Conceptual Design Review of the NPDGamma Experiment in Beam Line 13 Seppo Penttila NPDGamma project manager September 25, 2007 at SNS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tritium Target 9 December Overview Design and major subsystems Thermal/structural analysis Cell filling Vent and stack T2 detection and monitoring.
Advertisements

Hydrogen Pre-Operation Safety Review 4 th October 2011 Hydrogen R&D System Operational Procedures and Test Plan M Courthold.
31/03/11FV 1 CEDAR from flammable gas safety point of view.
Pressure Vessel Safety Calculation Takeyasu Ito Los Alamos National Laboratory EDM Collaboration Meeting Durham, NC May 20-21, 2008.
Review of Helium Venting Analyses
NPDgamma Liquid Hydrogen Target Safety Review Project and Safety At LANL November 29-30, 2005.
Hydrogen Hazard Summary and Preliminary FMECA and HAZOP Yury Ivanyushenkov Elwyn Baynham Tom Bradshaw.
1 Status of Hydrogen System Development MICE Collaboration Meeting, Frascati, June 26-29, 2005 Yury Ivanyushenkov, Tom Bradshaw, Elwyn Baynham, Mike Courthold,
Proposal for Convection Absorber Test with Hydrogen at Fermilab Barry Norris Representing colleagues in BD/Cryogenics February 21, 2003.
1 MICE Absorber working group Columbia, 13 June 2003 MICE Hydrogen System. Preliminary HAZOP. Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw and Iouri Ivaniouchenkov,
MICE Safety System DE Baynham TW Bradshaw MJD Courthold Y Ivanyushenkov.
MICE AFCSWG Safety Review Summary Mary Anne Cummings Dec. 17, 2003 MICE Video Conference.
Absorber/vacuum windows and absorber assembly 1.Window Requirements 2.MICE experimental constraints 3.Welded vs. non-welded windows 4.Installation 5.Testing.
MICE Hydrogen System Implementation Tom Bradshaw Elwyn Baynham Iouri Ivaniouchenkov Jim Rochford.
MICE collaboration meeting RAL 28 October 2004 Absorber R & D Plan by Wing Lau – Oxford University.
1 Infrastructure at RAL Iouri Ivaniouchenkov, RAL MICE Collaboration CERN, 29 March 2003.
Matthew Hills Hydrogen System – Piping and Instrumentation Diagram.
Hydrogen R&D system HAZOP and failure analysis Yury Ivanyushenkov, Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Mike Courthold, Matthew Hills and Tony Jones.
Hydrogen Delivery System – R&D Activities T W Bradshaw M Courthold M Hills J Rochford Daresbury Controls Group etc…
Mucool cryo-design Christine Darve Fermilab/Beams Division/ Cryogenic Department 8/12/02.
MICE Hydrogen System Design Tom Bradshaw Iouri Ivaniouchenkov Elwyn Baynham Columbia Meeting June 2003.
Absorber Design Details Mary Anne Cummings MICE MEETING Columbia June 13, 2003.
MICE hydrogen review Summary of system hardware. System function To provide 22 litres of liquid hydrogen for use as a muon absorber within a superconducting.
2.5.6 Student Book © 2004 Propane Education & Research CouncilPage Operating a Propane Dispenser to Fill Vehicle-Mounted ASME Tanks To safely and.
MICE hydrogen review System modifications. Relief circuit repair During leak testing of R&D tests, the insulating vacuum would not go lower than
The MICE vacuum system Presented by Mark Tucker at CM-39, 26 June 2014.
MICE Hydrogen System Tom Bradshaw Yury Ivanyushenkov Elwyn Baynham Meeting October 2004 – Coseners House.
NPDgamma Liquid Hydrogen Target Safety Review At LANL November 29-30, 2005.
Patrick Thornton, SNS/FPE June 9, 2008
MICE Hydrogen Control System MICE H2 Review Meeting RAL 15 th Jan 2015 PJ Warburton – STFC Daresbury Lab.
NPDGamma - LH2 Target - Relief/Ventline Systems Seppo Penttila NPDGamma Project Manager Predicted A  =5x10 -8 We are aiming to 10% measurement.
