Local Loop Unbundling PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE 6 th JUNE 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Clash of Two Cultures ISPs and Telcos Geoff Huston.
Advertisements

Mwakabaga, Msiza and Marwala5th International Confernence on Open Access1 Local Loop Unbundling: A Way for Societies to Benefit from ICT by Teddy Mwakabaga,
“The Internet in South East Asia” Sam Paltridge, OECD Organized by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), hosted by the Post and Telegraph.
Gender Perspectives in Introduction to Tariffs Gender Module #5 ITU Workshops on Sustainability in Telecommunication Through Gender & Social Equality.
CoE/ARB Workshop On Infrastructure Sharing and LLU Session 4 Infrastructure Sharing Drivers and Blocks By: Isabelle Gross Khartoum – Sudan, 27 – 29 March.
Presented by: Eng. Karam Al-sofy
Unbundling the incumbent: Evidence from UK broadband M. Nardotto (ParisTech), T. Valletti (Imperial and ParisTech) and F. Verboven (KU Leuven)
1 Price squeeze tests in electronic communications: ARCEPs experience Competition Law and Electronic Communications Brussels, June 19, 2008.
Slide 1 Access to Bandwidth: Proposals for Action Ilsa Godlovitch Regulatory Policy Directorate
LLU and Broadband Regulation in France July 2005 Autorité de Régulation des Communications Electroniques et des Postes.
LOCAL LOOP UNBUNDLING IN HUNGARY Local Loop Conference, 5th July 2005, Bucharest Sandor Szilágyi National Communications Authority, Budapest.
Broadband to everybody!? Torstein Olsen Director Norwegian Post and Telecommunications Authority LLU Conference, Bucharest, 5 July 2005.
Ireland’s Broadband Performance and Policy Actions January 2010.
1 mec ACCC 2004 Regulation Conference July, 2004 Competition in a IP World Martin Cave Warwick Business School
PRESENTATION ON COST TO COMMUNICATE TO PARLIAMENT PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND POSTAL SERVICES 7 NOVEMBER 2014 Making South Africa.
14 November 2014 PROGRESS ON BROADBAND POLICY & REGULATIONS Briefing to Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Telecommunications and Postal Services.
Development of BB markets Access markets (M4 & M5) and remedies applied Linda Paršova 10 TH BALTIC ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS AND POSTAL SERVICES REGULATORS’
EP Transport Committee Fourth Railway Package - public hearing Brussels, 7 May 2013 Better governance of the railways – a freight perspective Tony Berkeley.
Cost sharing models of NGN rollout in rural or remote areas BEREC-EaPeReg-REGULATEL-EMERG Summit Barcelona, 2-3 July 2015.
Do what you love. Love what you do. Geoff Rehmet SAT3 – 2007 and beyond internet solutions.
The Effects of Network-Sharing Regulation in Telecommunications in the EU and the United States Robert W. Crandall The Brookings Institution PFF/CEPS Conference.
ADSL Broadband how it works the local network the bigger picture the local picture Julian Pratt Openreach.
The Public Network Chapter 4 Tamra Dean.
Strategies to achieve Broadband For All: is the US the only answer? Renata Kowalska Lisbon, 17 th June 2010 US and broadband strategy in Poland.
Ing. Vilém Veselý Czech Telecommunications Office Local Loop Conference Bucharest 5 th July 2005 Situation in Czech Republic.
The Public Network Chapter 4. Objectives In this chapter, you will learn to: Explain, in general terms, the structure of the public telephone network.
Internet Policy Day 1 - Workshop Session No. 2 Market structure Prepared for CTO by Link Centre, Witwatersrand University, South Africa.
Accessing Fixed Networks and Facilities to Speed Up Broadband Rollout Presented by Andrew Gorton CANTO 29th Annual Conference & Trade Exhibition 14 th.
By Omkar KiraniSridhara Chaitanya Sannapureddy Vivek Gupta 1.
Property of TERA Consultants CONSULTANTS T E R A IDATE– Workshop Lessons from Tunis (22 November 2005) TERA Consultants 32 rue des Jeûneurs PARIS.
9 March 2001 Page 1 Broadband in Australia Vicki MacLeod Manager Public Policy and International Regulatory Legal & Regulatory
TRANSTEL Implications of the Big Bang on telecommunications and the SNO Dr Angus Hay Chief Technology Officer, Transtel.
The Public Network Chapter 4. Objectives In this chapter, you will learn to: Explain, in general terms, the structure of the public telephone network.
PAKAMILE PONGWANA South Africa’s International and National Competitiveness 3-4 February 2015.
Telecommunications Act of 1996 Signed into law, February 8, 1996 “ An Act to promote competition and reduce regulation in order to secure lower prices.
