Scenario S: Preferred Alternative. Scenario S: Creating Mixed-use Centers Around Major Transportation Areas Is The Primary Driver Of Improved Transportation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Salt Lake City Downtown Transportation Master Plan Light Rail & Bus; Presentation Background and Introduction August 23, 2006.
Advertisements

Southern California Association of Governments Where Will Our Children Live? Darin Chidsey Member Relations Officer Growth, Change and Rising Prices.
GIS and Transportation Planning
Long Range Visioning Workshop November 13,14,15 th 2007 Tim Watkins Envision U.
Utilizing Connected Travel Demand and Land Use Models in the Sacramento Region Gordon R. Garry Sacramento Area Council of Governments April 30, 2010.
GREATER NEW YORK A GREENER Travel Demand Modeling for analysis of Congestion Mitigation policies October 24, 2007.
Incorporating Greenhouse Gas Considerations in RTP Modeling Jerry Walters, Fehr & Peers CTC Work Group Meeting on RTP Guidelines June 28, 2007.
Tom Fairchild The R&D initiative of Arlington County Commuter Services.
February 29,  Convergence  Reduced Cost  Increased Revenue  Productive vs. New Revenues  A “Plan”  Land Use / Finance / Services.
 Matt Gates.  Forecast sprawl  Guide long-range population and employment forecasts o For the region o For individual counties  Allocate growth to.
City of Fitchburg, WISAA Design Group + Teska +Montgomery NORTH STONER PRAIRIE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN Steering Committee Workshop: Plan Vision, Principles,
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood TODs & Complete Streets Unit 6: Station Design & Access.
Metro Vision 2035 Regional Growth Scenarios. Scenario Workshop.
® ® Contributor Session on Smart Mobility Performance Measures.
Measuring Spatial Characteristics of Urban Sprawl John Hasse Rowan University.
Multi-Family Development Trends in Delaware David L. Edgell, AICP Principal Planner.
GreenSTEP Statewide Transportation Greenhouse Gas Model Cutting Carbs Conference December 3, 2008 Brian Gregor ODOT Transportation Planning Analysis Unit.
LEED ND Rating System of Green Business Council – Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design One of many GBC systems – Building Design & Construction.
UrbanFootprint Module 3: Analysis Modules Materials prepared with funding support from the California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, and the.
1 Multi-Sector Approach to Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Metropolitan Washington Region Land Use and Transportation Strategies Prepared for:
2040 Long Range Transportation Plan for River to Sea TPO September 26, 2014.
August 2004 Hickory by Choice Linking Land Use and Air Quality Planning.
National Transportation || || 1 Lei Zhang, Ph.D. Associate Professor Director,
Connie Ruth, EPA Best Workplaces for Commuters The Advantages of Excellent Commuter Benefits Why your University or College Should Achieve the Best Workplaces.
Navigating SB 375: CEQA Streamlining and SB 743 Transportation Analysis 2014 San Joaquin Valley Fall Policy Conference.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
ENVISION TOMORROW UPDATES AND INDICATORS. What is Envision Tomorrow?  Suite of planning tools:  GIS Analysis Tools  Prototype Builder  Return on Investment.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
Planning for Smart Growth in Rural New Hampshire SWRPC Southwest Region Planning Commission.
Presentation Template Creating Sustainable Places Planning Tools for Creating Sustainable Places.
PTIS Project Update October 26 – 28, PTIS Project Objective Recommend transit investments and land use strategies for urban and rural Fresno County.
UPlan: How It Works and How to Get Started A description for the rest of us Nathaniel Roth Information Center for the Environment University of California,
Jefferson Area Eastern Planning Initiative Project Overview.
Capturing the Effects of Smart Growth on Travel and Climate Change Jerry Walters, Fehr & Peers Modeling for Regional and Interregional Planning Caltrans.
Projecting Energy and GHGs for General Plans and Regional Transportation Plans Robert A. Johnston Mike McCoy Information Center for the Environment University.
RPS Modeling Results Presentation to RPS Policy Committee Brian Gregor Transportation Planning Analysis Unit June 6,
1.Identify regional strategic areas for infill and investment 2.Develop “complete communities” 3.Develop nodes on a corridor 4.Plan for a changing demand.
DRAFT What If… The Washington Region Grew Differently? Public Forum on Alternative Transportation and Land-Use Scenarios National Capital Region.
1 Transit and Climate Change April 10, 2008 Deborah Lipman Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority.
Central California Planning Commissioners’ Workshop May 13, 2011 Barbara Steck, AICP, Deputy Director Fresno Council of Governments 2035 Tulare Street,
1 What If… The Washington Region Grew Differently? February 2005 Public Meeting on Alternative Transportation and Land-Use Scenarios National Capital Region.
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Overview of Metro’s Transportation Program Pam O’Connor Metro Chair July 25, 2007.
Emerging Themes New Urbanism and the Comprehensive Plan City of Palo AltoApril 10, 2008.
Challenges and Choices San Francisco Bay Area Long Range Plan Therese W. McMillan Deputy Executive Director, Policy Metropolitan Transportation Commission.
Purpose To develop and evaluate a range of transit and transportation alternatives throughout the MPO area, considering: u Regional Goals and Objectives.
Steve Heminger Executive Director Metropolitan Transportation Commission May 2010 Financing California’s Transportation System.
EPA’s Development, Community and Environment Division: T ools for Evaluating Smart Growth and Climate Change February 28, 2002 Ilana Preuss.
Pacific resource partnership THE POWER OF PARTNERSHIP YDHI-YDA 2015 PACIFIC REGION CONFERENCE John White, Executive Director.
TPB CLRP Aspirations Scenario 2012 CLRP and Version 2.3 Travel Forecasting Model Update Initial Results Ron Kirby Department of Transportation Planning.
Atlanta Regional Commission Tom Weyandt, Department Director Comprehensive Planning May 2008.
SITE. ZOM CPA ZOM R-1B R-1A PD A A.
July 13, 2010 Board of County Commission Transmittal Hearing.
An AQ Assessment Tool for Local Land Use Decisio ns 13 th TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 9, 2011 Reno, Nevada Mark Filipi, AICP.
The Regional Mobility and Accessibility Study Initial Results of CLRP/CLRP+ Analysis with Round 6.4 Growth Forecasts and Five Alternative Land Use Scenarios.
Defining Alternative Scenarios MTC Planning Committee and ABAG Administrative Committee May 13, 2011.
Shaping our Future Transportation Transportation trends Influencing trends through land use decisions Alternative futures: Base Case and Scenario Complementary.
Smart Growth and Air Quality: Design Concepts to Protect Human Health David B. Goldstein, Ph.D. Natural Resources Defense Council San Francisco, CA
Transportation 2035: S.F. Bay Area Targeting Health through Environment Metropolitan Transportation Commission Therese W. McMillan, Deputy Executive Director,
Urban Land Use. Residential – Includes all places where people live – Generally the largest land use in most cities often taking up to 40% or more of.
1 What If… The Washington Region Grew Differently? The TPB Regional Mobility and Accessibility Study Ronald F. Kirby Director, COG Department of Transportation.
Public Transit Performance Measurement Measure What Really Matters Jerry Benson, Ph.D. Chief Operating Officer Utah Transit Authority September 13, 2010.
Dreamer Development, LLC Northeast Gateway A Mixed-Use Land Bridge Development Minneapolis, MN.
 Transportation choices and CO 2 emissions By: Dayanara Veliz & Abel Adam.
CPPJ Meeting January 27, 2014 Project Team. Lake Charles MPO - Calcasieu Parish Chapters: 1.Introduction and Transportation Planning Process 2.Regional.
URBAN SPRAWL AND ENERGY INDEPENDENCE by Shauna L. Fleming Energy Law Spring 2007.
Regional Transportation Plan Draft Hybrid Scenario Transportation Policy Committee 7/22/03.
Economic Stress: Growth Water Land Use Transportation Energy.
Economic Framework. Charlotte Metro Area 36th most populated Metropolitan Area in U.S. (2005) Mecklenburg County accounts for about 50% of Metro population.
State Highway 130 Corridor Water Demand Estimation
Presentation transcript:

