ASR Preliminary Meeting Boulder, Colorado Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio David H. Bromwich,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© The Aerospace Corporation 2014 Observation Impact on WRF Model Forecast Accuracy over Southwest Asia Michael D. McAtee Environmental Satellite Systems.
Advertisements

Overview of AMPS-Polar MM5 real-time forecasting for Antarctica and plans for the assimilation of EOS data David H. Bromwich Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd.
John J. Cassano, Matthew Higgins, Alice DuVivier University of Colorado Wieslaw Maslowski, William Gutowski, Dennis Lettenmaier, Andrew Roberts.
Jared H. Bowden Saravanan Arunachalam
Improved Simulations of Clouds and Precipitation Using WRF-GSI Zhengqing Ye and Zhijin Li NASA-JPL/UCLA June, 2011.
Dynamical Downscaling of CCSM Using WRF Yang Gao 1, Joshua S. Fu 1, Yun-Fat Lam 1, John Drake 1, Kate Evans 2 1 University of Tennessee, USA 2 Oak Ridge.
Recent performance statistics for AMPS real-time forecasts Kevin W. Manning – National Center for Atmospheric Research NCAR Earth System Laboratory Mesoscale.
S4D WorkshopParis, France Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio A High-Resolution David H. Bromwich.
THORPEX-Pacific Workshop Kauai, Hawaii Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio David H. Bromwich.
John J. Cassano - University of Colorado Wieslaw Maslowski -Naval Postgraduate School William Gutowski - Iowa State University Dennis Lettenmaier – University.
Rapid Update Cycle Model William Sachman and Steven Earle ESC452 - Spring 2006.
Huang et al: MTG-IRS OSSEMMT, June MTG-IRS OSSE on regional scales Xiang-Yu Huang, Hongli Wang, Yongsheng Chen and Xin Zhang National Center.
Transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to the NWS 1 Evaluation of WRF Using High-Resolution Soil Initial Conditions from the NASA Land.
Weather Research & Forecasting Model (WRF) Stacey Pensgen ESC 452 – Spring ’06.
The Effects of Grid Nudging on Polar WRF Forecasts in Antarctica Daniel F. Steinhoff 1 and David H. Bromwich 1 1 Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research.
1 An Overview of the NARCCAP WRF Simulations L. Ruby Leung Pacific Northwest National Laboratory NARCCAP Users Meeting NCAR, Boulder, CO April ,
Arctic System Model WorkshopBoulder, Colorado Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio David H. Bromwich.
The National Environmental Agency of Georgia L. Megrelidze, N. Kutaladze, Kh. Kokosadze NWP Local Area Models’ Failure in Simulation of Eastern Invasion.
Mesoscale Modeling Review the tutorial at: –In class.
The Eta Regional Climate Model: Model Development and Its Sensitivity in NAMAP Experiments to Gulf of California Sea Surface Temperature Treatment Rongqian.
Atmospheric Modeling in an Arctic System Model John J. Cassano Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences and Department of Atmospheric.
Earth Science Division National Aeronautics and Space Administration 18 January 2007 Paper 5A.4: Slide 1 American Meteorological Society 21 st Conference.
Russ Bullock 11 th Annual CMAS Conference October 17, 2012 Development of Methodology to Downscale Global Climate Fields to 12km Resolution.
Jordan G. Powers and Kevin W. Manning Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Division NCAR Earth System Laboratory National Center for Atmospheric Research.
Collaborative Research: Toward reanalysis of the Arctic Climate System—sea ice and ocean reconstruction with data assimilation Synthesis of Arctic System.
EGU General Assembly C. Cassardo 1, M. Galli 1, N. Vela 1 and S. K. Park 2,3 1 Department of General Physics, University of Torino, Italy 2 Department.
NW NCNE SCSESW Rootzone: TOTAL PERCENTILEANOMALY Noah VEGETATION TYPE 2-meter Column Soil Moisture GR2/OSU LIS/Noah 01 May Climatology.
Jonathan Pleim 1, Robert Gilliam 1, and Aijun Xiu 2 1 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division, NOAA, Research Triangle Park, NC (In partnership with the.
NCEP Production Suite Review: Land-Hydrology at NCEP
Coupling of the Common Land Model (CLM) to RegCM in a Simulation over East Asia Allison Steiner, Bill Chameides, Bob Dickinson Georgia Institute of Technology.
Non-hydrostatic Numerical Model Study on Tropical Mesoscale System During SCOUT DARWIN Campaign Wuhu Feng 1 and M.P. Chipperfield 1 IAS, School of Earth.
Météo-France / CNRM – T. Bergot 1) Introduction 2) The methodology of the inter-comparison 3) Phase 1 : cases study Inter-comparison of numerical models.
