Water Quality Sampling, Analysis and Annual Load Determinations for Nutrients and Solids on the Ballard Creek, 2008 Arkansas Water Resources Center UA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Water discharge rate is monitored continually. 2 Sampling of stream and drainage water is made automatically or by grab sampling weekly while groundwater.
Advertisements

City of Edmonton Water Quality Monitoring Locations.
“How much soil is being lost from the fields in Tarland each year?” This is a very valid question since the soil is the farmer’s principal agricultural.
Low Flow Calculations In NPDES permits the permitted industry or municipality must meet certain requirements with regards to the toxicity of their effluent.
Figure 23. Nitrate concentrations on the lower Ventura River from June 2002 to October 2003: the vertical lines mark the beginning of the water year. The.
Quantification of Spill Data from Domestic Facilities Andy Squires Pinellas County Environmental Management Keith Hackett Janicki Environmental, Inc.
Transport of nitrogen and phosphorus from Rhode River watersheds during storm events David Correll, Thomas Jordan, and Donald Weller Water Resources Research,
Water Quality Assessment of Osage Creek & West Fork, White and Kings Rivers 2008 & ½ 2009 Marc Nelson PhD, PE Nelson Engineering.
2009 Water Quality Monitoring Report – Fish Creek Vaughn Hauser, B.Sc. Naomi Parker, B.Sc., BIT, CEPIT.
UA Division of Agriculture Arkansas Water Resources Center.
SCOPE OF DATA STREAM FLOW AND SOLUTE FLUXES Stream discharge gauging Stream water chemistry PRECIPITATION AND DEPOSITION NRCS Snow Survey and Snow Pillow.
Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs)
How Management Effects Nutrient and Sediment Losses Dennis FrameFred Madison Directors UW Discovery Farms Program.
Project Venue Little Bear River –Cache County, UT –5-20 km from Utah State University –Existing cyberinfra-structure from ongoing projects with EPA/USDA/USU/
Michael J. Brayton MD/DE/DC Water Science Center Hydrologic Controls on Nutrient and Pesticide Transport through a Small Agricultural Watershed, Morgan.
DESIGNING MONITORING PROGRAMS TO EVALUATE BMP EFFECTIVENESS Funded by grants from USDA- CSREES, EPA 319, NSF Nancy Mesner - Utah State University, Dept.
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT REPORT October - December 2009 Technical Oversight Committee March 2, 2010 Pam Lehr Section Leader Restoration Sciences Department.
Center for Watershed Protection Illicit Sewage Discharges in the Chesapeake Bay 2012 Chesapeake Bay Stormwater Retreat Lori Lilly Watershed Ecologist/Planner.
Presented at the 9 th Stakeholder Meeting Mike Herrmann, NCEEP Central Watershed Planner April 20th, 2010 Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) Intake Stessor.
SENSORS, CYBERINFRASTRUCTURE, AND EXAMINATION OF HYDROLOGIC AND HYDROCHEMICAL RESPONSE IN THE LITTLE BEAR RIVER OBSERVATORY TEST BED Jeffery S. Horsburgh.
SENSORS, CYBERINFRASTRUCTURE, AND WATER QUALITY IN THE LITTLE BEAR RIVER Jeffery S. Horsburgh David K. Stevens, Amber Spackman Jones, David G. Tarboton,
“E. coli, Enterococci and Protozoan Transport in New Mexico Watersheds” G. M. Huey 1 & Meyer, M. L 2 New Mexico Environment Department – Santa Fe, NM New.
West Virginia Non-tidal Monitoring Network: 2010 Update West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection West Virginia Department of Agriculture USGS.
Influence of Catchment Characteristics on Stream Nitrogen Transport to the Hood Canal Osborne, S.N.; Brett, M.T.; Richey, J.E.; Steinberg, P.D.; Newton,
Real-Time Water Quality Monitoring for Investigating the Strengths and Weaknesses of Existing Monitoring Techniques Little Bear River Basin Jeffery S.
Non-Point Source Pollutant Modeling Analysis and Prediction David Munn.
Monitoring and Pollutant Load Estimation. Load = the mass or weight of pollutant that passes a cross-section of the river in a specific amount of time.
Brian Haggard Arkansas Water Resources Center UA Division of Agriculture Arkansas Water Resources Center.
Water Quality Monitoring and Parameter Load Estimations in Lake Conway Point Remove Watershed and L’Anguille River Watershed Presented by: Dan DeVun, Equilibrium.
Water Quality Monitoring and Parameter Load Estimations in Lake Conway Point Remove Watershed, L’Anguille River Watershed, and Bayou Bartholomew Presented.