Scenario S: Preferred Alternative

Scenario S: Creating Mixed-use Centers Around Major Transportation Areas Is The Primary Driver Of Improved Transportation Performance Plan a range of mixed use centers around transit –A few regional centers –Many neighborhood centers –Close access to centers throughout the Vistas

Scenario S: Creating Mixed-use Centers Around Major Transportation Areas Is The Primary Driver Of Improved Transportation Performance Plan a range of mixed use centers around transit –A few regional centers –Many neighborhood centers –Close access to centers throughout the Vistas

Scenario S: Creating Mixed-use Centers Around Major Transportation Areas Is The Primary Driver Of Improved Transportation Performance Plan a range of mixed use centers around transit –A few regional centers –Many neighborhood centers –Close access to centers throughout the Vistas

Scenario S: Enhanced Network 7 Bus corridors Within ½ mile of transit: –30% Households –47% Jobs +19% +28%

Scenario X: Basecase

Scenario X Land Use Parameters Half the housing units and jobs of Scenario A –202,500 Housing Units 80% single family housing Averaging about ~6 dwelling units per net acre (3-4 per gross), similar to single family prevalent in the Gold Canyon and San Tan Valley areas –150,000 Jobs Primarily strip commercial with some office Retail and employment centers located at freeway and arterial intersections Small amount of multi-family located around interchanges and employment centers Less environmental sensitivity and open space –More encroachment into washes –Development on slopes –Fewer parks, more golf courses

Scenario X Transportation Parameters No regional transit, limited local transit Freeways built as planned Highway 60 and 79 expanded to 6 lane expressways, but with surface intersections Extension of existing major arterials –Follow conventional arterial pattern of one arterial per mile (use section lines)

Comparing Scenario S and X Scenario X: BasecaseScenario S: Preferred Alternative

Total Population

Total Housing Units

Total Jobs

Developed Acres % of site

Vehicle Miles Traveled (per person per day)

Walk/Bike Trips (% of Total)

Daily Transit Ridership

Transportation Emissions (CO2) Tons of CO2 per Year

Transportation Emissions (CO2) Tons of CO2 per Year Per Capita

Transportation Energy Use Gallons of Gas per Day per Person

Jobs-Housing Balance

Housing Mix Comparison Scenario X continues current trends, Scenario S anticipates future demographic shifts and changing housing needs.

Employment Mix Comparison

Building Emissions (CO2) Annual CO2 (ton/yr) Building emissions are lower in Scenario X because employment buildings use more energy

Building Emissions (CO2) Annual CO2 (ton/yr) Per Capita Building emissions are lower in Scenario X because employment buildings use more energy

Total Water Demand (Gallons/day - Building and Landscaping)

Total Water Demand (Gallons/day - Building and Landscaping) Per Capita