Earth-Sun System Division National Aeronautics and Space Administration SPoRT SAC Nov 21-22, 2005 Regional Modeling using MODIS SST composites Prepared.
Modern Era Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications: Introduction to NASA’s Modern Era Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications:
Justin Glisan Iowa State University Department of Geological and Atmospheric Sciences RACM Project Update: ISU Atmospheric Modeling Component: Part 1 3rd.
1 JRA-55 the Japanese 55-year reanalysis project - status and plan - Climate Prediction Division Japan Meteorological Agency.
WRF Four-Dimensional Data Assimilation (FDDA) Jimy Dudhia.
Arctic System Reanalysis David H. Bromwich 1,2 and Keith M. Hines 1 1- Polar Meteorology Group Byrd Polar Research Center The Ohio State University Columbus,
A Numerical Study of Early Summer Regional Climate and Weather. Zhang, D.-L., W.-Z. Zheng, and Y.-K. Xue, 2003: A Numerical Study of Early Summer Regional.
Implementation and preliminary test of the unified Noah LSM in WRF F. Chen, M. Tewari, W. Wang, J. Dudhia, NCAR K. Mitchell, M. Ek, NCEP G. Gayno, J. Wegiel,
An evaluation of satellite derived air-sea fluxes through use in ocean general circulation model Vijay K Agarwal, Rashmi Sharma, Neeraj Agarwal Meteorology.
Are Numerical Weather Prediction Models Getting Better? Cliff Mass, David Ovens, and Jeff Baars University of Washington.
Impact of FORMOSAT-3 GPS Data Assimilation on WRF model during 2007 Mei-yu season in Taiwan Shyuan-Ru Miaw, Pay-Liam Lin Department of Atmospheric Sciences.
NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center & *Environmental Modeling Center Camp Springs, MD Impact of High-Frequency Variability of Soil Moisture on Seasonal.
Autonomous Polar Atmospheric Observations John J. Cassano University of Colorado.
International Workshop on Antarctic Clouds Columbus, OH Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
The Impact of Data Assimilation on a Mesoscale Model of the New Zealand Region (NZLAM-VAR) P. Andrews, H. Oliver, M. Uddstrom, A. Korpela X. Zheng and.
Incorporation and use of the NOAH LSM in the Coupled/Ocean Atmosphere Mesoscale Prediction System (COAMPS) ® Incorporation and use of the NOAH LSM in the.
Modeling and Evaluation of Antarctic Boundary Layer
Oct. 28 th th SRNWP, Bad Orb H.-S. Bauer, V. Wulfmeyer and F. Vandenberghe Comparison of different data assimilation techniques for a convective.
A Brief Introduction to CRU, GHCN, NCEP2, CAM3.5 Yi-Chih Huang.
NCAR April 1 st 2003 Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Data Assimilation in AMPS Dale Barker S. Rizvi, and M. Duda MMM Division, NCAR
RIME A possible experiment for Advancing Antarctic Weather Prediction David H. Bromwich 1, John J. Cassano 1, Thomas R. Parish 2, Keith M. Hines 1 1 -
Module 17 MM5: Climate Simulation BREAK. Regional Climate Simulation for the Pan-Arctic using MM5 William J. Gutowski, Jr., Helin Wei, Charles Vörösmarty,
1 RUC Land Surface Model implementation in WRF Tanya Smirnova, WRFLSM Workshop, 18 June 2003.
1 Xiaoyan Jiang, Guo-Yue Niu and Zong-Liang Yang The Jackson School of Geosciences The University of Texas at Austin 03/20/2007 Feedback between the atmosphere,
David H. Bromwich 1, 2 and Francis O. Otieno 1 1 Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 2 Atmospheric.
Land-Surface evolution forced by predicted precipitation corrected by high-frequency radar/satellite assimilation – the RUC Coupled Data Assimilation System.
Global vs mesoscale ATOVS assimilation at the Met Office Global Large obs error (4 K) NESDIS 1B radiances NOAA-15 & 16 HIRS and AMSU thinned to 154 km.
IASC Workshop Potsdamr, Germany Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA The Arctic System Reanalysis.
AMPS Update – July 2010 Kevin W. Manning Jordan G. Powers Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Division NCAR Earth System Laboratory National Center for.
Indirect impact of ozone assimilation using Gridpoint Statistical Interpolation (GSI) data assimilation system for regional applications Kathryn Newman1,2,
Numerical Weather Forecast Model (governing equations)
A Brief Introduction to CRU, GHCN, NCEP2, CAM3.5
Simulation of the Arctic Mixed-Phase Clouds
ASM Project Update: Atmospheric Modeling
Performance of the VIC land surface model in coupled simulations
Panel: Bill Large, Bob Weller, Tim Liu, Huug Van den Dool, Glenn White
Vladimir S. Platonov, Mikhail I. Varentsov
A Coastal Forecasting System
Presentation transcript:

ASR Preliminary Meeting Boulder, Colorado Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio David H. Bromwich, Lesheng Bai and Keith M. Hines Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center The Ohio State University Plus Many Collaborators PROTOTYPE OF THE ARCTIC SYSTEM REANALYSIS PROTOTYPE OF THE ARCTIC SYSTEM REANALYSIS Supported by NSF, NOAA, and DOE

ASR Preliminary Meeting Boulder, Colorado Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio Outline The Arctic System Reanalysis (ASR) Polar WRF Atmospheric Data Assimilation Noah Land Surface Data Assimilation Validation ASR Results The Arctic System Reanalysis (ASR) Polar WRF Atmospheric Data Assimilation Noah Land Surface Data Assimilation Validation ASR Results

ASR Preliminary Meeting Boulder, Colorado Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio Arctic System Reanalysis Motivation 1. Rapid climate change is happening in the Arctic. A comprehensive picture of the climate interactions is needed. 2. Global reanalyses encounter many problems at high latitudes. The ASR is using the best available depiction of Arctic processes at much higher spatial resolution. 3. A system-oriented approach provides community focus with the atmosphere, land surface and sea ice communities. 4. The ASR provides a convenient synthesis of Arctic field programs (SHEBA, LAII/ATLAS, ARM,...).

ASR Preliminary Meeting Boulder, Colorado Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio ASR Outline A physically-consistent integration of Arctic and other Northern Hemisphere data Participants: Ohio State University - Byrd Polar Research Center (BPRC) - and Ohio Supercomputer Center (OSC) National Center Atmospheric Research (NCAR) University of Colorado-Boulder University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign High resolution in space (10 km) and time (3 hours) Begin with years (Earth Observing System)

ASR Preliminary Meeting Boulder, Colorado Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio Polar WRF (Version 3.2.1) Polar WRF (Version 3.2.1) The key modifications for Polar WRF are: Optimal turbulence (boundary layer) parameterization Implementation of fractional sea ice as well as variable thickness of sea ice and snow cover on sea ice in the Noah LSM Improved treatment of heat transfer for ice sheets and revised surface energy balance calculation in the Noah LSM Model evaluations through Polar WRF simulations over Greenland, the Arctic Ocean (SHEBA site), and Alaska have been performed. Polar WRF is used by forecasters as part of the National Science Foundation sponsored Antarctic Mesoscale Prediction System. Polar WRF is used by ASR. The key modifications for Polar WRF are: Optimal turbulence (boundary layer) parameterization Implementation of fractional sea ice as well as variable thickness of sea ice and snow cover on sea ice in the Noah LSM Improved treatment of heat transfer for ice sheets and revised surface energy balance calculation in the Noah LSM Model evaluations through Polar WRF simulations over Greenland, the Arctic Ocean (SHEBA site), and Alaska have been performed. Polar WRF is used by forecasters as part of the National Science Foundation sponsored Antarctic Mesoscale Prediction System. Polar WRF is used by ASR.

