Professional Development by Johns Hopkins School of Education, Center for Technology in Education Supporting Individual Children Supporting Students with.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations

Advertisements

A Vehicle to Promote Student Learning
The Teacher Work Sample
Teaching Strategies Gold
Testing Accommodations for Students with Disabilities.
VB-MAPP Verbal Behavior Milestones Assessment and Placement Program
I.E.P. on IEPs: Information Especially for Parents on Individualized Education Programs.
Alternate ACCESS for ELLs: An English Proficiency Test for Students with Significant Disabilities Understanding the Parent/Guardian Report.
1 Test Accommodations for Students with Disabilities in Virginia’s Accountability Assessment System Virginia Department of Education Division of Assessment.
Accommodations Manual Manual available online on the Testing Students with Disabilities Accommodations page at
Understanding the IEP Process
THE IEP PROCESS REBECCA ROTONDO, M.ED. NORRISTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT 1.
Defensible IEPs Douglas County School District 1 Module V: Documentation and Timelines.
Special Test Accommodations Virginia Association of Test Directors 2008 Assessment Conference October 2008.
PARCC Read Aloud Decision Making
PLS-5 Training.
Marzano Art and Science Teaching Framework Learning Map
PARCC Accommodation: Text-to-Speech, Screen Reader Version, ASL Video, Human Reader/Human Signer For the ELA/Literacy Assessment December 2014.
Guidelines for Making Decisions about IEP Services IEP Services 5 of 8 Determine the Special Education Services.
English-Language Development Unit 5 - Getting Ready for the Unit
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
 Inclusion and the Common Core State Standards  Inclusion and State Assessment  Inclusion and Teacher Evaluation  Results Driven Accountability 
Week 4 September 26th IEP Amendments, Exit, Written Notice, meeting notes Determining ESY, Special transportation, Alt-Assess, our paperwork, Cum files,
Special Education Review & Update for Regular Educators.
I nitial E valuation and R eevaluation in IDEA Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
NCSC Testing is Underway Reminders Guidance Test Window Test Security Administration Closing Test Capturing Evidence for CR in Writing.
Professional Development by Johns Hopkins School of Education, Center for Technology in Education Supporting Individual Children Administering the Kindergarten.
Testing Students with Disabilities Office of Assessment Update Suzanne Swaffield Anne Mruz November
Eva M. Kubinski, MS Special Education Team Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction 2009 Children Come First Conference November 16, 2009.
Day 3 (1:00 – 2:00) Room 5 Presented by: Heidi Fulcher.
Digging Deeper The Power of Observations and the Kindergarten Readiness Assessment 1 Digging Deeper.
CLEARING UP THE CONFUSION FOR PROFESSIONALS IN EDUCATION By:Jessica Frisch Laura Cerulli Leigh Hogwood Beth Waltrich SPED 563 ACCOMMODATIONS VERSUS MODIFICATIONS.
Louisiana Department of Education. It’s the LAA! Leap ALTERNATE ASSESSMENT.
Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale
Bilingual Students and the Law n Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 n Title VII of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act - The Bilingual Education.
Special Education Law for the General Education Administrator Charter Schools Institute Webinar October 24, 2012.
Professional Development by Johns Hopkins School of Education, Center for Technology in Education Ready for Kindergarten.
Modifications for Special Needs Students Inclusion Strategies Assessment Accommodations.
Presented by State Support Team 13 Assessment System Components Early Learning Assessment 3-K Kindergarten Readiness Assessment Early Learning Assessment.
Section 1. Introduction Orientation to Virginia’s QRIS.
PARCC Accessibility Features and Accommodations Manual Training for Parents Presented on November 20, 2014 Presented by the: Office of Special Education.
Suggested training for region, district, and campus professionals 9/24/2014Texas Education Agency – Student Assessment Division 1.
Welcome Principals Please sit in groups of 3 2 All students graduate college and career ready Standards set expectations on path to college and career.
ASSESSMENT AND PLANNING. Special Education  The term ‘special education’ means specially designed instruction, at no cost to parents, to meet the unique.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training January 2010.
Testing Accommodations. Allowable Test Administration Procedures and Materials  Available to any student who regularly benefits from the use of these.
1 NCEXTEND1 Alternate Assessment with Alternate Achievement Standards Conference on Exceptional Children November 17-18, 2008 NCDPI Division of Accountability.
 ask in writing for evaluation; keep a copy of the request  explain child’s problems and why evaluation is needed  share important information with.
STAAR Decision Making Process for LPAC for Teachers.
1 The Development of a Compliant and Instructionally-Relevant Individualized Education Plan Solitia Wilson ADMS 625 Summer 2014.
Application of UDL ‘way of thinking’ UDL-PCG Webinar 5 May 6, 2013.
Update Accommodations SEPTEMBER 17, 2015 ASSMNT. FOR STUDENTS W/ DISABILITIES TETN #36603.
Parent Education Meeting February 16, Agenda Understanding PLAAFPS Understanding IEPs State Assessment – STAAR, STAAR-A, and STAAR-ALT.
“All kids get to go to school and get a fair chance to learn. That’s the idea behind IDEA. Getting a fair chance to learn, for kids with disabilities,
2 KENTUCKY ALTERNATE ASSESSMENT Transition Attainment Record (TAR) Click here to download the TAR Administration Guide (Required for completion.
Oral Administration Training
Understanding the Alternate ACCESS for ELLs Individual Student Report
Come in, get settled, and please complete our survey:
Week 12: Observation and Assessment
Assessing all children
Ready 4 Kindergarten: Maryland’s Early Childhood Comprehensive Assessment System Kindergarten Readiness Assessment App.
The Newly Revised Vineland-3
Assessment of Communication
TELPAS Alternate Student Eligibility
Lynne Kahn Kathy Hebbeler The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center
Evaluation in IDEA 2004.
Ready for Kindergarten: Ohio’s Early Childhood Comprehensive Assessment System Kindergarten Readiness Assessment App.
Presentation transcript:

Professional Development by Johns Hopkins School of Education, Center for Technology in Education Supporting Individual Children Supporting Students with Dsiabilities Administering the Kindergarten Readiness Assessment to Students with Disabilities

Professional Development by Johns Hopkins School of Education, Center for Technology in Education Supporting Individual Children

Professional Development by Johns Hopkins School of Education, Center for Technology in Education Accessibility and Supports Assessing Young Students with Disabilities

Professional Development by Johns Hopkins School of Education, Center for Technology in Education Level the Field Supports Are intended to reduce or even eliminate the effects of a student’s disability, allowing him or her to demonstrate his or her knowledge and skills through assessment activities Provide equal access and opportunity for participation in the assessment without substantially altering what the student is expected to do Level the Field Supports

Professional Development by Johns Hopkins School of Education, Center for Technology in Education Individualized Education Program (IEP) or Section 504 plan Instructional Team:  teacher  special educator  related service providers  others Identified Needed Additional Supports

Decision Making Process Option 1: General Administration Student is able to participate Administer items following general administration procedures and utilizing Kindergarten Readiness Assessment Universally Designed Allowances. 1.Record the student’s score in Ready for Kindergarten Online. 2.Continue to next item. Note: Repeated use of a particular Universally Designed Allowance across multiple items could indicate an instructionally-relevant pattern of support needs. Record this information on the Student Details page in Ready for Kindergarten Online by clicking the Comment button within the Individualized Supports box to note any allowances that were repeatedly used. Decision Making Process: Option 1

Decision Making Process Option 2: Level the Field Selected Response/Performance Task Items Use braille to present item content, when appropriate. Use sign language to administer the item to a student who is deaf or hard of hearing and uses sign language as his or her mode of communication. Allow the student to gesture toward, touch, use eye gaze, or otherwise indicate a response through whatever dominant communication mode/language he or she utilizes, including sign language, sign language approximations, and digital language (e.g., use of augmentative communication device, allowing the student to “show” versus “tell”) Decision Making Process: Option 2

Decision Making Process Option 2: Level the Field Observational Rubric Items Do not penalize the student for the use of varied materials that allow the student to demonstrate the skill independently as stated in the item (e.g., adapted writing utensils). The student can use any of the following modes of communication to demonstrate skills and behaviors that imply verbal or spoken language, such as items that use the words express, suggest, communicate, ask, or tell:  Sign language (including approximations).  Digital language (e.g., use of an augmentative communication device).  Gestural language (e.g., head not, eye gaze) Decision Making Process: Option 2

Decision Making Process Option 2: Level the Field Recording scores Student is able to participate 1. On the Individual Student Details page in Ready for Kindergarten Online, click the View Supports button within the Level the Field Supports box and select the support(s) used under Student with a Disability. Note: The same Level the Field support may be used for multiple items, but it only needs to be recorded once within the Level the Field Supports box. 2. Record the student’s score for the item. 3. Continue to the next item. Option 2: Level the Field: Recording scores

Professional Development by Johns Hopkins School of Education, Center for Technology in Education Decision Making Process 1.Record “Not Scorable” for the item in Ready for Kindergarten Online. 2.Use the item’s comment box to explain why the item was “Not Scorable”. Also, look for the skill in naturally-occurring routines and activities and record information/observations useful for instructional decision-making. 3.Continue to the next item. Option 3: Not Scorable Recording scores Option 3: Not Scorable:Recording scores

Professional Development by Johns Hopkins School of Education, Center for Technology in Education Pausing Administration of a Domain Pause the administration of a domain when a student with a disability is unable to access three items (not necessarily consecutive) in the domain given allowable supports. Meet with the student’s instructional team to review the remaining items in the domain.

Professional Development by Johns Hopkins School of Education, Center for Technology in Education Pausing Administration of a Domain “ Not Scorable” means the teacher was not able to score the item because the child could not access it given allowable supports. A score of “0” means the child was able to access the item, but did not demonstrate the skill according to the scoring criteria. Teachers are not advised to pause administration of a domain after three scores of “0” unless there are other reasons to do so. Pausing Administration of a Domain

Professional Development by Johns Hopkins School of Education, Center for Technology in Education Key T akeaways Follow the Guidelines on Allowable Supports for Administration of the Kindergarten Readiness Assessment document Meet with the child’s instructional team as outlined in the guidelines Follow the decision-making process Record scores and supports as appropriate Key Takeaways