Advanced Physical therapy Procedures Ahmed alhowimel.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Statistics in Research Articles Elizabeth Crabtree, MPH, PhD (c) Director of Evidence-Based Practice, Quality Management Assistant Professor,
Advertisements

Studying a Study and Testing a Test: Sensitivity Training, “Don’t Make a Good Test Bad”, and “Analyze This” Borrowed Liberally from Riegelman and Hirsch,
Step 3: Critically Appraising the Evidence: Statistics for Diagnosis.
GP 4001 Lecture Series Dealing with undifferentiated problems in primary care II.
Critically Evaluating the Evidence: diagnosis, prognosis, and screening Elizabeth Crabtree, MPH, PhD (c) Director of Evidence-Based Practice, Quality Management.
Azita Kheiltash Social Medicine Specialist Tehran University of Medical Sciences Diagnostic Tests Evaluation.
Step 3: Critically Appraising the Evidence: Statistics for Harm and Etiology.
Evidence-Based Diagnosis in Physical Therapy Julie M. Fritz, PhD, PT, ATC Department of Physical Therapy University of Pittsburgh.
Diagnosing – Critical Activity HINF Medical Methodologies Session 7.
GerstmanChapter 41 Epidemiology Kept Simple Chapter 4 Screening for Disease.
Business Statistics - QBM117
Statistics for Health Care
By Dr. Ahmed Mostafa Assist. Prof. of anesthesia & I.C.U. Evidence-based medicine.
Shoulder physical examination Abdulaziz Alomar, MD, MSc FRCSC Assistant Professor and consultant Orthopaedic surgeon. KKUH, KSU.
Inferential Statistics
Diagnosis Concepts and Glossary. Cross-sectional study The observation of a defined population at a single point in time or time interval. Exposure and.
Hypothesis Testing.
 Mean: true average  Median: middle number once ranked  Mode: most repetitive  Range : difference between largest and smallest.
Clinical Approach to Patients Tanarat Choon-ngarm MD.
Diagnosis Articles Much Thanks to: Rob Hayward & Tanya Voth, CCHE.
Shoulder Impingement Algorithm
DEB BYNUM, MD AUGUST 2010 Evidence Based Medicine: Review of the basics.
Lecture 4: Assessing Diagnostic and Screening Tests
Statistics for Health Care Biostatistics. Phases of a Full Clinical Trial Phase I – the trial takes place after the development of a therapy and is designed.
Evidence Based Medicine Workshop Diagnosis March 18, 2010.
EVIDENCE ABOUT DIAGNOSTIC TESTS Min H. Huang, PT, PhD, NCS.
1 SCREENING. 2 Why screen? Who wants to screen? n Doctors n Labs n Hospitals n Drug companies n Public n Who doesn’t ?
CHP400: Community Health Program-lI Mohamed M. B. Alnoor Muna M H Diab SCREENING.
Appraising A Diagnostic Test
Week 71 Hypothesis Testing Suppose that we want to assess the evidence in the observed data, concerning the hypothesis. There are two approaches to assessing.
· Lecture 31 & 32 : Scope of clinical biochemistry ط Uses of clinical biochemistry tests ط Diagnosis, Prognosis, Screening, Monitoring ط Reporting results.
Evidence-Based Medicine Diagnosis Component 2 / Unit 5 1 Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0 /Fall 2010.
1. Statistics Objectives: 1.Try to differentiate between the P value and alpha value 2.When to perform a test 3.Limitations of different tests and how.
Prediction statistics Prediction generally True and false, positives and negatives Quality of a prediction Usefulness of a prediction Prediction goes Bayesian.
Principles of Screening
Screening and its Useful Tools Thomas Songer, PhD Basic Epidemiology South Asian Cardiovascular Research Methodology Workshop.
Diagnostic Tests Studies 87/3/2 “How to read a paper” workshop Kamran Yazdani, MD MPH.
Unit 15: Screening. Unit 15 Learning Objectives: 1.Understand the role of screening in the secondary prevention of disease. 2.Recognize the characteristics.
The Diagnostic Process A BRIEF OVERVIEW diagnostic process What is it? to figure out to problem solve method scheme.
Diagnostic Test Characteristics: What does this result mean
Evidence based medicine Diagnostic tests Ross Lawrenson.
EBM --- Journal Reading Presenter :傅斯誠 Date : 2005/10/26.
Integrated Management of Childhood Illnesses
Can SLAP Lesions be Clinically Diagnosed? Eric Bales Department of Applied Medicine and Rehabilitation ~ Indiana State University Objective Results Superior.
Diagnosis Examination(MMSE) in detecting dementia among elderly patients living in the community. Excel.
Unit 4 Seminar Contd… (we shall pick up where we left off last seminar to discuss some key concepts)
Normal Distribution, Likelihood Ratios, and ROC Curves Body Mass Indices for WNBA and NBA Players Seasons.
Shoulder Objective Examination How to Interpret Special Tests.
Biostatistics Case Studies 2006 Peter D. Christenson Biostatistician Session 1: Demonstrating Equivalence of Active Treatments:
Diagnostic Likelihood Ratio Presented by Juan Wang.
Diagnosis:Testing the Test Verma Walker Kathy Davies.
© 2010 Jones and Bartlett Publishers, LLC. Chapter 12 Clinical Epidemiology.
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Receiver- Operator Characteristic Curves 10/10/2013.
Role of Tests and Measures in Clinical Practice Paul Mintken PT, DPT, OCS, FAAOMPT Associate Editor, Tests & Measures, PTNow Associate Professor Physical.
Screening Tests: A Review. Learning Objectives: 1.Understand the role of screening in the secondary prevention of disease. 2.Recognize the characteristics.
Critical Appraisal Course for Emergency Medicine Trainees Module 5 Evaluation of a Diagnostic Test.
Is suicide predictable? Paul St John-Smith Short Courses in Psychiatry 15/10/2008.
PATIENT PRESSENTATION 2 nd – 6 th February 2011 Fritz Joubert.
GP ST2 Group, 28/9/11 Tom Gamble
Introduction to Evidence-Based Physical Diagnosis
When is the post-test probability sufficient for decision-making?
Chapter 7 The Hierarchy of Evidence
Diagnosis II Dr. Brent E. Faught, Ph.D. Assistant Professor
Part 4 appreciate appraise apply
P-value Approach for Test Conclusion
Refining Probability Test Informations Vahid Ashoorion MD. ,MSc,
Dr. Hannah Jordan Lecturer in Public Health ScHARR
Figure 1. Table for calculating the accuracy of a diagnostic test.
Assessment of the shoulder complex
Evidence Based Diagnosis
Presentation transcript:

Advanced Physical therapy Procedures Ahmed alhowimel

History taking,observation Active Functional ROM Passive ROM Resisted Muscle Testing Special Tests

It enables the clinician to both assemble information and to interpret the findings in order to assist in identifying the nature and stage of the patient’s disease or injury, determine the need for further investigations, provide a prognosis, guide treatment and measure outcome

Which test to choose! When you want to confirm your primary hypothesis of e.g. Torn ACL ligament, there are many tests available to use, good tests are those with high Specificity and Sensitivity.

Interpreting the evidence Essentially, we want to know whether a diagnostic test is accurate i.e. that it is positive when a particular pathology is present (true positive) and negative when it is not (true negative). Unless the test is perfect (which none are), it will sometimes prove positive when pathology is not present (false positive) or fail to reveal pathology when it is present (false negative).

Result test Target condition present Target condition absent PositiveAB NegativeCD

A=True Positive B=True Negative C=False Positive D=False Negative

Sensitivity Sensitivity is the proportion of people with the condition of interest (target condition) who have a positive test. If 100 people have the condition, then a test that is 98% sensitive will detect 98 of those cases and miss two. Sensitivity is calculated using the figures from the table Sensitivity= A⁄A+C

Specificity Specificity measures the proportion of people without the condition of interest (target condition) who have a negative test. If 100 people are free from the condition, then a test that is 98% specific will correctly exclude 98 of those cases but will incorrectly identify two people as having the condition. Specificity is calculated using figures from the table Specificity= B/B+D

Likelihood ratios Likelihood ratios (LR) are the best statistics to assess the clinical usefulness of a diagnostic test as they combine the sensitivity and specificity into a ratio that quantifies a shift in the probability of a condition being present or absent in the event of a negative or positive test. As most musculoskeletal tests have two outcomes positive or negative we can talk about two ratios; one for a positive test outcome (LR+) and one for a negative outcome (LR-).

LR+ indicates the increase in odds favoring the target condition being present when the test result is positive. A large LR+ indicates that the condition is more likely to be present. This can be calculated from the sensitivity and specificity values: LR+= Sen⁄1-Sp

LR- the probability of the target condition being present given a negative test result. A small LR- indicates that the condition is less likely to be present: LR-= 1-Sen⁄Sp

LR+LR-MeaningUsefulness >10<0.1Generates large and often conclusive shift in probability Excellent _0.2Generates Moderate shift in probability Good —0.5Generate small but sometimes important shift in probability Fair Alters probability to small and rarely important degree Poor

Shoulder Joint 1.Tendon Tests 2.Impingement Tests 3.LABRAL tests 4.Instability Tests 5.AC joint Tests

Tendon tests

1-Speed Test

2- Yergason’s Test

3-Empty/Full Can Test

Impingement tests

1-Neer Test

2-Hawkins–Kennedy

Labral Tests

Crank Test

Instability Tests

Apprehension and Relocation Test

ACJ Tests

Active Compression Test

Elbow Joint Tests

1- Tennis Elbow Test

2-Glofer’s Elbow Test

Wrist Tests

Finkelstein’s Tests

Phalen’s Test