ASR Preliminary Meeting Boulder, Colorado Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio ASR WRF-3DVar / WRF Modeling System Background Error (gen_be) Nested WRF 3h Forecast xbxb xaxa Update Lateral & Lower BCs (UPDATE_BC) Background Preprocessing (WPS, real) x lbc Cycled Background B0B0 y o, R xfxf WRF-3DVar Global Fields ERA-Interim Seasonal dependent PREPBUFR Radiance BUFR Other spec. data 3h frequency HRLDAS output Verification & Visualization WRF-3DVar Analysis performed over one domain in a 3-h interval Atmospheric Data Assimilation

ASR Preliminary Meeting Boulder, Colorado Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio Aqua (AMSU, AIRS) NOAA (HIRS, AMSU) Atmospheric Data Assimilation Observational Data for ASR Atmospheric Data Assimilation Observational Data for ASR PREPBUFR from Jack Woollen (including synop, metar, ship, buoy, qscat, sound, airep, profiler, pilot, satob, ssmi_retrieval_sea_surface_wind_speed, ssmi_retrieval_pw, gpspw) Radiances also from JW different sensors (amsua, amsub, mhs, hirs3, hirs4) in separate BUFR files GPS GPSRO, GPSIPW

ASR Preliminary Meeting Boulder, Colorado Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio High-Resolution Land Data Assimilation System (HRLDAS) for ASR Blending atmospheric and land-surface observations with the Noah land surface model. E.g., MODIS surface albedo, snow cover, and vegetation characteristics. To provide land state variables for driving the coupled Polar WRF/ Noah modeling system – Soil moisture (liquid and solid phase) – Soil temperature – Snow water equivalent and depth – Canopy water content – Vegetation characteristics To provide long-term evolution of the above variables plus surface hydrological cycle (runoff, evaporation) and energy cycle (surface heat flux, ground heat flux, upward long-wave radiation)

ASR Preliminary Meeting Boulder, Colorado Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio Domain for ASR

ASR Preliminary Meeting Boulder, Colorado Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio Validation Polar WRF Satellite Radiance Microphysics and Cloud Fraction Diurnal Pressure over Mountain Regions Polar WRF Satellite Radiance Microphysics and Cloud Fraction Diurnal Pressure over Mountain Regions

ASR Preliminary Meeting Boulder, Colorado Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio ASR Data Assimilation Result Polar WRF corrected 2m-temperature warm bias over Greenland Polar WRF AVN Data assimilation 2m-temperature ( o C) using Polar WRF and WRF, and ERA-Interim 2m-temperature ( o C) in October AVN ERA-Interm AVN ERA

ASR Preliminary Meeting Boulder, Colorado Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio Validation: T 2m cold bias over sea ice (200712) Polar WRF WRF AVN

ASR Preliminary Meeting Boulder, Colorado Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio Test Cases: Radiance T 2m NCEP PREBUFER NCEP PREBUFER + RAD

ASR Preliminary Meeting Boulder, Colorado Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio Validation: Radiance NCEP PREBUFER NCEP PREBUFER + RAD

ASR Preliminary Meeting Boulder, Colorado Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio Validation Microphysics and Cloud Fraction WSM 6-class scheme Morrison 2-moment scheme Cloud fraction. one month cycling run (200808) WSM 6-class schemeMorrison 2-moment scheme Cloud fraction. one month cycling run (200808)

ASR Preliminary Meeting Boulder, Colorado Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio Validation: Surface Pressure Diurnal Cycle (200808) ERA-Interim (6h) ASR (3h) AVN (6h)

ASR Preliminary Meeting Boulder, Colorado Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio Two Year Cycling Runs n Period: n Reduced Resolution: 30km/71L, 10mb top n Observations in 3-hour time window –PREPBUFR (global obs errors) –satellite radiance data (AMSU-A, AMSU-B, MHIS) n ERA-Interim reanalysis for LBCs n WRF-3DVar/Polar WRF version n Full 3-hourly cycling run on OSC Glenn cluster n Period: n Reduced Resolution: 30km/71L, 10mb top n Observations in 3-hour time window –PREPBUFR (global obs errors) –satellite radiance data (AMSU-A, AMSU-B, MHIS) n ERA-Interim reanalysis for LBCs n WRF-3DVar/Polar WRF version n Full 3-hourly cycling run on OSC Glenn cluster