Proposed Tactical Framework Telecomm Regulation Onno W. Purbo
1 Status of Broadband New Delhi 15 December 2006 Presentation by S.C. Khanna, Secretary General Association of Unified Telecom Service Providers of India.
COMP514 – ADSL.
The Notification Procedure of national telecoms markets Pál Belényesi 27 October 2006.
Internet Policy Day 3 - Workshop Session No. 5 The impact of telecomms regulation Prepared for CTO by Link Centre, Witwatersrand University, South Africa.
Telecommunications competition - a new entrant’s perspective on the UK experience Rickard Granberg 2 December 2008.
Covad Confidential Broadband Technology and Policy – A Service Provider Perspective Anjali Joshi EVP, Engineering July 2002.
Rules for NGN? ITU March 2006 Challenges of NGN regulation for developing countries: a perspective from South Africa Alison Gillwald LINK Centre Graduate.
This project is funded by the European Union EU regulatory framework for electronic communications - Access Directive Richard Harris Independent EU telecommunications.
1 Federal Network Agency for Electricity, Gas, Telecommunications, Post and Railways Michael Schimmel Price squeeze tests in electronic communications.
Slide 1 Access to Bandwidth The Way Forward Peter Walker Director, Technology OFTEL
Cost to Communicate in SA - Presentation to Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Telecommunications and Postal Services 7 November 2014.
A group subsidiary Irene Charnley Commercial Director 28 September 2001 Comments on the Telecommunications Amendment Bill.
Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Communications by the Telecommunication Unit Presented by : Peter Hlapolosa Date : 08 October 2004.
Views expressed are those of the author and may not reflect opinion of ITU, its members or the government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
Broadband in Turkey: From Regulator’s Perspective Dr. Muhterem ÇÖL Head of Tariffs Department.
Mohamed El Bashir Technical Affairs Dpt. Manager Communications Regulatory Authority The State of Qatar Telecom Laws and Regulations Forum Telecommunications.
Harmonisation in progress: the telecom regulation example Andrzej Chrzanowski Office of Telecommunications and Post Regulation URTiP, Poland November 2004.
Cost to Communicate Programme Presentation to Select Committee 31 July
DD/gk/Telecoms Bill PRESENTATION BY SENTECH LIMITED TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON COMMUNICATIONS, REGARDING THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMENDMENT BILL.
1 OVERVIEW OF TISP WORK: Analysis of Policies and Regulations Carrier Selection and Pre-selection Indicators of the Assessment of Telecommunications.
Interconnection and Access Presentation by Dale N. Hatfield Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology Federal Communications Commission June 6, 2000.
MARKET ANALYSIS IN SERBIA Workshop on EU telecommunications regulation, Belgrade, June Aleksandar Utjesinovic Market Analysis and Cost Accounting.
Mec1224 EETT: From Telecommunications to Electronic Communications Athens, 28 March 2005 “Investment and competition in electronic communications services.
Local loop Unbundling Dr. ZOUAKIA Rochdi ANRT. Presentation outline Definition of Unbundling local loop (LLU) Importance of LLU Types of LLU : Description.
Broadband Workshop Facilitating Broadband Investment French regulatory framework Bertrand Vandeputte ARCEP European Commission – DG INFSO March 23rd, 2011.
Broadband regulation in Denmark 24. September 2009 TRIS workshop Tomas Skov Lauridsen National IT and Telecom Agency, Denmark.
Presentation to Portfolio Committee on Telecommunications and Postal Services Costs to Communicate September 2016.
CO$T TO COMMUNICATE 20 SEPTEMBER Dominic Cull ISPA Regulatory advisor
New policy environment for the South African telecommunications sector
Regulation of NGA networks – the EU experience
©Alliance Law Group LLC
Internet Interconnection
SACF Comments on the ECA Amendment Bill B
PC ON TELECOMMUNICATION & POSTAL SERVICES
Presentation transcript:

Local Loop Unbundling PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE 6 th JUNE 2007

Agenda Introduction What is Local Loop? What is Local Loop Unbundling? What does it Achieve? Recommendations

Introduction LLU report is a response to the mandate by the Minister for the Local Loop Unbundling Committee (LLUC) to recommend how Telkom’s last mile network should be unbundled The report has been finalised and was presented to the Minister on the 25 th May 2007.