Iouri Ivaniouchenkov RAL Safety considerations at RAL July 9, RAL MICE Collaboration Meeting 1.
ERT 312 SAFETY & LOSS PREVENTION IN BIOPROCESS INTRODUCTION TO RELIEF
NFPA 31 Standard for the installation of Oil- Burning Equipment
COMPRES 2007 Annual Meeting COMPRES Gas Loading System at APS Progress Report June 2007 Mark Rivers.
The 2nd NPDGamma Experiment Safety Review - Liquid Hydrogen Target Seppo Penttila NPDGamma project manager June 09, 2008 SNS.
Ventilation of the LH2 Target GHS In MPF-35: The target gas handling system (GHS), target cryostat, and part of the vent stack are covered by a tent that.
MICE Hydrogen Control System MICE Collaboration Meeting CM33 27 th July 2012 PJ Warburton – STFC Daresbury Lab.
Utilities 14 October 2008 Martin Nordby, Gordon Bowden.
HD target.
Hydrogen system R&D. R&D programme – general points Hydrogen absorber system incorporates 2 novel aspects Hydrogen storage using a hydride bed Hydrogen.
Safety Requirements and Regulations 10/3/20121Safety Requirements & Regulations James Sears.
Normalization of the NPDGamma Experimental Data F. Simmons, C. Crawford University of Kentucky, for the NPDGamma collaboration Background: NPDγ Experiment.
ERL: G-5/e-Gun Cryogenic & Pressure Safety Committee Review ERL G-5/e-gun Beam Line Vacuum Failure Analysis April 24, 2009.
MICE Hydrogen Control System MICE Safety Review Meeting 4 th Oct 2011 PJ Warburton - Daresbury Lab.
NPDgamma Liquid Hydrogen Target Safety Review Operating Procedures At LANL November 29-30, 2005.
CM 28 – 6 th October 2010 LH2 Infrastructure M Hills M Courthold T Bradshaw I Mullacrane P Warburton.
The NPD  Experiment David Bowman IScientific goals IIStatus.
CM27 – 8 th July 2010 LH2 System Progress and Future Plans M Hills T Bradshaw M Courthold I Mullacrane P Warburton.
The LH2 target has to be in the para-hydrogen state. At room temperature H2 is 75% ortho and 25% para. To catalyze the conversion between ortho and para.
Process Definition of the Operation Modes for Super-FRS Magnet Testing CSCY - CrYogenic department in Common System, GSI, Darmstadt Y. Xiang, F. Wamers.
MICE LH2 Absorber Safety Mary Anne Cummings Edgar Black (IIT) Abingdon, UK Oct. 30, 2003.
SOME CEDAR NEWS Lau Gatignon / EN-MEF TD meeting 12/07/2011  Summary of HAZOP and Zoning meeting  Forthcoming CEDAR related work at CERN.
Hydrogen Control System MJD Courthold TW Bradshaw Y Ivanyushenkov D Baynham.
Technical Readiness Review of the n-3He Experiment Seppo Penttila ORNL P-div At SNS Jan
Moving the NPDGamma Experiment to the SNS FnPB Christopher Crawford University of Kentucky overview of NPDGamma transition to the SNS expected.
GTK GAS COOLING SYSTEM Marco Statera, Vittore Carassiti, Ferruccio Petrucci, Luca Landi, Stefano Chiozzi, Manuel Bolognesi NA62 - GTK working group meeting.
UITF ODH Assessment UITF Safety Review May 10, 2016.
Process Safety Management Soft Skills Programme Nexus Alliance Ltd.
Working group meeting 07/05/15. Agenda Overview of review and current action list Relief system – Summary of problem – Details of analysis, testing and.
NPDG Liquid Hydrogen Target: Design and Safety Features
2 K Coldbox Safety and ESH
Proximity Cryogenics P&IDs meeting
Project Manager’s Report + DC/MoM Report
Status of Hydrogen System Development
A Liquid Deuterium Cold Neutron Source for the NIST Research Reactor – Conceptual Design Robert Williams, Paul Kopetka, Mike Middleton, Mike Rowe, and.
Cryogenic System Commissioning Summary Report
ESS elliptical cryomodule
Schematic diagram of the cryogenic system
Presentation transcript:

Conceptual Design Review of the NPDGamma Experiment in Beam Line 13 Seppo Penttila NPDGamma project manager September 25, 2007 at SNS

NPDGamma Experiment Requires Liquid Hydrogen Target To measure  -ray asymmetry in the capture reaction of a 16 liter liquid hydrogen target is required. The size of the target is determined by –The goal error of the experiment -  -asymmetry is very small. The experiment has to run for several months with the full SNS power for reaching the statistical error goal. –The n-p capture cross section is small. Target has to be more than 99% in the para-hydrogen state. Target has to be reliable and not labor intensive. Target has to be absolutely safe. It needs to meet a number of codes, rules and regulations but it still needs to meet the physics goals.

NPDGamma Experiment was Successfully Operated at LANSCE The NPDGamma Experiment with the LH2 target was operated successfully at LANSCE during the 2006 run cycle. LANSCE’s neutron beam intensity is not enough for achieving the physics goal. The experiment requires SNS beam intensity. Proposed technical and safety concepts are based on the results of the LANSCE run, necessary improvements and modifications, and requirements of the facility. Proposed technical and safety concepts are based on the results of the LANSCE run, or they are necessary improvements and modifications, or they are requirements from SNS facility.

The NPDGamma Liquid Hydrogen Target System in Beam Line 13 20slpm 3x cold trap opc

The NPDGamma Liquid Hydrogen Target System - Main Design Documents A general description of the design, operation, and safety criteria can be found in: The NPDGamma Liquid Hydrogen Target Engineering Document Some of design criteria are presented in: Design Criteria for the NPDGamma Liquid Hydrogen Target Vent Stack on Target BLDG 2086 in Beam Line 13. Design Criteria for the Hydrogen Supply System of the NPDGamma Liquid Hydrogen Target in Beam Line 13. Design Criteria for the Gas Handling System and its Ventilation of the NPDGamma Liquid Hydrogen Target in Beam Line 13 at SNS.

The NPDGamma Liquid Hydrogen Target - H2 Supply Enclosure for 3xH2+He cylinders Ventilated with chimney-effect enclosure In H2 regulators 20 slpm flow restrictors 100 psi relief valve RV106, see Diagram of Target Gas Handling System Source shutoff valve PV100 Target filling takes about 2-3 days H2 monitors in enclosure

The NPDGamma Liquid Hydrogen Target - Gas Handling System Ventilated - chimney-effect - enclosure that includes:  valves  pressure gauges  metering valve  cold trap  2 pcs 100 psi relief valves RV 102 and RV103  hydrogen proof mechanical vacuum pump  H2 monitors Most joints welded Needed only during target fillings days

The NPDGamma Liquid Hydrogen Target - Cryostat and LH2 Vessel 30 cm Target volume is 16 liters and it is operated at K by two mechanical cryo-coolers Target in para-state

The NPDGamma Liquid Hydrogen Target - Cryostat and LH2 Vessel Modifications to LH2 vessel effecting on safety: We need a thin ” - beam entry window but design pressure has to be larger than MAWP to allow safe operating range. LH2 vessel has to be a pressure vessel FAE buy C. Luttrell shows that internal pressure up to 130 psi is possible. MAWP is set by the relief valve RV104 to 20 psid The worst possible accident scenario is the loss of the isolation vacuum: t=40 min

The NPDGamma Liquid Hydrogen Target - Cryostat Isolation vacuum chamber of the cryostat is not a pressure vessel; MAWP has to be kept below 15 psi. Modifications to cryostat effecting on safety: Beam windows are double windows He between; we need 0.063” thick each window. Preliminary analysis indicates that the internal design pressure of the single window is 18 psi. MAWP is set by rupture disks RD201 and RD202. A safety feature of the cryostat isolation vacuum chamber: Helium channels around weldings and demountable joints form a buffer between air and the hydrogen. RGA (residual gas analyzer) monitors helium level in the isolation vacuum chamber. In general, if possible, He gas volumes are used between air and the H2.

The NPDGamma Liquid Hydrogen Target - Relief Chamber and Vent Stack

The relief system - piping, relief valves, check valves, and rupture disks - allows safe relief of hydrogen gas outside the Target building in emergencies and during normal venting. Sizing of the vent stack for event where the isolation vacuum is ruptured: 1.Heat flow to the liquid hydrogen -> boil off rate = mass flow rate. 2.Define MAWP = source pressure of the venting hydrogen gas. 3.Select the flow friction of the components of the vent stack so that MAWP of the vessel is not exceeded.

Diagram of the Safety Interlock System

Other Target Safety Related Issues 1.Target operators -Senior and Junior Operators - are OJTed. At LANSCE we had an approved training program. 2.Target User’s Guide includes a number of step-by-step operating procedures for different target operations.