 3 based on the Non Firm >5% FWD GTL impacts and for TLR Level 5 based on all >5% FWD GTL impacts.  Full reload without Targets for Markets and Non Markets will only occur if a TLR level 1 or 0 is issued.