ASR Preliminary Meeting Boulder, Colorado Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio Polar WRF (Version 3.2) Numerical and Physics options Non hydrostatic dynamics; 5th order horizontal advection (upwind-based); 3rd order vertical advection; Positive-definite advection for moisture; 6th-order horizontal hyper diffusion; Full horizontal diffusion; Grid nudging to ERA-Interim 200 hPa and above; Upper damping; Morrison double-moment scheme; New Grell sub-grid scale cumulus scheme; RRTMG atmospheric radiation scheme; RRTMG shortwave scheme; MYNN planetary boundary layer scheme; MYNN surface layer; Noah land surface model; Fractional sea ice. Non hydrostatic dynamics; 5th order horizontal advection (upwind-based); 3rd order vertical advection; Positive-definite advection for moisture; 6th-order horizontal hyper diffusion; Full horizontal diffusion; Grid nudging to ERA-Interim 200 hPa and above; Upper damping; Morrison double-moment scheme; New Grell sub-grid scale cumulus scheme; RRTMG atmospheric radiation scheme; RRTMG shortwave scheme; MYNN planetary boundary layer scheme; MYNN surface layer; Noah land surface model; Fractional sea ice.

ASR Preliminary Meeting Boulder, Colorado Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio PREPBUFR Including synop, metar, ship, buoy, qscat, sound, airep, profiler, pilot, satob, ssmi_retrieval_sea_surface_wind_spee d, ssmi_retrieval_pw Radiances amsua, amsub, mhs Fractional Sea Ice Observational Data for ASR

ASR Preliminary Meeting Boulder, Colorado Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio Domain for ASR

ASR Preliminary Meeting Boulder, Colorado Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio ASR Data Assimilation Result Precipitation ERA Yearly Total 2008, Unit: cm ERA ERA-Interim ASR

ASR Preliminary Meeting Boulder, Colorado Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio Near Surface Variables Statistics The data used for the surface statistics: NCEP FNL (or AVN) ERA-Interim Surface stations (More than obtained from the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) and Greenland Climate Network (GC-NET))

ASR Preliminary Meeting Boulder, Colorado Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio ASR Data Assimilation Result: Near Surface Variables Statistics Average statistics from comparing ASR for 2007 with observations. Month Wind Speed2m-Temperature2m-Dew pointSurface pressure bias rmse corr Average Average statistics from comparing AVN for 2007 with observations. MonthWind Speed2m-Temperature2m-Dew pointSurface pressure bias rmse corr Average

ASR Preliminary Meeting Boulder, Colorado Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio ASR Data Assimilation Result 2m Temperature Statistic Differences between ASR (AVN) assimilation and observations in August 2008 ASR correlation -AVN correlation ASR rmse -AVN rmse

ASR Preliminary Meeting Boulder, Colorado Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio ASR Data Assimilation Result 2m Temperature Statistic Differences between ASR (ERA) assimilation and observations in August 2008 ASR correlation -ERA correlation ASR rmse -ERA rmse

ASR Preliminary Meeting Boulder, Colorado Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio ASR Data Assimilation Result 10m Wind Speed Statistic Differences between ASR (AVN) assimilation and observations in August 2008 ASR correlation -AVN correlation ASR rmse -AVN rmse

ASR Preliminary Meeting Boulder, Colorado Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio ASR Data Assimilation Result 10m Wind Speed Statistic Differences between ASR (ERA) assimilation and observations in August 2008 ASR correlation -ERA correlation ASR rmse -ERA rmse

ASR Preliminary Meeting Boulder, Colorado Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio Summary A reduced-resolution prototype assimilation for the Arctic for has been completed. Major progress has been made. The test results look very encouraging, and have being distributed to selected users (16 months). However, still quite some testing to do to optimize ASR, especially the physics, and land surface data assimilation. To engage the community in early ASR evaluation and use, a 10-km, 3-h assimilation is planned to be run for 4 months, and a 30-km (3h) assimilation will be completed for 10 years ( ) by end of A reduced-resolution prototype assimilation for the Arctic for has been completed. Major progress has been made. The test results look very encouraging, and have being distributed to selected users (16 months). However, still quite some testing to do to optimize ASR, especially the physics, and land surface data assimilation. To engage the community in early ASR evaluation and use, a 10-km, 3-h assimilation is planned to be run for 4 months, and a 30-km (3h) assimilation will be completed for 10 years ( ) by end of 2010.