What is Local Loop? The local loop is  that portion of the telecommunication network that is situated between the end of subscriber’s telephone connection and the MDF (Main Distribution Frame), where all the user lines come together before being connected to the telephone exchange.  The physical wire connection between the customers and owned by the telecommunication company

Local Loop Diagrammatically

What is Local Loop Unbundling? Is a regulatory process of allowing multiple locally- and national telecommunications operators to make use of connections from the telephone exchange central office to the customer’s premises. (Wikipedia definition). Is a process that covers a series of regulatory offers that is aimed at fairly providing newly entrant operators with access to the local loop in a competitive environment.

What does it achieve? Lower the prices paid by customers Increase quantity and quality of services Increase the number of available business opportunities Increase innovation Provide affordable access to national telecommunication infrastructure for ICT growth and participation

Achievement - Customers Perspective

Full unbundling Line sharing Bitstream access – wholesale access  Bitstream with collocation  Bitstream without collocation  Resale of local traffic services  Resale of access services Sub-loop unbundling Slide 1/7

Full unbundling  The entire copper loop is assigned to the leasing operator Slide 2/7

Line sharing  This takes place when the incumbent retains use of the loop for its baseband, PSTN service, but unbundles the higher frequency part of the spectrum for use by another DSL operator. Slide 3/7

Bitstream access – wholesale access  the incumbents are supposed to provide a whole data service for ISPs to service the fast growing Internet market.  Bitstream access topology is automatically set when the process of LLU is done while the incumbent has rolled the broadband network. Slide 4/7

Bitstream access – wholesale access Slide 5/7

Bitstream access – wholesale access  Bitstream with collocation access from the incumbent’s premises - collocation included.  Bitstream without collocation access at a point of interconnection outside the incumbent’s premises - collocation is excluded.  Resale of local traffic services access where by the incumbent sells traffic services to new entrants at a wholesale price for the new entrants to resale at a retail price.  Resale of access services access where by the incumbent sells access services to new entrants at a again a wholesale price. Slide 6/7

For the case of South Africa, Telkom is the incumbent operator in the country. There are three issues that may need to be considered with respect to Telkom in restructuring for the benefits of LLU process.  Telkom is kept away from LLU.  Leave the local loop with Telkom and regulate its use.  Telkom share the local loop with other players.

Incumbent wishes to prevent or delay for as long as possible for arrival of LLU and DSL within its own or anyone else’s product ranges. Incumbent acceptance of the technology, though with a determination that it will dominate and control the market for DSL based broadband products.  Incumbents will resist to the maximum possible not the technology but competition and unbundling. Incumbent recognizes the new market  view competition as a means of growing the market to the common benefit, and co-operate in encouraging it.

Incumbent has deployed ADSL services to residential and business customers New entrant can  Install cables, ducts to an exchange building  Has right to obtain information on where to place cables/ducts and technical standards for connection All lines must be made available for leasing to all new entrants  Lines must meet any technical specifications imposed by ICASA Charges for subscriber lines must be published  ICASA can issue orders on charging principles and calculation of costs Slide 1/3

Provision of service can be restricted or interrupted for safety or public order purposes Must be a minimum period of notice for technical changes, terminating contract to other operators and users Areas of controversy  Price – different prices for residential and business customers  Timescale – uncertainty about whether the loop can be obtained makes it very difficult for the new entrants to market services on the basis of unbundled loops  Capacity – uncertainty about whether an existing line or a new line can obtained Slide 2/3

Conclusion The report covers issues on  Technical aspects of LLU  Legal/Regulation settings  Economics of LLU  Recommendations  Policy concerns on implementation period by regulators

Recommendations regarding policy decisions and directions Three unbundling structures be implemented to allow innovation and through the competitive environment Requirement for immediate implementation and to be in the advance stage at the 2011 Immediate finalisation of the guidelines by the regulator

THANK YOU