Water Quality Monitoring : Galla Creek Bayou Bartholomew L’Anguille River Presented By: The Ecological Conservation Organization.
Water Quality Trends across 319 Monitoring Sites Brian E. Haggard Director, Arkansas Water Resources Center Funding provided by ANRC.
Castro Valley Creek Stormwater Quality Monitoring Brake Pad Partnership Meeting June 22, 2005.
West Fork of the White River Stream Restoration Monitoring Dan DeVun Ecological Conservation Organization (501)
Interim Update: Preliminary Analyses of Excursions in the A.R.M. Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge August 18, 2009 Prepared by SFWMD and FDEP as part.
Nicole Reid, Jane Herbert, and Dean Baas MSU Extension Land & Water Program W. K. Kellogg Biological Station Transparency tube as a surrogate for turbidity,
1. Introduction The Big Darby Creek is categorized as a national scenic river with an array of biological species. Since this is one of the last pristine.
Ghost River & Waiparous Creek in Waiparous Village on June 21, 2007.
Water Quality Monitoring and Constituent Load Estimation in the Kings River near Berryville, Arkansas 2009 Brian E. Haggard Arkansas Water Resources Center.
Filtration Observations in the Carver County WMO West Metro Water Alliance May 25, 2011 (Thanks to Kristen Larson, Carver County)
Ric Lawson Watershed Planner Huron River Watershed Council MiCorps Staff.
2010 Water Quality Implementation Report Water Quality Management Plan for 2009 Water Year Provo River and Jordanelle & Deer Creek Reservoirs.
1 State of San Lorenzo River Symposium Nicole Beck, PhD 2NDNATURE April San Lorenzo Lagoon A Decade of Dry Season WQ Monitoring.
Water Quality Monitoring in the Upper Illinois River Watershed and Upper White River Basin Project Brian E. Haggard University of Arkansas.
Response of benthic algae communities to nutrient enrichment in agricultural streams: Implications for establishing nutrient criteria R.W. Black 1, P.W.
Sediment Delivery to the Watonwan River
Delaware’s Non-Tidal Monitoring Update for CY 2011 February 8,
Nutrient and Sediment Loading in Sougahatchee Creek and the Impacts on Aquatic Biota Report submitted to West Point Stevens and the Cities of Auburn and.
Robert M. Hirsch, Research Hydrologist, USGS September 6, 2012 Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Suspended Sediment fluxes from the Susquehanna River to the Bay.
Edge of Field Monitoring in the Lake Champlain Basin of Vermont
SWAT Modeling of Priority Watershed- Phase II 2013 NPS Conference – September 19, 2013 Dharmendra Saraswat Assoc. Prof,/Ext. Engineer- Geospatial
Settlement Agreement April June 2007 Prepared for the Technical Oversight Committee August 28, 2007.
Continuous Water- Quality Monitoring. Continuous Water Quality Monitoring Advantages Needed in rapidly changing systems Provides better understanding.
Brian Haggard Director Arkansas Water Resources Center Funding provided by ANRC through Beaver Water District.
Willow Lake Cobb Gauge site Sample site Mesonet site For more information: We gratefully acknowledge.
Water Quality Sampling, Analysis and Annual Load Determinations for the Illinois River at Arkansas Highway 59 Bridge, 2008 Brian E. Haggard Arkansas Water.
Guide to Choosing Time-Series Analyses for Environmental Flow Studies Michael Stewardson SAGES, The University of Melbourne.
Land Use Influences on Water, Sediment and Nutrients in the Napa Valley Watershed: Conceptual Models and Examples Lester McKee (PhD) Watershed Program.
Annual Membership Meeting Water Quality Report 2010
Reducing sediment & nutrient losses from intensive agriculture Restoring eutrophic shallow lakes Pastoral agriculture is the dominant land use in New.
Source: US EPA National Stormwater Calculator Release
Case Study: Evaluating Retrofit Urban Best Management Practice Performance and Lessons Learned Nick Muenks, Marc Leisenring, Mark Willobee – Geosyntec.
Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake TMDL Water Quality Monitoring Update – Summary August 15, 2017.
URBANIZATION IMPACTS ON STREAM NUTRIENT
URBAN NON-POINT SOURCE NUTRIENT IMPACTS
Jim McClelland Rae Mooney University of Texas at Austin
Jacob Piske, Eric Peterson, Bill Perry
Low Flow Calculations In NPDES permits the permitted industry or municipality must meet certain requirements with regards to the toxicity of their effluent.
Little River Ditches Watershed Monitoring
URBANIZATION IMPACTS ON STREAM NUTRIENT
Presentation transcript:

Water Quality Sampling, Analysis and Annual Load Determinations for Nutrients and Solids on the Ballard Creek, 2008 Arkansas Water Resources Center UA Division of Agriculture

Summary 2008 Loads and Flow-Weighted Concentrations

Water samples were collected at Ballard Creek during base and storm flow events. Stage and discharge recorded in 30 min intervals by AWRC. Approximately every other week base flow samples were collected, and storm samples were above specified trigger level (i.e., 20 cfs). Water samples were analyzed at the AWRC WQL for: – NO 3 -N – NH 3 -N – TN – TP – SRP – TSS – SO 4 – Cl Loads and flow-weighted concentrations of constituents were calculated for Ballard Creek County Road 76

Load and Flow-Weighted Concentration Determination Loads (kg) – Calculated using the mid-interval approach where storm samples were composites Flow-weighted concentration (mg L -1 ) − Total load divided by discharge volume during specified time period (e.g., annual)

Discharge and constituent concentrations were variable throughout the year. Total discharge: 58,800,000 m 3 – Base flow: 27% – Storm flow: 73% 26 water samples were collected during base flow conditions 26 composite storm event samples were collected

Cl, SO 4, NO 3 -N, and TN flow- weighted concentrations were greater during base flow.

And, NH 3 -N, SRP, TP and TSS flow- weighted concentrations were greater during storm flow.

The monthly constituent loads at Ballard Creek varied by orders of magnitude. Monthly loads were variable depending on the frequency of storm event during the month. – Greatest loads transports during spring (March & April) – Lowest loads occurred late fall and winter No storms in January or October

Phosphorus loads were highest in 2008, but so was annual discharge.

Variability in nitrogen concentrations from follows the pattern of annual discharge.

Total suspended solids loads in 2008 were also the highest since monitoring began in 2002.

Summary 2008 Loads and Flow-Weighted Concentrations

What about the data collected from January to June 2009? Total discharge was 25,200,000 – Base flow: 42% – 13 Base flow samples collected – Storm flow: 58% – 19 Composite storm events sampled

Monitoring is on-going at this site. Water quality monitoring is being continued at Ballard Creek County Road 76. The sampling scheme has shifted to collected more frequent samples on a fixed interval, and to also collect samples during storm events. The partial loads from 2009 together with the continued monitoring data will be used to calculate annual loads for CY 2009.

QUESTIONS? Take Home Message: Total constituent loading is dependent on annual discharge volume which is closely tied to the frequency and duration of storm events. QUESTIONS?